[00:00] asac: It is still getting rejected [00:01] nhandler: well. check the checksum of the tarbal you downloaded and compare with the checksum of the tarball referenced in the changes [00:06] asac, when a blueprint is empty, could i copy the content of gobby to the whiteboard? or should i let the bp leader do that? [00:07] asac: It looks like the checksums match. Strange thing is, I wasn't even uploading the .orig.tar.gz the first few times (no -sa). I just tried uploading it, and it still failed [00:10] fta: what do you mean with "leader" ? [00:11] asac, no idea, someone else ;) [00:11] fta: is it your blueprint? [00:11] then just do it [00:11] nope [00:11] it's the multiarch session [00:12] i would think you should leave it to the drafter to do that [00:12] ok [00:12] ask him what he prefers if you want to help [00:13] fta: it's entirely possible that openarena is simply doing Bad Things, but checking its source is fairly low on my priority list :/ [00:13] ok [01:05] off ... cu tomorrow [02:01] asac: fta: nvm me! I installed BetterCache Addon and forgot about it... sorry for the noise! === kbrosnan_ is now known as kbrosnan === asac_ is now known as asac [09:47] debian bug 531348 [09:47] Debian bug 531348 in xulrunner "Please compile xulrunner with PGO optimizations" [Wishlist,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/531348 [09:48] asac, you're working on that now? [09:48] asac, have a look at the i586 gobby document [09:49] fta: hmm. what do you mean? gobby document on pgo? [09:49] no [09:49] guud morning fta asac [09:50] morning [09:53] hey BUGabundo [09:53] asac: did you read what I say last night? [09:54] I figured out what was the prob [09:54] better cache addon [09:54] hey reed__ [09:55] sigh ... apturl mail thread now on mail discuss [09:55] devel-discuss [09:56] eheh [09:56] I have an hugeeee backlog [09:56] like 100 emails [09:57] 1352 [09:57] authc! [09:57] without lists [09:57] ahhh [09:57] I was just saying -devel and -devel-discuss [09:57] 85k total unread [09:57] zillions then [09:58] asac, http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/chromium-browser-licensecheck3.txt [10:22] fta: are those all files? [10:23] http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/chromium-browser-licensecheck.txt [10:23] or http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/chromium-browser-licensecheck2.txt [10:23] ah ok. so only the problematic ones are 3.txt [10:24] only those not whitelisted / identified [10:24] yeah [10:24] http://paste.ubuntu.com/186053/ [10:27] mozilla bug 495648 [10:27] Mozilla bug 495648 in XUL "Incorrect itemCount and scrolling of listboxes with XUL templates for RDF datasources" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495648 [10:27] Between the two that's probably enough to justify a stop-ship on 3.0.11, and [10:27] there are likely other addons affected. [12:52] getting 503 service unavailable on identi.ca [13:20] asac: should i change the maintainer of adblock-plus to MOTU or mozilla-team? [13:28] bdrung: isnt it motu atm? [13:29] bdrung: did the bzr mv of the .OTHER files work? [13:29] asac: no, its "Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT) " [13:29] bdrung: yeah. so use what the other firefox-extension branches have [13:29] asac: yes, it works. [13:29] i think its MOTU [13:29] and the release branch is in ~ubuntu-dev which means MOTU [13:30] bdrung: ok cool. lets hope bzr understood now that the upstream files should be taken in future [13:32] * asac lunch time [13:35] asac: https://code.launchpad.net/~bdrung/firefox-extensions/adblock-plus.ubuntu [13:35] asac: ready for release [13:46] asac: debian/rules get-orig-source will only work, if you merge my upstream branch [15:10] bug 365067 [15:10] Launchpad bug 365067 in adblock-plus "1.0.2 released" [Wishlist,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/365067 [15:55] hi YokoZar [15:56] hey [15:56] let me check if i can find the jemalloc bug with PGO [15:57] mozilla bug 418866 [15:57] Mozilla bug 418866 in Build Config "turn on profile-guided optimization (pgo) on linux" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418866 [15:57] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418866#c36 [15:58] YokoZar: so to get started check if https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Building_with_Profile-Guided_Optimization works now with gcc 4.4 [15:59] maybe with https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=372234 [15:59] asac: I can't tell if GCC 4.3 was even tested on that bug report [15:59] if that works well, we can look into making xulrunner pgo'ed [15:59] YokoZar: yeah. but the commen suggest that gcc might allow to enable pgo for jemalloc [15:59] comment [16:00] feel free to test it with gcc 4.3 [16:01] to enable jemalloc PGO you probably need to backout the https://bug418866.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=305385 [16:01] patch [16:02] at best start with trunk: hg clone http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/ [16:02] install build-deps of xulrunner-1.9.2 and firefox-3.6 from the daily archive [16:03] asac: actually a later comment indicates that we need to only try this with 4.4 and an extra flag [16:04] YokoZar: yeah. that flag is the patch i gave you above afaict. https://bug418866.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=372234 [16:04] that one also backs out the disabling in jemalloc [16:04] so just apply that to trunk [16:06] asac: will do. Need to make a karmic install on this machine, so this will likely take a few hours to test properly :0 [16:09] YokoZar: isnt gcc 4.4 available in jaunty? [16:09] thought doko had made it available there too [16:09] asac: not by default...