[09:51] <LaPingvino> ping("Hello everybody");
[09:51] <LaPingvino> asac.ping("Nudge about language packaging; request for comment");
[11:20] <gnomefreak> asac: have you read the email from Freddy yet?
[12:05] <gnomefreak> asac: hope you had a nice trip
[12:34] <gnomefreak> 3.6 should not be named minefield but our build is named minefield
[12:35] <fta> 3.6 *is* minefield
[12:35] <gnomefreak> 3.5 is isnt it?
[12:35] <gnomefreak> one or the other should be changed
[12:35] <gnomefreak> they are both named minefield
[12:36] <fta> i know, it's a bug on my side
[12:36] <fta> in 3.5
[12:37] <gnomefreak> yeah i just opened 3.5 and it says Shiretoko but i guess .desktop has it as minefield but as long as you know :)
[12:38] <fta> we discussed that last week and it's not worth changing, 3.5 is nearly out
[12:39] <gnomefreak> makes sense
[12:41] <gnomefreak> The following packages will be REMOVED: abrowser abrowser-3.0-branding firefox-greasemonkey firefox-launchpad-plugin firefox-linky firefox-notify greasemonkey
[12:41] <gnomefreak> that cant be good
[12:42] <fta> indeed
[12:42] <gnomefreak> thats odd
[12:42] <gnomefreak> installing firefox-3.0-brnding gives the above output if you install firefox it does not remove all them just abrowser packages
[12:43] <gnomefreak> branding even
[12:43] <gnomefreak> it seems installing -branding only installs branding it doesnt install firefox
[12:44] <gnomefreak> im guessing that is the problem. branding should have firefox as a depend
[12:44] <fta> the other way around, firefox has the two branding things as dep
[12:44] <gnomefreak> Depends: firefox-3.0 (= 3.0.10+nobinonly-0ubuntu1)
[12:45] <gnomefreak> that should be firefox as well
[12:45] <gnomefreak> thats the -branding deps
[12:45] <gnomefreak> firefox-3.0 is not the same as firefox
[12:46] <gnomefreak> 3.0 is installed with or without abrowser but to use FF branding you have to install "firefox" not *-3.0
[12:49] <gnomefreak> The following packages will be REMOVED: abrowser abrowser-3.0-branding
[12:49] <gnomefreak> The following NEW packages will be installed: firefox firefox-3.0-branding
[12:49] <gnomefreak> thats installing firefox package
[12:49] <fta> good
[12:50] <gnomefreak> ok my fun/work/thinking is done for the day i have other things to get done for my meetings this week
[14:39] <fta> -rw-r--r-- 1 fta fta 381135135 2009-05-30 19:08 chromium-browser_3.0.183.0~svn20090530r17289.orig.tar.gz
[14:39] <fta> -rw-r--r-- 1 fta fta 227600363 2009-05-31 15:38 chromium-browser_3.0.183.0~svn20090531r17302.orig.tar.gz
[14:39] <fta> asac, ^^
[14:40] <fta> asac, it's a 40% win
[15:22] <nhandler> asac: ping
[18:24] <fta> asac, hm, http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=7094387
[19:07] <stefanlsd> fta: you packaging chromium?
[19:07] <fta> stefanlsd, yes
[19:07] <micahg> fta:
[19:07] <micahg> can you help me with a crash Q
[19:07] <fta> micahg, crash of what?
[19:07] <stefanlsd> fta: oh ok. did they do the same thing like gears... third_party directory with every third party lib source which they have modified to get it to compile?
[19:07] <micahg> firefox
[19:08] <fta> stefanlsd, yes, sort of
[19:08] <micahg> is a segfault crash useful or do they have to run something else
[19:08] <micahg> well
[19:08] <micahg> I actually know they should run something else
[19:08] <micahg> ok
[19:08] <micahg> let me start over (working without caffeine)
[19:09] <micahg> some attached a crash file
[19:09] <fta> micahg, a properly backtrace with resolved symbols is always nice to have
[19:09] <micahg> I extracted it
[19:09] <stefanlsd> fta: heh. yeah. gears source code is 300mb or so uncompressed (mostly 3rd party libs like gecko, gtk, sqlite.) heh.  was lots of work getting it to compile against system libs
[19:09] <micahg> I got all the files
[19:09] <fta> (it's dinner time for me, i have to go for a while)
[19:09] <micahg> but it
[19:09] <micahg> 's for FF2
[19:09] <micahg> and I don't have symbols for it
[19:10] <fta> micahg, ?? i don't understand. you're still using ff2?
