=== heHATEme is now known as Vorian | ||
wgrant | If it adds new functionality, why wouldn't you put the new version of the dependency in the older release as well? | 00:01 |
---|---|---|
ninix | that's not necessary a dependency that i support.. but it is in ubuntu. | 00:04 |
poolie | jml: re bug 297902, *i* don't see options to set importance, status etc when filing a bzr bug | 00:40 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 297902 in malone "Assign, prioritize and target bug at report time" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/297902 | 00:40 |
jml | poolie: on which project, I wonder. | 00:41 |
poolie | yes i wondered about that too, so i tried it on bzr | 00:42 |
poolie | i was testing on edge | 00:42 |
poolie | maybe it's different on staging? | 00:42 |
wgrant | I've been able to do it on edge. | 00:42 |
poolie | !! | 00:42 |
jml | poolie: https://devpad.canonical.com/~jml/advanced-form.png | 00:43 |
jml | sorry about the password protection -- I need to memorize a public server for pushing screenshots to. | 00:43 |
wgrant | Ubuntu One! | 00:44 |
wgrant | Although I don't think that actually does public :( | 00:44 |
jml | also, I haven't installed it yet. | 00:44 |
james_w | wgrant: I think it's possible through the nautilus menu, though I haven't tried it | 00:45 |
james_w | unless that's the old broken samba based sharing | 00:45 |
lifeless | jml: paste.ubuntu.com | 00:45 |
wgrant | james_w: That's Samba sharing. | 00:45 |
lifeless | jml: oh, screenies. uhm | 00:45 |
james_w | lifeless: uuencode? | 00:45 |
lifeless | james_w: ugly | 00:46 |
lifeless | flickr maybe | 00:46 |
wgrant | I don't think U1 does Nautilus integration yet. | 00:46 |
lifeless | U1 would work too | 00:46 |
lifeless | wgrant: I'm fairly sure it does | 00:46 |
james_w | wgrant: for sure it does | 00:46 |
wgrant | lifeless: I can't see it anywhere. | 00:46 |
* wgrant restarts Nautilus | 00:46 | |
poolie | jml: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26609824/2009-05-12-094353_1024x737_scrot.png | 00:46 |
poolie | maybe it's implemented but buggy | 00:47 |
james_w | wgrant: go to the directory, you get a banner | 00:47 |
lifeless | jml: you can attach screenshots to lp bugs | 00:47 |
jml | poolie: yeah, so that's something that I get on the bzr page | 00:47 |
lifeless | jml: so open a bug; called 'jmls screenshots'. | 00:47 |
wgrant | james_w: Looks like I needed to restart Nautilus. | 00:47 |
james_w | ah | 00:47 |
* lifeless admires the info leakage | 00:47 | |
jml | poolie: I don't know what the secret is. | 00:48 |
wgrant | james_w: So you can do sharing through Nautilus. | 00:49 |
james_w | wgrant: how? | 00:49 |
wgrant | james_w: Right click, Share on Ubuntu One. | 00:49 |
wgrant | It's not public sharing, though. | 00:50 |
lifeless | poolie: there is an advanced filing form | 00:50 |
poolie | lifeless: yes, this is it | 00:50 |
poolie | it's unfortunately distinguishable from magic :) | 00:50 |
wgrant | I definitely get the extra options on +filebug(-advanced) on edge. | 00:51 |
poolie | ok | 00:53 |
james_w | I don't get them for bzr though | 00:53 |
poolie | i definitely don't | 00:53 |
poolie | so there's some kind of bug | 00:53 |
james_w | for projects I "own" I do | 00:54 |
wgrant | I get them for Ubuntu, where I'm not the owner - just the bug supervisor and uploader. | 00:55 |
james_w | https://code.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntuone-storage-protocol | 00:59 |
james_w | "1 branch owned by 7 people and 1 team," | 00:59 |
wgrant | There should be no branches; I filed that bug last need. | 00:59 |
wgrant | Er. | 00:59 |
wgrant | Last *night*. | 00:59 |
james_w | well, I can see one branch link, but can't see the branch | 00:59 |
wgrant | The stats are also precalculated, and a bug I filed about that message making no sense was Won't Fix'd IIRC. | 00:59 |
james_w | but I don't see how that branch is owned by 7 people and 1 team | 00:59 |
james_w | ah | 00:59 |
james_w | thanks | 00:59 |
* thumper coughs | 01:07 | |
thumper | they aren't pre calculated | 01:07 |
thumper | they are just generated by branches you can't see :) | 01:07 |
* thumper will get around to fixing it | 01:07 | |
