[00:29] <BUGabundo> dtchen: ping.
[00:29] <BUGabundo> dtchen: will you return to #ubuntu+1 any time soon ?
[00:29] <BUGabundo> or you are just too busy?
[00:40] <nhandler> asac: I got a branch up for lp:~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/firefox-greasemonkey.ubuntu and set it as 'Abandoned'. They do not have bzr whiteboards anymore, so I can't easily leave a note on the branch saying that it has moved to lp:~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/greasemonkey.ubuntu
[00:41] <asac> ok. thats ok i guess
[01:03] <fta> asac, i think i will tweak chromium to use gcc 4.3 on karmic, there are too many issues with 4.4
[01:04] <asac> fta: hmm. you mean compile errors or segfaults?
[01:04] <fta> both
[01:04] <fta> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=9104
[01:05] <fta> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=9932
[01:07] <asac> i think its ok to tweak it and wait for upstream fix
[01:08] <nhandler> Did something happen to chatzilla?
[01:09] <fta> asac, i discussed with the fedora guy and some v8 devs, they have no real clue about what's going on.
[01:46] <fta> asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/172684/ ?
[01:47] <fta> (hardy doesn't have 4.3)
[01:54] <nhandler> Jazzva: ping
[01:55] <Jazzva> nhandler: pong
[01:59] <nhandler> Jazzva: In the mood to look at lp:~nhandler/firefox-extensions/foxyproxy.ubuntu ?
[02:00] <Jazzva> nhandler: I'll give it a quick look... tired and soon going to sleep
[02:01] <nhandler> Thanks a lot
[02:01] <Jazzva> np
[02:08] <Jazzva> nhandler: huh... we'll have to rebrand it. I missed this piece of information... http://paste.ubuntu.com/172693/
[02:10] <Jazzva> nhandler: at least that's what ".... are proprietary work and are neither open-source nor free" sounds like to me.
[02:10] <nhandler> Jazzva: How do we go about replacing the logo in the actual extension?
[02:12] <Jazzva> nhandler: I suppose we replace the icon in chrome... and then there are styles, which I'm unsure about. there is one CSS file in chrome/skin.
[02:13] <Jazzva> But I see loss of functionality in removing it. I'll mail the developers tomorrow and see what they exactly meant. That's a shame :(.
[02:14] <Jazzva> nhandler: If I understand correctly, that means it's not for universe, but multiverse.
[02:14] <nhandler> Not really. We still can't use the icons and name and all of that stuff
[02:15] <Jazzva> nhandler: they didn't mention anything on redistribution of artwork and icons. It sounds like it's implied, but it might be redistributable. I might be wrong, too :). Anyway, I'll mail them and see what they meant. Maybe they reconsider the license? (but I doubt that)
[02:16] <Jazzva> s/artwork and icons/artwork, icons and the rest/
[02:17] <nhandler> Jazzva: You are right. It might be able to go in Multiverse.
[02:17] <Jazzva> nhandler: though I hope they will reconsider their decision (which slipped by me in the past)
[02:18] <nhandler> It must have also slipped by the Archive Admins ;)
[02:18] <Jazzva> nhandler: it's a long chain :)
[02:18] <Jazzva> nhandler: it's good that we noticed now. I'll e-mail them tomorrow. The rest of the packaging looks good. I'm off to sleep
[02:18] <Jazzva> good night :)
[02:19] <nhandler> Night Jazzva
[13:24] <fta> wtf? Estimated repository size: 20.3 GiB (100.00%) of 20.0 GiB
[14:05] <gnomefreak> i need some ideas on apps to burn dvds. I have tried gnomebacker braseo and neither one will burn it
[15:07] <asac> brasero is nice for me
[15:07] <asac> ;)
[15:07] <asac> gnomereak isnt even here ;)
[15:16] <fta> ;)
[15:29] <micahg1> asac: you have time for a couple ff bugs?
[16:29] <stefanlsd> I am installing an extension system-wide in /usr/share/gears.  It seems like new profile's get the extension no problem, existing ones dont. Does anyone have any ideas?
[19:04] <BUGabundo> ola peeps
[19:04] <fta> plop
[19:05] <BUGabundo> nope... peeps, really
[19:05] <asac> peep ;)
[19:06] <BUGabundo> eheh
[20:01] <Jazzva> nhandler: http://foxyproxy.mozdev.org/drupal/content/foxyproxy-license
[20:01] <Jazzva> nhandler: now we can just wait...
[20:10] <fta> asac, what is "gcc-4.3 | gcc" supposed to do if gcc(-4.4) is already installed?
[20:12] <fta> hmm, i guess i should have used "gcc-4.3 | gcc-4.2" instead
[20:31] <BUGabundo> fta: AFAIK nothing! it keeps what you have
[20:32] <fta> yep, i figured that out
[20:33] <fta> apparently, upstream is watching me, they just moved the gcc 4.4 bug from P2 to P0 :)
[20:33] <BUGabundo> fta: you go girl...
[20:33] <BUGabundo> ^w dude
[20:34] <fta> google is watching me, oh my!
[20:34] <fta> :)
[20:38] <mbana> asac: you said there were plans to allow a 32bit ver. on a 64bit machine ...
[21:04] <micahg> what should the status of wishlist requests in the firefox package (not 3.0 or 3.5)
[22:28] <asac> fta: yeah ... just depend on the gccs you want to use ... the default will be installed anyway
[22:28] <asac> micahg: if wishlist bugs are filed against firefox and they still exist in firefox-3.5, reassign to that package
[22:29] <asac> or add firefox-3.5 and set firefox task to wontfix
[22:45] <fta> asac, done that already
[22:46] <fta> asac, umd is still red on karmic :p
[22:47] <fta> d'oh! http://code.google.com/p/chromiumembedded/
[22:48] <BUGabundo> fta: at least chromium is buildign
[22:48] <fta> BUGabundo, eH?
[22:48] <BUGabundo> I just got an update for it
[22:48] <fta> karmic?
[22:49] <fta> just amd64, the other ones failed
[22:49] <fta> https://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa
[22:51] <fta> http://code.google.com/p/qrome/