[02:29] Why doesn't Ubuntu install on LVM by default? I know it [02:29] I know it's possible to install on LVM using the alternate installer.... [02:31] It just seems to me that LVM allows for /so/ much more flexibility. [10:13] grub-installer: cjwatson * r780 ubuntu/ (debian/changelog grub-installer): [10:13] grub-installer: If sfdisk fails to set the first primary partition we try as active, try [10:13] grub-installer: the other primary partitions rather than failing. Don't fail even if [10:13] grub-installer: none of them can be set as active, since the BIOS may not mind anyway [10:13] grub-installer: (LP: #285716). [13:43] evand1: should https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/oem-tracking-id be marked as Implemented now? [15:09] davmor2 did you test 134? [15:09] evand, would it be ok to pull in new translations at this stage? (see for instance 376005) [15:09] by the way I got user confirmations for all fixed bugs [15:09] running it in about 20 minutes or so [16:37] xivuon: You dropped an L :) [16:38] xivuon: 134 I tried using a username that read T&$ter it told me not to use caps then to only use standard letters and now it's currently installing on my fat32 xp install :) [16:45] I'll let you know if it succeeds [18:06] xivuon: Right I've just come back to it and it still hasn't formatted swap space on the Linux side of things :( I'll try and get some log files off it.