hggdh | sigh. another tornado warning | 00:52 |
---|---|---|
hggdh | brb. Or not... | 00:53 |
=== asac_ is now known as asac | ||
=== dwg_ is now known as dwg | ||
dholbach | good morning | 06:34 |
neoXsys | Ubuntu 9.04, Sound Control -> Recording, Recording buttons always remains false. :( | 06:56 |
neoXsys | Is that know Bug? | 06:56 |
neoXsys | Even code it self says the same :( http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/193231/ | 06:58 |
thekorn | good morning | 07:28 |
micahg | morning | 07:28 |
thekorn | and happy hug day everybody! | 07:29 |
thekorn | morning micahg | 07:29 |
micahg | I hugged 4 already :) | 07:29 |
* thekorn hugs micahg | 07:29 | |
=== madmax_X_ is now known as madmax_X | ||
=== ziroday is now known as zeroday | ||
=== zeroday is now known as ziroday` | ||
=== ziroday` is now known as ziroday | ||
pedro_ | folks we're celebrating a hug day today! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20090611 feel free to start triaging any bug of that list and if you have any questions please ask those in the channel | 13:14 |
=== jjesse_ is now known as jjesse | ||
=== thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | ||
pedro_ | salut seb128 | 14:18 |
seb128 | pedro_: ola | 14:18 |
MagicFab | heya | 14:38 |
MagicFab | I am not sure how to report a bug about an application that crashes. | 14:38 |
MagicFab | Using ubuntu-bug I get the apport dialog right away... I want to open the app and only get apport when it crashes. | 14:38 |
MagicFab | Currently it crashes silently. | 14:38 |
MagicFab | What should I do ? | 14:38 |
MagicFab | The app is pencil, crashes when using export > Flash / SWF | 14:39 |
seb128 | MagicFab: enable apport? | 14:40 |
persia | MagicFab, Is apport enabled? Check https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed | 14:41 |
MagicFab | Hmm normally it's enabled on this system - duh! let me check. | 14:41 |
persia | (didn't enabling apport used to be done in /etc/default/apport or something? Might it be worth documenting the old way for people doing -proposed testing on dapper or hardy?) | 14:42 |
neoXsys | Again, Ubuntu 9.04, Volume Applet -> Open Volume Control -> Recording, Recording Buttons always remains "FALSE", doesn't owner the users's choice. | 14:42 |
neoXsys | Is that know bug? | 14:42 |
persia | MagicFab, apport also has a preference to disable reports for a certain app&version, in case you've already reported the bug I'm not sure where that's stored, but there would have been a checkbox. | 14:42 |
neoXsys | Even code says the same :( Please look http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/193231/ | 14:43 |
persia | neoXsys, You'd probably want to search LP to determine if it's a known bug: there's a large enough number that only a subset is usually known to the people in the channel at any given time. | 14:43 |
neoXsys | persia: Sure, That i will do, I just want to take chance because seb128 is here :) | 14:44 |
MagicFab | ok, so I am not crazy, I just hadn't enabled it in this system - tx. !! | 14:44 |
MagicFab | I guess I'll wait.. "Could not upload report data to crash database: <urlopen error timed out>" | 14:46 |
seb128 | neoXsys: I think that's a duplicate yes | 14:48 |
seb128 | we have a zillion of bugs about that interface and recording and nobody looking at those anyway | 14:48 |
seb128 | so no real need to bother open this one on launchpad | 14:48 |
neoXsys | seb128: Thanks. Now let me search one and try to fix one :) | 14:49 |
bddebian | Boo | 15:02 |
=== torkiano is now known as torkiano|afk | ||
neoXsys | seb128: This is the bug i am talking about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-media/+bug/299642 | 15:36 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 299642 in gnome-media "Microphone Capture ALWAYS muted" [Low,Confirmed] | 15:36 |
neoXsys | seb128: Which is already filed in Upstream http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=578174 | 15:36 |
ubot4 | Gnome bug 578174 in gst-mixer "gnome-volume-control mutes my audio" [Minor,New] | 15:36 |
seb128 | ok | 15:37 |
