[06:40] macvr: Aye [06:41] dashua: now i forgot what i wnated to ask ! [06:42] dashua: btw way new doubt, how do i select inkscape colors from outside the program, like from the desktop? [06:42] Oh wow, it [06:42] 's been a while [06:43] Not an expert with inkscape. I've only dabbled with it [06:43] the color picker seems to work only within the page... :( [06:43] np... [06:44] dashua: i'll ask later when i remember the thought i had yday... :) [06:45] I've run into the same problem. I don't make icons just themes ;) [06:45] But I will usually use Gimp for that [06:46] thats what i do for ,now... find the color from gimp and copy it to inkscape :P [06:59] Goodnight macvr. Time for sleep. [07:00] goodnight :) === zniavre_ is now known as zniavre [09:37] anyone here? :P [09:38] does anyone know where I can find the mandriva logo? [09:38] in svg format that is [09:53] savvas: actually i think i'v killed this room :P ... ever since i'v been active things have died down ... and i dont know about the logo... [09:54] haha ok [11:00] hi people [11:54] bonjour SiDi [11:54] bonjour zniavre :) [11:55] whats up ? [11:55] nothing news ..."la routine" [12:37] hm.. is your gimp working after the last updates in jaunty? [12:43] savvas, i saw some imagemagick updates [12:43] gimp works fine here, afaics [12:43] ah ignore [12:44] there was an instance open [12:44] I had to: killall -9 -r gimp [12:44] :P [12:51] there can only be one === savvas_ is now known as savvas [16:31] macvr, can't agree with that ;) [16:31] knome: ? its alive? :P [16:32] macvr, not much, but it maybe never has been really active [16:32] so it's just normal [16:33] knome: atleast SiDi used to troll :P ... even he seems to have calmed down [16:33] lol [16:33] yes, but he was a newbie;) [16:33] still had the energy [16:33] to try activate the chan i mean ;) [16:34] haha.. [16:34] he used to troll a lot more in #xubuntu-devel also but he's calmed down there also [16:34] or not troll actually [16:34] just make noise [16:34] :o) [16:35] oh sir, you have a huge nose there [16:35] knome: i was kidding about the trolling ... just to lure him back in :P [16:35] macvr, i know;) [16:35] he gets irritated so easily [16:35] oh sir, you have a huge nose there??? me? [16:35] zniavre_, ;) [16:36] knome, you wants noize ? [16:36] i was little if the bit i said was already noise! [16:36] SiDi, always [16:36] he's back [16:36] me comez to helsinki then [16:36] and makez noize! [16:36] hehe [16:38] knome, you've never seen me on #ubuntu-fr [16:38] knome: is mma also away? [16:38] SiDi, hah:D [16:38] macvr, dunno [16:40] knome: SiDi: >>> http://imagebin.ca/popup/REVT0J.html <<< feedback? [16:40] macvr, i don [16:41] ...'t like drawn smilies [16:41] :( ... only ascii ones? [16:41] knome: but do u see anything wrong? [16:42] suppose not. [16:42] yes, i only like ascii ones :D [16:42] :) [16:47] knome: do u work with inkscape? [16:47] macvr, yes [16:47] how do i change the perspective? [16:48] macvr, "the perspective"? [16:48] s [16:48] from the effects menu [16:49] don't know [16:49] haven't used it [16:49] :( [16:49] and i'm on an eeepc now [16:49] can't even try [16:49] is inkscape generally slow? [16:49] and heavy on the resources? [16:49] heavy on GPU indeed [16:49] uh, hard to say. if you have lots of things, yes [16:50] it has caused 2 freezes and 1 crash! along with the ext4 they are causing havoc! [16:50] lol [16:51] why lol :( ...! [16:51] :P [16:51] funnily said [16:52] how do i use imagemaigck? [16:52] man imagemagick [16:52] damn! [16:52] i forgot that! [16:53] knome: is it command line or does it have a gui? [16:53] i have it installed but, dont see a menu item [16:53] cli [16:54] ok.. [16:54] inkscape is what you want to use to edit stuff even if it took all our resources ;) [16:54] *your [16:54] not ours [16:55] ^haha [16:55] knome: i dont like any cli things... i just found it in the packages and was wondering [16:55] hah [16:55] it can be useful sometimes [16:57] i just hate to enter commands ... :( ... so i hope i dont ever need to use it! [16:57] lol [16:57] ok [16:57] maybe you won't then [16:57] :) [18:02] http://www.getdropbox.com/gallery/187396/1/svg?h=a783bc can i hav critics with this icon test [18:02] ? [18:05] zniavre_: i think the one on the right is better... they are different aernt they? [18:05] what icon is it? [18:06] it reminds me of soulseek (?) [18:07] guys>>>> http://imagebin.ca/popup/T8v0EmS7.html ... http://imagebin.ca/popup/FQ6a4HM.html ... which is better? the difference is the mouth stroke.. [18:08] I like the last one ;p [18:10] me too , but was wondering if the fuzziness was a prob... [18:10] macvr, 2nd. however, make sure stroke width is never below 1px [18:11] thorwil: the stroke is not less than 1px in the big ones , but in the smaller ones its less... [18:15] thorwil: how do i use the perspective from the effects menu? [18:17] macvr, i virtually never use that, so i have no idea :) [18:18] * thorwil -> dinner [18:18] i think i'm the only crazy person who is interested in that! noone seems to use it... [20:23] macvr, thank you , yes it's soulseek icon [20:23] !info xorg [20:23] xorg (source: xorg): X.Org X Window System. In component main, is optional. Version 1:7.4~5ubuntu18 (jaunty), package size 1 kB, installed size 24 kB [22:55] hey [23:27] hey [23:27] ? [23:32] I had been suggesting on -devel a reform for usplash's theme [23:32] since we're all trying to aim for quick boot-ups, even on slower hardware, I think we should "decrease" the profile of the Usplash theme on Karmic [23:33] <_MMA_> Viper550: As they are looking to drop it altogether, I doubt they wanna spend *any* time on it. [23:33] I suggested we just switch to it being a small dark grey Ubuntu logo with a small throbber [23:34] doesn't sound so... possible [23:35] but they still said you'd need a feedback for fsck [23:36] <_MMA_> Viper550: Then the old-school text can pop up. I just know what I read on the lists. [23:37] <_MMA_> Some of the latest posts look very promising. Just some issues with initramfs. [23:37] * _MMA_ looks for link. [23:38] <_MMA_> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2009-June/028308.html [23:46] but on slower computers if possible [23:47] <_MMA_> Viper550: I would wager, if they attain the 10s time for most modern HW, Usplash will be dropped from the Ubuntu disks totally. [23:49] But, what about my computer? The 256mb P3 equiv [23:51] <_MMA_> Viper550: You're S.O.L. in my experience. (if you're serious) I can only speak to what I've learned as a developer of Ubuntu Studio working with upstream Ubuntu. [23:51] yes my designated linux computer is older, but it still hums nicely [23:52] <_MMA_> Viper550: It will be up to Xubuntu and the like to cater to you. (if that's their target) [23:52] xubuntu will be just able to run on your configuration. [23:52] It's evolved a bit from its stock config though, it originally had 128MB of RAM and a Nvidia graphics card. I don't think one of the newer versions didn't like my graphics card much - I had to go into recovery mode and set it to use vesa instead of ATI to make it work [23:59] For a desktop/office/internet system, it ran ... oh great forgot where I put the disc