BUGabundo | fta_: but it is fun isn't it? | 01:18 |
---|---|---|
fta_ | ? | 01:18 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
Nafallo | aaaw | 01:18 |
Nafallo | I didn't get to pull the tail :-/ | 01:18 |
BUGabundo | fta: the OOo splash bug | 01:19 |
fta | i guess it's a picture | 01:19 |
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg | ||
micahg | does anyone know the upstream bugs channel for mozilla? | 05:38 |
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg | ||
micahg | we're under 600 new bugs! | 07:47 |
sebner | asac: ping, why does the app font of ff3.5 is so ugly? | 11:32 |
gnomefreak | dist-upgrade | 11:37 |
gnomefreak | oh damn ignore that | 11:38 |
gnomefreak | gfaim (recipes app) is only in french :( is it really that hard to add other langs. | 11:48 |
fta | gfaim is french = "j'ai faim" so i'm not surprised ;) | 11:50 |
fta | i don't complain where 99.9% of apps are in english only ;) | 11:51 |
gnomefreak | fta: thats a good point :) i liked anymeal but that was in my kde days | 11:52 |
gnomefreak | honestly i think packaging an app to use maybe top ten langs. or for any/all langs. would be best way to go but im guessing that is not possible all the time | 11:54 |
gnomefreak | system default would be great way to do it | 11:54 |
gnomefreak | ok be back soonish | 12:08 |
asac | sebner: not sure ... mybe you are using msttcorefonts? | 14:18 |
asac | those are usually ugly | 14:18 |
sebner | asac: nah, not installed. and if they were installed also firefox3.0 should look ugly what's not the case | 14:19 |
fta | nope, ff3.5+ has an improved font rendering system | 14:20 |
sebner | fta: improved? ahahaha *lol* | 14:21 |
fta | wfm | 14:21 |
sebner | fta: asac : compare http://img223.imageshack.us/my.php?image=screenshotstartseitevon.png and http://img232.imageshack.us/my.php?image=screenshotwfmwikipediat.png | 14:25 |
=== ejat is now known as e-jat | ||
gnomefreak | anyone one know how much 2000 euros is in #s? | 14:45 |
Nafallo | gnomefreak: google | 14:49 |
gnomefreak | Nafallo: yeah i know i was hoping someone knew but i will google in a little while | 14:50 |
Nafallo | not even sure what #s means so... | 14:50 |
fta | pounds? | 14:50 |
fta | 2000 Euros = 1 777.45531 British pounds | 14:51 |
fta | (google) | 14:51 |
fta | 2000 Euros = 2 694.8 US$ | 14:51 |
gnomefreak | opps it should have been $s | 14:58 |
gnomefreak | 2694.80 $ that is a nice laptop | 14:59 |
gnomefreak | asac: fta thanks for cleaning up mailing list junk | 15:25 |
* asac runs dist-upgrade to karmic on main desktop | 16:03 | |
gnomefreak | asac: use the 2.6.28 kerrnel at least i have to or i wont get X to work also terminal wont stay open | 16:53 |
gnomefreak | and for some reason update-manager wont use -d but i wanted to talk to mvo about it but i havent run into him this past week | 16:54 |
BUGabundo | gnomefreak: to get to KK ? | 16:55 |
gnomefreak | BUGabundo: yes | 16:55 |
BUGabundo | worked for me, and a lot of other +1s | 16:55 |
gnomefreak | +1? | 16:55 |
BUGabundo | the only reason some ppl are still using .28 is for the wifi cards | 16:56 |
BUGabundo | gnomefreak: #ubuntu+1 , as in Karmic testers | 16:56 |
gnomefreak | ah | 16:56 |
BUGabundo | heeh | 16:56 |
BUGabundo | humm alpha1 is a bit late to sed sources and distupgrade... | 16:56 |
BUGabundo | do you have any logs from $ do-release-upgrade on cli? | 16:57 |
BUGabundo | UM aint much verbose | 16:57 |
BUGabundo | but d-r-u -d is | 16:57 |
gnomefreak | havent looked yet | 16:57 |
BUGabundo | haven't seem mvo either | 16:57 |
BUGabundo | guess he has been busy | 16:58 |
BUGabundo | talk to you latter... need to fill up the company car gas tank.. | 16:58 |
BUGabundo | be back in a while.... expecting long line of drivers at gas pump | 16:58 |
sebner | asac: karmic \o/ stable stable stable (ext4 also of course (also thanks to 30er kernel)) | 16:59 |
BUGabundo | gnomefreak: back | 18:08 |
* gnomefreak getting ready to leave :) | 18:09 | |
BUGabundo | ehehehe | 18:09 |
gnomefreak | ok folder is 4.1 gigs after compressing it it is now 5.9 gigs << what the fuck is that about | 18:10 |
gnomefreak | and im using tar.gz which should compress it not make it bigger | 18:11 |
BUGabundo | depends on what is inside | 18:11 |
BUGabundo | but very strange to grow so much | 18:12 |
gnomefreak | BUGabundo: it should not bbe 1+ gigs bigger than folder | 18:12 |
BUGabundo | try to put a tar inside and compress it | 18:12 |
gnomefreak | no matter what it should be around the same size as folder | 18:12 |