wgrant | thumper: Oh, so there is actually no reason not to fix it. Good. | 01:09 |
wgrant | Can a code person please look at bug #374865 fairly soon? It has vanished from edge now, but is still on staging. | 02:16 |
ubottu | Bug 374865 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/374865 is private | 02:16 |
spm | blech. forgot about staging. ta. | 02:24 |
wgrant | spm: Ah, so that bug is known? | 02:25 |
spm | wgrant: mis config, not bug.. :-( | 02:26 |
wgrant | spm: Is that why I saw a bug about auditing privacy policy changes? | 02:26 |
wgrant | i don't see how that isn't a bug, though - I can't see the branch, so it shouldn't be visible in listings. | 02:27 |
spm | wgrant: I wouldn't like to hazard a guess... ;-) | 02:27 |
spm | wgrant: not sure. I see what you mean tho. thumper is probably best placed to answer that tho. | 02:27 |
thumper | wgrant: it was a bug that you couldn't see it | 02:40 |
thumper | well... | 02:40 |
thumper | kinda yes, kinda no | 02:40 |
thumper | not a simple answer | 02:40 |
ziroday | Hi, I seem to have an extremely flaky connection when using bzr to pull from launchpad and usually get around 5kB/s or so, anyway to speed it up? | 03:43 |
spiv | ziroday: which version of bzr are you using, and are you pulling via http or bzr+ssh? | 03:45 |
spiv | and which branch? | 03:46 |
ziroday | spiv: using 1.13.1, branch is https://code.launchpad.net/~breathe-dev/breathe-icon-set/trunk and I have no idea to the http or ssh :) | 03:46 |
spiv | ziroday: what URL are you using to pull that branch? | 03:47 |
ziroday | spiv: I just did bzr branch lp:breathe-icon-set | 03:47 |
ziroday | so I presume that's http? | 03:47 |
spiv | It depends on whether you have done "bzr launchpad-login YOUR_LP_ID" | 03:47 |
ziroday | spiv: no I haven't yet | 03:47 |
SamB | ziroday: didn't it show an expanded URL? | 03:48 |
ziroday | SamB: I'll pastebin the whole terminal output | 03:48 |
spiv | As SamB points out bzr will tell you the URL it expanded the lp URL to. | 03:48 |
spiv | But if you run that command (and upload your SSH public key to Launchpad), then bzr can use bzr+ssh for lp URLs, which is generally much faster than HTTP. | 03:48 |
ziroday | spiv: ah neat | 03:49 |
SamB | if you don't upload that public key, though, it can just fail | 03:49 |
ziroday | http://pastebin.com/m6ad04457 here's the terminal output | 03:49 |
ziroday | right, upload ssh public key I shall, thanks SamB spiv! | 03:49 |
SamB | until either you do, or you remove the login from whatever file in ~/.bazaar it got added to ... | 03:49 |
ziroday | well its working currently, just horrifically slowly | 03:50 |
SamB | hmm, how recently did you update bzr? | 03:51 |
ziroday | SamB: err nevermind it just crashed | 03:52 |
SamB | and that's another reason to update! | 03:52 |
ziroday | SamB: this is a fresh jaunty install, should I be moving to some PPA? | 03:53 |
ziroday | here's the traceback of the crash http://pastebin.com/m64c5c70a | 03:53 |
spiv | ziroday: the 1.13.1 in Jaunty is ok, there is a PPA at https://launchpad.net/~bzr/+archive for more recent releases if you like | 03:56 |
SamB | probably should ask a bout it in #bzr, and paste the exception line to the channel directly? | 03:56 |
ziroday | SamB: shall do | 03:57 |
spiv | ziroday: that error is typically a sign of disk corruption. | 03:57 |
ziroday | spiv: mmm don't think I have disk corruption | 03:57 |
ziroday | anyway no matter, I'll upgrade to latest bzr and add my ssh key | 03:57 |
SamB | spiv: could launchpad have disk corruption ? | 03:57 |
ziroday | or could the transfer have got garbled along the way? | 03:58 |
spiv | SamB: no, but the person that originally pushed that branch might... | 03:58 |
SamB | spiv: and launchpad wouldn't have balked at that? | 03:58 |
spiv | SamB: it depends :) | 03:58 |
spiv | I would probably expect it too. | 03:58 |
spiv | s/too/to | 03:58 |
spiv | It's also possible that there's a bzr bug, although so far I don't think that exception has ever turned out to be a bzr bug, but perhaps there's a first time... | 03:59 |
ziroday | mmm, I have a feeling its something to do with the dodgy govt. internet | 04:00 |
