/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/06/03/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

=== BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo
=== asac_ is now known as asac
=== reed__ is now known as [reed]
micahgany ideas on bug 382181?05:49
ubottuLaunchpad bug 382181 in firefox-3.0 "can't open wikipedia" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/38218105:49
asacfta: added the build system for hardy ;) ... lets hope this works smooth09:58
ftathanks09:58
asacfta: can you take a quick look if you see anything i missed?09:58
asac.hardy branch09:58
asacpushed it to security ppa now09:59
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-security/+archive/ppa09:59
asacstefanlsd: so did persia review gears licensing yet?10:00
stefanlsdasac: not yet. although i've been working with him on licensing review stuff and plan to do the review myself, moving it to dep5 - http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/10:01
stefanlsdasac: i have a big deadline for some stuff, so hopefully before or during the weekend i'll have that done...10:02
stefanlsdasac: managed to have a look at the libpng, libjpeg issue?10:02
asacstefanlsd: so persia definitly said that just BSD is wrong and you should post the full license in changelog10:02
asacstefanlsd: what do you mean by "do review yourself" ?10:02
ftaasac, so many commits? wasn't it in the debian/ dir in the 1st place?10:03
asacstefanlsd: no. i think what would work would be using the libpng from gecko and the libjpeg for gecko10:03
asacfta: i cherry picked all build-system related commits you had10:03
ftaoh10:03
asacthat was 5 or 610:03
asacmatching the amount of commits10:04
asacthe comments of the later landed ones didnt really read as if they were optional ;)10:04
asacfta: you think i picked too many?10:04
ftaoh, code.lp is giving you credits so i thought you redid everything manually, n-m10:04
asacwell. merge -c doesnt really remember what you merged10:05
asaconly full branch merges10:05
stefanlsdasac: im gonna redo the licensing myself, and then double check with persia10:05
asacmerge -c is basically a diff + patch + some conflict tracking10:05
asacstefanlsd: ok. let me know if you need anything.10:06
ftait does when you cherry pick with merge -r 125..12710:06
asaci am sure we can do further system lib refinements later10:06
asacfta: i think you will survive it ;)10:07
ftasure :)10:07
stefanlsdasac: kk. how do i link agaist gecko png and jpeg?10:07
asacfta: if this all blows up you probably dont want to be referencable anyway ;)10:07
ftalol10:07
asacstefanlsd: i would really think that system jpeg should work. you sure you tried just doing that?10:07
stefanlsdasac: mm. yeah. doesnt work without it10:09
stefanlsdasac: is probably not the end of the world either linking libpng and libjpeg. I will also just let security guys know that thats the case...10:09
asacright10:10
stefanlsdasac: cool. i'll have my license revision done by / on the weekend and will get persia to check.10:12
asacstefanlsd: thanks. let me know. do we have a bzr branch already? (sorry if i forgot)10:13
stefanlsdasac: yeah. im pulling from here - http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~rail/%2Bjunk/gears/10:14
* gnomefreak hates when packages i need are removed/heldback10:31
asacfta: argh ... they bumped sqlite requirement on 1.9.0 branch :(11:00
asacwithout a bug even11:00
asacfta: http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=all&branch=HEAD&branchtype=match&dir=&file=configure.in&filetype=match&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=2&date=explicit&mindate=2009-04-01&maxdate=2009-04-19&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot11:01
fta2asac, not even a bug number? :(11:23
asacyeah i found it though: mozilla bug 48871011:23
ubottuMozilla bug 488710 in Storage "Upgrade to sqlite 3.6.7 on the 1.9.0 branch" [Normal,Verified: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48871011:23
asaci backout the configure.in part for now ... lets see11:24
