[00:00] <nhandler> asac: It is still getting rejected
[00:01] <asac> nhandler: well. check the checksum of the tarbal you downloaded and compare with the checksum of the tarball referenced in the changes
[00:06] <fta> asac, when a blueprint is empty, could i copy the content of gobby to the whiteboard? or should i let the bp leader do that?
[00:07] <nhandler> asac: It looks like the checksums match. Strange thing is, I wasn't even uploading the .orig.tar.gz the first few times (no -sa). I just tried uploading it, and it still failed
[00:10] <asac> fta: what do you mean with "leader" ?
[00:11] <fta> asac, no idea, someone else ;)
[00:11] <asac> fta: is it your blueprint?
[00:11] <asac> then just do it
[00:11] <fta> nope
[00:11] <fta> it's the multiarch session
[00:12] <asac> i would think you should leave it to the drafter to do that
[00:12] <fta> ok
[00:12] <asac> ask him what he prefers if you want to help
[00:13] <dtchen> fta: it's entirely possible that openarena is simply doing Bad Things, but checking its source is fairly low on my priority list :/
[00:13] <fta> ok
[01:05] <asac> off ... cu tomorrow
[02:01] <BUGabundo> asac: fta: nvm me! I installed BetterCache Addon and forgot about it... sorry for the noise!
[09:47] <asac> debian bug 531348
[09:48] <fta> asac, you're working on that now?
[09:48] <fta> asac, have a look at the i586 gobby document
[09:49] <asac> fta: hmm. what do you mean? gobby document on pgo?
[09:49] <fta> no
[09:49] <BUGabundo> guud morning fta asac
[09:50] <fta> morning
[09:53] <asac> hey BUGabundo
[09:53] <BUGabundo> asac: did you read what I say last night?
[09:54] <BUGabundo> I figured out what was the prob
[09:54] <BUGabundo> better cache addon
[09:54] <BUGabundo> hey reed__
[09:55] <asac> sigh ... apturl mail thread now on mail discuss
[09:55] <asac> devel-discuss
[09:56] <BUGabundo> eheh
[09:56] <BUGabundo> I have an hugeeee backlog
[09:56] <BUGabundo> like 100 emails
[09:57] <fta> 1352
[09:57] <BUGabundo> authc!
[09:57] <fta> without lists
[09:57] <BUGabundo> ahhh
[09:57] <BUGabundo> I was just saying -devel and -devel-discuss
[09:57] <BUGabundo> 85k total unread
[09:57] <fta> zillions then
[09:58] <fta> asac, http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/chromium-browser-licensecheck3.txt
[10:22] <asac> fta: are those all files?
[10:23] <fta> http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/chromium-browser-licensecheck.txt
[10:23] <fta> or http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/chromium-browser-licensecheck2.txt
[10:23] <asac> ah ok. so only the problematic ones are 3.txt
[10:24] <fta> only those not whitelisted / identified
[10:24] <asac> yeah
[10:24] <fta> http://paste.ubuntu.com/186053/
[10:27] <asac> mozilla bug 495648
[10:27] <asac> Between the two that's probably enough to justify a stop-ship on 3.0.11, and
[10:27] <asac> there are likely other addons affected.
[12:52] <asac> getting 503 service unavailable on identi.ca
[13:20] <bdrung> asac: should i change the maintainer of adblock-plus to MOTU or mozilla-team?
[13:28] <asac> bdrung: isnt it motu atm?
[13:29] <asac> bdrung: did the bzr mv of the .OTHER files work?
[13:29] <bdrung> asac: no, its "Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT) <rainct@ubuntu.com>"
[13:29] <asac> bdrung: yeah. so use what the other firefox-extension branches have
[13:29] <bdrung> asac: yes, it works.