neoXsys | neoXsys: Can we attach the Upstream to LP Bug? | 15:37 |
BUGabundo | seb128: hi. quick question if you can | 15:37 |
seb128 | BUGabundo: hi, sure | 15:38 |
BUGabundo | seb128: what is the current karmic packages for bluetooth? | 15:38 |
neoXsys | seb128: Can we attach Upstream bug to LP bug? | 15:38 |
BUGabundo | I seem to have too many of them seb128 | 15:38 |
seb128 | neoXsys: yes, click on the text under the table to say it also concern and upstream project and copy the url | 15:38 |
seb128 | BUGabundo: I've no clue about bluetooth but the goal is to move to gnome-bluetooth | 15:38 |
neoXsys | seb128: Thanks :) | 15:38 |
seb128 | not sure if they are there yet though | 15:38 |
BUGabundo | yeah I noticed so in the blueprint seb128 | 15:39 |
BUGabundo | but since I have both gnome, bluez, and bluetooth stack | 15:39 |
BUGabundo | I get a messy system | 15:39 |
neoXsys | seb128: But, can i use the "Also affects project" link? | 15:41 |
seb128 | neoXsys: right | 15:41 |
=== theyeti_ is now known as theyeti | ||
bdmurray | leoquant: you should be able to renew your own membership in the desktop bugs team | 16:26 |
bdmurray | pedro_: I don't think bug 363500 should be fix released for jaunty do you? | 16:32 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 363500 in update-manager "update-manager jaunty partial upgrade exits silently" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/363500 | 16:32 |
bdmurray | pedro_: whoops, my bad | 16:32 |
pedro_ | bdmurray: np | 16:33 |
bdmurray | Shouldn't it be Fix Released for karmic though? | 16:34 |
pedro_ | does that version contains the build depends on the nvidia-common? | 16:37 |
* pedro_ looking | 16:37 | |
persia | I think it ought be fix released in jaunty: as it was claimed to be fied in 0.111.8, and jaunty-updates has 0.111.9 | 16:37 |
bdmurray | right, so the jaunty task looks good, I'm curious about the karmic one | 16:38 |
bdmurray | I think it can be Fix Released... | 16:40 |
pedro_ | bdmurray: well the build depend (on nvidia-common) is also on the the karmic package, so yeap | 16:40 |
pedro_ | fix released for me as well | 16:40 |
bdmurray | cool | 16:41 |
persia | Sufficiently versioned build-depend? | 16:41 |
bdmurray | seb128: Could you please remove me as an admin of the desktop bugs team? | 16:41 |
seb128 | bdmurray: changed | 16:43 |
bdmurray | thanks | 16:44 |
=== torkiano|afk is now known as torkiano | ||
bdmurray | asac: is the intrepid n-m task for bug 327053 fixed? | 16:54 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 327053 in network-manager "Intrepid -> Jaunty upgrade kills NetworkManager" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/327053 | 16:54 |
dupondje | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aiccu/+bug/104590 <- its fixed but not yet in repo's ? | 17:08 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 104590 in aiccu "AICCU halts during post-installation" [Medium,Fix committed] | 17:08 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
leoquant | bdmurray thx, but i'am not able to renew it, i have got no email. | 17:30 |
* leoquant takes a look at the launchpad page | 17:32 | |
fccf | Greetings bug-team --- strange sitiuation ... running hardy ... trying to install build-essential and it keeps saying that there are missing dependincies... I have a Ubuntu 8.04 server install and it is saying that the necessary version isn't available for g++ --- see this http://paste.ubuntu.com/193576/ -- been using ubuntu for 4 years and I know I have a very regular install - and regular package list ... what's broken --- I'd co | 17:52 |
BUGabundo | fccf: that's more appropriated for #ubuntu | 17:52 |
BUGabundo | #ubuntu-bugs is for triage | 17:52 |
BUGabundo | never the less I'll try to help | 17:53 |
persia | Hrm? No, that's a bug. | 17:53 |
BUGabundo | I think you are using the CD as the main reop | 17:53 |
BUGabundo | *repo | 17:53 |
BUGabundo | check your Software Sources and remove it | 17:53 |
fccf | no I have removed the CD line .... Does it need to be there? | 17:53 |