ziroday | plays havoc with all sorts of things | 04:00 |
spiv | Over HTTP, it could also be due to a dodgy proxy I suppose. | 04:00 |
ziroday | spiv: all connection go through a transparent govt. proxy here, it causes hiccups for everything | 04:00 |
spiv | If so, that's another reason to use bzr+ssh | 04:01 |
ziroday | yep | 04:01 |
ziroday | anyway I'm using bzr+ssh I'll see how that fares | 04:03 |
spiv | ziroday: FWIW branching that over bzr+ssh works ok for me. | 04:03 |
spiv | (at well over 100kB/s overall) | 04:04 |
SamB | bzr+ssh should be fine as long as the govt. doesn't MitM your SSH connections automatically ;-) | 04:05 |
ziroday | spiv: I'm getting 20kB/s now, looks like bzr+ssh is the way to go | 04:05 |
SamB | and, if it does, it should fail to authenticate at all | 04:05 |
ziroday | SamB: I have no clue what our dear govt. does besides be a royal PITA | 04:05 |
SamB | yes, but the thing about MitM and SSH is that it would presumably result in your public key not matching what launchpad sees from the MitM | 04:07 |
SamB | (MitM stands for Man in the Middle, a type of cryptographic attack) | 04:07 |
ziroday | SamB: yep, the key fingerprint's match up | 04:07 |
ziroday | SamB: and I doubt they would go that far out of the way just to pick on launchpad | 04:08 |
SamB | unless you're dealing with the NSA, you should be fine ;-) | 04:08 |
ziroday | heh | 04:08 |
daftykins | MitM isn't necessarily cryptographic | 04:12 |
daftykins | enter; the ARP poisoning attack :) | 04:12 |
=== hggdh_ is now known as hggdh | ||
=== savvas_ is now known as savvas | ||
lifeless | has the email interface changed? | 05:10 |
thumper | lifeless: for what? | 05:11 |
lifeless | bugs | 05:11 |
lifeless | its rejecting | 05:11 |
lifeless | status confirmed | 05:11 |
lifeless | affects bzr | 05:11 |
lifeless | and I can't see whats wrong there | 05:11 |
thumper | lifeless: it should say what is wrong | 05:11 |
thumper | can you pastebin me the full raw email text? | 05:12 |
lifeless | it says noThe bug is reported in 0 | 05:12 |
lifeless | different contexts, and you have to specify which one by using the | 05:12 |
lifeless | affects command. | 05:12 |
lifeless | For example: | 05:12 |
lifeless | affects /distros/ubuntu | 05:12 |
thumper | affects /bzr ? | 05:13 |
thumper | although | 05:13 |
thumper | I'm not sure | 05:13 |
lifeless | at 10 am I sent in | 05:13 |
lifeless | affects launchpad-code | 05:13 |
lifeless | and that worked | 05:13 |
lifeless | whatever is wrong has changed in the last 4 hours | 05:13 |
lifeless | spm: ^ | 05:13 |
thumper | lifeless: we don't change the mail processor | 05:14 |
lifeless | s/don't/didn't/ ? | 05:14 |
thumper | unless there is a cherry pick | 05:14 |
thumper | spm: was there a cherry pick in the last four hours? | 05:14 |
lifeless | thumper: right, thus me asking:) | 05:14 |
thumper | I don't think there was | 05:14 |
=== ursula_ is now known as Ursinha | ||
wgrant | lifeless: Would that not be because you need the 'affects' line before the other commands? | 07:02 |
lifeless | wgrant: who knows | 07:11 |
lifeless | wgrant: if it needs to be, then I imagine I'd have read docs to that affect somewhere | 07:11 |
wgrant | lifeless: Given that you can alter multiple tasks, the statements need be executed in order, so it would make sense. | 07:12 |
wgrant | Although some of the examples have them in the other order, maybe they're not on multi-task bugs. | 07:13 |
wgrant | The example for the multi-task bug has the 'affects' command first. | 07:13 |
lifeless | wgrant: this was a new bug | 07:15 |
wgrant | lifeless: Oh. | 07:16 |
wgrant | I missed the '0' in the error message. | 07:16 |
lifeless | you may well be right | 07:17 |
lifeless | regardless, bug open, should be easier to debug | 07:17 |
=== Lure_ is now known as Lure | ||
cody-somerville | Can someone fix https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/pike/7.8 ? It should be Pike/7.8 and not Pike/7.9 | 07:50 |
cody-somerville | err | 07:50 |
cody-somerville | It should be Pike/7.8 and not pike/7.8 | 07:50 |
mwhudson | cody-somerville: done | 07:55 |
cody-somerville | thanks | 07:55 |
maxb | ooi, do the amd64 builders run on significantly slower hardware than the lpia ones? | 08:04 |
