| trimeta | soren: Thanks. | 00:47 |
|---|---|---|
| === Qtpaxa2 is now known as Qtpaxa | ||
| Sydero | Anyone know the minimum version of gcc required to compile kernel 2.6.28? | 05:55 |
| dtchen | Documentation/Changes lists 3.2 | 06:00 |
| Sydero | thanks | 06:00 |
| === TheMuso_ is now known as TheMuso | ||
| Kano | hi rtg , there are several issues with your 2.6.30 kernel | 13:10 |
| Kano | first | 13:11 |
| Kano | drivers/staging/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/Kconfig | 13:12 |
| Kano | why on earth did you disable 3 drivers? | 13:12 |
| Kano | funnyly you even patched one of those disabled drivers | 13:12 |
| Kano | rt2870 got an added id | 13:13 |
| Kano | but it never was compiled | 13:13 |
| Kano | that added id conflicts merging with | 13:13 |
| Kano | http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=a9ed12e5c149b05adf13bea5f1e96d68c2127faf | 13:14 |
| Kano | thats after rc5,but add it, then you could add the added it you have in your tree | 13:14 |
| Kano | i hate to resolve it everytime | 13:15 |
| Kano | next | 13:15 |
| Kano | i found the issue why the kernel did not boot on my systems with saa7136 tv card | 13:15 |
| Kano | the error was s626 module | 13:16 |
| Kano | can be solved when you do disable CONFIG_COMEDI, which is useless for me anyway | 13:17 |
| Kano | last thing is | 13:18 |
| Kano | if you want to be able to use fglrx with all tricks then you need | 13:18 |
| Kano | http://kanotix.com/files/excalibur/linux-2.6.30-generic/source/2.6.30-export-flush_tlb_page.patch | 13:18 |
| Kano | and if you do not want to use a very huge patch then use | 13:18 |
| Kano | http://kanotix.com/files/excalibur/linux-2.6.30-generic/source/2.6.29-ubuntu-copy-headers-for-fglrx.patch | 13:18 |
| Kano | Host/Kernel/OS "Kanotix" running Linux 2.6.30-4-generic i686 [ Kanotix Excalibur 20090506-17:27 ] | 13:19 |
| Kano | CPU Info (1) Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @ clocked at [ 2999.000 MHz ] | 13:19 |
| Kano | (2) Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @ clocked at [ 1999.000 MHz ] | 13:19 |
| Kano | Videocard ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450 X.Org 1.4.2 [ 1680x1050 ] | 13:19 |
| Kano | Processes 140 | Uptime 1:03 | Memory 438.3/1977.9MB | HDD Size 1000GB (6%used) | GLX Renderer ATI Radeon HD 3450 | GLX Version 2.1.8591 | Client Konversation 1.1 | Infobash v2.67.1 | 13:19 |
| Kano | with those patches it is possible to run fglrx | 13:19 |
| Kano | the export is absolutely required | 13:19 |
| soren | Kano: Why exactly is it that you don't report this on Launchpad? IRC is a horrible, horrible bug tracker. | 13:20 |
| soren | Horrible. | 13:21 |
| Kano | soren: there is no 2.6.30 in launchpad | 13:21 |
| Kano | as it is only git | 13:21 |
| Kano | or where are the packages | 13:21 |
| soren | a) yes, there is. | 13:21 |
| soren | b) that does not make IRC a better bug tracker. | 13:21 |
| apw | Kano, you are reporting issues with karmics kernel... as you say 'your 2.6.30' | 13:21 |
| Kano | soren: not my problem, i fixed the issues, fix em or leave it | 13:22 |
| apw | therefore there is a package to report it against | 13:22 |
| Kano | apw: i use git | 13:22 |
| Kano | as i require changes | 13:22 |
| Kano | which are not that important for u | 13:22 |
| apw | i use keyboards that doesn't mean that there isn't a bug tracker | 13:22 |
| Kano | fix it or not | 13:22 |
| ogra | fun | 13:23 |
| soren | Aw. | 13:23 |
| apw | there really are packages of the karmic kernel in the karmic release pocket | 13:25 |
| * TheMuso reads the above exchange, and finds himself thinking that if were on the kernel team, he'd ignore kano's "bug reports" out of spite. :)( | 13:27 | |
| apw | heh, no we just tend to lose things that are only in irc | 13:38 |
| TheMuso | apw: I know that. kano refuses to use a bug tracker period. I've seen some things fixed that he's brought up in here, but I am sure there are many that aren' | 13:40 |
| TheMuso | apw: I know that. kano refuses to use a bug tracker period. I've seen some things fixed that he's brought up in here, but I am sure there are many that aren't. | 13:40 |
| apw | smb, can you remind me what was triggered when libusual was enabled | 14:54 |
| smb | apw, With libusual enabled this would try to handle registration of usb storage devices, which would try to load usb-storage rather early as it was built in | 14:55 |
| apw | ahh yes, usb storange, thanks | 14:56 |
| smb | no worries :) | 14:56 |
| apw | cking, your machine which is showing the bad sound ... what kernel is it running? | 15:02 |
| cking | 2.6.28-12.43 | 15:05 |
| cking | apw: I don't think it's a kernel issue. The error I get is a pulseaudio big. "The CPU load limiter only becomes active as result of PA entering an | 15:10 |
| cking | endless loop of some kind. It's only symptom of a bug somewhere, but | 15:10 |
| cking | gives no hint where it actually is." | 15:10 |
| apw | i think that means you have the appropriate 'fixes' for the pointers stuff as i understand it, which might be triggering confused pulse | 15:10 |
| cking | I suppose I can roll back to an earlier kernel and test | 15:11 |