BUGabundo | then you should be able to update and install | 17:53 |
BUGabundo | no need! | 17:53 |
BUGabundo | only if you do not have net | 17:53 |
persia | BUGabundo, But the CD should be self-contained: if build-essential is there, then all the dependencies ought be there (otherwise it's a bug) | 17:53 |
BUGabundo | bbl ! lunch | 17:53 |
BUGabundo | persia: there was a bug, that the package on the CD as not enough | 17:54 |
persia | Anyone else have a hardy system available? | 17:54 |
BUGabundo | but it was on pre-jaunty | 17:54 |
persia | BUGabundo, Ah. Annoying. | 17:54 |
BUGabundo | it happened to me a few times | 17:54 |
fccf | already ran update - and I do have net and have checked everything I know | 17:54 |
BUGabundo | have to go. food awaits | 17:54 |
fccf | eat up BUGabundo | 17:54 |
fccf | persia: I have run apt-get update & apt-get upgrade ... at latest versions of everything hardy ... I actually think this is a bug based on 4 years as an ubuntu user ... I welcome any input | 17:59 |
persia | fccf, I think you're right it's a bug. I don't have a hardy system handy to verify (although I might in a couple hours). | 18:00 |
persia | Basically, the trick is determining what changed that broke it, and fixing it. | 18:01 |
fccf | I will track down as much as I can in the next hour or so ... I will have some pastebins for the channel | 18:02 |
=== ejat is now known as e-jat | ||
fccf | start with these http://paste.ubuntu.com/193603/ http://paste.ubuntu.com/193607/ | 18:08 |
persia | fccf, Keep going down the stack until you find something that explains itself with more than "is not going to be installed" | 18:10 |
fccf | I think I found it ... hold on | 18:11 |
fccf | Couldn't find package g++-4.2-base | 18:11 |
persia | Aha! | 18:12 |
persia | Next, do an apt-cache search g++, and see what exists with -base. | 18:12 |
fccf | i did apt-cache search g++ |grep base --- is that right? still a very long list | 18:14 |
fccf | based base database ... | 18:15 |
fccf | it is there gcc-4.2-base - The GNU Compiler Collection (base package) | 18:15 |
persia | Odd, I wouldn't have expected a gcc-4.2-base without a g++-4.2-base. | 18:16 |
fccf | so it is named wrong in packages.gz? | 18:17 |
persia | No, more likely something else is wrong. | 18:17 |
fccf | I'll keep digging | 18:17 |
persia | apt-cache rdepends g++-4.2-base may help | 18:17 |
persia | But I'm going to stop helping you with this now, in hopes that I can get to a hardy environment sooner, and help you more then :) | 18:18 |
asac | bdmurray: the upgrade issues are resolved without touching intrepid iirc | 18:18 |
fccf | ok see you in a bit | 18:18 |
fccf | lee@fccf-stream:~$ apt-cache rdepends g++-4.2-base /newline/ W: Unable to locate package g++-4.2-base | 18:20 |
persia | fccf, I got a hardy system up, although it turns out build-essential was already installed. Which package were you trying to install that pointed at g++-4.2-base ? | 18:31 |
fccf | g++-4.2 | 18:34 |
fccf | look at second paste | 18:34 |
fccf | 193607\ | 18:34 |
persia | fccf, Which architecture are you using? | 18:38 |
fccf | see also http://paste.ubuntu.com/193627/ | 18:38 |
fccf | from uname -a Linux fccf-stream 2.6.24-24-server #1 SMP Wed Apr 15 16:36:01 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux | 18:39 |
BUGabundo | .24? | 18:39 |
BUGabundo | that's not jaunty is it ? | 18:39 |
fccf | no this system is hardy | 18:40 |
charlie-tca | should be hardy | 18:40 |
BUGabundo | yeah | 18:40 |
BUGabundo | using cutting edge makes me loose track of older versions | 18:41 |
persia | fccf, Hrm. Try a dist-upgrade. I think you got caught by the 4.2.3 -> 4.2.4 change. | 18:41 |
persia | (which is a known and partially solved, bug). | 18:41 |
fccf | does dist-upgrade take me to intrepid? | 18:41 |
persia | Not unless you change your sources.list. It just tries to upgrade harder. | 18:42 |
BUGabundo | fccf: no | 18:42 |
persia | You have -updates and -security enabled, right? | 18:42 |
BUGabundo | fccf: update-manager -c or -d does upgrade you | 18:43 |
fccf | yes - lemme make make sure | 18:43 |