wgrant | maxb: It looks like they're about the same (you can tell the approximate age of each machine using the naming scheme) | 08:07 |
maxb | huh, I've been feeding the build queue sizes into rrdtool, and amd64 are noticable slower | 08:08 |
wgrant | More stuff will fail on lpia, and I suppose lpia could be better optimised... but I really don't know. | 08:09 |
maxb | (Also, "sandpaperfig" is part of a *scheme* ?!?! :-) ) | 08:09 |
wgrant | Yes. The fruits scheme, which seems to be latest. | 08:10 |
wgrant | s/sc/t/, perhaps. | 08:10 |
maxb | wow, it never even crossed my mind that it was a real plant, but google says it is | 08:11 |
maxb | I thought it was a "jam two random words together" affair | 08:11 |
wgrant | Heh, no. | 08:11 |
wgrant | Although some of them look like it. | 08:11 |
wgrant | Take the armel builders, for example. | 08:12 |
wgrant | They're fruits. | 08:12 |
maxb | the things you learn looking at the builders page... :-) | 08:12 |
mwhudson | i think it goes penguins, antartic bases, elements, fruit | 08:16 |
wgrant | That was my understanding. | 08:18 |
wgrant | But penguins was very early on. | 08:18 |
wgrant | (heh, gentoo.ubuntu.com still exists) | 08:18 |
cody-somerville | mwhudson, https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/pike/7.9 is also broken but this time because 7.9 doesn't exist yet - it will in the future though. Should I mark it failing, invalid, etc.? | 08:25 |
mwhudson | cody-somerville: suspend it for now? | 08:25 |
cody-somerville | okay | 08:26 |
mwhudson | i generally find that if i have no idea which scheme a machine name is from, it's an antartic base | 08:26 |
=== henninge changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: henninge | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | ||
wgrant | mwhudson: It's more often a fruit for me. | 08:26 |
wgrant | They've got some nice obscure ones. | 08:27 |
wgrant | Although I suppose I see quite a different set of machines. | 08:27 |
cody-somerville | Most of mine are all berries | 08:28 |
Nafallo | berries \☺/ | 08:28 |
wgrant | Nafallo: I prefer the armel-fruits. | 08:29 |
Nafallo | wgrant: you just say that cause you miss podocarpus | 08:30 |
cody-somerville | I wonder what scheme humboldt belongs to | 08:31 |
Nafallo | I like the berries, mostly because I know why I made them berries :-P | 08:31 |
wgrant | Nafallo: It's taking podocarpus a while to be fixed. Or has it been reassigned? | 08:31 |
Nafallo | cody-somerville: most likely antarctic station. | 08:31 |
Nafallo | wgrant: priorities | 08:32 |
wgrant | cody-somerville: Penguin, I think. | 08:32 |
cody-somerville | Yea | 08:32 |
cody-somerville | Penguin | 08:32 |
Nafallo | penguin :-) | 08:32 |
mwhudson | i wouldn't be surprised if penguins and antartic bases overlapped in a couple of names | 08:33 |
wgrant | Then the world ends. | 08:33 |
natureshadow | g'morrow folks | 09:19 |
natureshadow | I have version 0.7.42-3 of a package in a PPA on Launchpad, now I ampackaging for Debian's official release and have to begin with 0.7.42-1 there. Is there any way of removing 0.7.42-3 from the Launchpad PPA and restarting with 0.7.42-1 there as well? | 09:28 |
bigjools | natureshadow: unfortunately not, but you could open a new PPA | 09:28 |
natureshadow | bigjools: ok, let me see ... | 09:29 |
natureshadow | bigjools: Well, can I somehow mark the old PPA as "obsolete" then or something? | 09:30 |
natureshadow | https://launchpad.net/~twittare/+archive/ppa | 09:30 |
natureshadow | This is the PPA | 09:30 |
bigjools | natureshadow: Launchpad remembers all versions that you ever upload. You can delete the package, but it will still not let you upload the same or lower versions of it. | 09:30 |
natureshadow | But I can upload a lower version to a new PPA, right? | 09:31 |
bigjools | your best bet is to open yourself another PPA | 09:31 |
bigjools | yes | 09:31 |
bigjools | you can have more than one PPA on the go, you don't need to make anything obsolete | 09:31 |
natureshadow | bigjools: Well, I just meant I want to tell users that the old PPA is not to be used | 09:32 |
