[00:46] <yoasif> heya guys
[00:47] <yoasif> any idea how i can more effectively triage this bug? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/379221
[00:47] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 379221 in eog "Scrolling in a zoomed in image results in blocks" [Undecided,New]
[00:53] <bcurtiswx> yoasif: you are getting some good help upstream, plus apport collected most of the information you need to have in the report.  In fact, upstream has more info than the ubuntu bug.. I think its a good enough job to get the triaged mark.  Setting...
[00:54] <bcurtiswx> yoasif, does it fix itself or is it a permanent "block"
[00:54] <yoasif> bcurtiswx: sweet deal :)
[00:54] <yoasif> bcurtiswx: does not fix itself, maybe if i do a fullscreen or something
[00:54] <yoasif> one sec
[00:56] <yoasif> bcurtiswx: initiating a full screen makes it redraw and it comes up fine, when exiting fullscreen it looks good again, but doing an up/down scroll messes it up again
[00:57] <bcurtiswx> yoasif: gj, everythings set
[00:58] <yoasif> bcurtiswx: thanks :)
[00:58] <bcurtiswx> yw
[00:59] <yoasif> bcurtiswx: is low really a good idea -- it's a regression
[00:59] <yoasif> regressions are a nono, no?
[01:00] <bcurtiswx> yoasif: upstream can't reproduce it, at the moment
[01:01] <yoasif> bcurtiswx: any chance producing a screencast might help?
[01:01] <bcurtiswx> yoasif: screencasts always help :-)
[01:02] <yoasif> cool
[01:15] <yoasif> bcurtiswx: updated the bug with a screencast heh
[01:18] <bcurtiswx> hmm, doesn't want to load for me
[01:21] <bcurtiswx> ah, there we go
[01:21] <yoasif> bcurtiswx: unrelated question -- when there is a file playing in totem, and you open a new one in nautilus, what is supposed to happen?
[01:23] <bcurtiswx> nautilus is the file manager, totem is playing a movie.. im confused on your scenario here
[01:25] <yoasif> i opened a mp3 in totem... now i double click on a new movie/file in nautilus... totem is the file handler.... nothing happens -- is anything supposed to happen?
[01:25] <bcurtiswx> it should change to that
[01:25] <bcurtiswx> (just tested it)
[01:26] <yoasif> bcurtiswx: hehe doesn't for me
[02:20] <bcurtiswx> i686 = x86_64 ?
[02:20] <bcurtiswx> if not whats diff of i386 and i686 ?
[02:21] <jmarsden> i686 == newer CPUs from Intel with some extar instructions compared to the original 386.  Whether am i686 class CPu runs 64bit is a different thing entirely.
[02:21] <bcurtiswx> jmarsden: ty
[02:21] <jmarsden> No problem.  If you care about the details, try http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_P6_(microarchitecture)
[02:26] <jmarsden> For checking whether your CPU can run amd64 (64bit) instructions, you can do    egrep '^flags.*(vmx|svm)' /proc/cpuinfo
[02:26] <jmarsden> Oh, sorry that is for virtualization...
[02:27] <bcurtiswx> haha, i am just asking because of a bug
[02:27] <bcurtiswx> thx though
[02:28] <jmarsden> OK.  The one for 64bitness is the lm flag, btw
[02:58] <bcurtiswx> bug #384044 I am wondering who I should subscribe to this bug, as well as im thinking importance = high
[02:58] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 384044 in ubuntu "Ubuntu 9.04 live CD crashes on boot" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/384044
[03:02] <jmarsden> bcurtiswx: looks like the bug is highly specific to a very old CPU and chipset (does Jaunty even officially support running on an 850MHz Athlon?), so I'm not sure how important that would be... also so far only one person reported it -- if you can't confirm it yourself, I'd leave the importance alone until it becomes clearer how many people are affected by it.
[03:05] <bcurtiswx> jmarsden: ok.. idk what else i'd add to that to make it officially triaged
[03:06] <bcurtiswx> the wiki for debugging casper doesn't contain much, and i had the reporter do what it said... so should I mark as triaged and let the devs determine if its all still supported or not ?
