[00:12] <bcurtiswx> bdmurray: may I PM you?
[00:56] <BUGabundo1> bed time. its 1am! kiss kiss and free hugs!
[04:25] <scream> anyone want to set 351369
[04:31] <bcurtiswx> scream: to what?
[04:31] <bcurtiswx> bug #351369
[04:31] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 351369 in update-notifier "Preferences should allow for custom "check for updates" frequency" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/351369
[04:31] <scream> complete, wishlist
[04:31] <bcurtiswx> are you in bugsquad?
[04:32] <scream> No, and I don't think I would confirm my own bugs. :)
[04:32] <bcurtiswx> ah, names don't match i go clueless
[04:35] <bcurtiswx> is scream your typical IRC name?
[04:35] <JonCharge> scream, NonvocalScream
[04:36] <JonCharge> If I'm activly working on bugs, I'll change nick to JonCharge.
[04:36] <JonCharge> I'f I'm actively working on Wikimedia related stuff, I'll use scream.
[04:36] <JonCharge> I don't usually do both at the same time. :)
[04:37] <JonCharge> I actually just requested more information and changed the status on #378177
[04:39] <bcurtiswx> k bug set
[04:39] <bcurtiswx> i will push that upstream to gnome ASAP
[04:39] <JonCharge> ty
[04:39] <bcurtiswx> i would now, except my eyes are starting to do that "im not opening past halfway until you go to sleep" thing
[04:40] <bcurtiswx> nite all
[04:41] <micahg> nite bcurtiswx
[04:48] <JonCharge> Did I triage 378182 correctly?
[04:49] <micahg> bug 378182
[04:49] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 378182 in screenlets "package screenlets 0.1.2-3ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo post-removal script retornou estado de sa?da de erro 2" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/378182
[05:57]  * Hobbsee shakes her head at bugsquad
[05:57]  * Hobbsee dupes it, as the bug person should have done
[06:01] <Hobbsee> and now launchpad dies.
[06:24] <micahg> why is Hobbsee shaking her head at bugsquad?
[06:54] <Hobbsee> micahg: because instead of duping it with something with an almost identical name, which is highly likely to be the same thing, they've gone and asked for more information - most of which is very likely to be in that dpkg terminal log anyway
[06:54] <Hobbsee> and we wonder why people get annoyed that their bugs don't go anywhere....
[06:58] <micahg> well, sometimes people don't know about the dups
[07:07] <Hobbsee> perhaps they should, before commenting
[07:08] <Hobbsee> when it's close to the same text (but the language is different, so it's not exactly the same...)
[09:12] <DJJeff> anyone ubuntu-powerpc users?
[09:17] <YoBoY> hi DJJeff, if you are looking for support, go to #ubuntu
[09:17] <DJJeff> over 1000+ users in #ubuntu
[09:17] <DJJeff> very hard to get support X_X
[09:18] <jpds> Or you could try #ubuntu-ppc or something.
[09:18] <jpds> or #ubuntu-powerpc.
[09:18] <DJJeff> 11 users in there all idle X_X
[09:19] <DJJeff> I may try looking for ubuntu forums
[09:19] <jpds> Or the mailing lists.
[09:20] <DJJeff> there are no ubuntu forums?
[09:20] <DJJeff> ah yes found them
[09:20] <DJJeff> http://www.ubuntu.com/support/community/webforums
[09:20] <DJJeff> :)
[09:33] <gnomefreak> when using apport-collect bug# what format is the bug#used
[09:53] <xteejx> morning guys :)
[09:57] <thekorn> hey xteejx
[09:57] <xteejx> thekorn, hiya
[09:57] <thekorn> gnomefreak, it is just `apport-collect 123456`, or what did you mean?