[13:29] <asac> i think its MOTU
[13:29] <asac> and the release branch is in ~ubuntu-dev which means MOTU
[13:30] <asac> bdrung: ok cool. lets hope bzr understood now that the upstream files should be taken in future
[13:32]  * asac lunch time
[13:35] <bdrung> asac: https://code.launchpad.net/~bdrung/firefox-extensions/adblock-plus.ubuntu
[13:35] <bdrung> asac: ready for release
[13:46] <bdrung> asac: debian/rules get-orig-source will only work, if you merge my upstream branch
[15:10] <asac> bug 365067
[15:55] <asac> hi YokoZar
[15:56] <YokoZar> hey
[15:56] <asac> let me check if i can find the jemalloc bug with PGO
[15:57] <asac> mozilla bug 418866
[15:57] <asac> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418866#c36
[15:58] <asac> YokoZar: so to get started check if https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Building_with_Profile-Guided_Optimization works now with gcc 4.4
[15:59] <asac> maybe with https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=372234
[15:59] <YokoZar> asac: I can't tell if GCC 4.3 was even tested on that bug report
[15:59] <asac> if that works well, we can look into making xulrunner pgo'ed
[15:59] <asac> YokoZar: yeah. but the commen suggest that gcc might allow to enable pgo for jemalloc
[15:59] <asac> comment
[16:00] <asac> feel free to test it with gcc 4.3
[16:01] <asac> to enable jemalloc PGO you probably need to backout the https://bug418866.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=305385
[16:01] <asac> patch
[16:02] <asac> at best start with trunk: hg clone http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/
[16:02] <asac> install build-deps of xulrunner-1.9.2 and firefox-3.6 from the daily archive
[16:03] <YokoZar> asac: actually a later comment indicates that we need to only try this with 4.4 and an extra flag
[16:04] <asac> YokoZar: yeah. that flag is the patch i gave you above afaict. https://bug418866.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=372234
[16:04] <asac> that one also backs out the disabling in jemalloc
[16:04] <asac> so just apply that to trunk
[16:06] <YokoZar> asac: will do.  Need to make a karmic install on this machine, so this will likely take a few hours to test properly :0
[16:09] <asac> YokoZar: isnt gcc 4.4 available in jaunty?
[16:09] <asac> thought doko had made it available there too
[16:09] <YokoZar> asac: not by default...(apt-cache shows empty)...maybe it's in a ppa or something
[16:10] <asac> ah ok
[17:02] <asac> fta: damn ... hg got removed from my install during dist-upgrade
[17:02] <asac> requires python < 2.6
[17:03] <asac> off for getting some food stocks ... bbl
[17:17] <bdrung> asac: thanks for uploading
[17:18] <bdrung> asac: can you merge the upstream branch too? https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/adblock-plus.upstream
[17:18] <bdrung> https://code.launchpad.net/~bdrung/firefox-extensions/adblock-plus.upstream
[18:02] <asac> bdrung: we dont need an upstream branch
[18:03] <asac> thats what the default.conf is about
[18:03] <asac> i will dump it
[18:03] <asac> (btw, i had to adjust the upstream revision ... you referred to the revision before the last commit to upstream)
[18:03] <bdrung> ups
[18:03] <bdrung> its to hot here
[18:04] <asac> no problem. maybe look at the --show-ids log
[18:04] <asac> and check that you understand how to pick the revision ;)
[18:06] <asac> but i guess you just forgot to bump it after adding a last commit
[18:07] <bdrung> asac: the get-orig-source needs to be adjusted.
[18:07] <bdrung> how should it be changed?
[18:07] <asac> bdrung: to do what?
[18:08] <asac> bdrung: what does get-orig-source do?
[18:08] <asac> doesnt that produce a tarball
[18:08] <asac> ?
[18:08] <asac> oh ... yeah
[18:08] <asac> i think we can remove it entirely to be honest
[18:09] <asac> as it just does what bzr bd does automatically if default.conf is right
[18:15] <kklimonda> hey, is there any chance to get prism 0.9 for Jaunty from some PPA?
[18:20] <asac> kklimonda: we have prism dailies in ~ubuntu-mozilla-daily ppa
[18:21] <asac> https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa
[18:24] <kklimonda> asac: oh, thanks - I was afraid that it will upgrade xulrunner and firefox to unstable version but it doesn't seem to be a problem.
[18:28] <asac> kklimonda: yes. if oyu run ffox 3.0 you wont get dailies from there
[18:28] <asac> only 3.5 and 3.6 are tracked there
[19:06] <asac> fta: did you try the AT+C... magic locally now? or have you checked changing auth to PAP from CHAP?
[19:06] <asac> locally == in home network
[21:19] <BUGabundo> guud evening
[21:22] <nhandler> Hey BUGabundo
[21:23] <BUGabundo> hey nhandler
[21:23] <nhandler> What are you up to today?
