[08:38] <stefanlsd> asac: you make it to spain alive?
[10:25] <asac> hi
[10:25] <asac> stefanlsd: yeah ;)
[10:26] <asac> fta: Jazzva: pong ;)
[10:26] <stefanlsd> asac: cool.  I compiled gears again without libpng and libjpeg and checked console, as well as error console. nothing on either of them...
[10:27] <asac> stefanlsd: ok. do you have a bzr branch for that?
[10:27] <stefanlsd> asac: as far as the linking, did you have something like this in mind - http://paste.ubuntu.com/175698/
[10:29] <asac> stefanlsd: yeah. did that work?
[10:29] <stefanlsd> asac: yeah. works :)
[10:29] <stefanlsd> we dropped our big patch...
[10:29] <asac> fantastic ;)
[10:30] <asac> stefanlsd: could you mind making a bzr branch out of the packaging?
[10:30] <asac> s/could/would/g
[10:31] <stefanlsd> asac: yeah, do have one.. https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~stefanlsd/+junk/gears
[10:32] <stefanlsd> merging between myself and rail
[10:33] <asac> stefanlsd: note that you dont use the right email for committing ;)
[10:33] <asac>  Stefan Lesicnik <stefan@lsd>   10 minutes ago
[10:33] <asac> great
[10:33] <stefanlsd> asac: ack. (reinstalled, thanks will fix)
[10:34] <asac> are you or rail ubuntu-dev?
[10:36] <stefanlsd> mm. not sure... i am uuc (ubuntu member)...
[10:36] <stefanlsd> actually, got my motu application on the 28th :)   https://wiki.ubuntu.com/stefanlsd/MOTUApplication
[10:47] <stefanlsd> asac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/176287/   is the README.google for libpng and libjpeg.    cant really see why it wouldn't work...
[10:47] <asac> stefanlsd: trying get-orig-source ... wonder if it would be better to only get the stuff we want instead of getting everything and remving
[10:49] <asac> stefanlsd: do you have the tarball uploaded somewhere - maybe PPA? wifi isnt that great here ;)
[10:50] <asac> ok i got your ppa
[10:50] <asac> let me check
[10:50] <stefanlsd> you can wget http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/revu1-incoming/gears-0905172124/gears_0.5.21.0~svn3334+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
[10:50] <asac> thx
[10:51] <stefanlsd> the only change from there is the new change of deleting third_party/libjpeg/config.log
[10:51] <stefanlsd> brb. meeting
[10:58] <fta2> asac, hi, how's spain?
[11:03] <asac> quite great so far
[11:03] <asac> we are in a remote area though ... till sat when we move to city centre
[11:05] <fta2> asac, oh? you're not in the Rey Juan Carlos?
[11:05] <fta2> it's still far from the center though, about 5km
[11:07] <asac> fta2: no wait a sec
[11:07] <asac> http://www.principal-hayley.com/venues-and-hotels/la-mola
[11:08] <asac> LA MOLA, NEAR BARCELONA
[11:08] <asac> ;)
[11:08] <fta2> ;)
[11:08] <asac> thats a good way to say it
[11:08] <asac> here is _nothing_ but a golf course
[11:09] <asac> and they dont even have a cigarette machine anywhere in the proximity
[11:10] <asac> and next store to buy something is 18 EUR by taxi
[11:11] <asac> Jazzva: so the extension sync thing is basically blocked on the fact that there are very few extension .xpis that have a proper LICENSE file
[11:11] <asac> Jazzva: besides from that volans did some awesome work on scripts that would allow do run such a bot
[11:11] <asac> only thing missing is one main script that puts together the pieces
[11:14] <asac> fta2: when will you arrive? sat or sun?
[11:16] <asac> ok lets see what is going on with gears
[11:23] <asac> ok going to some session
[12:53] <fta2> asac, I arrive on sunday, ~14:20
[13:11] <Jazzva> asac: can we use the bot for extensions that include license file? can you point me to the place where the scripts are? i would like to try and finish the bot.
[14:36] <BUGabundo> hey asac !
[14:36] <BUGabundo> already at barça?
[14:48] <BUGabundo> fta2: ping
[14:49] <BUGabundo> fta2: http://www.blog.amrlima.info/images/CapturaEcra-Planet%20Ubuntu%20-%20Minefield.png
[14:49] <fta2> brb
[14:49] <BUGabundo> okay
[14:54] <BUGabundo> fta: back??
[15:13] <BUGabundo> fta2: hey
[15:13] <BUGabundo> fta2: http://www.blog.amrlima.info/images/CapturaEcra-Planet%20Ubuntu%20-%20Minefield.png
[15:13] <BUGabundo> no yellow on daily FF 3.5 and 3.6
[15:18] <fta2> yellow?
[15:19] <fta2> the search highlight is pink here
[15:24] <BUGabundo> i see it
[15:24] <BUGabundo> but no colour on the images
[15:30] <fta2> ?
[15:34] <BUGabundo> fta2: i've asked the user to come here
[15:34] <BUGabundo> lets see if he can
[15:35] <fta2> i'm at work, i don't have time to troubleshoot anything :P
[15:35] <BUGabundo> no worry
[15:35] <BUGabundo> prob he wont even show up
[16:30] <BUGabundo> amrlima: welcome!
[16:30] <BUGabundo> fta2: are u available now?
[16:35] <amrlima> BUGabundo: thanks, brb
[16:43] <amrlima> BUGabundo: back, crazy day at work
[16:51] <BUGabundo> i bet
[16:51] <BUGabundo> here is calm amrlima
[16:51] <BUGabundo> seem fta is having a busy day too, at the office
[16:51] <amrlima> ok, I'll be here for an hour more or so
[17:44] <asac> Jazzva: yes. let me check something.