| cking | I've just spotted: hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. | 15:12 |
| === awe is now known as awe-afk | ||
| === awe-afk is now known as awe | ||
| === awe is now known as awe-afk | ||
| === awe-afk is now known as awe | ||
| === smb__ is now known as smb | ||
| apw | rtg this FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL config change, do we know how much other firmware this may bring into the kernel other than the keyspan stuff? | 16:53 |
| rtg | apw: I think you have to selectively pick the drivers that get firmware. I think the option just enables those selections | 16:54 |
| apw | there appears to be a few other things which use fw-shipped-* in the Makefiles, which would be changed by it, as as soon as this option is turned on we longer put any firmware for any device which is =y into the firmware module from the kernel | 16:57 |
| apw | s/module/result blob/ | 16:57 |
| apw | so i assume all of that firmware must go into the kernel image as well | 16:57 |
| apw | it doesn't look like _that_ much, just making sure its what you expect | 16:57 |
| apw | mod-fw := $(fw-shipped-m) | 16:58 |
| apw | # If CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL isn't set, then install the | 16:58 |
| apw | # firmware for in-kernel drivers too. | 16:58 |
| apw | ifndef CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL | 16:58 |
| apw | mod-fw += $(fw-shipped-y) | 16:58 |
| apw | endif | 16:58 |
| apw | installed-mod-fw := $(addprefix $(INSTALL_FW_PATH)/,$(mod-fw)) | 16:58 |
| rtg | apw: shit. I would not have expected that enabling the option would adversely affect other drivers. | 16:59 |
| rtg | apw: so, should we put it in the linux-firmware package instead? | 16:59 |
| apw | rtg, risk wise perhaps so for sru ... a difficult call. what happens to the firmware blob that the kernel builds during build of the kernel | 17:01 |
| apw | i wonder if that should be making its way wholesale into the firmware package | 17:01 |
| Kano | rtg: when do you merge aufs2? | 17:01 |
| Kano | rtg: http://aufs.sourceforge.net/README.aufs2 | 17:01 |
| rtg | apw: dunno, lemme look at it again. | 17:02 |
| Kano | in the test live image is even squashfs 3.1 used, that will never work | 17:02 |
| Kano | you need a cvs snapshot | 17:02 |
| Kano | user space of course | 17:02 |
| Kano | as squashfs 4 is in the kernel since .29 | 17:03 |
| Kano | hmm you are lucky,there is even a final 4.0 | 17:04 |
| Kano | in sid | 17:04 |
| Kano | when i build my .29 test image i had to use cvs | 17:05 |
| Kano | well merge aufs2 (it is already .30 compatible) + update squashfs-tools in karmic, then you can hope ;) | 17:06 |
| Kano | rtg: do you want to update jaunty to 2.6.28.10 today? | 17:08 |
| apw | jaunty is released now so anything like that would be an sru | 17:08 |
| apw | that said i thought .28 was already in git | 17:08 |
| Kano | apw: i mean the jaunty branch | 17:08 |
| Kano | i do not use precompiled kernels | 17:08 |
| apw | the jaunty git tree has .10 in it | 17:09 |
| apw | commit 8bdd945b77faa2d7c63ad669d2d8b1a623c57e67 | 17:09 |
| apw | Author: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> | 17:09 |
| apw | Date: Sat May 2 11:54:43 2009 -0700 | 17:09 |
| apw | Linux 2.6.28.10 | 17:09 |
| Kano | ok | 17:09 |
| Kano | will compile it now | 17:09 |
| Kano | or do you want to add some more fixes soon? | 17:11 |
| apw | there are always commits in the pipeline | 17:12 |
| apw | as for aufs, that pending a decision on how live cd's will be done for karmic | 17:13 |
| Kano | you can have it the kernel even if you dont use it ;) | 17:14 |
| Kano | as you can use it without a live system too | 17:14 |
| apw | no point in carrying delta for something we don't use | 17:14 |
| Kano | so how do you want to create live images? anything new in casper yet | 17:15 |
| apw | no decision that i am aware of no | 17:15 |
| Kano | well i create live images, you talk about em ;) | 17:15 |
| Kano | apw: did you rebase jaunty today? or since when is there .10? | 17:19 |
| apw | jaunty doesn't rebase its released. the commits for .10 went in about the 2nd | 17:19 |
| Kano | ok, then i have it already | 17:20 |
| Kano | so all i have to try now is aufs2... bbl | 17:22 |
| cluk | Hi | 20:06 |
| cluk | I am trying to provide linux-vserver kernel packages based on the ubuntu kernel in my ppa at: | 20:07 |
| cluk | https://launchpad.net/~christoph-lukas/+archive/ppa | 20:07 |
| cluk | the vserver kernel image for jaunty is working fine, the vserver functionality is also working fine | 20:08 |
| cluk | but I get an kernel oops when I try to load the nvidia module 180.44 build via dkms for this kernel. | 20:08 |
| cluk | could anybody help me debugging this issue? | 20:08 |
| cluk | the oops is here: http://paste.ubuntu.com/169897/ | 20:09 |
| === awe is now known as awe-afk | ||
| === erle64- is now known as erle- | ||
| cluk | my linux-headers package seems to be broken which seems to break the nvidia module. | 22:17 |
| cluk | sorry for the noise. | 22:17 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!