[09:58] <gnomefreak> thekorn: thats it i just wasnt sure if it was lp# or bug #1111
[09:58] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 1111 in gst-plugins0.8 "doesn't extract last track" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1111
[09:59] <gnomefreak> go figure
[10:00] <xteejx> bug 109530, how do i debug/triage this one, i've got the apport-collect stuff, where do i go from here, it's a recurring problem
[10:00] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 109530 in sane-backends "Need method to disable sane from probing scanners on parallel port(s)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/109530
[10:03] <xteejx> done it no worries :)
[10:06] <xteejx> Quite a few oldies are dismissable as I've just found out - looking good for "invalidating with update" :)
[10:07]  * xteejx is happy he is helping clear out the old crap
[10:19] <xteejx> Should bug 114758 be changed to a Wishlist bug, or should it be referred to Brainstorm, I do not believe this is a bug, but how it is meant to work
[10:19] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 114758 in k3b "k3b error when writing and verifying DVDs using slimline drive" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/114758
[10:24] <xteejx> anyone? thekorn, hggdh, bdmurray? lol
[10:44] <xteejx> no-one awake then
[10:46] <wolfger_> I'm awake, barely :-)
[10:47] <wolfger_> I just looked at it, and I'm uncertain.
[10:48] <wolfger_> I can see how it could be deemed a wishlist item, or a bug. It's a matter of perspective.
[10:49] <wolfger_> I'd say look upstream for something like this, or open it upstream and see how they feel about it.
[10:50] <xteejx> wolfger_, and se a watch for it?
[10:50] <xteejx> *set
[11:05] <wolfger_> yes
[11:07] <xteejx> has anyone got kubuntu they can test a quick thing for me?
[11:10] <xteejx> namely bug 106364, in aptitude
[11:10] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 106364 in aptitude "aptitude: PgDn on 'update' screen moves to end" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/106364
[11:19] <xteejx> come on people at 11:19AM in the UK, and canonical is based here (i think) lol
[11:43]  * xteejx yawns
[11:43] <xteejx> Am I the only one tired?
[11:46]  * chrisccoulson yawns too
[11:46] <chrisccoulson> xteejx - no, it's catching
[11:47] <xteejx> chriscoulson, lol its 11:46 here, bad night
[11:47] <chrisccoulson> it's 11:49 here. my clock must be fast ;)
[11:47] <xteejx> haha :)
[11:48] <chrisccoulson> why a bad night?
[11:48] <xteejx> it was really humid, just couldnt sleep
[11:48] <chrisccoulson> i never have a problem sleeping
[11:48] <xteejx> neither do i normally
[11:49] <xteejx> good old kentish weather lol
[11:49] <chrisccoulson> lol
[11:50] <xteejx> wonder how millbank is today...?
[11:51]  * xteejx thinks the Canonical crew is asleep in their hammocks in the office :)
[11:51] <xteejx> lol
[11:53] <jpds> xteejx: Hmm, spots of clouds here.
[11:54] <xteejx> jpds: Not much better here :(
[11:55] <jpds> xteejx: Anyway, I think they're all in Spain right now.
[11:55] <xteejx> jpds: Alright for some!!!
[11:57] <jpds> Heh.
[12:08] <xteejx> is there any debugging procedures for sane?
[12:08] <xteejx> !sane
[12:08] <ubot4> Scanning software: XSane, the GIMP (GNOME), Kooka (KDE). For instructions see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ScanningHowTo and to see supported hardware: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HardwareSupportComponentsScanners - See also !OCR
[12:18] <xteejx> I've looked through the wiki and can't find any standard procedures for Traiging/Debugging sane, have I missed it?

[13:32] <chrisccoulson> hey hggdh
[13:33] <hggdh> hi chrisccoulson, good morning/afternoon
[13:33] <chrisccoulson> good afternoon. you not in barcelona?
[13:33] <hggdh> no... good ol' Texas
[13:33] <chrisccoulson> there's not much activity around here today;)
[13:34] <hggdh> well, UDS is kicking in, so people are travelling/resting ;-)
[13:35] <chrisccoulson> yeah, it seems so
[13:35]  * hggdh really wanted to have stayed in bed... barely 0730 now
[13:35] <chrisccoulson> what time do you normally get up?
[13:36] <savvas> pffft, I get up at 6 :p
[13:36] <hggdh> at around 0600, much against my will
[13:36] <savvas> not an early bird eh :)
[13:36] <hggdh> pfui
[13:36] <xteejx> i was up at 8am in the UK lol
[13:36] <hggdh> I was born to appreciate the night, not the morning ;-)
[13:36] <chrisccoulson> heh. i normally get up at 7.30, although i should get up earlier really. i'm late to work every single day
[13:37] <chrisccoulson> i hate mornings
[13:37] <hggdh> the early bird gets the worm, they say here. But  OTH, the early worm dies faster
[13:37] <chrisccoulson> that's true
[13:39] <xteejx> hggdh: how come you're all in texas, thought the UDS guys were in Spain?