(apt-cache shows empty)...maybe it's in a ppa or something [16:10] ah ok [17:02] fta: damn ... hg got removed from my install during dist-upgrade [17:02] requires python < 2.6 [17:03] off for getting some food stocks ... bbl [17:17] asac: thanks for uploading [17:18] asac: can you merge the upstream branch too? https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/adblock-plus.upstream [17:18] https://code.launchpad.net/~bdrung/firefox-extensions/adblock-plus.upstream [18:02] bdrung: we dont need an upstream branch [18:03] thats what the default.conf is about [18:03] i will dump it [18:03] (btw, i had to adjust the upstream revision ... you referred to the revision before the last commit to upstream) [18:03] ups [18:03] its to hot here [18:04] no problem. maybe look at the --show-ids log [18:04] and check that you understand how to pick the revision ;) [18:06] but i guess you just forgot to bump it after adding a last commit [18:07] asac: the get-orig-source needs to be adjusted. [18:07] how should it be changed? [18:07] bdrung: to do what? [18:08] bdrung: what does get-orig-source do? [18:08] doesnt that produce a tarball [18:08] ? [18:08] oh ... yeah [18:08] i think we can remove it entirely to be honest [18:09] as it just does what bzr bd does automatically if default.conf is right [18:15] hey, is there any chance to get prism 0.9 for Jaunty from some PPA? [18:20] kklimonda: we have prism dailies in ~ubuntu-mozilla-daily ppa [18:21] https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa [18:24] asac: oh, thanks - I was afraid that it will upgrade xulrunner and firefox to unstable version but it doesn't seem to be a problem. [18:28] kklimonda: yes. if oyu run ffox 3.0 you wont get dailies from there [18:28] only 3.5 and 3.6 are tracked there [19:06] fta: did you try the AT+C... magic locally now? or have you checked changing auth to PAP from CHAP? [19:06] locally == in home network [21:19] guud evening [21:22] Hey BUGabundo [21:23] hey nhandler [21:23] What are you up to today? [21:27] nothing much [21:27] a movie, catching up on mails [21:27] busy last few days [21:28] and I expect it to continue all week [21:28] and Saturday aint looking any slower [21:28] FLOSS Class in the morning, ANSOL (FLOSS National Association) elections after lunch, and twitter/µblog dinner [21:29] Man, and I thought I was busy [21:30] this is just Saturday... eehh [21:39] asac: i found the mistake i made. i copied the parent-id instead of revision-id. ;) [22:05] bdrung: right ;) [22:05] thats what i fixed [22:09] asac, you're working on pgo? or is that someone else? [22:10] * BUGabundo rises eyebrow .... [22:10] PGO ?? woot [22:10] that's going to make a few ppl happy [22:12] BUGabundo, well, don't hold your breath on that, it's not trivial [22:13] I know [22:13] I've read a bit on it [22:13] and all the trouble for gentoo [22:14] asac: please merge this branch again: https://code.launchpad.net/~bdrung/firefox-extensions/adblock-plus.ubuntu [22:17] bdrung: huh? [22:17] bdrung: whats the change? i already fixed the default.conf in the ~ubuntu-dev [22:18] fta: YokoZar wanted to do some pre evaluation now. so i wont directly jump the gun for the moment [22:18] asac: the get-orig-source removement. (only merge, not release) [22:19] bdrung: hmm. usually you should use topic branch names. in that way you dont need to override your old branches, but just mark them as "merged" [22:19] https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~bdrung/firefox-extensions/adblock-plus.ubuntu [22:19] asac: it might take me all day to play with this so please give it a shot anyway ;) [22:19] the branch is still "updating" ;) [22:19] YokoZar: i have no time for the next few days [22:20] ;) [22:20] asac: the updating needs very long. [22:22] BTW, 3.5 is showing up in the menu as Minefield still [22:23] yes [22:23] thats a bug ;) [22:23] but desnt matter much ... we will switch to official branding soonish. though i am not so sure we should do that in daily [22:23] I don't remember if I filed it or not [22:23] micahg: i thought someone filed a bug ;) [22:24] but its not open against ffox 3.5 at least ;) [22:24] oh wrong url [22:24] one sec [22:24] nope dont seems to be abug [22:25] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5 [22:25] micahg: how about closing all old crashes ;)? [22:25] at least those that dont have dupes [22:25] I was gonna talk to you about that [22:25] old in 3,5? [22:27] old is everything that was filed before b4 [22:27] Just for FF3.5, right? [22:27] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bugs?field.tag=apport-crash [22:27] yeah [22:27] ok [22:27] also, what do I do if a .crash file is attached, but I can't retrace it or I get no debugging symbols when retracing [22:28] I'll work on that when I get home tonight [22:30] micahg: crash files shouldnt be really attached. user should have used apport-collect i guess [22:30] anyway. if a crash doesnt properly retrace its just invalid [22:30] yeah, but if they are, I'm assuming that I should remove it and retrace myself? [22:30] or can I tag it and have LP do it? [22:30] you can ask the user to retrace locally, but most likely he will not have more luck [22:31] micahg: dont think so. [22:31] ok [22:31] micahg: maybe you can run apport-collect on your own [22:31] after downloading [22:31] ah, ok [22:31] one of the ones I was looking at before was from FF2 [22:31] micahg: ff2 is eol ... just set to wontfix [22:32] ok [22:32] and reassign to "firefox" package which was firefox 2 [22:32] should I remove the .crash file or change to private? [22:59] micahg: for wontfix and invalid remove crash file and unset private [23:18] thanks asac