[00:20] <kklimonda|W810> hey
[00:21] <BUGabundo> hey kklimonda|W810 LOLOL
[00:21] <BUGabundo> from the phone ?
[00:21] <kklimonda|W810> Ya, I'm bored ;)
[00:21] <BUGabundo> LOLOL
[00:21] <BUGabundo> can you really read this ?
[00:22] <BUGabundo> wasn't my dent enough to keep you busy for a while?
[00:22] <kklimonda|W810> Whatever I do I can't setup gprs in Linux :-/
[00:23] <kklimonda|W810> It's not that bad. but writing even with T9 is really irritating.
[00:24] <kklimonda|W810> And I can't check identi.ca when I'm here ;)
[00:24] <BUGabundo> heh
[00:26] <kklimonda|W810> I really want a g1 phone :-/. I have to wait at least month more
[00:29] <yoasif> i have a bug that may be an issue with two packages -- how do i add a second package to the bug?
[00:30] <yoasif> BUGabundo: around?
[00:30] <BUGabundo> yoasif: a bit more
[00:30] <BUGabundo> yoasif: link for the bug?
[00:30] <BUGabundo> "affects too"
[00:31] <yoasif> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/seamonkey/+bug/386060
[00:31] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 386060 in seamonkey "[karmic] seamonkey menu hard to read with dust theme" [Undecided,New]
[00:31] <yoasif> dusttheme
[00:32] <yoasif> is what it also affects
[00:32] <yoasif> i can't figure out how to add the affects to...
[00:32] <BUGabundo> lol
[00:33] <BUGabundo> humm
[00:33] <BUGabundo> some devs really hate when you add another task
[00:33] <yoasif> am i missing something really simple? :)
[00:33] <BUGabundo> 'cause if latter one is invalid, they still get the mail
[00:33] <BUGabundo> so better be sure you want to affect both
[00:34] <yoasif> alright, i guess i'll just leave it alone
[00:34] <yoasif> but i only see it with that theme
[00:34] <BUGabundo> yoasif: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/seamonkey/+bug/386060/+distrotask
[00:34] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 386060 in seamonkey "[karmic] seamonkey menu hard to read with dust theme" [Undecided,New]
[00:35] <yoasif> and that theme is included with ubuntu
[00:35] <yoasif> ah thanks BUGabundo... i thought that distribution only meant distribution
[00:37] <yoasif> BUGabundo: i don't really see how i can link to https://launchpad.net/dusttheme
[00:37] <BUGabundo> eheh
[00:38] <BUGabundo> just use ubuntu and then set dusttheme as the package
[00:38] <yoasif> yeah, but dusttheme isn't a package in ubuntu
[00:38] <yoasif> it's part of the themes package i guess
[00:43] <BUGabundo> ahh
[00:57] <mrooney> anyone have any idea what package this is https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/368973 ?
[00:57] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 368973 in ubuntu "Volume control doesn't lower subwoofer volume on a Dell Inspiron 9300" [Medium,Triaged]
[01:03] <Ampelbein> mrooney: could be a problem with the soundserver used? side note: a report that doesn't even have the correct package set can hardly be set to triaged, right?
=== asac_ is now known as asac
[01:22] <mrooney> Ampelbein: it is triaged pending the package which I assumed I'd get an answer to :)
[01:23] <mrooney> It could have been slightly premature, though someone looking through triaged bugs would probably know the package
=== yoasif_ is now known as yoasif
[01:24] <Ampelbein> mrooney: sound chipset, mixer in use, soundsystem in use? not to be pedantic, but I think there is quite some information missing. just assume that the developers don't know what a inspiron 9300 laptop is, so give them as much detail as possible.
[01:28] <mrooney> Ampelbein: oh yes good call, I've attached lspci
[01:29] <cwillu> mrooney, I think the point is that triaged implies that sort of work has already been done.  Spending time retagging bugs to the correct package isn't the best use of the time of someone who is looking through triaged bugs :)
[01:30] <mrooney> yeah, I've set back to Confirmed
[02:15] <Rammler1983> hallo, i can't log in after installing the latest ati driver
[06:18] <dholbach> good morning
[06:18] <micahg> morning dholbach
=== calc` is now known as calc
[06:18] <dholbach> hola micahg!