[13:39] <hggdh> :-)
[13:40] <hggdh> cuz I am not an Ubuntu member/developer/canonical employee, and I had work to do here (I mean *paying* work), and nobody offered to pay the trip :-)
[13:42] <xteejx> hggdh: always thought u were canonical lol
[13:43] <hggdh> :-)
[13:43] <hggdh> just a volunteer, like most here
[13:44] <xteejx> hehe
[16:21] <xteejx> hey hey
[16:27] <xteejx> charlie-tca, finally some life!
[16:28] <charlie-tca> Been dead?
[16:28] <davmor2> charlie-tca: no surely you were just really ill
[16:29] <xteejx> just a bit dead...
[16:29] <xteejx> pretty much all day actually, all the guys are in barcelona i assume
[16:30] <davmor2> xteejx: the devs are next week will be the really dead week :)
[16:30] <xteejx> davmor2: True lol
[16:30]  * hggdh is still alive, but busy
[16:30] <xteejx> Does anyone still take any notice of Brainstorm for implementing blueprints?
[16:31] <hggdh> yes, but number of voters play a good role
[16:31]  * xteejx passes hggdh a coffee
[16:31] <micahg> any ideas on bug 374398?
[16:31] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 374398 in firefox "Glitches around checkboxes in Firefox" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/374398
[16:31] <xteejx> hggdh: I still want **NICE** themeing
[16:32] <xteejx> micahg: I don't get that problem with compiz on or off, I use gmail for my launchpad account
[16:33] <micahg> xteejx: ok, but it's obviously not a FF problem, so where should I send it?
[16:33] <xteejx> micahg: xorg? Could be a driver issue, I've seen similar things before on my other laptop
[16:33] <hggdh> micahg, it might be interesting to know what add-ons are installed
[16:34] <hggdh> and, just in case, the X driver...
[16:34] <xteejx> micahg: Get an about:plugins output from them,
[16:34] <micahg> hggdh: xteejx, user tried with new profile
[16:34] <micahg> But, I'll ask anyways
[16:34] <micahg> after I get that, where should it go?
[16:35] <xteejx> micahg: that may not disable extensions
[16:35] <micahg> well, only system extensions would remain
[16:35] <micahg> but user has trouble in vbox as well
[16:35] <xteejx> micahg: Let us know when you get that info, i'm sure one of us can take a quick look
[16:35] <xteejx> micahg: sounds more like a X or driver issue then
[16:36] <xteejx> compiz disabled? stupid question
[16:36] <micahg> are you saying I asked a stupid question?
[16:37] <xteejx> lol no :) i mean i'm asking you, its a silly question
[16:37] <xteejx> but i just noticed you already asked the user :)
[16:37] <hggdh> heh
[16:37] <micahg> so, do I need to ask for the plugins if user is experiencing in multiple apps?
[16:38] <xteejx> it can't hurt to ask what they have installed
[16:38] <hggdh> ye, but if the issue is on multiple apps, it is probably no FF. Just in case, though...
[16:40] <micahg> but then to generic xorg?
[16:40] <xteejx> I would, it would then be a display problem, from there it can be further debugged and recategorised
[16:40] <hggdh> sounds like, yes
[16:41] <hggdh> or against the specific driver in use
[16:41] <micahg> how about bug 259982
[16:41] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 259982 in firefox-3.0 "firefox3 do not interprate function() "syntax error"" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/259982
[16:41] <micahg> I goofed
[16:41] <micahg> I confirmed I couldn't confirm after I confirmed
[16:41] <xteejx> its already triaged?
[16:42] <micahg> I did that with hggdh's help :)
[16:42] <hggdh> heh
[16:43] <xteejx> is that all the debugging they'll need in FF team?
