=== asac_ is now known as asac [13:14] isn't there supposed to be an ubuntu-meeting today? [13:20] Ok, so it seems that the meeting is for 21:00 UTC but the http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendar said something else. Can someone change it there? THe right time? [13:21] persia...do you have the rights to change that? Thanks... [13:22] pan1nx, I don't know. I'll check. [13:22] thanks persia [13:23] Hrm. I can't figure out who invited the calendar to that meeting :( [13:24] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Fridge/Calendar seems to indicate it's just an event in someone's calendar, and they invited the fridge. [13:24] Does anyone here remember setting up this invitation? [13:30] There's a meeting, but it's later today [13:30] It's 9pm UTC [13:32] Right, but the fridge is wrong, and that ought be fixed. The trick is determining who created the fridge entry. [13:40] oh man... [13:40] can't we delete the old entry and fire up a new one [13:42] The entry was fixed. Revisionist history is good for you :) [13:43] The meeting is at 21:00. The meeting has always been at 21:00. :) [13:53] persia I just placed the fridge to my sync calendar [13:53] persia: just for the record, how did you change it? [13:55] I didn't. One of the members of the team that maintains the fridge calendar changed it. [13:55] See -meeting for details [14:14] ok...master cody :D [15:41] new nokia tablet : Video about N900 and maemo5 http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?p=293687&posted=1#post293687 [21:10] hi there. anyone of you got mid 9.10 running in virtualbox? [21:12] v29a: yes [21:14] ian_brasil: did you configure anything specific? [21:14] i can get 8.10 to run flawlessly ... 9.10 wont start an xserver [21:15] virtualbox version is the current stable [21:22] you converted an .img right [21:22] vboxmanage convertdd ubuntu-9.04-beta-mid-lpia.img ubuntu-9.04-beta-mid-lpia.vdi [21:22] yes i did [21:24] i followed http://www.greenhughes.com/content/installing-ubuntu-mid-virtualbox ... worked for 8.10 but not for 9.10 [21:24] and then you installed to a hard drive [21:25] the image i used was http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-mid/daily-live/current/ [21:25] sounds like you got a bust x [21:26] why are you using current? [21:26] why not get the 9.04 release? [21:27] ? [21:27] Yeah. Using that which will become 9.10 is subject to the "When it breaks, you get to keep the pieces" rule. [21:27] well i did just find dl links for 8.10 and 9.10 ;-) [21:28] Right. UNR 9.04 can be found at http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/ [21:31] persia: i still cant seem to find links for the mid on that page .. [21:33] Sorry. I thought you were looking for UNR. MID is somewhere else. [21:34] http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/9.04/release/ [21:35] lol just found it too [21:35] thanks for your help [21:35] ill try it === ogra_ is now known as ogra [22:07] does anyone know about ui changes to ubuntu mid? [22:07] v29a, Which sort of UI changes? [22:07] doesnt look like they changed anything from 8.10 -> 9.04 [22:08] persia: well changes that make it more look like the screens there http://www.ubuntu.com/products/mobile [22:09] That's the interface the MID effort has been moving from, not towards. At this point, that page is pointlessly out of date. [22:09] ? [22:09] where are they moving towards then? [22:10] I'll probably get this updated more this weekend, but https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Specs/MobileMidKarmicUseMer [22:13] ok, so i should go for the mer project then? [22:16] v29a, Towards which goal? [22:16] well ... intended usage ;-) [22:17] i want a distribution to run a car pc with a touchscreen [22:17] 7-10" [22:20] OK. Does Ubuntu MID 9.04 not work for you? [22:20] it does [22:21] oh sorry ... i meant it is running [22:21] but the interface doesnt really look ready to use yet ... [22:21] Ah. You liked the interfaces from that web page better? [22:21] jep :) [22:22] i hoped they were integrated in a more recent version [22:23] No. Those were flash demos. The free flash players are only so-so. [22:23] And a flash demo is only so powerful when it comes to being the default interface to an OS. [22:25] ogra: How long does it take you to run --second-stage in qemu usually? [22:25] quite long [22:25] i dont get it yet ... so the version providing those screens does not really exist? or is it just too slow? [22:25] it sits at the configuring and unpacking stages andlessly, give it 10-15min [22:25] or even 20 [22:26] Oh great, thanks; I was wondering whether that was normal [22:26] v29a, It never really existed. [22:26] the bad thing is that you dont get any output [22:26] persia: i see .. [22:27] ogra: What's odd is that I get no disk activity during this time; I suspect something is very slow on arm and not expected to be slow in debootstrap [22:27] Perhaps some perl [22:27] yeah [22:27] how do you measure disk activity on an image ? :) [22:27] it might all happen in ram