asaci am a bit scared about moving to system sqlite because there were a few hacks at some points in embedders wrt loading that lib11:24
asacfta2: anyway, hardy seems to have built ... maybe pocket copy the binaries to daily so we can see if the build system works?11:25
asacsigh i made the uds survey but seems i closed the tab at some point :(11:26
asacwhy doesnt ffox 3.6 ask me if i really want to close modified forms?11:26
fta2i'll wait for amd64, it's not done yet11:29
asack11:29
gnomefreakasac: firefox uses hunspell right11:30
* gnomefreak thinking no the more i think about it11:31
asacgnomefreak: it uses hunspell, yeah11:31
gnomefreakok thanks11:31
asac(still)11:31
asacfta2: all ppa archs built12:00
gnomefreakasac: upstream firegpg has the FireGPGCall dir. commenting the clean section in debian/rules fix the build failure but now when building it makes an empty FireGPGCall dir. can you give me an idea on a more stable fix for this. here is the rules file http://pastebin.mozilla.org/65494612:31
asacgnomefreak: what did change upstream?12:32
gnomefreakMOZ_XPI_BUILD_COMMAND = make -C FireGPGCall/; cp FireGPGCall/*.xpt FireGPGCall/*.so components/; sh build.sh  i guess i can set that to default again from XPI_TEMPLATE but would like a clean rule12:32
asacplease provide a diff of the too origs12:32
gnomefreakasac: i dont have the old one any more12:32
gnomefreakis there a way to get it out of PPA12:32
asacgnomefreak: grab it from archive12:32
gnomefreakasac: cant you never pushed it12:33
asacgnomefreak: yes, you can look for superseded builds12:33
gnomefreakk12:33
asacthere the orig should still be avail12:33
nhandlerasac: Could you please try and upload greasemonkey today for me? It is in lp:~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/greasemonkey.ubuntu12:33
asacnhandler: you could commit to ubuntu-dev but cant upload?12:34
nhandlerasac: I have the necessary permissions to upload, but I keep getting rejection emails12:34
asacnhandler: please paste the mail you get12:35
asacnhandler: please add a .bzr-builddeb/default.conf12:35
asaclook at adblock-plus branch12:35
asacyou can find the long revision id by running  bzr log -l --show-ids on the upstream branch12:36
asacerr, you can find the long revision id by running  bzr log -l1 --show-ids on the upstream branch12:36
gnomefreakonly way i found was to look at sucessful builds and there is no source just normal info https://edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/+archive/ppa/+build/77384712:37
gnomefreakone moment12:37
asacnhandler: are you on karmic?12:39
nhandlerasac: No, jaunty12:39
nhandlerasac: For the bzr log command, I thought we weren't using .upstream branches anymore, only .ubuntu.12:40
asacnhandler: yeah. so what happens is that it doesnt find the right tarball because its only in karmic12:41
asachow do you produce the tarball?12:41
nhandlerasac: I tried downloading the one used in karmic using pull-lp-source12:42
asacnhandler: we have upstream branches. they are just inside the .ubuntu branch12:42
asacnhandler: if you look at bzr log you see the revisions merged in12:42
asacif you use that revision (e.g. 1.1.1) you will  get the upstream branch12:42
asace.g. bzr branch -r 1.1.1 greasemonkey.ubuntu upstream12:42
asacwill produce the upstream branch12:42
asacanyway. i will fix it now.12:43
asacalso adding .bzr-builddeb12:43
asaclook at bzr log --show-ids to see how to find the upstream revision i add there now12:43
nhandlerThanks asac. What is the .bzr-builddeb/default.conf for? Just to make it easier to build the package using bzr bd ?12:44
asacnhandler: if you use that it will automatically produce the orig.tar.gz from the branch. yes12:46
asacbut you still have to take care that you got the right orig if its already in the archive12:47
asaci think for that we would need to do "merge upstream" instead12:47
asachave to experiment a bit before migrating bzr branches there12:47
asacnhandler: let me know if it failed again :)12:49
asacpushed12:49