bigjools | natureshadow: just delete the packages that you don't want people to use | 09:33 |
natureshadow | ok | 09:34 |
loic-m | Hi | 10:02 |
djsiegel_ | sabdfl keybuk seb128 pitti mvo et al: I just took the launchpad tour, and had one of those moments where I was floored by how cool Launchpad is. Thank you for creating something so awesome! | 10:03 |
loic-m | I've got some troubles with a ppa build of mplayer (same source package as karmic) for karmic - the build stops because of missing dependencies like debhelper and other stuff that is in karmic already (I checked) | 10:03 |
wgrant | loic-m: Build log? | 10:03 |
loic-m | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26545774/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.mplayer_2%3A1.0~rc2-0ubuntu20~karmic1_MANUALDEPWAIT.txt.gz | 10:04 |
loic-m | my ppa is at https://launchpad.net/~loic-martin3/+archive/xvid | 10:04 |
=== Nicke_ is now known as Nicke | ||
thumper | djsiegel_: I'm pleased you like it | 10:04 |
thumper | djsiegel_: you can always praise feedback@launchpad.net :) | 10:05 |
* thumper thinks anyway | 10:05 | |
djsiegel_ | oh, good, to know, thumper :) | 10:05 |
wgrant | loic-m: E: Package liblzo-dev has no installation candidate | 10:05 |
wgrant | loic-m: That's the error. Nothing about debhelper. | 10:05 |
djsiegel_ | thumper: so, if I don't have anything nice to say, don't say it at all -- but if I do, email feedback@launchpad.net? | 10:05 |
djsiegel_ | your nick is apropos | 10:05 |
thumper | djsiegel_: any feedback is good feedback | 10:06 |
thumper | djsiegel_: just like any press is good press | 10:06 |
loic-m | Thanks. Why was there all those missing warnings like "debhelper: missing", and how comes the same package built fine for karmic? | 10:07 |
sobbayi | hi all. i am having trouble signing the code of conduct. i keep getting an error of no data despite using the the registered credentials. does anyone have any light on this? | 10:07 |
natureshadow | sobbayi: What command are you using to sign it? | 10:08 |
wgrant | loic-m: Those were part of the dependency calculation process. It was working out what it already had, and what it needed to install. | 10:08 |
wgrant | loic-m: Perhaps liblzo-dev has only recently disappeared from the archive. | 10:08 |
thumper | djsiegel_: what did you mean by "your nick is apropos"? | 10:08 |
djsiegel_ | I was referring to Bambi's Thumper | 10:09 |
loic-m | Thanks for the explanation. Actually, liblzo-dev is not listed as a dependency on packages.ubuntu.com for mplayer | 10:09 |
sobbayi | am using pgp --clearsign filename | 10:09 |
djsiegel_ | thumper: who gives advice on doling praise/blame | 10:09 |
sobbayi | the file is being signed alright t when i paste it onto launchpad i get the no data error | 10:10 |
thumper | djsiegel_: I can dole blame if you like :) | 10:10 |
thumper | djsiegel_: we don't have advice on it | 10:10 |
natureshadow | sobbayi: I'm not so sure whether it supports "real" PGP ... | 10:11 |
natureshadow | I'm afraid you have to use GnuPG | 10:11 |
thumper | is the key on the keyserver? | 10:11 |
sobbayi | natureshadow: yeah the key is on the keyserver | 10:12 |
loic-m | wgrant, thanks, I've checked the .diff.gz on packages.ubuntu.com and liblzo-dev is listed as a dependency in the diff.gz, but not on the package page. I'll try to ask on #ubuntu-motu | 10:12 |
sobbayi | natureshadow: okay let me try the whole process again using GnuPG and see what happens | 10:14 |
sobbayi | natureshadow: okay seems i was already using gnupg and even tried out a windows version (yes! am that desperate) but still no luck | 10:17 |
natureshadow | hmm | 10:17 |
natureshadow | sobbayi: Can you nopaste me the data block? | 10:17 |
sobbayi | natureshadow: i have noticed something strange... here is the 1st line of the signed file.. | 10:20 |
sobbayi | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- | 10:20 |
natureshadow | sobbayi: This is correct | 10:20 |
sobbayi | is the PGP the actually correct or should it be GPG? | 10:20 |
sobbayi | next line | 10:21 |
sobbayi | Hash: SHA1 | 10:21 |
natureshadow | sobbayi: Paste it please | 10:21 |
sobbayi | = Ubuntu Code of Conduct = | 10:21 |
sobbayi | the whole file? | 10:21 |
