[00:11] <pace_t_zulu> anyone here?
[00:11] <pace_t_zulu> hggdh: ?
[00:12] <hggdh> hi
[00:13] <BUGabundo> hey
[00:15] <pace_t_zulu> hey guys
[00:15] <pace_t_zulu> i have an old bug that appears to be fixed to me
[00:15] <BUGabundo> yay
[00:16] <pace_t_zulu> i filed it nearly 3 years ago
[00:16] <BUGabundo> lol
[00:16] <BUGabundo> bug id ?
[00:16] <pace_t_zulu> and we need to mark it as fixed upstream also
[00:16] <pace_t_zulu> 73650
[00:16] <pace_t_zulu> launchpad bug # 73650
[00:16] <pace_t_zulu> launchpad bug #73650
[00:16] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 73650 in evolution-data-server "Subscribed Calendars do not adjust events to local time" [Low,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/73650
[00:16] <pace_t_zulu> that's better
[00:18] <pace_t_zulu> you guys looking at it?
 it *had* to be an e-d-s bug...
[00:18] <hggdh> looking
[00:18] <pace_t_zulu> haha
[00:18] <pace_t_zulu> sorry
[00:19] <BUGabundo> ehehh
[00:19] <BUGabundo> that's hggdh field of work
[00:20] <pace_t_zulu> i know
[00:20] <pace_t_zulu> but he'll be happy to close one...
[00:20] <hggdh> hum. I *do* remember a change to the timezones, sometime ago...
[00:20] <pace_t_zulu> i check it because there was a libical update for jaunty today...
[00:20] <pace_t_zulu> that's where the problem was... so i revisited the bug
[00:20] <hggdh> pace_t_zulu, what version of Evo are you running now?
[00:21] <pace_t_zulu> it could have been fixed 2 years ago for all i know
[00:21] <pace_t_zulu> jaunty
[00:21] <pace_t_zulu> hold on... i will be more specific
[00:21] <pace_t_zulu> 2.26.1
[00:22] <hggdh> OK. Since then, libical went from being an internal source (a fork of the libical project) to standard libical. It may have been corrected under libical itself.
[00:22] <hggdh> I will update upstream, and close it
[00:22] <pace_t_zulu> hggdh: thanks
[00:23] <pace_t_zulu> hggdh: how do i get privileges to modify the importance of a bug?
[00:24] <hggdh> pace_t_zulu, you have to be experienced on Gnome bugzilla; you are then given some more access, and monitored (yes indeed) for a while
[00:24] <BUGabundo> pace_t_zulu: you became a an ubuntu-bugcontrol member
[00:24] <hggdh> oh, darn it, he was talking about LP :-(
[00:25] <pace_t_zulu> it's ok
[00:25]  * hggdh was fully into bugzilla
[00:25] <BUGabundo> I though he was... he may not have been
[00:25] <pace_t_zulu> i know y'all don't give out those kinds of privileges like candy
[00:25] <pace_t_zulu> i am modifying launchpad bug #371302
[00:25] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 371302 in ubuntu "When I play AVI file, the system crashes immediately " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/371302
[00:26] <pace_t_zulu> marking it incomplete
[00:28] <pace_t_zulu> hggdh: is that resonable? marking #371302 as incomplete?
[00:28] <hggdh> pace_t_zulu, I closed upstream fixed obsolete (the ICS issue)
[00:28] <hggdh> looking
[00:29] <pace_t_zulu> hggdh: thank you for your help
[00:30] <hggdh> pace_t_zulu, other questions that come to my demented mind: (1) "system crashes" -- the whole system, or just MoviePlayer?
[00:30] <hggdh> (2) can the reporter provide us with the AVI (if it is not copyrighted/restricted access)?
[00:30] <pace_t_zulu> hggdh: i didn't file it... just trying to help with triage...
[00:31] <hggdh> pace_t_zulu, yes, I understand. Just giving you some other things to look for
[00:32] <pace_t_zulu> hggdh: i added a comment with the questions you raised
[00:34] <pace_t_zulu> adios Sebastien
[00:36] <pace_t_zulu> hggdh: thanks for your help
[00:38] <pace_t_zulu> hggdh: i'd like to resolve all the bugs i've been involved in... (launchpad bug #36189 might be wishful though)
[00:38] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 36189 in gnome-panel "Applets do not scale well with changing resolution" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/36189
[00:39] <BUGabundo> pace_t_zulu: that would mean I had to kill 400 bugs!
[00:39]  * BUGabundo brings out the big squatter
[00:40] <pace_t_zulu> BUGabundo: my list is considerably shorter... but i guess that is indicative of my limited contribution so far... i want to step it up
[00:42] <cprofitt> hello all - is Brad Figg in the room?
[00:43] <cprofitt> Any one else want to advise on this bug -- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/365733
[00:43] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 365733 in linux "Jaunty - Wireless issue causes laptop shutdown to hang indefinitely" [High,Incomplete]
[00:44] <cprofitt> Brad asked for information that was already provided so I am not sure how to proceed
[00:45] <hggdh> pace_t_zulu, with all due respect, the discussion should be carried upstream on 36189
[00:45] <pace_t_zulu> hggdh: i have carried it upstream...
