[04:58]  * tonyyarusso giggles at a certain someone being called an idiot by other idiots - it's poetic
[04:59] <Flannel> !away > joshthecoder 
[07:29] <Myrtti> elky: @#ubuntu-fellas WTF?
[07:29] <Myrtti> *cough*
[07:29] <elky> Myrtti, that's where this weirdo has come from?
[07:30] <Myrtti> elky: that's what's on his /wii
[07:34] <elky> oh, /who the channel
[07:35] <Myrtti> I didn't get any replies
[07:35] <Myrtti> did they just put it to +s?
[07:35] <elky> * #ubuntu-fellas n=lt3410 AC828381.ipt.aol.com irc.freenode.net ZukaRasami H@ :0 chizuru maria yatomochi
[07:35] <elky> * #ubuntu-fellas n=dan unaffiliated/luthir irc.freenode.net luthir H@ :0 luthir
[07:35] <elky> * #ubuntu-fellas :End of /WHO list.
[07:35] <Myrtti> I guess the almighty GC hammer could be used on that channel?
[07:35] <Myrtti> or staff hammer alternatively
[07:36] <Myrtti> DOH
[07:37] <Myrtti> I didn't get any response on the /who because I did it on IRCnet
[07:37] <Myrtti> DOH
[07:37] <elky> nalioth, care to help us with #ubuntu-fellas and luthir, who is an ex of maco who keeps harrassing #ubuntu-women and recruiting assistance to do so.
[07:37]  * Myrtti joins #freenode for extra lulz
[07:40] <elky> hmm, is #facebook an official channel...
[07:42] <elky> i suspect that's where luthir's recruited zukarasami from. it's the only discussion channel that they seem to share
[07:43] <elky> zukarasami now goes by Gibraltr
[07:43] <Myrtti> apart from ##ZukaRasami
[07:43] <elky> yeah, which one assumes came after. he claims they've only just met
[07:53] <mneptok> ex of maco? not recent, i hope.
[07:54] <Myrtti> nope, not recent
[07:56] <mneptok> good good. time wounds all heels.
[07:56] <Myrtti> mneptok: he seems to have problems still
[07:56] <elky> mneptok, from a while ago, i believe. he came across her name in conjunction with something computery, and decided 'girls using linux, lolz'
[07:57] <Myrtti> [09:48] ~~~Gibraltr is now known as SpecopsElite342
[07:57] <elky> and the current obsession with harrassing came about
[07:57] <mneptok> then he should be bothering #ubuntu-girls
[07:57] <Myrtti> mneptok: shut up
[07:57] <elky> that should go to #ubuntu-women :P
[07:57] <mneptok> Myrtti: ?!
[07:58] <Myrtti> mneptok: that's exactly what he's doing.
[07:58] <Myrtti> recruiting idiots to come to #ubuntu-women
[07:58] <mneptok> oh, the channel actually exists with a redirect? that's precious.
[07:58] <Myrtti> actually, it doesn't...
[07:58] <Myrtti> hmmm
[07:58]  * mneptok sings "girl, you'l be a woman ... when lag catches up ..."
[07:59]  * Myrtti looks at elky
[08:00] <elky> mneptok, i know you're trying to be funny, but it's been a long week of stalkers and misogyny.
[08:03] <Myrtti> I lost my humour about all this sometime last Friday or so
[08:03] <Myrtti> and I've got my EMP set on "kill" instead of "stun"
[08:03] <elky> Myrtti, it's still nice to know that mumbai cybercrime unit is better than anything in the UK or .de
[08:04] <Myrtti> elky: true
[08:05] <mneptok> elky: you either laugh or cry. up to you. :/
[08:06] <elky> mneptok, not really.
[08:09] <Myrtti> [10:08]  * luthir is afk
[08:09] <Myrtti> BWAHAHA
[08:09]  * Myrtti gets her idiot stamp set
[08:11] <topyli> actually, #facebook's existence on freenode is interesting
[08:13] <topyli> it's advertised on the facebook development wiki as "used by those interested in development with the Facebook platform."
