mbana | well i've got ia32 but what's this gre.d? i don't know to configure that | 00:04 |
---|---|---|
mbana | there's already a file named 1.9.1b4pre.system.conf | 00:22 |
mbana | $ firefox-3.5 | 00:22 |
mbana | Could not find compatible GRE between version 1.9.1b4pre and 1.9.1b4pre. | 00:22 |
mbana | the message is not that helpful | 00:22 |
fta | your firefox version doesn't match the xulrunner version | 00:23 |
fta | are they both b4pre ? | 00:23 |
mbana | $ ls *xul* | 00:36 |
mbana | xulrunner-1.9.1_1.9.1~b4~hg20090330r24021+nobinonly-0ubuntu1_i386.deb | 00:36 |
mbana | xulrunner-1.9_1.9.0.10+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1_i386.deb | 00:36 |
mbana | xulrunner-1.9.1-gnome-support_1.9.1~b4~hg20090330r24021+nobinonly-0ubuntu1_i386.deb | 00:36 |
mbana | xulrunner-1.9-dev_1.9.0.10+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1_i386.deb | 00:36 |
mbana | xulrunner-1.9-gnome-support_1.9.0.10+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1_i386.deb | 00:36 |
mbana | shall i install all of those? | 00:36 |
mbana | i've looked at the gre.d files and they seem almost identical expect for the x86_64 part | 00:37 |
mbana | can anyone confirm please | 00:50 |
fta | is your firefox 3.5 also ~b4~hg20090330r24021* ? | 00:50 |
mbana | yes, i've installed firefox-3.5_3.5~b4~hg20090330r24021+nobinonly-0ubuntu1_i386.deb | 00:51 |
mbana | i'm just worried if i should install xulrunner-1.9.1_1.9.1~b4~hg20090330r24021+nobinonly-0ubuntu1_i386.deb or not, as it's already installed | 00:52 |
BUGabundo | night | 00:53 |
nhandler | Night BUGabundo | 00:53 |
fta | i'm not multitasking well at 2am :P | 00:53 |
nhandler | Then go to bed fta ;) | 00:56 |
=== rickspencer3 is now known as rickspencer3-afk | ||
fta | jcastro, we don't have binutils-gold, not even in karmic. it's in debian experiental. | 01:27 |
jcastro | fta: ah | 01:29 |
fta | jcastro, just discussed with the chromium guys, they would like to have it | 01:29 |
jcastro | oh cool | 01:32 |
jcastro | are you planning to put it in universe? | 01:33 |
mbana | any thoughts before i head of to bed | 01:34 |
fta | jcastro, it's part of binutils so i figure it's a matter of letting it enter the repo. maybe i'm wrong | 01:35 |
jcastro | fta: so is it like, binutils-gold or something? | 01:36 |
* jcastro makes a mental note to ask someone at UDS | 01:36 | |
fta | http://packages.debian.org/experimental/binutils-gold | 01:36 |
fta | looking at our source package | 01:37 |
jcastro | fta: I noticed the chrome part of chromium matches my gtk color thing now | 01:37 |
fta | Package: binutils-gold | 01:37 |
fta | Architecture: amd64 i386 lpia powerpc sparc | 01:37 |
jcastro | instead of being blue | 01:37 |
fta | it's a mistake, because of transparency | 01:37 |
jcastro | ah | 01:37 |
fta | should be fixed with the next successful build | 01:37 |
jcastro | it's coming along pretty nicely | 01:39 |
fta | our package looks ok. maybe ask the archive admins why binutils-gold is not in, maybe it's blacklisted or just needs to be manually added | 01:40 |
fta | brb | 18:07 |
asac | fta: yeah huge build numbers | 18:16 |
asac | asked cjwatson if he does a full archive rebuild on ppas or something ;) | 18:17 |
fta | asac, https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20090513 | 18:19 |
asac | oh so they just show up there | 18:19 |
asac | crazy stuff ;) | 18:20 |
fta | no idea why he wants to do that | 18:20 |
asac | well. they do that regularly | 18:21 |
asac | to discover packages that now fail to biuld et al | 18:21 |
asac | its just that previously you didnt see that i think | 18:21 |
fta | we already have that http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-archive/testing/karmic_probs.html | 18:26 |
asac | fta: thats the result of those rebuilds i think | 18:27 |
asac | fta: thats installability ... not build failures | 18:27 |
fta | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26725584/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-lpia.firefox-3.5_3.5~b5~hg20090514r25181%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 18:27 |
fta | pooff | 18:27 |
asac | yeah gnomefreak had that today as well | 18:27 |
asac | transitional issue most likely | 18:27 |
=== rickspencer3 is now known as rickspencer3-afk | ||
=== mconnor_ is now known as mconnor | ||
fta | i guess i can fall back to gcc 4.3 for now | 21:03 |
BUGabundo | hi everyone | 21:30 |
fta | lo | 21:36 |
BUGabundo | fla hi | 21:48 |
BUGabundo | fta I mean | 22:09 |
BUGabundo | eheh | 22:09 |
fta | at last | 22:22 |
BUGabundo | fta: ping | 22:22 |
fta | openoffice.org-l10n is finally ok | 22:22 |
BUGabundo | fta: what can you tell me about chromium vs google chrome | 22:22 |
fta | google chrome is chromium + some non-free stuff from google | 22:23 |
BUGabundo | and what is the chromium project? | 22:23 |
BUGabundo | is it mantained/founded by Google? | 22:24 |
fta | where? | 22:24 |
fta | on lp? | 22:24 |
BUGabundo | no | 22:24 |
BUGabundo | on google code | 22:24 |
BUGabundo | or where it is hosted | 22:24 |
fta | it's where open development happens | 22:24 |
BUGabundo | is it mantained/founded by Google? | 22:25 |
fta | well, yes | 22:25 |
BUGabundo | oh so its not Community? | 22:26 |
fta | it is | 22:26 |
fta | someone has to host it | 22:26 |
BUGabundo | now you got me lost.... | 22:26 |
BUGabundo | so is it mantained by both google devs and community members? | 22:26 |
BUGabundo | like yourself ? | 22:26 |
fta | yes | 22:27 |
BUGabundo | ah great | 22:27 |
BUGabundo | mundano: are we clear now? | 22:27 |
fta | http://dev.chromium.org/getting-involved | 22:28 |
mundano | yes | 22:28 |
BUGabundo | thanks fta | 22:32 |
* KaptenRodSkagg_ is away: Jag är upptagen | 23:22 | |
=== fta_ is now known as fta |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!