[19:10] <micahg> no, user was
[19:10] <micahg> I'm just wondering if I should remove the .crash file and attach all the files that come out of it
[19:10] <micahg> -CoreDump
[19:11] <micahg> but I keep getting this
[19:11] <micahg> No symbol table info available.
[19:11] <micahg> I'm assumming since I don't have FF2
[19:11] <fta> stefanlsd, i don't want to strip those 3rd party libs. i just stripped some stuff used only on mac/win and gained quite a lot. I want to be able to build with or without system libs
[19:12] <jcastro> stefanlsd: thanks for packaging gears!
[19:12] <fta> micahg, hm, i still don't understand but I'm not much into bugs so maybe that's just me.
[19:12] <micahg> ah
[19:12] <micahg> jcastro: you into bugs?
[19:13] <fta> stefanlsd, chromium is supposed to have gears builtin
[19:13] <jcastro> micahg: not if I can help it. :p
[19:13] <stefanlsd> fta: i think we need to aim to build everything against system libs
[19:13] <micahg> hmmm
[19:13] <micahg> asac: you around?
[19:14] <fta> stefanlsd, yes but chromium is far from ready to do that. my initial patch to use 14 system libs has been lost during the transition to gyp.
[19:14] <fta> (it was committed upstream)
[19:14] <stefanlsd> jcastro: no problem. would be great to get it through revu.  few small issues we need to sort out :)
[19:15] <jcastro> yeah for some reason after installing it my prism gmail thing started launching the calendar instead
[19:15]  * jcastro is digging through the lp bugs
[19:15] <fta> oh, for once, my name is used: http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/05/hands-on-google-chromium-browser-alpha-for-linux.ars   neat :)
[19:16]  * jcastro hugs fta 
[19:16] <jcastro> I am so tired I can barely type
[19:18] <stefanlsd> fta: nice :)
[19:18] <fta> jcastro, :) I just had a 1h20min flight so i'm ok, i just lost a lot of time in airports, trains and buses
[19:20] <jcastro> heh
[19:28] <fta> -rw-r--r-- 1 fta fta 227585328 2009-05-31 19:07 chromium-browser_3.0.183.0~svn20090531r17302.orig.tar.gz (with bz2 inside)
[19:28] <fta> -rw-r--r-- 1 fta fta 197049960 2009-05-31 20:26 chromium-browser_3.0.183.0~svn20090531r17302.orig.tar.gz (with 7z inside)
[19:28] <fta> better than the 381M tarball from yesterday
[22:09] <Jazzva> nhandler: yay. we got license and settings dir changes accepted upstream :) http://foxyproxy.mozdev.org/drupal/content/foxyproxy-license
[22:15] <nhandler> Jazzva: That is good news. I'm still waiting for a few other devs to include a proper license for some other extensions
[22:18] <Jazzva> nhandler: seems like we'll have to wait a bit more... look at #ubuntu-motu channel
[22:37] <fta> BUGabundo, spilled water? ;)
[22:38] <BUGabundo1> I moved a bottle thinking it was closed
[23:31] <fta> Selecting previously deselected package greasemonkey.
[23:31] <fta> Unpacking greasemonkey (from .../greasemonkey_0.8.20090123.1-0ubuntu1_all.deb) ...
[23:31] <fta> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/greasemonkey_0.8.20090123.1-0ubuntu1_all.deb (--unpack):
[23:31] <fta>  trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions/{e4a8a97b-f2ed-450b-b12d-ee082ba24781}', which is also in package firefox-greasemonkey
[23:31] <fta> Preparing to replace firefox-greasemonkey 0.8.20080119.0-0ubuntu2 (using .../firefox-greasemonkey_0.8.20090123.1-0ubuntu1_all.deb) ...
[23:31] <fta> Unpacking replacement firefox-greasemonkey ...
[23:31] <fta> ...
[23:31] <fta> Errors were encountered while processing:
[23:31] <fta>  /var/cache/apt/archives/greasemonkey_0.8.20090123.1-0ubuntu1_all.deb
[23:31] <fta> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)