[07:15] <snadge> corrupted sound, pulseaudio pidgin
[07:15] <snadge> err i meant to plug that into google ;)
[07:15] <persia> heh :)
[07:20] <snadge> known issue though surely
[07:20] <persia> I hadn't heard of it: I'd think that it ought just work.
[07:21] <snadge> doesnt always do it.. weird, just sometimes the sound comes through with a static/scratchy sound
[07:21] <persia> Only sometimes?  Does that happen for all alerts, or just pidgin?
[07:21] <snadge> only sometimes, and just pidgin as far as i can tell
[07:21] <snadge> intel onboard audio
[07:21] <persia> Odd.
[07:21] <snadge> i think some of the pulse devs are aware of it, and they blamed ubuntu of course
[07:22] <snadge> instead of working with you guys to fix it
[07:22] <persia> Well, that might be it.  every single implementation of "intel onboard audio" seems to be different, and it seems to have more special-case config patches for ALSA than anything else.
[07:23] <snadge> yeah, they're totally shoddy
[07:23] <persia> Hrm.  That doesn't help much.  Be nice if the specific issue could be tracked in a bug clearly.
[07:23] <snadge> or more to the point, implemented rather randomly
[07:23] <persia> implemented randomly.  Some of them happen to be quite good.
[07:23] <persia> (well, as good as one might expect from that class of amp, etc.)
[07:30] <thekorn> good morning
[07:47] <thekorn> hmm, who is running this script to mass mark this compiz bugs?
[07:47] <thekorn> as duplicates, that is
[07:48] <thekorn> I hope it's a script, and not somebody going crazy clicking through the web UI
[07:58] <micahg> dups of 99740?
[07:58] <micahg> bug 99740
[07:58] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 99740 in firefox-3.1 "[MASTER] Firefox problems with desktop-effects" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/99740
[08:04] <thekorn> no, Imeant bug 131679
[08:04] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 131679 in compiz "Crash inside doPoll()" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/131679
[08:04] <micahg> ah
[08:05] <micahg> thekorn: is it the retracing service?
[08:05] <thekorn> micahg, no, looks like someone is running a script
[08:49] <neoXsys> Question: How to changes the Bug status from "Unknown" to "Triaged"? Is that required any authorization?
[08:50] <neoXsys> Or am i missing something?
[08:51] <persia> neoXsys, It requires being a member of bug control.  If you believe a bug to be triaged, and you're not a member, feel free to ask someone to mark it so here.
[08:52] <neoXsys> persia: Ok, Yesterday i have done everything for bug, but could not do changed it to "Triged", But in morning i have checked that bug has been "Triged" So, i was curious about that :)
[08:53] <neoXsys> persia: Now, How to become part of Bug Control Squad?
[08:54] <persia> Start by reading the links in the /topic :)
[08:57] <neoXsys> persia: Thanks for the link. Give me some time to get back :)
[10:13] <BUGabundo> bons dias
[10:13] <BUGabundo> any one has anything to add to https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/malone/+bug/386261 ?
[10:13] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 386261 in malone "bugs get a mail about pre-dupes bugs are going to be marked as dupes of it" [Undecided,New]
[10:24] <BUGabundo> any one has that cups / ps bug ?
[10:24] <BUGabundo> it went into to karmic e jaunty proposed and is messing some scanners (I think)
=== seb128_ is now known as seb128
[13:39] <skyfolly> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/279693 is this kinda bug solved, i am getting the same thing under 9.04
[13:39] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 279693 in linux "Regression Sata hard disk unable to mount after upgrade 2.6.27 generic kernel" [Undecided,New]
[13:40] <skyfolly> tried different MB, rams, sata cables, HDs, still the same thing, i am sure it is a bug in the kernel
[13:40] <skyfolly> even different PCs
[15:10] <BUGabundo>   Installed: 0.2.14+debian-2ubuntu2
[15:10] <BUGabundo> since when do you carry debian packages?
[15:10] <BUGabundo> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exaile/+bug/386349
[15:10] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 386349 in exaile "exaile lost ability to control Volume from tray icon" [Undecided,New]
[15:11] <bcurtiswx-mini> wow
[15:11] <bcurtiswx-mini> neat :P
[15:11] <BUGabundo> bcurtiswx-mini: hi. no really!