natureshadow | Not here of course ^^ | 10:21 |
natureshadow | http://www.nopaste.com | 10:21 |
sobbayi | http://www.nopaste.com/p/aijuI4FHT | 10:23 |
soren | sobbayi: You've got at stack of spurious linebreaks in there. | 10:25 |
natureshadow | soren: Wanted t osay that as well ;) | 10:25 |
soren | sobbayi: http://nopaste.com/p/asl02ExZS <-- here. I fixed it for you. | 10:26 |
natureshadow | soren: Do you think you can do that without breaking the signature? | 10:27 |
soren | natureshadow: I did. | 10:27 |
soren | natureshadow: The odd linebreaks were added after signing. You can tell by the fact that the signature itself is messed up. | 10:27 |
natureshadow | soren: Sure, but I cannot verify it. | 10:28 |
soren | natureshadow: Why? | 10:28 |
natureshadow | soren: Because the hash in the signature doesn't match the hash stated in the file | 10:28 |
natureshadow | *hash algorithm | 10:28 |
soren | natureshadow: Err... What? | 10:28 |
natureshadow | soren: Only got the message in German ;) | 10:28 |
lifeless | what what | 10:28 |
natureshadow | gpg: WARNUNG: Widersprechende Hashverfahren in der signierten Nachricht | 10:29 |
soren | natureshadow: http://www.nopaste.com/p/asl02ExZS/txt <-- Works. | 10:29 |
natureshadow | soren: oops, yes it does | 10:29 |
natureshadow | Doesn't when I remove th elinebreaks ;) | 10:29 |
sobbayi | thanks guys. i didnt notice that... surprisingly my local copy does not have those line breaks. it has worked now. Yay!! | 10:29 |
soren | natureshadow: Well... Don't :) | 10:29 |
soren | lifeless: hm? | 10:30 |
natureshadow | soren: \r\n :P ? | 10:30 |
lifeless | soren: nothing, just a very old joke | 10:30 |
soren | lifeless: I see | 10:31 |
soren | (, he said, but he really didn't) | 10:31 |
=== dpm_ is now known as dpm | ||
=== mcasadevall is now known as NCommander | ||
=== henninge_ is now known as henninge | ||
Goundy | Is it possible to create a branch for my launchpad project through bazaar ? | 11:51 |
Goundy | Actually I've a mainline, then I did: bzr branch mainline newBranch | 11:52 |
Goundy | Now I want this newBranch to be hosted on launchpad also | 11:52 |
wgrant | Goundy: Of course. Launchpad would be pretty useless for distributed development otherwise. Just 'bzr push lp:~user/project/branch' | 11:53 |
intellectronica | Goundy: yeah, just push your branch to lp:~your-username/project-name/branch-name | 11:53 |
wgrant | Replace 'user' with a team name if you want multiple people to be able to access it. | 11:53 |
Goundy | oh I pushed to lp:project :P | 11:53 |
Goundy | Now I understand my mistake. Thank you very much ! | 11:53 |
wgrant | lp:project is just an alias to another branch. | 11:53 |
Goundy | I see ! | 11:53 |
Goundy | oh nice it worked ! | 11:55 |
wgrant | Launchpad has a convenient habit of doing that. | 11:55 |
Goundy | yeah I see that | 11:55 |
Goundy | I need to read more about bazaar also | 11:55 |
Goundy | oh btw, wgrant I've one last question | 11:56 |
wgrant | https://help.launchpad.net/Code is a good start for everything related to code on Launchpad. | 11:56 |
Goundy | thanks :) | 11:56 |
Goundy | My branch "mainline" is owned by me at the moment, can I set the ownership for a team that I create for example ? | 11:56 |
wgrant | You can (click the pencil on the branch page, and you'll see a dropdown at the top). Anybody in that team can then write to the branch. | 11:57 |
Goundy | Awesome. wgrant thank you very much ;) | 11:57 |
wgrant | Goundy: No problem. | 11:57 |
* henninge lunches | 12:09 | |
ziroday | Hi, is there a way to migrate https://launchpad.net/~nick-hs to https://launchpad.net/~nickhs ? | 12:22 |
wgrant | ziroday: Click 'Change details' at the top right of that page. There you can rename it. | 12:25 |
wgrant | ziroday: Although that will cause problems with your PPA. | 12:26 |
ziroday | wgrant: being blind, thanks | 12:26 |
ziroday | wgrant: and my PPA has a zilch in it currently | 12:26 |
wgrant | ziroday: That should be fine, then. | 12:26 |
ziroday | wgrant: worked fantastically, thanks again | 12:27 |
wgrant | ziroday: np | 12:28 |