[08:16] <topyli> well why not? there is #launchpad too :)
[08:17] <elky> #launchpad is properly managed
[08:17] <elky> i'm pretty certain #facebook isnt
[08:21]  * Gary dances with Myrtti's pink feather
[08:22] <Myrtti> http://mysticalfairies.co.uk/shopimages/products/normal/WA_1624.jpg
[08:24] <Gary> mwhaha
[08:24] <Gary> nice pic Myrtti 
[08:48] <elky> whoa... what's happening in -offtopic?
[08:49] <topyli> aprilhare and hateball are about to leave for a month's holiday from there
[08:49] <topyli> that's what i think is happening
[08:51] <elky> a month's holiday from aprilhare's obsession?! WOOHOO!
[08:53] <Myrtti> someone must have mixed something in their morning porridge lately
[08:54] <Myrtti> it seems that even the regulars have gotten an absency of brain lately
[08:54] <topyli> not sure about aprilhare right now
[08:55] <topyli> he's the worse offender, but as it happens, he's very careful right now
[08:55] <elky> he's been extra careful since he got the repeated warnings about being clingy
[08:56] <elky> but seriously hateball's pedobear act wasnt nice at all.
[08:57] <topyli> yes well he often has sudden bursts of complete asshattery like that, then returns to near normalcy
[08:58] <topyli> not sure why it happens, i guess help is needed. i can't provide that help, so..
[09:04] <nalioth> is that anything like beaverhattery?
[09:12] <topyli> that might be contingent on the cultural surroundings
[09:12] <jussi01> nalioth: behave... :P
[09:12]  * nalioth has been being have  :P
[09:46] <elky> topyli...
[10:10] <topyli> yes elky?
[10:14] <elky> aprilhare was walking the line again
[10:14] <Myrtti> yup
[10:14] <Myrtti> still is
[10:25] <topyli> he takes up too much too many people's time
[10:26] <topyli> hi aprilhare
[10:26] <aprilhare> hello
[10:27] <aprilhare> * You have left channel #ubuntu-offtopic (requested by topyli: "enough. see you in a month or so")
[10:27] <topyli> i know
[10:27] <aprilhare> why
[10:28] <topyli> annoying most people, making some people uncomfortable, and wolfram spamming everybody
[10:28] <topyli> also, never learning when asked to behave
[10:29] <aprilhare> your comments are unhelpful. i don't spam anyone
[10:30] <topyli> i disagree
[10:30] <topyli> your wolfram ads are unsolicited and posted to a large group of people who haven't requested them
[10:31] <aprilhare> i don't care if you disagree. i think you have a agenda that involves dissing anyone who likes or mentions anything to do with wolfram alpha; probably some sort of anti-hype
[10:31] <aprilhare> no wolfram ad
[10:31] <aprilhare> no spam
[10:32] <elky> i thought i warned you yesterday...
[10:32] <topyli> aprilhare: i do disagree and i think you should care
[10:32] <aprilhare> elky: warned me? to do what? never mention wolfram alpha again? how about i never mention google again? or bing?
[10:32] <aprilhare> topyli: too bad
[10:33] <elky> aprilhare, i warned you that you sound like a spammer for wolfram
[10:33] <aprilhare> maybe next ppl will tell me not to breath
[10:33] <aprilhare> breathe even
[10:33] <topyli> aprilhare: you know very well that nobody fills the channel with google ads like you go on about wolfram
[10:33] <aprilhare> advertising for inhaling air
[10:33] <topyli> your sexual innuendo is another thing that doesn't amuse everyone
[10:33] <aprilhare> topyli: below the belt
[10:33] <topyli> which iirc we have discussed before
[10:34] <aprilhare> topyli: you are lousy and a bully
[10:34] <aprilhare> goodbye
[10:34] <topyli> bye
[10:34] <Myrtti> below the belt?