[00:45] <pace_t_zulu> hggdh: they're mum on the issue
[00:46] <hggdh> :-)
[00:48] <hggdh> that happens. Getting hold of some developers to think on it is not easy sometimes. They may also be busy elsewhere...
[00:48] <hggdh> we might as well bump the gnome version, if this still happens on 2.26
[00:48] <hggdh> (it is right now set to 2.7/2.8)
[00:49] <hggdh> one thing, though: the bug is in a NEW status, meaning it has been acknowledged as being real in b.g.o
[00:53] <BUGabundo> night
[01:08] <pace_t_zulu> hggdh: thank you for bumping the gnome version on the "right stick" bug
[01:21] <hggdh> welcome, pace_t_zulu
[17:47] <cruisemaniac> showard: i saw the link you shared.  thanks a lot :)
[17:53] <cruisemaniac> hey, is there a desktop application for launchpad which acts as the alternate to the functionality of the browser???
[17:53] <cruisemaniac> did i just ask the question in the wrong channel???
[17:54] <bencrisford> i dont know sorry
[17:54] <bencrisford> but you might want to ask in #launchpad
[17:54] <cruisemaniac> bencrisford: thanks... doing just that :)
[17:56] <bencrisford> ok :)
[18:07] <bdmurray> cruisemaniac: not really
[18:11] <Ampelbein> bdmurray: thanks
[18:11] <greg-g> what happens to that project, umm, I forget the name, which was going to do just that?
[18:11] <greg-g> s/happens/happened/
[18:11] <bdmurray> leonov
[18:11] <greg-g> thats it
[18:12] <greg-g> dead?
[18:12] <bdmurray> maybe comatose?
[18:12] <greg-g> probably.
[18:12] <greg-g> :)
[18:18] <hggdh> \sh said, sometime ago, that he was trying to get back to it
[18:34] <Strider^> hi there
[18:35] <bencrisford> hi
[18:35] <ror> hi
[18:36] <Strider^> what's up with the hug day ?
[18:37] <bencrisford> i forgot about that!  when is it again?
[18:38] <Strider^> i think it's today ^^
[18:38] <Strider^> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20090514
[18:39] <bencrisford> lol!  :P  i completely forgot
[18:49] <Strider^> on the wiki there's hugday init --user LAUNCHPAD_ID --cookie PATH/TO/MOZILLA/COOKIE
[18:49] <Strider^> what's the PATH/TO/MOZILLA/COOKIE ?
[18:49] <Strider^> something in ~/.mozilla ?
[18:52] <ror> o0
[19:04] <Strider^> here, at the bottom of the page : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/Tools
[19:10] <pedro_> Strider^: yeah, the cookies.sqlite file inside that directory
[19:11] <Strider^> ok thanks
[19:11] <pedro_> Strider^: the documentation says that btw :" COOKIE is the cookie.sql or cookie.txt of your mozilla browser profile"
[19:11] <pedro_> no problem
[19:16] <bencrisford> if there are any bug control members around it would be great if you could review my application.  im just a bit worried about it being forgotten.  Thanks :)
[19:16] <bencrisford> and another reply should reveal whether I am allowed in or not
[19:17] <bencrisford> so im a little anxious to know :)
[19:18] <andol> bencrisford: Don't you worry, it me took a couple of weeks before I got my positive response. People simply have a lot of other things to do as well.
[19:19] <bencrisford> yeah i guess :)
[19:21] <bencrisford_> soz just changed client
[20:13] <askand> Anyone knows about bug 349992 ? Will it not be fixed in Jaunty? >:o
[20:13] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 349992 in xserver-xorg-video-intel "[i945 tiling] (Needs kernel 2.6.30-rc3) Low performance due to no A17 workaround" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/349992
[20:16] <charlie-tca> if it requires the .30 kernel, chances are good it won't make jaunty
[20:21] <kklimonda> can bug 371720 be set to Medium? It breaks scripts previously working in 8.10
[20:21] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 371720 in tix "_tkinter.TclError: unknown color name "{#c3c3c3}"" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/371720
[20:22] <kklimonda> (Unfortunately the only fix I know is upgrading tix to 8.4.3 and it won't make it as an SRU probably)
[20:22] <hggdh> askand, the linux jaunty task is still open. It is the xorg intel driver that will not be touched, so far
[20:23] <hggdh> kklimonda, is there a workaround for this?
[20:23] <askand> thanks
[20:24] <kklimonda> hggdh: If there is I don't know it.. simple testcase http://bugs.python.org/file11493/test_combotix.py doesn't even use "#c3c3c3" string so it's something deeper..
[20:25] <kklimonda> also no workaround was mentioned in a bug report I've linked to.
[20:26] <kklimonda> hggdh: also nothing on fedora forum - The solution is to upgrade tix to 8.4.3
[20:27] <kklimonda> thanks
[20:29] <hggdh> welcome
[20:31] <kklimonda> hggdh: the fact that bug 367214 is New on package and Fix commited for release means that it isn't fixed on KK yet, right?
[20:31] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 367214 in python-django-tagging "utils.calculate_cloud() can leave font_size unset for most frequent tag" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/367214
[20:33] <kklimonda> can i set it as "in progress" if I've requested package sync? sync will fix it on KK
[21:30] <BUGabundo> hi everyone
[21:34] <bencrisford_> hey bugabundu
[21:34] <bencrisford_> hey bugabundo*
[21:34] <BUGabundo> eheeh
[21:34] <BUGabundo> bencrisford_: don't you know how to use autocomplete on irc?
[21:34] <BUGabundo> just push TAB key
[21:35] <bencrisford_> BUGabundo: Wow!  ice :D  lol cheers
[21:36] <hggdh> kklimonda, looking at it now. Sorry for the delay
[21:36] <kklimonda> sure
[21:36] <BUGabundo> hggdh: kklimonda: [[]]
[21:36] <kklimonda> hey
[21:36] <hggdh> BUGabundo, [] [] []
[21:36] <BUGabundo> how are you enjoing your U1 kklimonda?
[21:37] <hggdh> kklimonda, the fix has been put available for jaunty-proposed -- this is one of the meanings form 'fix committed' on Ubuntu tasks
[21:37] <kklimonda> hggdh: yes - i know
[21:38] <hggdh> oh
[21:38] <kklimonda> hggdh: so there is no reason to mark package as "In progress"?
[21:38] <hggdh> yes, there is no reason. If the package will be sync-ed for kk, no.
[21:38] <kklimonda> I thought that two statues mean that the first one, package's is about fix for current development release
[21:39] <kklimonda> and the second one is about fix for nominated release.
[21:39] <kklimonda> k, thanks
[21:39] <hggdh> yes
[21:39] <persia> "in progress" is best used when one is actually working on a patch.
[21:39] <hggdh> note the *actually* part, please
[21:40] <kklimonda> persia: I'm working on getting sync done.. poking MOTUs ;)
[21:40] <persia> kklimonda, Right.  THat's a sync, not a patch.
[21:41] <persia> You might leave a note like "Will be fixed by a sync from Debian (see bug #747737) in a comment, but at that point, you can relax.
[21:43] <hggdh> BTW, there should be a workflow request opened for it, kklimonda
[21:44] <kklimonda> hggdh: can you say something more or point me in the right direction?
[21:45] <kklimonda> I thought I've followed SRU closely..
[21:46] <hggdh> kklimonda, a sync request should have a description starting with "please sync blahblah from blehbleh", and it is opened as a bug on LP -- but it is *NOT* a bug, it is a workflow request. (there's more)
[21:46] <kklimonda> hggdh: I'm using requestsync tool
[21:47] <kklimonda> hggdh: I actually started using it after MOTU advised it instead of doing it by hand..
[21:48] <hggdh> oh, OK. Then all you need is to refer to the sync request on this bug, pretty much as persia said
[21:49] <hggdh> and unassign yourself from this one (and we mark it as triaged
[21:49] <hggdh> )
[21:50] <kklimonda> hggdh: also mark it as Low if you are there already :)
[21:50] <hggdh> heh. Will do it now :-)
[21:51] <persia> And it's generally not best practice to sync for SRU.
[21:51] <persia> Better to extract the patch, and prepare a special SRU candidate.
[21:51] <kklimonda> persia: sync is for KK
[21:52] <persia> Oh, OK.  That's fine then.
[21:53] <hggdh> kklimonda, now the only thing that we need is a reference to the sync request, so that we can find this, and close it, when the sync is accepted & done
[21:54] <hggdh> (or make sure that the changelog for kk will have the (LP #xxxxx) entry)
[21:54] <kklimonda> hggdh: it will need both?
[21:54] <kklimonda> i.e. one for sync request and second for this bug?
[21:55] <kklimonda> hggdh: as it's a sync we don't modify it in any way - I'll mark this bug as fix released (?) when sync is complete.
[21:56] <persia> Sometimes the Debian uploads have the (LP: #nnn) magic, and it just works, but this isn't so often.
[21:56] <hggdh> kklimonda, no, the sync reference is enough
[23:55] <mnemo> ogasawara: can this be a kernel bug you think? --> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfree86-driver-synaptics/+bug/374459
[23:55] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 374459 in xfree86-driver-synaptics "touchpad can be switched off, but not on again" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[23:55] <mnemo> ogasawara: the reason why i'm suspect this is because "modprobe -r psmouse; modprobe psmouse" makes the touchpad work again
[23:57] <ogasawara> mnemo: I'd seen a similar kernel bug that the touchpad was disabled after suspend/resume and you'd have to reload the psmouse module to restore it
[23:58] <mnemo> actually this is the opposite
[23:58] <mnemo> taking it to S3 and back makes the touchpad work again
[23:58] <mnemo> and it breaks just by itself after its been used a while
[23:58] <ogasawara> interesting
[23:58] <mnemo> so I think the S3 wakeup triggers some kernel code that sort of "re initializes" it
[23:59] <mnemo> thats why I asked if that modprobe command fixes it as well