[00:33] hi [00:33] whats the difference between rtentry and fib_node? [00:45] or... whats the best way to manage routes: rt structures or fib frontend? === SEJeff is now known as SEJeff_home [08:10] is there any documentation on how to prepare a PPA for a custom flavor? [09:10] Surely you don't need to do anything to the PPA, just to the source package? [10:10] hi [10:11] is there a channel for low level questions? I want to find a way to limit the RAM usage of a single process. this will presumably require a kernel patch [10:30] where is /proc/config.gz on ubuntu? Is it somewhere else or just missing? [10:33] there is /boot/config-`uname -r` [10:35] makke: thanks [11:53] hmm ... tried to push my kernel packages up to PPA, and got this build error: EE: Missing modules (start begging for mercy) [11:53] but it compiles fine on my laptop... [11:53] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27010983/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-i386.linux_2.6.28-12.43_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [11:53] any ideas what i'm doing wrong? [16:21] Hi guys, I'm having a problem with a users bug, specifically bug 114010, and I was wondering instead of subscribing the Kernel Team, if someone would have a look at it, it's a bug in ppp, and this is part of the kernel now isn't it? [16:21] Malone bug 114010 in ppp "pppd logs incorrect traffic stats" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/114010 [16:26] xteejx: there is a kernel PPP driver [16:26] But pppd is a userspace program. [16:29] johanbr: ok, so it could just be pppd itself and not the driver? no worries, i got him doing a gdb backtrace anyway but thanks :) [16:30] xteejx: a backtrace of what, exactly? this isn't a crash after all [16:30] it looks like a simple overflow in pppd [16:31] im new to triaging you see and someone on IRC told me to get a backtrace from him [16:31] in this case, that's unlikely to be helpful [16:31] you can ask if the traffic statistics reported by ifconfig also overflow [16:31] if they do, it's a bug in the kernel [16:32] if they don't, it's a bug in pppd [16:32] ok i'll ask for that then thank you :) [16:32] you're welcome