[10:35] <Myrtti> I really enjoyed the pedobear comic reference today
[10:35] <Myrtti> they must be on some drug that makes their brain take a leave and run in pain, leaving them to perform general asshattery
[10:38] <christel> topyli: you're a lousy bully :(
[10:39] <topyli> well, do the math, it must be so!
[10:39] <Flannel> I haven't paid attention to much of anything said in there, but a month on (as far as I know) a first time ban seems steep
[10:39] <topyli> it is long yes
[10:40] <Myrtti> how many times has he been kicked again?
[10:40] <Myrtti> or warned?
[10:40] <elky> Myrtti, warned, heaps. he usually flees before the kick
[10:40] <Myrtti> he really *SHOULD* know how to behave
[10:41] <elky> Myrtti, he does know how to behave. we just let him get away with it too long
[10:41] <Myrtti> exactly
[10:41] <topyli> iirc i've kicked him before, and we had a /query after that. that's what i was referring to up there
[10:42] <topyli> quite a while ago, and warnings aplently after (and before) that
[10:43] <topyli> @login
[10:43] <topyli> @btlogin
[10:47] <jpds> Back in #ubuntu now.
[10:49] <Myrtti> jpds: nothing wrong with that
[10:52] <Myrtti> aprilhare: hi
[10:52] <aprilhare> hey Myrtti
[10:52] <Myrtti> so whuzzup?
[10:53] <aprilhare> i blew my top a minute or two ago in here - topyli banned me and started on me - first mentioning the wolram, then lousy allegations of sexual innuendo
[10:53] <Myrtti> both quite valid points though
[10:54] <Myrtti> but do continue?
[10:54] <aprilhare> that's all i've got.
[10:54] <Myrtti> oh, ok.
[10:55] <aprilhare> he talked about a month or two ban - how long is is cause i won't be holding my breath before topyli ever unbans me
[10:55] <aprilhare> i think the second is a beatup
[10:55] <aprilhare> the second point
[10:56] <aprilhare> if he wants to desex me, he'll have a fight
[10:56] <topyli> the month is hardly set in stone, ban length usually depends on a few things
[10:57] <Myrtti> and usually the ban length isn't revised within the first 24hours of it
[10:57] <Myrtti> as that's usually the minimum lenght of the bans.
[10:57] <aprilhare> if this ban isn't cleared up today, i'll be off for a new home and you can chat among yourselves about it methinks
[10:57] <topyli> aprilhare: no intention to personally attack you, sorry if it looks like that. i did ban you and answered your question "why"
[10:59] <aprilhare> well its not a fair cop. people mention websites all the time. if its google, its google derived results; if its wikipedia, its wikipedia articles; why not wolfram alpha!
[10:59] <topyli> aprilhare: and that's precisely why 24 hours is a good first review time. some people are angry right after being banned, and won't say things that are likely to make things better :)
[10:59] <aprilhare> review it all you want
[10:59] <aprilhare> take it and make a PhD study
[11:00] <Myrtti> aprilhare: why the hostility? you seem to be "threatening" us with something, and giving the finger to the guidelines and common sense in the process?
[11:01] <aprilhare> the guidelines didn't include "don't mention wolfram alpha" like its fight club
[11:02] <elky> aprilhare, they do include 'if you're asked to stop, do so politely'
[11:02] <Myrtti> you don't seem to bring anything else to the conversation than wolfram alpha, and you've been told to stop it a few times if I recollect correctly
[11:03] <aprilhare> Myrtti: don't worry. i won't be bringing anything to any conversations!
[11:03] <aprilhare> maybe you could suck out my brain while you're at it
[11:03] <Myrtti> aprilhare: you're free to join any IRC channels you find appropriate and that suit your habits of IRC, of course.
[11:03] <elky> aprilhare, enough. stop. please desist.