asacnhandler: seems it got accepted ;)12:50
nhandlerThanks a lot asac. I'll take a look at the changes you made regarding bzr bd12:50
nhandler:)12:50
asaccool12:50
nhandlerasac: Also, what is our current process for sending our extensions upstream to Debian?12:54
asacnhandler: we dont have a real process. if debian extension exists we should suggest them to use our approach. first i have to upload mozilla-devscripts though.12:54
nhandlerasac: Should we go through mentors, the Debian VCS, or some other area?12:56
gnomefreakasac: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/654950 trying to get more info out of it12:56
* nhandler wants to get his long-url-please extension added upstream12:56
asacnhandler: i will upload mozilla-devscripts12:58
asacnhandler: for packages that exist in debian we should file bugs12:58
asacfor new packages we should consider to maintain our packages in debian and sync them to ubuntu12:59
gnomefreakasac: the best diff you could ask for :) http://getfiregpg.org/news.html13:01
gnomefreakthey dont explain much do they13:03
asacgnomefreak: no ... make a diff locally using diff command13:03
gnomefreakasac: i gave you that output13:03
gnomefreakgnomefreak > asac: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/654950  trying to get more info out of it13:04
asacgnomefreak: make that recursively13:04
gnomefreakk13:05
asacdiff -ru dir1 dir213:05
gnomefreakok working on pastebin ing it13:07
* gnomefreak smoke while i wait. it seems to be huge13:08
asaclunch time ~1h13:08
asacgnomefreak: ^^13:08
asacso take your time ;)13:08
gnomefreakk13:08
gnomefreakdamnit way too big for pastebin, i am compressing it and emailing it i hope13:21
gnomefreakfta2: bug 373167 is the link refered to there needed to use mozilla-thunderbird as a trans. package?13:32
ubottuLaunchpad bug 373167 in mozilla-thunderbird "After installing Thunderbird, preferred applications shows both "Mozilla Thunderbird" and "Thunderbird"" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/37316713:32
gnomefreaki just commented on it. TBH i cant remember tbird anymore its been so damn long13:33
fta2no idea, i don't work on tb13:39
gnomefreakah ok13:39
fta2asac, did you ever use caff? (to sign keys)13:40
gnomefreaki will ping asa*c about it if i remember13:40
gnomefreakhes at lunch13:40
gnomefreakasac: incase im not here when you get back (have 2 meetings today) i emailed you the tar.gz of the diff due to the size.13:49
fta2asac, just signed your key, let me know if you receive the 4 emails14:24
asacfta2: so which caff command did you use?14:28
asacfor me the manpage was too much ;)14:28
fta2did it work?14:29
fta2asac, I added temporarily "default-cert-level 3" to my ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf (it's 0 by default), then created a ~/.caffrc with this in it: http://paste.ubuntu.com/187382/14:31
fta2then, just caff some_key14:32
fta2from the list14:32
asacfta2: ah. thought it would ask you for all keys in the special keyring14:35
asacsomehow14:35
asaci will finish my lunch cooking and then check emails14:36
ftadtchen, <crimsun@fungus.sh.nu>... Deferred: Connection refused by fungus.sh.nu.18:48
LaPingvinoasac ping, greetings for everybody else as well19:33
LaPingvinommm asac could have put an "away"-sign on his nick...19:35
asacLaPingvino: what up?19:36
LaPingvinojust a nudge about the language packs19:36
LaPingvinoand when are you normally available? I hate it to come here and to speak to walls at arrival... :S19:37
LaPingvinohow are you?19:37
LaPingvinooh and you won't see me most of the next two weeks as I will be in Brazil then ;)19:37
asacLaPingvino: usually here during european biz hours19:38
LaPingvinoah...19:39
asacbut if you stay online i will answer when coming back ;)19:39
LaPingvinoah I see :)19:39
LaPingvinowell that's all right then19:39
asacLaPingvino: what in particular about language packs?19:40
LaPingvinogot to updating the languages in firefox ubuntu?19:40
LaPingvinoyou asked me before to nudge you about that19:40