[16:43] <micahg> so, is my retraction enough
[16:43] <micahg> Well, I think it's really a JS error
[16:43] <micahg> but my JS isn't that proficient
[16:43] <hggdh> well, no harm. If it is not fixed, but the issue was correctly identified, the it is an upstream issue now
[16:44] <micahg> I just linked the upstream to LP
[16:44] <xteejx> i'd say thats more than enough then, its upstream as hggdh says, leave it at that
[16:45] <micahg> I just added the test case to upstream
[16:45] <micahg> ok
[16:45] <micahg> I'm gonna forget about it then
[16:45] <xteejx> micahg: obviously if theres any extra info you can give to upstream, steps to reproduce, etc, debug info from the bug report, send that upstream too :)
[16:47] <micahg> bug 194894
[16:47] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 194894 in firefox "[MASTER] Firefox reports Gecko Engine Version in "about:"" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/194894
[16:47] <micahg> should we mark ff3.5 triaged as well?
[16:48] <hggdh> might as well, micahg
[16:48] <micahg> and status Low
[16:48] <micahg> can you do that please hggdh?
[16:48] <micahg> :)
[16:48] <micahg> still waiting for bug control
[16:49] <xteejx> micahg: if you need something changed hggdh and myself can do it :)
[16:50] <xteejx> hggdh, ps i got accepted :D
[16:50] <micahg> good to know xteejx
[16:50] <hggdh> yeee
[16:50]  * hggdh gets some more free time
[16:50] <xteejx> hggdh, cheek!! lol
[16:51] <xteejx> brb
[16:51] <xteejx> afk
[16:57] <micahg> hggdh: can you triage that bug for me ;)
[16:57] <micahg> please...
[17:01] <hggdh> micahg, which one?
[17:02] <hggdh> ah
[17:02] <micahg> bug 194894
[17:02] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 194894 in firefox "[MASTER] Firefox reports Gecko Engine Version in "about:"" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/194894
[17:02] <micahg> I have a few more
[17:03] <hggdh> done, micahg
[17:03] <micahg> thanks
[17:03] <micahg> next one
[17:03] <micahg> bug 242513
[17:03] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 242513 in firefox "There should be a delay between successive "alert" boxes" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/242513
[17:04] <micahg> Medium Traiged?
[17:07] <hggdh> 1 min
[17:08] <hggdh> agrred, and done
[17:09] <micahg> now, do I need to add the reverse link upstream?/
[17:10] <hggdh> you mean the link to the Ubuntu bug? Yes, you should. It may help upstream, if they want to contact the reporter
[17:10] <micahg> well, it's an 8 year old bug
[17:12] <hggdh> still... we linked to it, so...
[17:12] <hggdh> we have had upstream complaining about the lack of these links, and they are right
[17:13] <micahg> ok
[17:13] <micahg> done
[17:14] <micahg> bug 306017, shouldn't it be traiged?
[17:14] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 306017 in firefox-3.0 "Firefox search box should be tab specific" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/306017
[17:15] <hggdh> yes, done, thanks
[17:15] <xteejx> hggdh, can you take a quick look at bug 102502 for me please, I dunno how to triage it, but theres a few people to confirm it. shall i do Confirmed, Medium?
[17:15] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 102502 in knetworkmanager "KNetworkManager doesn't use supplied WEP key" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/102502
[17:16] <xteejx> hggdh, its an old bug, but still a problem in jaunty
[17:18] <hggdh> yes, confirmed sounds correct. Did you try to look upstream for a similar one?
[17:18] <hggdh> triaged sounds even better...
[17:19] <micahg> hggdh: bug 302217 --close because of update?
[17:19] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 302217 in firefox-3.0 "firefox behaves weird" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/302217
[17:22] <xteejx> hggdh, do you think there is enough info there to set it as triaged?
[17:23] <hggdh> micahg, 302217 can be closed invalid, I think (and it sounds more like a metacity/compiz issue than enything else, BTW)
[17:23] <hggdh> there is no problem/way to reproduce, after all
[17:24] <micahg> yes, that's what I thought also
[17:24] <micahg> just wanted a 2nd opinion
[17:28] <_kool> hi
[17:29] <_kool> i wanna report a wubi bug
[17:30] <hggdh> _kool, please read https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs
[17:30] <_kool> i dont have menu help...
[17:31] <_kool> by command?
[17:31] <_kool> what is it?