[11:03] <Myrtti> you're not getting in #ubuntu-offtopic today, though
[11:04] <Myrtti> and you're not helping with getting there tomorrow, either
[11:04] <aprilhare> don't want to help
[11:04] <aprilhare> not my job
[11:04] <elky> aprilhare, then this isn not the channel for you
[11:05]  * Myrtti watches #ubuntu with intrest
[11:05] <Flannel> That was just odd.
[11:05] <popey> deliberate mis-interpretation of every single statement
[11:06] <Flannel> He needs someone to have an intervention with regard to wolfram, or something.
[11:07] <elky> aprilhare, nothing is going to be achieved until you've cooled down. come back tomorrow.
[11:08] <aprilhare> give me a minute if you will
[11:11] <aprilhare> now: I mention wolfram alpha a lot, it's true. but others mention it too in order to provoke a negative response. if this behaviour could be attenuated, i'll talk about wolfram alpha less as a matter of course. and it doesn't necessarily require bans. I'm *always* going to be interested in wolfram alpha. you can't ban it out of me! however, i'll bring more to conversations if it isn't a socially acceptable bait for trolling!
[11:11] <ikonia> aprilhare: what is wolfram ?
[11:12] <popey> ikonia: http://www.wolframalpha.com/
[11:12] <aprilhare> ikonia: wolfram|alpha a computational engine
[11:12] <ikonia> ok
[11:16] <aprilhare> elky, message received?
[11:19]  * aprilhare assumes so and wanders off, pm me if you want to resume this or indeed any other conversation
[11:23] <elky> that does not solve the innuendos
[11:41] <ikonia> @bansearch
[11:41] <ikonia> @bansearch cycrosism
[12:11] <elky> uh, guys...
[12:11] <elky> bacta's back...
[12:11] <bazhang> yep
[12:12] <bazhang> same old suggestions for naming 'M'
[12:12] <elky> yep
[12:12] <elky> did someone actually unban him?
[12:12] <elky> or did he just not get banned from -ot yet?
[12:12] <ikonia> he's banned from #u
[12:12] <bazhang> not banned in -ot afaik
[12:13] <elky> can someone say 'bacta, that looks awfully like baiting'
[12:14] <ikonia> patience........
[12:19] <elky> bazhang, nuke.
[12:19] <bazhang> elky, call topyli or someone who has +o in there
[12:20] <ikonia> I have it
[12:20] <Myrtti> I have it, I was just adjusting my hilights
[12:20] <Myrtti> anyone with mybrute will be caught next time
[12:20] <ikonia> what is mybrute ?
[12:21] <bazhang> a game
[12:21] <ikonia> is it bad ?
[12:21] <bazhang> just lame , afaik
[12:23] <Myrtti> referrer game of a sort
[12:31] <elky> why are we letting him continue?!
[12:31] <bazhang> no idea
[12:32] <elky> i would remove him, but he'd take it far more personally if i did
[12:32] <bazhang> ikonia, to the rescue!
[12:33] <elky> nah, he's dealt with ikonia before
[12:33] <ikonia> huh
[12:33] <elky> i'd say myrtti, but she doesnt deserve the pain. it's topyli time
[12:33] <ikonia> I'll deal with it now
[12:33] <ikonia> I'm watching
[12:38] <elky> whoa wait. what did netyire say?
[12:44] <elky> '[...] trying to find your ex [...] builds character'... is that what kids are being taught these days? no wonder we're having problems lately.
[12:45] <elky> can someone shut him up, please?
[12:47] <Myrtti> they've lost their brain
[12:51] <elky> tonyyarusso, stalking does not presume 'already found'. i've had friends who were stalked by proxy, with their friends and family under constant harrassment, as well as stuff like voicemail. however direct contact was not made, but it was still stalking.
[12:54] <elky> oh cripes. fujisan is back in town.
[13:02] <popey> ugh
[13:11] <ikonia> not in our channel = no problem
[13:16] <elky> ikonia, with fujisan, the keyword is 'yet'.