gnomefreak | BUGabundo: what do you mean put a tar inside? | 18:12 |
BUGabundo | exaclty | 18:13 |
BUGabundo | it shouldn't grow so much | 18:13 |
BUGabundo | even if the content aint going to compress | 18:13 |
BUGabundo | it should be close to the folder | 18:13 |
gnomefreak | right maybe ill just burn the folder than | 18:13 |
gnomefreak | Tar archive (gzip-compressed) (application/x-compressed-tar) | 18:14 |
gnomefreak | 5.9 GB (6302618406 bytes) | 18:14 |
gnomefreak | folder (inode/directory) | 18:14 |
gnomefreak | 1,521 items, totalling 4.1 GB | 18:14 |
BUGabundo | hehe | 18:15 |
BUGabundo | what is the FS? | 18:15 |
gnomefreak | ext2 | 18:15 |
gnomefreak | opps | 18:15 |
gnomefreak | ext3 | 18:15 |
BUGabundo | very strange | 18:16 |
BUGabundo | either bug, or bad FS | 18:16 |
BUGabundo | I would do a fsck on it | 18:16 |
gnomefreak | BUGabundo: im guessing bug in tar since everything else works ok | 18:16 |
gnomefreak | BUGabundo: never ran one myself | 18:16 |
BUGabundo | ahh | 18:17 |
BUGabundo | I run one at least every two weeks | 18:17 |
gnomefreak | what command? | 18:17 |
BUGabundo | I get a few crashes or power failures, forced powerdowns | 18:17 |
BUGabundo | better reboot and use the recovery console | 18:17 |
gnomefreak | im looking at the --help and it doesnt really give me much | 18:17 |
BUGabundo | it has an menu option for fsck | 18:17 |
BUGabundo | other then that | 18:17 |
BUGabundo | unmount the partition or remount as RO (for / ) | 18:18 |
BUGabundo | and $ fsck.ext3 -fvD /dev/sdX | 18:18 |
BUGabundo | gnomefreak: I want help for fsck.ext3 | 18:18 |
gnomefreak | maybe fsck -P / | 18:19 |
BUGabundo | where is a nice tip: man tune2fs | 18:19 |
BUGabundo | $ tune2fs -O large_file,dir_index,has_journal /dev/sdXx | 18:20 |
BUGabundo | it can be run one a mounted FS | 18:21 |
BUGabundo | it will make Nautilus very fast | 18:21 |
gnomefreak | ill have to look at it when i get home or tomorrow | 18:21 |
* asac reboots into karmic ;) | 18:32 | |
Nafallo | bye asac | 18:32 |
BUGabundo | far well asac | 18:32 |
BUGabundo | eheh | 18:33 |
BUGabundo | he will be the only person to not make it | 18:33 |
BUGabundo | ROFL | 18:33 |
asac | works good. nice | 18:38 |
BUGabundo | 6 min reboot? | 18:39 |
BUGabundo | that's *slowwwwwww* asac | 18:39 |
asac | i did some basic testing ;) | 18:39 |
BUGabundo | and left us hanging ? | 18:39 |
BUGabundo | bad man | 18:40 |
asac | lol | 18:40 |
asac | didnt know that you would feel that much with me ;) | 18:40 |
asac | i guess desktop effects will never work with my card ;) | 18:42 |
asac | waiting for years ... no change | 18:42 |
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg | ||
micahg | If a flash problem is solved by a driver update, how should that be flagged? | 19:31 |
BUGabundo1 | how can those be related? | 19:33 |
dtchen | BUGabundo1: depends on the symptom | 19:33 |
BUGabundo1 | I don't see a relation without further info | 19:33 |
dtchen | micahg: right, need a bug report # at least | 19:34 |
micahg | bug 366937 | 19:35 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 366937 in firefox-3.0 "firefox segmentation fault in kde4.2 jaunty on maximizing flash video" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/366937 | 19:35 |
dtchen | it should be triaged to affect xserver-xorg-video-intel | 19:36 |
dtchen | it definitely is not a firefox* bug | 19:36 |
dtchen | (or a Flash bug for that matter) | 19:36 |
micahg | ok, so package changes and status changes? | 19:37 |
dtchen | yes, -> xserver-xorg-video-intel and -> triaged | 19:37 |
micahg | ok | 19:38 |
micahg | well I still can't set triage | 19:38 |
dtchen | i'll set it. | 19:38 |
micahg | so should I change package and someone else can set triage | 19:38 |
micahg | or someone else do both in one shot? | 19:38 |
dtchen | ^ | 19:38 |
micahg | thanks | 19:38 |
dtchen | np | 19:39 |
micahg | asac was saying something about getting me bug control status | 19:39 |
BUGabundo1 | micahg: I think you have to apply for it | 19:40 |
stefanlsd | asac: finally got google gears into REVU. would appreciate a look over if you have some time | 20:22 |
stefanlsd | BUGabundo1: still only 3.0x :| | 20:22 |
BUGabundo1 | hey stefanlsd...u remmembered | 20:22 |
BUGabundo1 | stefanlsd: using 3.6a1 here | 20:23 |
stefanlsd | BUGabundo1: yeah. upstream says it will work before new FF is released | 20:23 |