BUGabundo | IF, big IF, you have set it to Normal distro release and not LTS | 18:43 |
fccf | whoops security and updates were not checked ... reloading now | 18:44 |
fccf | I'm an Idoit .... thank you for your wasted time bug-team | 18:44 |
persia | fccf, What was the issue? | 18:44 |
fccf | i didn't have security or updates enabled | 18:45 |
fccf | that resolved everything | 18:45 |
=== bdrung_ is now known as bdrung | ||
persia | You still shouldn't have gotten into that situation, but it appears it was the known issue with the 4.2.3 -> 4.2.4 mess, or at least that there's nothing else to fix. Thanks for confirming. | 18:45 |
fccf | build-essental is now installed --- now to compile | 18:46 |
fccf | again thanks guys | 18:47 |
BUGabundo | can some take a quick look at https://launchpad.net/bugs/386033 ? | 18:54 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 386033 in macchanger "after install macchanger -> erro : subprocess post-install script returned error exit status 1" [Undecided,New] | 18:54 |
charlie-tca | neat bug | 18:57 |
charlie-tca | the install failed, so the removal fails too | 18:57 |
BUGabundo | charlie-tca: actually I think install worked | 18:58 |
BUGabundo | let me ask | 18:58 |
BUGabundo | charlie-tca: user reports he can run it! | 18:59 |
charlie-tca | that's good! but this is install failing, isn't it? subprocess post-install script returned error exit status 1 | 19:00 |
charlie-tca | Something failed to complete | 19:01 |
persia | That's often a failure-to-configure, rather than a failure-to-install. | 19:02 |
BUGabundo | well he installed, used it | 19:02 |
charlie-tca | have him attach the log from /var/log/dpkg.log | 19:02 |
BUGabundo | when he tried to remove it, it failed | 19:02 |
charlie-tca | Since apport did not attach any | 19:02 |
charlie-tca | That might show what failed better | 19:02 |
BUGabundo | http://pastebin.com/m3d374ec3 | 19:02 |
charlie-tca | looks to me like it says it can't find it to remove it entirely. | 19:04 |
charlie-tca | Will synaptic package manager remove it? | 19:04 |
BUGabundo | I've asked the user to come here | 19:05 |
BUGabundo | hi alfatec | 19:05 |
alfatec | hi | 19:05 |
BUGabundo | alfatec: Will synaptic package manager remove it? | 19:05 |
alfatec | no | 19:05 |
alfatec | give the same error | 19:05 |
charlie-tca | uh-oh | 19:06 |
BUGabundo | alfatec: still have the apt-cache policy link around ? | 19:07 |
BUGabundo | alfatec: $ apt-cache policy macchanger | 19:07 |
charlie-tca | I can try to confirm it after I get this install done I'm running | 19:07 |
* BUGabundo still feels pastebinit should come on default install | 19:07 | |
alfatec | http://paste.ubuntu.com/193643/ | 19:08 |
=== lakin_ is now known as lakin | ||
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg | ||
pedro_ | hey micahg1, great work on the hug day ;-) | 20:19 |
=== YoBoY_Y is now known as YoBoY | ||
=== pace_t_zulu_ is now known as pace_t_zulu | ||
bcurtiswx-mini | anyone here heard of the "hundredpapercuts" project?? | 22:16 |
persia | bcurtiswx-mini, minimally. All the bugs I've seen so far seemed to be asking for comment. | 22:16 |
BUGabundo | no idea what that is | 22:18 |
bcurtiswx-mini | persia, i have a bug that was randomly assigned to the one hunder paper cuts project and the launchpad page is very uninformational | 22:18 |
bcurtiswx-mini | anything against me removing that and asking what and why (since the changer didn't comment on the change?) | 22:18 |
persia | bcurtiswx-mini, I'd leave that to the hundredpapercuts folk. I believe they are encouraging people to add papercuts tasks to bugs. | 22:19 |
bcurtiswx-mini | what is a "papercut" ? | 22:19 |
charlie-tca | It's the one hundred easy fix bugs to be done by release of karmic | 22:21 |
bdmurray | there was something about it on planet recently | 22:22 |
calc | bcurtiswx-mini: if you remove it may not get fixed for karmic, marking it means it will likely be fixed | 22:22 |
calc | at least aiui | 22:23 |