[13:20] <ikonia> +b = easy 
[13:20] <ikonia> he knows the drill - no need for warnings etc
[13:20] <elky> yeah
[13:20] <Seeker`> /abk = easier
[13:20] <ikonia> show off
[13:22] <Seeker`> :P
[16:10] <JanC> elky: which fujisan is that?  
[16:11] <Pici> shes asleep
[16:11] <popey> there is only one fujisan
[16:11] <popey> thank $DEITY
[16:11] <JanC> hm, I wonder if he is the same one who has a permban in #ubuntu-nl* ?
[16:12] <Pici> Probably
[16:12] <JanC> was he using the "FujiVickery" nick now?
[16:13] <JanC> a guy with that nick was in -nl-offtopic yesterday...
[16:13] <JanC> and fujisan has a permban in #ubuntu-nl*  ;)
[16:14] <JanC> so I'll keep an eye on that
[16:18] <Pici> Seeker`: Whats at the end of that url that was posted? I'm at work now and can't really check
[16:19] <Seeker`> a bad drawing of a naked person
[16:20] <Seeker`> am keeping an eye on him
[16:43] <Myrtti> hmmmm
[16:43] <Myrtti> who was sudobash again?
[16:43] <Myrtti> he's in #ubuntu
[16:43] <Pici> Someone annoying
[16:48] <Myrtti> just wondering about that forward from #ubunt to #sudobash or whatever earlier
[16:48] <Seeker`> @bansearch sudobash
[16:48] <Myrtti> oops
[16:49] <Pici> There are quite a few of them on the BT itself
[16:49] <Seeker`> hmm
[16:49] <Seeker`> don't see why the ban didn't keep them out though
[16:49] <Myrtti> oh, that's just a mark
[16:53] <Pici> Mamarok: happy birthday
[16:53] <Pici> :)
[16:54] <Mamarok> Pici:  thx :)
[17:08] <tsimpson> the bot should now show marks as "Mark: by <op> in <chan> on <date> (ID: <id>)", rather than "Match: ..."
[17:09] <Seeker`> @bansearch sudobash
[17:09] <tsimpson> you can get the comment with @comment 7100 (for example)
[17:09] <Seeker`> @comment 7100
[17:09] <Seeker`> cool
[17:09] <Seeker`> is it possible to get what it matched on 
[17:09] <Seeker`> so Mark: <host> by <op> ...
[17:11] <tsimpson> the mark is on the full host, unless the bot didn't know the host, then it's <nick>!*@*
[17:12] <tsimpson> the bot will check it's known users (users on channels it's in), then /whois, then /whowas. if all that fails it falls back to <nick>!*@*
[17:12] <Seeker`> is there a good reason for not including that information?
[17:13] <Seeker`> @bansearch fujisan
[17:13] <tsimpson> is there a use case?
[17:15] <Seeker`> for completeness?
[17:15] <tsimpson> actually the "Mark:..." will only show on the full host anyway
[17:15] <Seeker`> may give more information about what hosts someone has been seen from
[17:15] <Seeker`> why?
[17:15] <Pici> I like knowing something is a mark rather than a ban...
[17:15] <tsimpson> it only checks that '*' or '?' aren't in the banmask
[17:15] <Pici> In fact, I think I logged a bug about that
[17:15] <Seeker`> Pici: yeah, it is a useful feature
[17:17] <tsimpson> you can only bansearch when the user is online, or the user has a /whois/was entry, or if you specify the full host yourself
[17:17] <tsimpson> so you'll already know the host
[17:17] <Seeker`> @bansearch eth01
[17:30] <popey> Seeker`: he back?
[17:31] <Seeker`> no, just testing stuff
[17:31] <Seeker`> if i saw him in -uk, he wouldn't be there long
[17:35] <ikonia> yeah like !old is needed
[17:45] <Myrtti> graaaaahhhhhh I should have remembered BBC site crashes my browser :-CCCCCC
[17:52] <shadeslayer> hi strange thing
[17:53] <shadeslayer> when you try !alternate in #kubuntu it says something diff. from what you get in PM from ubottu
[17:53] <shadeslayer> could someone check it out??
[17:53] <Myrtti> !alternate
[17:53] <Myrtti> !alternate-#kubuntu
[17:53] <shadeslayer> Myrtti: see what i mean ?
[17:54] <Myrtti> yes, but where's the problem?
[17:54] <shadeslayer> Myrtti: the second factoid is out of date :)
[17:55] <Myrtti> ok, we'll look into it.
[17:55] <shadeslayer> thanks , and byw
[17:55] <shadeslayer> *bye
[18:02] <Myrtti> opinions?
[18:04] <Flannel> It is out of date.  Especially considering 8.04 isn't LTS for K
[18:04] <Myrtti> jussi01, genii, Tm_T? (Mamarok is probably partying, or *SHOULD* be)
[18:04] <Myrtti> Flannel: it isn't?
[18:04] <Myrtti> oh ok
[18:05] <Flannel> Myrtti: Nope.  Which actually means it'll be running out of support soon... whatever that actually means.
[18:06] <Flannel> Do we tend to have factoids for #k that are s/Ubuntu/Kubuntu/?
[18:06] <Flannel> that is, specialized/duplicated ones
[18:25] <Flannel> !away > goose 
[18:26] <Pici> . . . 
[18:26] <Flannel> heh
[18:28] <Pici> Flannel: see goose in #ubuntu
[18:30] <Flannel> Uh?
[18:31] <Flannel> Alright then.
[18:31] <Flannel> Full moon is still active I see!
[18:32] <Flannel> !away
[18:32] <Myrtti> shush
[18:32] <Myrtti> don't jinx it
[18:33] <Flannel> Nope, it doesn't offend your mother or anything.
[18:33] <Myrtti> don't jinx it!
[18:33] <Flannel> the !away factoid?
[18:33] <Flannel> is it going to start offending mothrs?
[18:33] <Myrtti> don't jinx the full moon on us
[18:34] <Myrtti> if the hell breaks loose in #ubuntu with idiots making a grande entry, I might end up short on my channels
[18:58]  * mneptok catches Wolfram Alpha discussion in scrool
[18:58] <Pici> stay in scrool
[18:59] <mneptok> http://www72.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Is+Wolfram+Alpha+sure+what+to+do+with+my+input%3F
[19:28] <Pici> that was odd
[19:29] <Seeker`> yes
[19:46] <Seeker`> gpryatel: how can we help you?
[19:47] <Myrtti> gpryatel: did you upgrade your router firmware already?
[19:47] <gpryatel> i'm still unable to join ubuntu; i updated my router's fw and changed port to 8001; even tried connecting from other network at work
[19:48] <gpryatel> ya, its the linksys  v 8, wireless g
[19:48] <gpryatel> i forget the model number
[19:48] <Myrtti> gpryatel: did you try the test me again?
[19:48] <gpryatel> ya it reconnected me & i still ended up back here
[19:48] <gpryatel> or shouldi exit filezilla ?
[19:48] <Myrtti> gpryatel: yeah, you need to try it again and again until it says you're ok to join
[19:49] <gpryatel> ok :)
[19:49] <Flannel> filezilla? or chatzilla?
[19:49] <gpryatel> er, chatzilla hehe
[20:37] <Pici> idiots
[20:38] <Pici> grr.... floodbots aren't working properly.
[21:17] <Myrtti> Jack_Sparrow: did you accidentally unban all web proxies in #ubuntu the other day?
[21:17] <Jack_Sparrow> NOt that I am aware of
[21:18] <Myrtti> thursday?
[21:18] <Jack_Sparrow> Again, not that I am aware of.
[21:19] <Myrtti> oh well...
[21:19] <Myrtti> according to the bantracker you did
[21:19] <Jack_Sparrow> There was a discussion about a mibbit user...
[21:19] <Myrtti> it broke the ban exception system and made it impossible for the floodbots to get rid of unwanted mibbit troublemakers
[21:21] <Jack_Sparrow> It must be the unban of a mibbit user via the xchat script.
[21:21] <jussi01> Jack_Sparrow: try to be a little careful with it, its really important that we dont break that system too much.
[21:22] <Jack_Sparrow> jussi01 I understand that.
[21:22] <Jack_Sparrow> I now need to check to see if they are mibbit beofre acting..
[21:22] <jussi01> Its a really good idea to learn to do it without the help of the script, no issues with using the script but if the script is borked...
[21:23] <Jack_Sparrow> jussi01 IT has taken how many months, years to run across this problem..
[21:23] <Jack_Sparrow> It was a mute and an unmute of a mibbit user that trigger the problkem
[21:24] <jussi01> Jack_Sparrow: regardless, you should by now know the system as that you can use it without a script
[21:24] <Jack_Sparrow> yep.
[21:30] <Seeker`> O.o
[22:25] <Ampelbein> hi there. the factoid !logs-#ubuntu-classroom has a double "see also !OpenWeek" at the end, i think this should be corrected.
[22:25] <Myrtti> !logs-#ubuntu-classroom
[22:25] <Ampelbein> yeah, that's what i mean.
[22:25] <Myrtti> !logs-#ubuntu-classroom ~/ - See also !OpenWeek//
[22:26] <Myrtti> !logs-#ubuntu-classroom ~= / - See also !OpenWeek//
[22:26] <Myrtti> !logs-#ubuntu-classroom
[22:26] <Ampelbein> ok, thanks Myrtti.
[22:26] <Myrtti> that's all wonky though
[22:26] <Ampelbein> now that you say it.
[22:27] <Myrtti> !logs-#ubuntu-classroom ~= /Channel logs can be found at Channel/Channel/
[22:27] <Myrtti> !logs-#ubuntu-classroom
[22:27] <Ampelbein> Myrtti: that looks better. didn't even notice the double beginning. thanks for changing that.
[22:29] <Ampelbein> Myrtti: it's me again. there is a factoid "open week" (with a space in it), which should be a alias for openweek
[22:33] <Flannel> !-open week
[23:38] <Seeker`> nalioth: mootbot hasn't returned yet
[23:40] <nalioth> Seeker`: i've noticed
[23:52] <elky> far out. could someone like back me up in -ot please.
[23:53] <J-_> Why am I getting in shit?
[23:53] <elky> J-_, because it's referrer spam.
[23:53] <elky> the aim of that site is to get people to spam and 'recruit'.
[23:54] <J-_> Oh please. You've pasted referrer spam before, too. That music game.
[23:54] <J-_> Same with other people.
[23:54] <elky> there's a million of referrer games out there. we dont want them.
[23:55] <elky> t61 isnt the same at all.
[23:55] <J-_> Sure it is.
[23:55] <elky> t61 is akin to last.fm
[23:56] <J-_> It's a referrer game. Recruit more people, make sure they type your name down so you get yet more points for pursuing.
[23:56] <J-_> Whatever you want to pursue.
[23:57] <J-_> I wasn't even obstructing anything when I pasted the URL twice. I didn't do it in a row. The other dude should have got in shit, not me.
[23:58] <J-_> Please make a rule of it.
[23:58] <J-_> Make even a factoid rather.
[23:58] <J-_> !o4o
[23:58] <elky> J-_, the other dude isnt a regular who'se seen it reprimanded before. you however, know better.
[23:59] <J-_> Does it say anything there about referrer games?
[23:59] <elky> no, but it does say about repetition.
[23:59] <jussi01> and particularly note: If you are asked to stop, do so politely
[23:59] <elky> that's all we need.