[03:10] <jmarsden> I'm not sure... if it can't be duplicated... you can probably mark it triaged, but that's just a guess... confirming it would be more useful -- can you find a friend who has that class of motherboard in their garage ??
[03:11] <bcurtiswx> jmarsden: we do the best we can, with what were given.  Marking it triaged :) thx
[03:12] <jmarsden> No problem :)
[12:24] <bencrisford> You know the command sed -i 's/hell/hello/g' path/to/file
[12:24] <bencrisford> is there a way of doing it so it only edits one line
[12:25] <bencrisford> say i have a two line file like this:
[12:25] <bencrisford> Hell
[12:25] <bencrisford> Hello
[12:25] <bencrisford> hell
[12:25] <bencrisford> and I only want the first hell to be hello
[12:25] <bencrisford> how would I do that?
[12:26] <geser> make your regex more strict: sed -i 's/Hell$/Hello/g' path/to/file
[12:27] <bencrisford> I dont understand geser :/  what does the $ do?
[12:27] <geser> $ matches end of line
[12:27] <geser> ^ if you need the begin of line
[12:27] <bencrisford> How would I specify what line though?
[12:27] <geser> Hell$ will match any line ending in Hell
[12:28] <bencrisford> oh
[12:28] <bencrisford> well im editing a config file
[12:28] <bencrisford> and writing a script that does it automatically
[12:28] <bencrisford> but alot of the settings are yes/no
[12:28] <bencrisford> and im using that command, so im kinda stuck with the yes/no
[12:29] <bencrisford> because its changing every no and every yes atm
[12:31] <geser> can you show an example of what exactly you want to accomplish, it's often easier to tell a solution for a certain problem than a generic one (at least for me)
[12:32] <bencrisford> ok, sure, ill pastebin my code
[12:32] <bencrisford> and what im trying to edit
[12:33] <bencrisford> geser: http://pastebin.com/m13dce847
[12:34] <bencrisford> but in the .conf i am editing there is many bools
[12:34] <bencrisford> the one i want to edit with that snippet is line 77
[12:35] <geser> and the setting is "no_kill = yes" ?
[12:36] <bencrisford> no_kill = no
[12:37] <geser> why don't you simply look for a line starting with "no_kill = " (independent of the current value) and replace it with what you want?
[12:38] <geser> sed -i "s/^no_kill = .*$/no_kill = $NEW4/g' file
[12:38] <bencrisford> geser: Your're a genius!
[12:40] <bencrisford> thank you so much :)
[12:52] <bencrisford> geser: Is there a command to clear a file?
[12:52] <bencrisford> like a log
[12:55] <Hobbsee> rm?
[12:55] <Hobbsee> rm file && touch file?
[12:55] <Hobbsee> echo '' > file might work, too
[12:55]  * Hobbsee assumes that will behave as intended
[12:55] <bencrisford> so:
[12:55] <bencrisford> rm logfile.log && touch logfile.log?
[12:56] <geser> cat /dev/null > file
[12:56] <Hobbsee> hm, even echo > file works
[12:56] <geser> bencrisford: and don't forget to restart the application if it has that file open while you empty it that way
[12:57] <bencrisford> so what command am i running geser, Hobbsee?