[15:12]  * BUGabundo thinks of greping the archive and filing a massive bug
[15:13] <bcurtiswx-mini> lol, how many devs would you piss off?
[15:13] <bcurtiswx-mini> but yeah, i'd test the bug but i won't be back home until August 8th.. im on work travel this summer in Colorado
[15:13] <BUGabundo> LOL
[15:14] <bcurtiswx-mini> right now visiting fam in New York
[15:15] <bcurtiswx-mini> ok, bio done :P
=== lakin__ is now known as lakin
[15:16] <Ampelbein> BUGabundo: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exaile/+bug/382852/comments/2 -> debian repackaged orig.tar.gz to drop upstream-shipped debian/-directory.
[15:16] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 382852 in exaile "Please merge exaile 0.2.14+debian-2 (universe) from Debian unstable" [Wishlist,Fix released]
[15:17] <Ampelbein> BUGabundo: in that case the +debian describes that the tarball was repacked.
[15:17] <BUGabundo> ahhh thanks Ampelbein
[16:36] <theyeti> Anyone want to take a look at bug #386366   This would be more of a support question than a bug per se wouldn't it?
[16:36] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 386366 in xorg "Xubuntu moves dialogs below screen edge" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/386366
[16:42] <theyeti> nvm, just confirmed it.
[16:54] <theyeti> If I am able to confirm a bug what all information do I need to make sure is in the bug report before changing the status?  (ie #386366   btw, I am new to how ubuntu triages bugs and their process)
[16:56] <BUGabundo> bug 386366
[16:56] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 386366 in xorg "Xubuntu moves dialogs below screen edge" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/386366
[16:56] <BUGabundo> theyeti: change status to what?
[16:56] <theyeti> confirmed or should I just leave it as new?
[16:59] <BUGabundo> is it your bug?
[17:01] <theyeti> no.   So just leave it as new then?
[17:03] <hggdh> theyeti, if you can reproduce it, then go ahead and mark as confirmed. Also please add a comment stating what you did to reproduce and the version(s) of the package(s) involved (if different from the reporter's version)
[17:04] <BUGabundo> hggdh: apport-collect or is it a bit too much?
[17:05] <theyeti> Thanks hggdh. :)   This is much different that working on bugs with like a single project and a small user/developer base.
[17:06] <hggdh> BUGabundo, I did not look at he bug itself (just got home), so: apport-collect *might* be used, as long as we change the package from xubuntu to something specific
[17:06] <hggdh> sigh. It is already xorg
[17:06] <BUGabundo> yep
[17:07] <theyeti> would it be a different package than xorg since it isn't restricted to just xubuntu?
[17:07] <hggdh> theyeti, probably
[17:07] <hggdh> like -- say -- compiz
[17:09] <theyeti> Cool thanks
[17:12] <theyeti> Will hopefully ask fewer dumb questions as I get more use to it.  Thanks for the help you guys. :)
[17:13] <hggdh> theyeti, thank you for helping, and keep asking questions whenever you have then
[17:15] <theyeti> Well, beneficial to everyone.   bugs get triaged and I get something to do at work in the middle of the night and when i'm bored
[17:15] <hggdh> heh
[18:49] <rCanastro> Hello every1
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[20:35] <MaxMax> Hi, I have a couple of bugs to submit for ubuntu 9.04 client
[20:36] <MaxMax> installer process part of the os
[20:37] <MaxMax> bug 1 #  The installer will not use "UPN" names j.smith@123.com as a user name
[20:37] <ubot4> MaxMax: Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: The read operation timed out
[21:02] <mrooney> bdmurray: re bug 379246, do Karmic bugs still belong in HAL if it is being deprecated?
[21:02] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 379246 in hal "ubuntu9.10 cannot find blackberry 7230" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/379246
[21:05] <kakemann> it seems audacious is broken in karmic right now because bug #383307 isn't in karmic yet
[21:05] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 383307 in audacious-plugins "Please merge audacious-plugins 2.0.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/383307
[21:09] <kakemann> how long does it usually take before the package is availible?
[21:15] <randomaction> kakemann: when I requested merge sponsorships, they were typically processed within several days
[21:17] <kakemann> ok, I guess I'll have to wait then :)
[22:04] <bdmurray> mrooney: I'm not certain but was hoping pitti would know best
[22:32] <micahg1> bdmurray: can I PM?
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg