/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/06/07/#ubuntu-motu.txt

RoAkSoAxheya guys... I want to package from scratch a program that contains a kernel module and and a user space daemon. When issuing dh_make, and selecting the type of package.. what should I select?00:24
jmarsdenRoAkSoAx: I suspect that whichever you pick you'll end up making a lot of changes to the resulting template files from dh_make -- mabe try both and use the one that looks closest to what you think you'll want?00:27
RoAkSoAxjmarsden, ok thanks :)00:28
directhexi suspect dh_make is 101% useless for this kind of package00:31
directhexyou want to look at a package which makes use of dkms, and rip off the contents of its debian/ folder00:31
RoAkSoAxok00:36
=== asac_ is now known as asac
=== SirDerigo is now known as Botderigo
=== Botderigo is now known as SirDerigo
=== ripps_ is now known as ripps
=== foxbuntu` is now known as foxbuntu
pythonichi, revu says Package is for "unstable" but only packages for "karmic" are currently accepted.09:24
jmarsdenpythonic: Did you upload a package to REVU that had "unstable" in the debian/changelog when it should have said "unstable"?  In the top line of the changelog file?09:26
pythonicright, it has unstable, should that be karmic (or whatever the next one is)?09:26
loic-mpythonic: unstable is for Debian, replace it with karmic and use a -0ubuntu1 version number09:27
loic-mpythonic: you just need need to edit that in the changelog (version + distribution)09:27
pythonicok, i have 0ubuntu1 version.. karmic is just the next release right? do i update the package when karmic is released to whatever the next release is?09:27
pythonic(if the package is not accepted before karmic releases)09:28
jmarsdenYes, as far as I know.09:29
pythonicok, thanks09:30
pythonici need to bump the version to 0ubuntu2 etc. for this right?09:30
loic-mnope09:33
pythonicoh, ok, when do i bump version numbers?09:34
loic-mas long as the package isn't accepted, you only get one entry in the changelog - 0ubuntu1 for new pkg not in Debian09:34
loic-mpythonic: it's different from Debian, where you document your changes and bump the version even when the package hasn't been accepted yet09:35
pythonici see.. i already have a package or two at 0ubuntu2. should i change those to 0ubuntu1?09:35
loic-mpythonic: once the package enter the repos, you bump the version number when you release a new version or modify the packaging09:35
loic-mpythonic: are they on REVU?09:36
pythonicyes09:36
loic-mThen AFAIK it should be 0ubuntu1 with only one changelog entry (you can regroup info from the two entries you have at the moment if it's relevant)09:36
pythonicok, thanks09:37
loic-myou're welcome09:40
pythonicok, fixed now09:52
=== mbamford` is now known as mbamford
=== kklimonda_ is now known as kklimonda
davideotapeHi guys :)11:34
davideotapeDoes anyone know how I can download the french source for https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iat when I'm on an english computer?11:35
directhexdavideotape, french source?11:38
davideotapedirecthex: Well, the french translation of that package11:39
davideotapeIf it helps, this is the bug I'm working on: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iat/+bug/37929011:39
ubottuLaunchpad bug 379290 in iat "typo in french description of iat" [Undecided,In progress]11:39
iuliandavideotape: apt-get source <pkg>11:46
davideotapeiulian: That gets me the source with the English translation, which doesn't' have the French description in it11:48
kklimondacould any MOTU sponsor bug 383109?11:48
ubottuLaunchpad bug 383109 in mercurial "Mercurial needs to be rebuilt for Python 2.6" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/38310911:48
davideotapekklimonda: Does that bug not need to be set to confirmed now you've provided a patch?11:50
kklimondadavideotape: good point.11:51
iuliandavideotape: That's odd.  I have no idea, sorry.  I couldn't find any translation in the source package.11:51
directhexthe description as in "apt-cache show" description?11:52
iuliandirecthex: Yea, it seems so, take a peek at the bug report.11:53
davideotapedirecthex: Yes, but the french description11:53
directhexright, i didn't think ubuntu used that11:56
directhexcheck rosetta?11:56
davideotapedirecthex: iat doesn't seem to use rosetta (ie. https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/iat) doesn't exist12:01
pochuonly packages in main do12:06
geserkklimonda: looking at your debdiff: how will this change fix the dependencies on python itself?12:06
kklimondageser: right now python 2.6 modules are installed in /usr/local/...12:07
davideotapepochu: I've found http://packages.debian.org/lenny/iat . What does debian use for it's translations?12:07
kklimondageser: because of that they aren't even installed in package.12:07
pochudavideotape: is it translated at all?12:08
geserkklimonda: the current python packaging helper know about that and move the files around, see http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27399626/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.mercurial_1.2.1-3_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz12:08
davideotapepochu: It must be, as the bug reporter ( https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iat ) says that they are using the french version12:08
kklimondageser: but not modules compiled into .so12:09
pochuoh12:09
geserah, I guess I begin to understand12:09
pochudavideotape: it's not the program that is translated, but the description :-)12:10
kklimondageser: copying build/lib.linux-i686-2.6/mercurial/base85.so -> /build/buildd/mercurial-1.2.1/debian/tmp/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/mercurial - they go here and then aren't in resulting package at all.12:10
geserright12:10
kklimondageser: and because of that /usr/bin/hg has python2.5 hardcoded as interpreter12:10
davideotapepochu: Okay. So where about are descriptions translated for ubuntu then?12:10
pochudavideotape: ddtp in Debian12:12
davideotapepochu: So that bug is one that would need to be fixed in debian, and passed downstream?12:12
pochudavideotape: you should check if the typo is in Debian, and if so, the answer is yes12:13
pochuI think there's something similar to ddtp in Ubuntu, but am not sure what it is12:13
davideotapepochu: Thanks, I'll go and have a look now :)12:15
geserkklimonda: thanks, uploaded (with one additional change)12:19
pochukklimonda: a FTBFS in Ubuntu that doesn't happen in Debian isn't a serious bug in Debian (re mercurial)12:25
kklimondapochu: heh, my bad - I though about it too late.12:26
pochuyou can still lower it :)12:28
DktrKranzpochu, at least for now :)=12:30
pochuDktrKranz: and hopefully not for a long time :-)12:30
* DktrKranz accepts bets12:30
mib_oujn9hi1hey can anyone help me create a simple meta package12:35
kklimondapochu: can I send an email with Severity: minor in first line and then comment? debian bts is really confusing sometimes.. ;)12:36
DktrKranzkklimonda, send one with severity bugnumber wishlist to control@bugs.debian.org instead12:36
pochuor use the 'bts' command :)12:37
kklimondayeah, it's much easier :)12:41
=== azeem_ is now known as azeem
goshawkhi13:45
goshawkthere is a problem with this package13:51
goshawkhttp://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/mercurial13:52
goshawki can't install on karmic13:52
goshawkdue to dependency error13:52
goshawkpython < 2.613:52
goshawkbut debian/control says : +Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ${python:Depends}, ucf (>= 2.0020),13:53
goshawk+ mercurial-common (= ${source:Version})13:53
cody-somervillegoshawk, Whats your question exactly?13:54
goshawkhave python been updated recently that a recompile of mercurial is needed?13:55
pochugoshawk: the fix has already been uploaded13:55
pochuwhat version of mercurial are you trying to install?13:55
goshawkmercurial (1.2.1-313:55
goshawkofficial from karmic13:56
goshawki'm in karmic13:56
pochugoshawk: 1.2.1-3ubuntu1 fixes it13:56
pochuso just wait until it appears in your mirror13:56
goshawkoki :)13:56
goshawkpochu: as long as you know, was it just a recompiling problem or a probem in the control or rules (i'm the one that filled the sync for that package, this is why i wanna know)13:58
goshawk*sync bug13:58
pochugoshawk: it needed some adjustements to build with 2.614:18
goshawkpochu: thx14:20
siretartFYI: I've just uploaded debian's mplayer uploaded to ubuntu14:45
aravindoohello everyone15:58
aravindooi am new. how do i join motu15:59
hyperair!motu16:02
ubottumotu is short for Masters of the Universe. The brave souls who maintain the packages in the Universe section of Ubuntu. See  http://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU16:02
Laneythere's a getting involved link in the topic16:02
aravindoothank for info guys16:04
hyperairhave fun16:09
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== funkyHat is now known as funkyBat
=== funkyBat is now known as funkyHat
thjcHi all, I am working on packaging a new library (gearbox) for ubuntu. The library uses cmake and produces a python extension, however doesnt use distutils17:25
thjcI am on good terms with the developers so can get changes made to the build system, what is the recommended way of dealing with python extensions with cmake?17:26
hyperairer. use their build system?17:27
hyperairactually the recommended way of dealing with python extensions is using distutils17:27
hyperairi suggest you drop by #debian-python and ask the guys there17:27
hyperairin OFTC, by the way17:27
thjcokay will do17:30
=== yoasif_ is now known as yoasif
=== lukjad007 is now known as channel
=== channel is now known as lukjad007
kklimondaWhen I'm updating package in ubuntu and, between time I have prepared debdiff and it was sponsored by developer, new version is released can I keep in changelog entry about previous one that didn't make it to ubuntu?19:56
kklimondaI keep changes in bzr repository so reverting it because update didn't happen is going to be pain in the ass.. ;)19:57
* LarstiQ would keep the changelog entries19:57
LarstiQbut I don't see how having it version controlled is making it _harder_19:58
kklimondano harder, just more work - i would have to revert a commit ;)20:00
LarstiQkklimonda: no?20:04
kklimondawhy not?20:06
ScottKkklimonda: No.  Debian/changelog should be the history of the package in the archive.20:07
ScottKYou needed revert, just merge the changes in and then re-edit your changelog.20:07
ScottKneeded/needn't.20:07
LarstiQScottK: which archive though?20:08
ScottKThe Ubuntu one (or Debian/Ubuntu in the case of packages we get from Debian and modify).20:08
* ScottK observes the Ubuntu is the distro we are working on here ....20:08
LarstiQScottK: the latter case is tricky20:09
ScottKLarstiQ: Not at all.  We have well established tools for the merge process.20:09
LarstiQnevermind20:09
ScottKOK.  Obviously we aren't communicating very well.20:09
ScottKIf you care to discuss it, it's fine with me.20:10
LarstiQScottK: you make a valid point, it's just that I'm not included20:10
LarstiQso I'll do the right thing and leave this channel, as I should have before20:11
LarstiQScottK: I'm fine with discussin it somewhere else20:11
ScottKLarstiQ: I certainly didn't intend to say anything that would cause you to leave.20:11
LarstiQScottK: no worries20:12
LarstiQScottK: would /query be ok with you?20:12
e-jatcan some one verify this : http://tinyurl.com/q6cm5l20:13
ScottKLarstiQ: If you really feel  it's needed.  OK.20:14
kklimondae-jat: link is broken20:14
e-jatyups .. proposed repo broken right ?20:15
kklimondano, the link to the post is broken20:15
ScottKYokoZar: I thought you'd be interested in http://ariya.blogspot.com/2009/06/how-to-get-spotify-running-on-opensuse.html20:20
YokoZarScottK: thanks20:21
ScottKno problem.20:21
LarstiQScottK: thanks, and cheers20:21
* LarstiQ goes back to #bzr20:21
c_korncan anyone explain me why this build fails? http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27625080/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-i386.vlc_1.0.0~rc3-1~ppa1~jaunty1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz20:34
sorenc_korn: Because libvlccore2 stopped provinding a unescape_URI function?20:36
c_kornsoren: so I just have to delete those two lines from the symbols file?20:39
sorenc_korn: Err...20:40
sorenc_korn: Not exactly.20:40
sorenc_korn: I mean.. Yes, that will make the build succeed again, but if something is actually using that symbol, you're screwed.20:41
c_korn(as I see the symbols have been removed upstream http://git.videolan.org/?p=vlc.git;a=commit;h=2341f8bbc23622d0d8b8a511b7cc745d20beb878 )20:41
sorenIf it was never used externally and only exported by accident or whatnot, you're probably fine.20:41
=== smarter_ is now known as smarter
pochucool - http://af.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idAFTRE5562332009060723:17
directhexpochu, sadly it sounds like the BNP have some seats too23:23
pochunot everything can be perfect...23:27

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!