asacLaPingvino: ah didnt that happen yet?19:40
LaPingvinothat's where I ask about19:40
LaPingvinolemme check then19:41
asaci know that lang teams regular run langpack updates19:41
asacafaik i set everything up so that next time that happens all should be up to date19:41
LaPingvinogreat :)19:42
LaPingvinoI will run a check (firefox with clean profile) to see whether esperanto is in it yet19:42
asacseems there was no update yet.19:42
asacLaPingvino: langpacks will first land here: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-langpack/+archive/ppa19:42
LaPingvinoah great :)19:42
asacafter two weeks they go to -proposed19:42
asacand from there to -updates19:43
ftaasac, question..20:15
ftaasac, chromium needs a special version of mpeg for its <video> tag20:16
ftaasac, it's detected at runtime20:16
ftai can't use our system ffmpeg because it's not multi-threaded20:17
ftahttp://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/deps/third_party/ffmpeg/README.chromium?view=markup20:17
ftathe sources are not in my current tarball20:17
ftaso the question is, should i a/ get http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/deps/third_party/ffmpeg/ unpack & build that, or b/ fetch the git snapshots from the readme and bundle that in my tarball, or c/ create 2 new packages20:19
ftaasac, ^^20:19
jcastrofta: did you see their first cut at the bookmark manager landed today for chromium?20:50
ftahm, nope20:50
ftai saw the 1st part of the option dialog a few days ago20:50
jcastrohttp://codereview.chromium.org/11815020:51
jcastroyeah I saw that too20:51
ftalanded in r1748920:51
jcastrowhere can you tell that?20:52
ftaCommitted: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=1748920:52
jcastroah20:53
ftai have r1748520:53
ftadamn20:53
ftaclose20:53
jcastrofta: do you have your build script up someplace? I'd like to mess with it20:55
ftai'm still fighting with my quota in that ppa so i can't push anything faster20:55
BUGabundohi guys20:55
jcastrolame20:55
ftajcastro, build script?20:55
jcastrofta: what you use to push to that ppa20:55
jcastrofta: have you talked to celso about the quotas?20:56
ftajcastro, the bot maintaining all the dailies or the chromium thing?20:56
jcastrojust the chromium thing20:56
ftaeverything is in the branch20:56
jcastroah? cool.20:56
ftahttps://code.edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-team/chromium-browser/chromium-browser.head20:57
jcastrogot it20:58
ftagood luck :)20:58
jcastro:)20:59
ftaasac, well, i'll go for a/21:13
ftajcastro, bug 38129621:18
ubottuLaunchpad bug 381296 in soyuz "PPA max quota is too small" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/38129621:18
BUGabundooh its now a bug21:20
BUGabundoeheh21:20
BUGabundoso Answer as not enough21:21
stefanlsdasac: gears has a few files with header information such as - // Copyright 2006 Google Inc. All Rights Reserved. and no license information .persia says those are not shippable21:21
ftaBUGabundo, re-read the last answer21:21
ftastefanlsd, same in chromium21:21
stefanlsdfta: heh. great!  google sucks :)21:22
BUGabundostefanlsd: +121:23
asacstefanlsd: how about filing a bug upstream for those files?21:24
stefanlsdasac: will do. i did file one about the modifications they do to libaries a while ago. heard nothing. I dont think upstream is particulary concerned.21:25
asacstefanlsd: well. licensing should be easy enough to fix21:25
BUGabundoahah21:25
asacstefanlsd: if the top level license file explicitly states that everything is licensed that way it might be ok imo21:26
asacfta: yeah. sounds bad though. why cant we build multi threaded ffmpeg in system libs?21:26
ftaasac, it's a different branch of ffmpeg, a fark21:26
ftafork21:26
asacwho maintains that fork?21:28
asacwhere is that hosted? in the ffmpeg repositories?21:28
ftahttp://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/deps/third_party/ffmpeg/README.chromium?revision=1664821:28
ftaand google just provides this http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/deps/third_party/ffmpeg/  it's not part of the chromium source tree (i.e. not trunk/src)21:30
stefanlsdasac: structure looks like..             debian,  gears,  third_party.          gears/COPYING is the top level for gears. Problem here is third_party/npapi/nphostapi.h  (doesnt seem to have a top level - unless gears/COPYING would be (im quite sure the file is under the same bsd style license as the rest of gears, although it doesnt say explicitly)21:30
asacgitorious ... sigh21:33
asacfta: does chromium not support gstreamer?21:33
ftahm, i don't think so21:34
asacwould be much better than ffmpeg21:34
ftaasac, well, even mozilla didn't choose gstreamer. i remember a bug about that but they went with direct asound+vorbis21:44
BUGabundofta: the only way to run gwiber21:48
BUGabundo$ watch -n 10 gwibber21:48
asacfta: yeah. at least they didnt pull in a full ffmpeg ;)21:48
ftasort of, just packed21:49
ftaBUGabundo, fix it21:49
BUGabundofta: I know nothing about python21:49
ftaBUGabundo, neither do i21:50
LaPingvinoI do know at least a bit about it...21:50
BUGabundoand my last two segfault bugs are still to be triaged :\21:50
BUGabundohey LaPingvino21:50
BUGabundoou alias, olá LaPingvino21:50
LaPingvinohehe21:50
LaPingvinofaca oq quer ;)21:51
BUGabundos/faca/faça/21:51
LaPingvinonão tenho isso :(21:52
LaPingvinoã sim, mas essa c não21:52
LaPingvinotá bem?21:52
LaPingvinoeu sei muito bem que tenho que usar isso assim21:53
BUGabundono prob LaPingvino, I though you wouldn't ....21:54
LaPingvino:P21:54
LaPingvinoobrigado :)21:54
LaPingvinotudo bem a ca?21:55
BUGabundoLaPingvino: lets talk in English21:56
BUGabundodon't want to mess with ppl heads again21:56
LaPingvinoOkay :)21:56
BUGabundofeel free to open a PVT too21:57
ftajcastro, any success? ;)21:57
jcastrofta: still checking out, hahah21:58
jcastroridiculous21:58
ftayep, it's huge21:58
ftadoing me best to strip it down, but well, there's no magic21:58
fta-rw-r--r-- 1 fta fta 196883994 2009-06-03 22:59 chromium-browser_3.0.184.0~svn20090603r17528.orig.tar.gz22:00
ftait was 351 MB+ a few days ago22:00
ftajcastro, what do you want to try with chromium?22:12
ftabtw, what was that channel renaming thing about?22:12
* BUGabundo This channel is now know as #Ubuntu-browserteam22:14
BUGabundos/know/known22:14
ftaJun  3 22:11:19 cube sm-mta[16790]: STARTTLS=client, relay=master.debian.org., version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=FAIL, cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, bits=256/25622:18
ftai wonder if it's possible to find the debian cert somewhere22:18
jcastrofta: I wanted to try that browser stuff22:30
jcastroer, bookmark stuff I mean22:30
asacfta: checkout db.debian.org/machines.cgi22:31
asachttp://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=master22:31
ftajcastro, if i can finish that video tag thing today, i'll bump the ppa manually22:31
jcastrocool22:31
asachmm. seems there is only ssh key on it22:32
jcastrowhat video tag thing, the ffmpeg-mt thing?22:32
ftayes22:32
ftato support <video> and <audio>, like in ff 3.5/3.622:32
jcastroneat22:32
asacfta: whats the idea? build a real lib package out of it?22:32
ftaasac, so far, no, i will build it along with chromium. i don't have a better option22:34
dtchenfta: WRT crimsun@fungus: domain was hijacked23:31
ftadtchen, ?23:31
dtchen13:48 #ubuntu-mozillateam: ( fta) dtchen, <crimsun@fungus.sh.nu>... Deferred: Connection refused by fungus.sh.nu.23:32
ftayes23:32
ftaand?23:32
dtchenfta: sh.nu was hijacked, and the original host (rightly) refuses to pay 300 euro/yr to regain it23:33
ftaoh, ok.23:33
ftajust got that after i signed your gpg key. i don't mind, it will stop bouncing eventually23:34
ftadtchen, ^^, you should remove/revoke that email from your key23:35
dtchenfta: done locally already23:35
ftayou're not alone to bounce. some @debian.org emails too. 451 Could not complete sender verify callout23:38
ftastrangely, not all23:38
ftadtchen, asac: you should sign too. do your part ;)23:40

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!