[17:32] <_kool> if any one interested, here is the posts of the bug: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1163971
[17:34] <_kool> bye
[17:34] <xteejx> !bug | _kool
[17:34] <ubot4> _kool: If you find a bug in Ubuntu or any of its derivatives, please file a bug using the command « ubuntu-bug <package> » If that fails, you can report bugs manually at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug - Bugs in/wishes for the bots can be filed at http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-bots
[17:34] <hggdh> lovely. Shoot & run
[17:34] <xteejx> isn't it just...
[17:37] <hggdh> well, I answered the forums thread, I hope he does understand enough English to follow
[17:39] <xteejx> hggdh, how do you know it isn't laziness? lol
[17:39] <hggdh> I do not, but I give them the benefit of doubt ;-)
[17:44] <unutbu> I get this message every time I boot:
[17:44] <unutbu> usb 2-1: device not accepting address 2, error -71
[17:45] <unutbu> but otherwise I boot just fine
[17:45] <_kool> done :)
[17:45] <unutbu> Is this a hardware problem?
[17:46] <hggdh> _kool, what was done?
[17:46] <xteejx> unutbu, does the USB work ok?
[17:46] <xteejx> if so, then there really is no problem :)
[17:46] <unutbu> xteejx: Yes, as far as I can tell
[17:47] <unutbu> Where can I go to find out what "error -71" means?
[17:47] <xteejx> !bug | untubu
[17:47] <ubot4> untubu: If you find a bug in Ubuntu or any of its derivatives, please file a bug using the command « ubuntu-bug <package> » If that fails, you can report bugs manually at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug - Bugs in/wishes for the bots can be filed at http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-bots
[17:47] <xteejx> You can try there and search for the error, maybe you can contribute to a bug report?
[17:48] <unutbu> If I use ubuntu-bug, which package should it be assigned to?
[17:50] <unutbu> xteejx: Also, if it is as you say, not a bug, should i be filing a bug report?
[17:50] <xteejx> unutbu, you can still file a report for regular annoyances, and to implement features
[17:52] <unutbu> This seems similar: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/293655
[17:52] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 293655 in linux "usb error on startup" [Undecided,New]
[17:57] <xteejx> unutbu, see if theres any extra info you can provide if its the same problem :)
[17:58] <unutbu> xteejx: I'm not sure what relevant information I could provide
[17:59] <xteejx> unutbu, if the problem affects you, you can change the "doesn't affect me" to "does affect me", problems with more people are likely to be solved sooner.
[17:59] <unutbu> xteejx: oooh. neat
[18:02] <unutbu> xteejx: so if I wanted to figure this out myself, I'd just have to start digging into linux kernel source?
[18:02] <xteejx> unutbu, i would suggest filing a bug if there isn't one, unless you really know what you're doing...
[18:03] <unutbu> xteejx: thanks for your help
[18:04] <xteejx> unutbu, you're welcome
[18:30] <gumpish> This bug currently has status "Incomplete". As I am experiencing the bug, I'd be happy to supply whatever information is needed to change this. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/239231
[18:30] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 239231 in compiz "cannot name workspaces on hardy 8.04" [Undecided,Incomplete]
[18:31] <gumpish> and I have a clean install of Jaunty.
[18:32] <gumpish> I suspect some number of the people in this channel have both the environment and authority to confirm this bug themselves.
[18:32] <BUGabundo> gumpish: i very much dough that
[18:32] <BUGabundo> i would say bellow 20%
[18:33] <gumpish> well, that's still some number... =/
[18:33] <BUGabundo> and good afternoon, btw
[18:33] <gumpish> Hello.
[18:35] <charlie-tca> gumpish: is that your comment at the end?
[18:36] <charlie-tca> If not, could you add a comment that you are experiencing this bug with 9.04, and I will then be able to confirm it.
[18:36] <charlie-tca> I do not use compiz at all, so it is difficult for me to confirm myself
[18:37] <gumpish> Ah.
[18:37] <gumpish> No, that's not my comment. I'll add one.
[18:37] <charlie-tca> Thank you
[18:38] <BUGabundo> whats the bug, btw?
[18:39] <BUGabundo> gumpish: ^^^^^^
[18:40] <Ampelbein> BUGabundo: bug 239231
[18:40] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 239231 in compiz "cannot name workspaces on hardy 8.04" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/239231
[18:41] <BUGabundo> 8.04? to old for me
[18:44] <gumpish> BUGabundo: It's still present in 9.04 =/
[18:44] <gumpish> charlie-tca: Comment added. Many thanks!