wgrant | bigjools: I just saw that you're working on bug #370636 now, and had another thought - can I also use the suite-override upload feature to upload to other pockets? | 12:37 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 370636 in soyuz "Can copy to non-RELEASE PPA pockets using Archive.syncSource" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/370636 | 12:37 |
bigjools | wgrant: I'll check the code | 12:38 |
bigjools | wgrant: no they get rejected | 12:41 |
wgrant | bigjools: OK. | 12:43 |
bigjools | wgrant: nice thought though :) | 12:43 |
wgrant | bigjools: I hope to have similar success when I next go hunting for security vulnerabilities. | 12:45 |
bigjools | wgrant: so do I! | 12:46 |
=== mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch | ||
=== salgado-afk is now known as salgado | ||
fta | hi, once again, i'm hitting the limit of a ppa: "Estimated repository size: 10.0 GiB (99.57%) of 10.0 GiB", should I file a question? | 13:22 |
fta | https://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa | 13:22 |
fta | i started to do debs for karmic yesterday and i will add lpia today :P | 13:24 |
wgrant | Wow. -testsuite-dbg is big. | 13:24 |
=== mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell | ||
fta | wgrant, indeed. i will probably drop it at some point as it's not that useful. | 13:45 |
Goundy | Hi back. | 14:21 |
Goundy | I created a new branch in launchpad => https://code.launchpad.net/louza | 14:22 |
Goundy | So now I've two: mainline and miloud_work the problem is that the miloud_work one no longer appears there... | 14:22 |
Goundy | How come? | 14:22 |
wgrant | Goundy: See the status dropdown at the top? Select "Any status" rather than "Any active status". | 14:23 |
wgrant | It looks like your branch was automatically marked as merged, as it contained no new revisions. | 14:24 |
wgrant | You can change the status back. | 14:24 |
Goundy | wgrant oh I see ^^ | 14:24 |
Goundy | thank you very much again :) | 14:24 |
wgrant | Goundy: No problem, again! | 14:24 |
Goundy | Awesome all's okay \o/ | 14:25 |
wgrant | Excellent. | 14:25 |
=== asac_ is now known as asac | ||
=== vednis is now known as mars | ||
=== deryck is now known as deryck[lunach] | ||
=== deryck[lunach] is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
=== henninge changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: - | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | ||
=== salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | ||
fta | wgrant: fyi, I reopened https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+question/62386 | 16:53 |
=== mkorn is now known as thekorn | ||
=== deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
vertix | i need some help with not being able to boot ubunto 8.10. Is there anyone online now? | 17:12 |
maxb_ | vertix: Try #ubuntu | 17:13 |
vertix | well, this problem is prolly not exactly the ubundu issue. but who knows. I thought it is grub issue | 17:14 |
Spads | vertix: Then you absolutely want #ubuntu. | 17:16 |
vertix | well, it is almost impossble to do anything on #ubuntu cause it is so busy | 17:21 |
Spads | vertix: well you could ask a question on https://answers.launchpad.net/ | 17:23 |
vertix | thanx, Spads, i guess i have to try that one also. I already spent a week not being able to boot and i am a develper, but did not work with linux lately | 17:24 |
=== salgado-lunch is now known as salgado | ||
vertix | well, that #ubuntu chan is really useless with all the traffic. too bad | 17:30 |
maxb_ | I agree :-/ | 17:30 |
vertix | may be someone here knows about mounting the root file system | 17:30 |
maxb_ | But I still don't think you should abuse unrelated channels because of that | 17:30 |
vertix | the filesystem is clean and it is referenced via coorect device file | 17:30 |
vertix | kernel starts booting | 17:31 |
vertix | and then this error [2.023879] VFS: Cannot open root device "sdb8" | 17:31 |
vertix | i have two drives, IDE and SCSI, and i noticed they are being swapped around, but even when i tried to address it on both drives, still get the same problem | 17:32 |
vertix | any idea? | 17:32 |
fanno | morning/evning all depending on where in the world you all are =) i have been looking around, am i correct in understanding that launchpad is "only a hosting service", and that launchpad cant be installed on private servers ? or in any case i cant find anything about that toppic | 17:46 |