bcurtiswx-mini | hmm, ok.. just had red flag going up in my mind, because the person who assigned this bug to the paper cut project has almost no affiliations and i didn't know what papercutproject was | 22:23 |
bcurtiswx-mini | no big deal apparently :) thx | 22:23 |
bdmurray | I don't understand why they created a project though | 22:24 |
* calc has no idea how its implemented | 22:24 | |
calc | bdmurray: isn't it being run by ivanca/ | 22:24 |
calc | er ? | 22:24 |
bcurtiswx-mini | bug #359740 is the bug im talking about | 22:24 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 359740 in gstreamer0.10 "Volume control should change slower when loud and faster when silent " [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/359740 | 22:24 |
calc | hmm i though the papercuts was supposed to just be a tag, but i haven't been following it closely | 22:25 |
persia | I'm not sure all the papercuts will get "fixed", but I presume they'll all at least get more attention than they would otherwise. | 22:26 |
calc | but there are 80 open bugs with that task so i guess it is the way they are doing it | 22:26 |
* persia is reminded of the phrase "death by a thousand cuts" | 22:27 | |
BUGabundo | persia: :)) | 22:27 |
hggdh | bdmurray, ping -- please see http://paste.ubuntu.com/193807/, this is how it is getting to be | 23:04 |
bdmurray | hggdh: outstanding! | 23:04 |
hggdh | still some cleanup to do, turned out to be more weird than I expected... | 23:05 |
micahg | does LP edge allow more than one file uploaded at a time? | 23:07 |
bdmurray | not edge or production | 23:08 |
micahg | so I guess I have to attach them 1 at a time | 23:08 |
bdmurray | unless apport-collect gets what you want | 23:09 |
micahg | nope, it's pngs | 23:09 |
BUGabundo | micahg: used to do | 23:10 |
BUGabundo | but theirs is /was a bug | 23:10 |
micahg | BUGabundo: can you confirm 386132? | 23:11 |
micahg | oops | 23:11 |
micahg | bug 386132 | 23:11 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 386132 in firefox-3.5 "Firefox 3.5 renders certain pngs with wrong colors" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/386132 | 23:11 |
BUGabundo | LOLOL | 23:12 |
BUGabundo | its BLUE | 23:12 |
micahg | try it in FF 3.0 | 23:13 |
BUGabundo | testing | 23:13 |
BUGabundo | works | 23:14 |
micahg | :) | 23:14 |
BUGabundo | micahg: confirmed | 23:15 |
BUGabundo | let me test opera and chormium | 23:16 |
micahg | BUGabundo: can you confirm in LP? | 23:16 |
micahg | it's my bug :) | 23:16 |
BUGabundo | grr | 23:16 |
BUGabundo | doesn't show the full page on chromium | 23:16 |
BUGabundo | OLOLOL | 23:16 |
BUGabundo | humm red is redish on chromium | 23:17 |
BUGabundo | micahg: humm | 23:18 |
BUGabundo | wait soemthig wrong here | 23:18 |
BUGabundo | you mean just the PNG or the full palet? | 23:18 |
BUGabundo | cause the pngs alone show OK | 23:18 |
micahg | png | 23:18 |
micahg | where? | 23:18 |
BUGabundo | well amrlima just said he fixed that same bug | 23:19 |
BUGabundo | but he lost link | 23:19 |
BUGabundo | asked him to come here | 23:19 |
BUGabundo | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27796267/square_glass_green.png | 23:19 |
BUGabundo | this is GREEN | 23:19 |
BUGabundo | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27796158/ff3.5Display.png | 23:20 |
BUGabundo | this is blue | 23:20 |
BUGabundo | so micahg I can't be sure I can confirm the bug | 23:21 |
micahg | BUGabundo: why not? | 23:21 |
micahg | it shows green for you in FF3.6? | 23:21 |
BUGabundo | I'm confused | 23:21 |
BUGabundo | yes | 23:21 |
BUGabundo | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27796267/square_glass_green.png | 23:21 |
BUGabundo | does | 23:21 |
BUGabundo | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27796158/ff3.5Display.png | 23:21 |
BUGabundo | doesn't! | 23:21 |
amrlima | BUGabundo: micahg if you change in about:config just change gfx.color_management_mode from 2 to 0 | 23:22 |
micahg | BUGabundo: the second one was a png I took of the display | 23:22 |
micahg | it shouldn't change | 23:22 |
amrlima | i think png's get back to normal | 23:22 |
BUGabundo | the 3.5 is BLUE | 23:22 |
BUGabundo | the green png is a scale of green | 23:22 |
micahg | amrlima: do I have to restart FF? | 23:23 |
BUGabundo | nope | 23:23 |
BUGabundo | about:config is usually real time | 23:23 |
amrlima | can't remember | 23:23 |
micahg | didn't work in 3.5, let me try 3.6 | 23:23 |
amrlima | micahg: try to restart | 23:24 |
micahg | ok | 23:24 |
BUGabundo | let me test 3.5 | 23:24 |
micahg | works :) | 23:25 |
amrlima | great :) | 23:25 |
micahg | so now what? | 23:25 |
micahg | Isn't it still a bug? | 23:25 |
micahg | what does that setting do? | 23:25 |
micahg | is it ati driver only? | 23:26 |
BUGabundo | looks the same to me on 3.5 | 23:26 |
BUGabundo | nvidia here | 23:26 |
micahg | same with what BUGabundo | 23:26 |
micahg | BUGabundo: did you make the setting change? | 23:26 |
micahg | or by default was it ok? | 23:26 |
amrlima | I have ati | 23:27 |
BUGabundo | I did not change my about:config | 23:27 |
micahg | ok | 23:27 |
amrlima | I had the bug only with this pc | 23:27 |
micahg | amrlima: is that the only {PC with ati? | 23:27 |
amrlima | yes , the other is nvidia | 23:27 |
micahg | amrlima: gfx color managerment is disabled in ff3.0 | 23:28 |
BUGabundo | UnreportableReason: This is not a genuine Ubuntu package | 23:28 |
BUGabundo | LOVE this ^^^^^ | 23:28 |
micahg | It's not, it's from the dailies :) | 23:29 |
BUGabundo | why can I see the attachements without login !?!?! | 23:30 |
amrlima | BUGabundo: it's always been like that i think.. | 23:30 |
BUGabundo | never noticed | 23:33 |
BUGabundo | I'm always logdin | 23:33 |
micahg | BUGabundo: it's already upstream | 23:48 |
micahg | mozilla bug 490537 | 23:48 |
ubot4 | Mozilla bug 490537 in GFX: Color Management "Colors in some PNG images are severely wrong" [Major,Unconfirmed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490537 | 23:48 |
micahg | hggdh: can I mark my own bug triaged without confirmation if I found it upstream? | 23:49 |
bdmurray | Yes, that's reasonable. | 23:50 |
hggdh | yes | 23:50 |
micahg | ok, also would you classify a color rendering issue as medium in firefox or high? | 23:50 |
hggdh | does it block the user from seeing the frames? | 23:51 |
micahg | https://bug490537.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=374939 | 23:51 |
micahg | for me it was just a color change | 23:52 |
micahg | but was counterintuitive in my web app | 23:52 |
hggdh | ugh! | 23:52 |
hggdh | real bad... I would go with high... | 23:52 |
BUGabundo | hggdh: no | 23:53 |
hggdh | no? | 23:53 |
BUGabundo | doesn't affect defaut browser | 23:53 |
micahg | what? | 23:53 |
micahg | it sure does in ff3.5 | 23:53 |
BUGabundo | karmic still has 3.0 as default | 23:53 |
BUGabundo | I think | 23:53 |
hggdh | what BUGabundo means is ff3.5 is not the default appl | 23:53 |
BUGabundo | should change to 3.5 once final hit | 23:53 |
micahg | yes, but importance is per app | 23:54 |
BUGabundo | hggdh: yep | 23:54 |
micahg | ah | 23:54 |
BUGabundo | isn't it per audience? | 23:54 |
hggdh | still, it is worth it -- 3.5 is the replacement-to-be | 23:54 |
BUGabundo | yeah | 23:54 |
BUGabundo | medium ? | 23:54 |
micahg | Has a severe impact on a small portion of Ubuntu users (estimated) | 23:54 |
micahg | ? | 23:54 |
hggdh | will have a severe impact later on... OTOH, this will be fixed upstream, so we can go with medium | 23:55 |
micahg | ok | 23:55 |
hggdh | oy vey | 23:55 |
micahg | I was thinking medium to begin with | 23:55 |
BUGabundo | only on ATI !? | 23:55 |
micahg | yeah, so | 23:55 |
BUGabundo | so not that big audience | 23:55 |
BUGabundo | I guess... then again if I was affected... it would be bad | 23:55 |
micahg | ?? | 23:55 |
micahg | they are a major vendor | 23:56 |
hggdh | python regular expressions are... weird... | 23:56 |
micahg | It's at medium | 23:56 |
micahg | if FF3.5 becomes default and it's not fixed, I'll move to high | 23:56 |
BUGabundo | micahg: s/if/when/ | 23:56 |
micahg | BUGabundo: assuming it gets released before October :) | 23:57 |
BUGabundo | ahhaha | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!