[13:01] <geser> like you want, but be aware that if the app has still the file open while you rm it, it will still be able to write to the now deleted file
[13:28] <bencrisford> info pessulus
[13:28] <bencrisford> !info pessulus
[13:28] <ubot4> bencrisford: pessulus (source: pessulus): lockdown editor for GNOME. In component main, is optional. Version 2.26.0-0ubuntu1 (jaunty), package size 39 kB, installed size 1200 kB
[13:31] <bencrisford> !info
[13:31] <bencrisford> !info ubot4
[13:31] <ubot4> bencrisford: Package ubot4 does not exist in jaunty
[13:45] <bencrisford> !info inkscap
[13:45] <ubot4> bencrisford: Package inkscap does not exist in jaunty
[13:45] <bencrisford> !info inkscape
[13:45] <ubot4> bencrisford: inkscape (source: inkscape): vector-based drawing program. In component main, is optional. Version 0.46-5ubuntu4 (jaunty), package size 14108 kB, installed size 61288 kB
[13:46] <bencrisford> !info quassel
[13:46] <ubot4> bencrisford: quassel (source: quassel): KDE4/Qt based, IRC client. In component main, is optional. Version 0.4.1-0ubuntu3 (jaunty), package size 19125 kB, installed size 54804 kB
[14:44] <bencrisford> !info ninja
[14:44] <ubot4> bencrisford: ninja (source: ninja): Privilege escalation detection system for GNU\Linux. In component universe, is optional. Version 0.1.2-2 (jaunty), package size 16 kB, installed size 88 kB
[17:46] <yoasif> i think this should be tagged wishlist https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/384514
[17:46] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 384514 in ubuntu "What about a deamon warning the user when disk is full ?" [Undecided,New]
[17:52] <xteejx> Hey guys, just a quick question, I've tried to get a backtrace for gdesklets, and it keeps coming up with an error about python2.5 - bug 384550 (it's mine - I'm trying to get more info)
[17:52] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 384550 in gdesklets "[jaunty] gdesklets fails to start with Could not launch 'gDesklets'" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/384550
[18:01] <hggdh> looking
[18:01] <hggdh> xteejx, yes, it seems to be related to python 2.5
[18:02] <xteejx> hggdh, thanks :) is there any more info I can give?
[18:03] <hggdh> well, you could look at the source package, to see what are the pre-reqs
[18:04] <hggdh> looking for where python 2.5 is requested
[18:04] <hggdh> but, as far as I can see, from a triage point of view, it is done
[18:04] <hggdh> the programme is asking for a python that is not installed (and not listed as pre-req).
[18:05] <xteejx> the source stuff is a bit beyond my level at the mo heh
[18:05] <xteejx> I'm guessing debian/rules problem
[18:05] <BUGabundo> xteejx: eheh
[18:05] <hggdh> xteejx, if it helps any, I just installed it & run it
[18:05] <hggdh> successfully
[18:05] <xteejx> ??? how
[18:05] <BUGabundo> karmic ?
[18:05] <hggdh> for the record, I am running karmic
[18:06] <hggdh> heh
[18:06] <BUGabundo> how did I know lol
[18:06] <BUGabundo> :))
[18:06] <xteejx> I'm in Jaunty at the mo, Karmic is installed on my USB thumbdrive
[18:06] <BUGabundo> how are you guys ?
[18:06] <xteejx> not bad thanks BUG, you?
[18:06] <hggdh> hey BUGabundo boa noite
[18:07] <xteejx> good night?
[18:07] <BUGabundo> hggdh: boa tarde, sff
[18:07] <hggdh> xteejx, yes, good night. and BUGabundo answered good afternoon
[18:07] <xteejx> ahh, in english good night impies you are going hehe
[18:07] <xteejx> *implies
[18:08] <yoasif> i think this should be marked wishlist https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/384505
[18:08] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 384505 in evolution "More persistent calendar reminders" [Undecided,New]
[18:08] <hggdh> yes, but not in Portuguese
[18:08] <hggdh> yoasif, looking
[18:08] <xteejx> ahh i see :)
[18:09] <BUGabundo> hggdh: going where?
[18:09] <hggdh> er, what?
[18:09] <BUGabundo> xteejx: ^^^
[18:09] <xteejx> ?? I'm confused...
[18:09] <hscdude> hi
[18:10] <hggdh> oh, teej meant you say 'good night', in English, when you are going to bed/going home
[18:10] <hscdude> is it just me or did sopmething happened to ssl crtificate
[18:10] <xteejx> hggdh, who said my name was teej :P
[18:10] <hscdude> bugs.launchpad.net uses an invalid security certificate.     The certificate will not be valid until 05/08/2009 05:05 PM.
[18:10] <hggdh> yoasif, it would be good to know what version of Evo and Ubuntu we are talking about in the bug.
[18:10] <xteejx> take the s from https out or allow an exception in firefox
[18:11] <xteejx> hscdude, ^^
[18:11] <hscdude> xteejx: but why
[18:11] <hggdh> yoasif, but I tend to agree with you, sounds wishlist. But I will wait until we know the versions
[18:11] <yoasif> hggdh: cool
[18:11] <hscdude> someone failed at administrating that server or what
[18:11] <xteejx> hscdude, I assume you mean you cannot connect to the site?