[17:44] <Jazzva> no problem
[17:52] <asac> Jazzva: lp:~mozillateam/firefox-extensions/med-auto-scripts
[17:52] <Jazzva> asac: thanks, I'll check them out.
[17:52] <asac> Jazzva: wait for rev 5
[17:53] <asac> now there
[17:54] <stefanlsd> asac: is there a plan to get mozilla-devscripts into debian?
[18:18] <asac> stefanlsd: yes. i opened a ITP for that
[18:18] <asac> next is the upload ;)
[18:19] <stefanlsd> asac: that will be great :)
[19:07] <asac> ok dinner
[19:07] <fta> mozilla bug 492464
[19:08] <fta> "Update NSPR from NSPR_4_7_4_RTM to NSPR_4_8_BETA1."
[19:09] <fta> ok, dinner time too
[20:28] <dkg0> asac: i just got a segfault while running icedove under gdb!
[20:29] <dkg0> so i have a better stack trace.
[20:29] <dkg0> (though there are still a few ?? lines.
[20:31] <dkg0> the last valid function reference is:
[20:31] <dkg0> nsImapUrl::GetMsgFileSpec
[20:31] <dkg0>     at ../../../dist/include/xpcom/nsISupportsUtils.h:114
[22:46] <BUGabundo> holla UDSistas
[22:49] <fta> not yet
[22:52] <BUGabundo> humm
[22:52] <BUGabundo> was that for me, fta?
[22:53] <fta> yes
[22:53] <fta> UDS starts monday
[23:04] <asac> dkg0: you should definitly copy the backtrace somewhere so we can see the full thing
[23:05] <asac> dkg0: but from the line you pasted it looks like its probably some mail message that gets this problem
[23:05] <asac> dkg0: so identifiying the message that causes this might be a  good step
[23:05] <fta> asac, bug 378828
[23:05] <asac> ouch
[23:06] <fta> hurting us badly: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa
[23:06] <asac> yeah i can figure
[23:07] <asac> fta: i will (try to remember to) bug celso tomorrow moring
[23:07] <fta> thx
[23:08] <fta> i can work around it (sort of) by dropping my strict dep temporarily
[23:08] <asac> yeah ... or maybe do a one day offset for the moment
[23:08] <asac> like today require at least from yestreday
[23:09] <asac> though practically it probably wont make a big difference (until xul starts to fail for some reason)
[23:09] <fta> well, it means more code, and computing dates backward is a pain. dropping the dep is just 1 line in the conf file
[23:09] <asac> ack
[23:09] <mbana> did anyone get my message from yesterday about the differing in rendering?
[23:10] <mbana> i gave an image
[23:10] <asac> just remember to readd that once the bug is fixed
[23:10] <asac> mbana: font stuff? i think i looked at that, but couldnt see the difference ... you can see what fc-match Sans gives you ...
[23:12] <mbana> http://img211.imageshack.us/img211/7454/screenshotcio.png.  look at the bleeding
[23:12] <mbana> the fonts on the left are more blurry
[23:12] <mbana> a sign of red hint i think
[23:14] <asac> mbana: so what does that fc-match give you?
[23:14] <mbana> $ fc-match Sans
[23:14] <mbana> DejaVuSans.ttf: "DejaVu Sans" "Book"
[23:15] <mbana> the font used in each case is Tahoma not DejaVu
[23:16] <asac> mbana: you mean the html page rendering? or the chrome (menu)?
[23:16] <mbana> the font
[23:16] <mbana> on the wiki page
[23:17] <asac> mbana: what hinting type do you have in font appearence dialog?
[23:17] <asac> (gnome)
[23:18] <mbana> just hold on for second, do you see the difference?  and why do i even see different rendering?
[23:18] <mbana> can i also ask
[23:19] <mbana> is appearance system wide?    what bout .fonts.conf?
[23:19] <mbana> asac the default, i guess
[23:19] <asac> mbana: ffox 3.0 had bugs that made it ont properly honour fontconfig ... thats why its different
[23:20] <asac> 3.5 is usually right. could be that you have a different hinting type in the gnome appearence dialog
[23:20] <mbana> but in this case, FF 3.0 is doing it right
[23:21] <mbana> the one of the left is showing redness on the outlines of the fonts ... ?  unless i got really bad eye sight
[23:21] <mbana> shall i try this ... create a new temp account and take a snapshot of each one?
[23:22] <mbana> is the appearance system wide?
[23:23] <asac> gnome settings are per-user-account ... .fonts.conf is per user
[23:23] <asac> the rest is syste mwide
[23:24] <asac> mbana: "right" doesnt necessarily mean better ... e.g. if the config is not right its still right, but worse :)
[23:24] <asac> mbana: what kind of monitor are you using?
[23:25] <asac> mbana: so try to create  a new user account to rule out the per-user settings ... if that doesnt help, try to change the hinting in gnome appearence to see if that makes ffox 3.0 match what you see in ffox 3.5
[23:26] <asac> e.g. use slight/medium/full hinting
[23:26] <mbana> ok cool thanks
[23:26] <asac> red colors is either a wrong subpixel rendering (e.g. you use rgba on crt monitors)
[23:26] <asac> if thats not the case its usually too much hinting
[23:27] <asac> anyway ... i have to sleep ... just got a couple hours over the last few days ... today is ment to be recharging ;)
[23:27] <asac> cu tomorrow
[23:55] <mbana> bye