nhandler | I was looking at updating mozilla-stumbleupon. However, it ftbfs. It has http://paste.ubuntu.com/173835/ in debian/rules, and uncommenting that allows it to build. Could someone help me understand what exactly chrome/stumbleupon.jar file is being used for and if it is needed? | 20:30 |
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg | ||
fta | https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-karmic-multiarch-support :) | 21:42 |
BUGabundo1 | hehe | 21:44 |
micahg | can someone check bug 297837 on x86? | 21:48 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 297837 in firefox-3.0 "bad gopher support of abstracts with case sensitive file names" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/297837 | 21:48 |
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg | ||
micahg | what to do with bug 297837 | 22:12 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 297837 in firefox-3.0 "bad gopher support of abstracts with case sensitive file names" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/297837 | 22:12 |
micahg | upstream says gopher support is being removed | 22:13 |
BUGabundo1 | without further reading, WontFix? | 22:14 |
micahg | well | 22:14 |
micahg | it seems to actually be a debate upstream | 22:14 |
micahg | I was hoping someone authoratative can jump in | 22:15 |
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg | ||
=== BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo | ||
fta | lol, gopher. the last time i used it was.. what.. 1994? | 23:12 |
micahg | fta: apparently, it's making a comeback | 23:18 |
micahg | do you know anything about it being removed | 23:18 |
micahg | if it's authoratative or not | 23:18 |
micahg | and if we should just mark the bug won't fix | 23:18 |
fta | no idea | 23:19 |
micahg | ok | 23:19 |
micahg | I guess I'll jsut monitor the upstream status | 23:19 |
fta | for me, gopher is long dead. the web killed it in the mid-90s | 23:19 |
BUGabundo1 | eheh | 23:27 |
fta | dtchen, the sound in sauerbraten is very good and stable, i don't get why it's so bad in openarena | 23:43 |
BUGabundo1 | 'cause it uses alsa ? | 23:43 |
fta | both are | 23:45 |
fta | Estimated repository size: 25.6 GiB (100.00%) of 20.0 GiB | 23:48 |
fta | wtf | 23:48 |
BUGabundo1 | LOL | 23:48 |
fta | oh, now i understand, one full build of chromium is worth 8.1GB (3 arches x 4 dists) | 23:49 |
fta | so if there are more than 2 builds in the PPA, it's full | 23:50 |
fta | bad | 23:50 |
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg | ||
gnomefreak | ok i have a few minutes to find out why compressing a file makes it >1 gig more than file size | 23:54 |
micahg | what format? | 23:55 |
micahg | gnomefreak: | 23:55 |
micahg | ^^ | 23:55 |
gnomefreak | tar.gz | 23:55 |
micahg | you're compressing the tarball? | 23:55 |
BUGabundo1 | gnomefreak: I'm out of ideas | 23:55 |
gnomefreak | file size is 4.1gig tart.gz is 5.9gig | 23:55 |
BUGabundo1 | try to make a new from dd /dev/zero | 23:55 |
micahg | what's the original format? | 23:55 |
gnomefreak | tar.gz even | 23:56 |
gnomefreak | micahg: a normal file | 23:56 |
micahg | define normal? | 23:56 |
gnomefreak | s/file/folder | 23:56 |
micahg | graphic, movie, text? | 23:56 |
BUGabundo1 | eheh what's normal? | 23:56 |
* BUGabundo1 there is no normal. the _normality_ is the anormal | 23:56 | |
gnomefreak | micahg: everything some music some text some pics. its a back up folder | 23:56 |
micahg | ah, so depending on the algorithm, you might get a higher size from pictures | 23:57 |
micahg | you can try bzip2 | 23:57 |
micahg | tar -cjvf | 23:57 |
gnomefreak | regaurdless of folder a tar should never be bigger in size than folder at least not over a gig | 23:57 |
micahg | not true | 23:57 |
micahg | it's not the tar | 23:57 |
micahg | it's the gxz | 23:57 |
gnomefreak | micahg: the normal doics will compress regaurdless of music or pics | 23:57 |
gnomefreak | nothing should get bigger | 23:58 |
fta | gnomefreak, just make sure you're not tarring the tar itself ;) | 23:58 |
micahg | graphics will get bigger with gz sometimes | 23:58 |
gnomefreak | fta: im not i made sure of that :) | 23:58 |
BUGabundo1 | micahg: by a Giga? | 23:58 |
gnomefreak | micahg: not close to a gig | 23:58 |
micahg | if there are enough | 23:58 |
fta | gnomefreak, pastebin what you did | 23:59 |
gnomefreak | micahg: i didnt add any pics from last backup nor music and it was 4.4 gig tar.gz i replaced some of my . dirs | 23:59 |
gnomefreak | fta: how? i tared it up earlier | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!