[18:45] <BUGabundo> gumpish: im on karmic
[18:45] <gumpish> oooo
[18:45] <gumpish> heheh
[18:45] <BUGabundo> ping me latter and ill check it
[18:45] <gumpish> :)
[18:46] <BUGabundo> but gnome 2.27 dropped a lot of stuff
[18:46] <gumpish> i see
[18:46] <charlie-tca> Thank you for helping, gumpish
[18:53] <kklimonda> hey guys & gals.
[19:01] <BUGabundo> bbl
[19:02] <kklimonda> chrisccoulson: would you mind commenting about transmission 1.61 merge? I've made a comment in bug 375000
[19:02] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 375000 in transmission "Please merge transmission 1.61-1 from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/375000
[19:02] <chrisccoulson> hi kklimonda, i'll take a look later if that's ok
[19:03] <kklimonda> sure
[19:04] <kklimonda> I left it for few days hoping that I'll get some response from package's debian maintainer bug no luck so far..
[19:43] <xteejx> hey BUGabundo, harlie-tca, didnt see you both here :)
[19:45]  * charlie-tca been hiding
[19:56] <xteejx> charlie-tca, if someone tells apport-collect that it can only read, how do you reset it to change all....its already saved....
[19:57] <charlie-tca> I don't know
[19:58] <xteejx> shit :(
[19:58] <jussi01> !language | xteejx
[19:58] <ubot4> xteejx: Please watch your language and topic to help keep this channel family friendly.
[19:58] <greg-g> I think you can remove it from your approved application/whatever in your launchpad profile
[19:58] <xteejx> sh**t :)
[19:59] <xteejx> greg-g, whereabouts is that, i havent seen it anywhere
[20:01] <greg-g> xteejx: unfortunately, I am quite busy right now, I just rmember doing it myself when the same thing happened to me
[20:01] <greg-g> help.launchpad.net is probably useful
[20:02] <xteejx> greg-g, ahh ok i'll scout around some more trying to find it, trying to help someone in a bug report recover from the same problem
[20:55] <hggdh> well, he is gone... delete ~/.launchpadlib/*.cred; you will be asked again for the permissions
[20:56] <greg-g> hggdh: ahhhh, thanks
[20:57] <BUGabundo> guud evening
[21:03] <hggdh> guud oone, BUGabundo
[22:16] <xteejx> evening guys
[22:16] <xteejx> not on for long, just going over replies from bugmail
[22:19] <BUGabundo> xteejx: ol
[22:19] <xteejx> BUGabundo: ??
[22:19] <BUGabundo> *hello
[22:30] <xteejx> BUGabundo: Ohhh hello lol
[22:31] <xteejx> I'm well annoyed trying to get mates to sign up to get me a free iPhone :(
[22:31]  * xteejx cries
[22:32] <BUGabundo> iphone is bad
[22:35]  * micahg is waiting for the Palm Pre
[22:36] <charlie-tca> iphone is only bad if you use it, right?
[22:48] <xteejx> charlie-tca: lol, well i tried getting it on contract with o2, didnt get it :(
[22:49] <xteejx> anyway it'd be free if i can just get my "mates" on the thing its well annoying, more so than some bugs heh
[22:51] <charlie-tca> I would guess it might be
[22:51] <xteejx> lol
[23:03] <andre_k> 307492 is a dup of 181553
[23:03] <andre_k> now if someone could mark it
[23:05] <micahg> andre_k: you could mark it a dup :)
[23:05] <andre_k> i don't think i have enough permissions
[23:05] <BUGabundo> andre_k: anyone can dupe bugs
[23:06] <micahg> what he said :)
[23:06] <andre_k> oops. then i still don't understand the launchpad interface :)
[23:06] <micahg> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#A%20duplicate
[23:06]  * BUGabundo is now know as *he*
[23:07] <BUGabundo> s/know/known
[23:07] <andre_k> ah. thanks a lot!
[23:07] <micahg> no, thank YOU :)
[23:09] <BUGabundo> uhh positive re-enforcement