[18:11] <hggdh> xteejx, your bug ;-)
[18:11] <hggdh> hscdude, let me check
[18:11] <hscdude> I mean the site uses invalid ssl crtificate, which should be fixed
[18:12] <xteejx> I'm not having any probs
[18:12] <hggdh> xteejx, are you connected to edge, or standard LP?
[18:12] <xteejx> standard
[18:13] <hscdude> any webmaster of that site here?
[18:14] <xteejx> try #launchpad
[18:14] <hscdude> guys do you also get this invalid cert?
[18:14] <xteejx> nope
[18:14] <xteejx> i got 08/05/09 to 09/05/10 on the certificate...
[18:14] <hggdh> hscdude, I just checked both LP and edge, both show certs that are still valid (expiring in July 2009)
[18:15] <hggdh> so I guess we are being load-balanced...
[18:15] <hscdude> hmm.. perhaps our wifi is being highjacked \o/  wtf
[18:15] <xteejx> hggdh, why is mine different :S
[18:15] <hggdh> brb
[18:15] <BUGabundo> hscdude: to me the cert looks good
[18:15] <BUGabundo> and signed by GoDady
[18:15] <BUGabundo> I wonder if YOUR cert cache is outdate
[18:15] <xteejx> BUGabundo, that's exactly what i can see
[18:15] <hscdude> BUGabundo: it was always working for me before
[18:15] <hscdude> BUGabundo: also, this cert is in the FUTURE (wtf)
[18:16] <xteejx> hscdude, have you done the usual clear cache, etc?
[18:16] <BUGabundo> mine says it expires in 2010
[18:16] <xteejx> yeah 9th May 2010 on mine
[18:16] <BUGabundo> ahh right
[18:16] <BUGabundo> 09/052009
[18:16] <BUGabundo> for the issue date
[18:16] <hscdude> yes I cleared cache
[18:16] <BUGabundo> maybe hscdude is reading it on Europe date format
[18:17] <xteejx> BUGabundo, 9th May 2009....its 7th June, I'm seeing the same thing, shouldnt be a problem
[18:17] <hscdude> of course I am
[18:17] <hscdude> USA  m/d/y date format is retarded
[18:17] <xteejx> I'm English, mine woul dbe messed up too if that was the case
[18:17] <xteejx> hscdude, agreed on that one hehe
[18:18] <hscdude> on a side note, someone should beat up the Open Office default time format, which uses m/d/y
[18:18] <BUGabundo> you can
[18:18] <BUGabundo> but there is nothing system wide to set it on gnome
[18:18] <BUGabundo> only kde
[18:18] <xteejx> doesnt it change with the en-gb set?
[18:18] <BUGabundo> there's a bug for that
[18:19] <xteejx> then again I hardly ever use OOo
[18:20] <BUGabundo> xteejx: here is one for you: make OOo calc use #,###.00 instead of #.###,00
[18:20] <xteejx> hscdude: nudge someone in #launchpad see if they know about the cert problem
[18:20] <hscdude> ohh!
[18:20] <hscdude> lol I found the problem.
[18:20] <xteejx> BUGabundo, I don't need to ###.## is GB standard :P
[18:20] <BUGabundo> xteejx: what prob? seems fine to me
[18:21] <BUGabundo> not in PT
[18:21] <hscdude> date
[18:21] <hscdude> Sat Jan  6 00:31:26 EET 1996
[18:21] <BUGabundo> we have .#,00
[18:21] <BUGabundo> Sun Jun  7 18:21:14 WEST 2009
[18:21] <hscdude> I was in middle of debugging  wakup using CMOS clock magic.  didnt corrected my clock yet lol. n/m
[18:21] <xteejx> BUGabundo, looks like the UK are different with another thing again, left hand drive cars, . not , lol
[18:22] <xteejx> hscdude, lol no worries we all make mistakes :)
[18:24] <xteejx> anyway guys I'm off so bye all :) and thanks hggdh for the help
[23:57] <hggdh> bcurtiswx, I see your issue was resolved ;-)
[23:58] <bcurtiswx> yes sir :-), thx for your help