[21:27] <BUGabundo> nothing much
[21:27] <BUGabundo> a movie, catching up on mails
[21:27] <BUGabundo> busy last few days
[21:28] <BUGabundo> and I expect it to continue all week
[21:28] <BUGabundo> and Saturday aint looking any slower
[21:28] <BUGabundo> FLOSS Class in the morning, ANSOL (FLOSS National Association) elections after lunch, and twitter/µblog dinner
[21:29] <nhandler> Man, and I thought I was busy
[21:30] <BUGabundo> this is just Saturday... eehh
[21:39] <bdrung> asac: i found the mistake i made. i copied the parent-id instead of revision-id. ;)
[22:05] <asac> bdrung: right ;)
[22:05] <asac> thats what i fixed
[22:09] <fta> asac, you're working on pgo? or is that someone else?
[22:10]  * BUGabundo rises eyebrow ....
[22:10] <BUGabundo> PGO ?? woot
[22:10] <BUGabundo> that's going to make a few ppl happy
[22:12] <fta> BUGabundo, well, don't hold your breath on that, it's not trivial
[22:13] <BUGabundo> I know
[22:13] <BUGabundo> I've read a bit on it
[22:13] <BUGabundo> and all the trouble for gentoo
[22:14] <bdrung> asac: please merge this branch again: https://code.launchpad.net/~bdrung/firefox-extensions/adblock-plus.ubuntu
[22:17] <asac> bdrung: huh?
[22:17] <asac> bdrung: whats the change? i already fixed the default.conf in the ~ubuntu-dev
[22:18] <asac> fta: YokoZar wanted to do some pre evaluation now. so i wont directly jump the gun for the moment
[22:18] <bdrung> asac: the get-orig-source removement. (only merge, not release)
[22:19] <asac> bdrung: hmm. usually you should use topic branch names. in that way you dont need to override your old branches, but just mark them as "merged"
[22:19] <asac> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~bdrung/firefox-extensions/adblock-plus.ubuntu
[22:19] <YokoZar> asac: it might take me all day to play with this so please give it a shot anyway ;)
[22:19] <asac> the branch is still "updating" ;)
[22:19] <asac> YokoZar: i have no time for the next few days
[22:20] <asac> ;)
[22:20] <bdrung> asac: the updating needs very long.
[22:22] <micahg> BTW, 3.5 is showing up in the menu as Minefield still
[22:23] <asac> yes
[22:23] <asac> thats a bug ;)
[22:23] <asac> but desnt matter much ... we will switch to official branding soonish. though i am not so sure we should do that in daily
[22:23] <micahg> I don't remember if I filed it or  not
[22:23] <asac> micahg: i thought someone filed a bug ;)
[22:24] <asac> but its not open against ffox 3.5 at least ;)
[22:24] <asac> oh wrong url
[22:24] <asac> one sec
[22:24] <asac> nope dont seems to be  abug
[22:25] <asac> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5
[22:25] <asac> micahg: how about closing all old crashes ;)?
[22:25] <asac> at least those that dont have dupes
[22:25] <micahg> I was gonna talk to you about that
[22:25] <micahg> old in 3,5?
[22:27] <asac> old is everything that was filed before b4
[22:27] <micahg> Just for FF3.5, right?
[22:27] <asac> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bugs?field.tag=apport-crash
[22:27] <asac> yeah
[22:27] <micahg> ok
[22:27] <micahg> also, what do I do if a .crash file is attached, but I can't retrace it or I get no debugging symbols when retracing
[22:28] <micahg> I'll work on that when I get home tonight
[22:30] <asac> micahg: crash files shouldnt be really attached. user should have used apport-collect i guess
[22:30] <asac> anyway. if a crash doesnt properly retrace its just invalid
[22:30] <micahg> yeah, but if they are, I'm assuming that I should remove it and retrace myself?
[22:30] <micahg> or can I tag it and have LP do it?
[22:30] <asac> you can ask the user to retrace locally, but most likely he will not have more luck
[22:31] <asac> micahg: dont think so.
[22:31] <micahg> ok
[22:31] <asac> micahg: maybe you can run apport-collect on your own
[22:31] <asac> after downloading
[22:31] <micahg> ah, ok
[22:31] <micahg> one of the ones I was looking at before was from FF2
[22:31] <asac> micahg: ff2 is eol ... just set to wontfix
[22:32] <micahg> ok
[22:32] <asac> and reassign to "firefox" package which was firefox 2
[22:32] <micahg> should I remove the .crash file or change to private?
[22:59] <asac> micahg: for wontfix and invalid remove crash file and unset private
[23:18] <micahg> thanks asac