maxb_ | fanno: Correct. (Though *bits* of Launchpad become open source at the end of July) | 18:04 |
fanno | maxb_: thankyou =) i cant wait untill i can integrate it with joomla =) | 18:24 |
=== Adri2000_ is now known as Adri2000 | ||
sale | for the last couple of days I keep getting timeout errors at translations.launchpad.net ...what's going on? | 20:27 |
beuno | sale, do you have an OOPS id? | 20:28 |
beuno | also, danilo_ may know more | 20:28 |
sale | beuno: Error ID: OOPS-1228EA217 | 20:28 |
danilo_ | sale: I'll take a look (there's a bug I am working on, though, but let me check if that's it first) | 20:28 |
sale | danilo_: oh, yeah, now I remember I read something about that on the mailing list | 20:30 |
danilo_ | sale: that's it, it happens only on edge, please disable redirection using the button on https://launchpad.net/ and use that until this is fixed (I am landing a fix for this, and it should be on edge tomorrow or the day after) | 20:32 |
sale | danilo_: everything seems to be OK now (even though using translations.launchpad.net few minutes ago resulted with some kind of connection error to Launchpad) | 20:37 |
=== beuno_ is now known as beuno | ||
sale | danilo_: thank you for your time | 20:37 |
danilo_ | sale: the bug is not yet fixed, so you may hit more problems on translations.edge.launchpad.net, especially when saving, so I suggest you to not use edge until this rolls out (I'll email the list about it) | 20:38 |
mirak | I have a version like that 0.99.5+cvs20070914-2.1~lenny2ubuntu2 , I want to rebuilt it and upload to ppa, how do I adapt the version number ? | 22:28 |
mwhudson | mirak: i guess i would go for something like 0.99.5+cvs20070914-2.1~lenny2ubuntu3~ppa0 | 22:43 |
savvas | that's a train-version :) | 22:44 |
savvas | as in really long :P | 22:44 |
mwhudson | yeah | 22:45 |
* SamB would suggest starting with a different base package version ;-) | 22:46 | |
maxb | I do not understand why people advise the "increment ubuntu revision and append ~ppa" method | 22:46 |
SamB | maxb: what method would you suggest? | 22:47 |
maxb | I find "do *not* increment the ubuntu revision, and append +ppa" to be much more reflective of what you're actually packaging | 22:47 |
SamB | ah. | 22:47 |
SamB | yeah. | 22:47 |
maxb | I'm curious where mirak arrived at that version number, since the archive only has an ....ubuntu1 version of that | 22:48 |
mwhudson | maxb: i guess that would make more sense indeed | 22:48 |
SamB | yeah, ~ mostly seems to make sense for backports ... | 22:49 |
wgrant | ~ also makes sense when what you are packaging is actually an early version of the next release in the primary archive. | 22:53 |
williamd | Isnt launchpad a really broad topic, or is it for the webpage utilities? | 22:53 |
SamB | yeah, and release-candidates and stuff | 22:53 |
SamB | sure | 22:53 |
wgrant | williamd: It's for the website itself. How is it really broad? | 22:54 |
williamd | I use launchpad for Ubuntu realated bug stuff | 22:54 |
williamd | Do all the distros use it? | 22:54 |
wgrant | No, only Ubuntu and a couple of others. | 22:54 |
SamB | no, this channel isn't about all projects in launchpad, just about what launchpad does ... | 22:54 |
mirak | maxb: maybe it's from a backported version ? | 22:54 |
wgrant | #ubuntu-bugs is good for discussing Ubuntu bugs. | 22:54 |
wgrant | #ubuntu for Ubuntu support | 22:55 |
wgrant | Here for Launchpad support. | 22:55 |
maxb | mirak: I don't understand what you mean | 22:55 |
SamB | maxb: what exactly was in the "..."? | 22:55 |
maxb | Exactly the same except the last digit | 22:55 |
mirak | maxb: I did a dch -iU before pasting here probably | 22:56 |
maxb | For the sake of your users and co-developers, do try to keep your version numbers meaningful | 22:57 |
mirak | maxb: I just copy pasted it don't bother with this number | 22:57 |
mirak | though you remark is valid | 22:58 |
=== salgado is now known as salgado-afk | ||
mirak | but it's just a little error of pasting | 22:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!