[04:52] hey guys anybody know if theres something wrong with openssl's md5 functions? [04:55] it seems to produce the hash with one character missing [05:14] can somebody tell me why this is producing the wrong hash http://pastebin.com/d3d8753c1 === calc` is now known as calc === bjf is now known as bjf_afk [09:58] hmm, should the abi file be generated automatically while building the kernel image? i'm wondering why some modules compiled but not in the abi modules list [10:01] mr_claus: yes, abi is generated after the build [10:01] amitk: there are missing some modules in flavour.modules file and i don't know why [10:02] mr_claus: what are you compiling, how and what are the changes you made? [10:02] amitk: i started to compile 2.6.30 from the jeremy git (xen-patches) [10:03] amitk: i used the build system from 2.6.28 and fit the files to 2.6.30 [10:04] i changed changelog of course, control.d/vars.xen (created) [10:04] and config/amd64/config.xen [10:05] but ... i didn't change config/amd64/config until now [10:06] mr_claus: and the build is complaining about missing modules? [10:06] after a "find . -name 'sata_sil*' i get [10:06] ./build/build-xen/drivers/ata/sata_sil.o [10:06] ./build/build-xen/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.o [10:06] but the two modules are not in the .deb [10:07] and not in the xen.modules [10:07] mr_claus: did .ko's get built? [10:07] alex_joni: no [10:09] mr_claus: and the module is enabled in the configs? 'debian/rules editconfigs' to edit them interactively [10:14] amitk: with editconfigs the files in config/amd64/config.* will be modified, right? [10:15] amitk: in config/amd64/config there are SATA_SIL and SATA_SIL24 set to "y" [10:17] amitk: but the interesting is, if i run editconfigs it looks different [10:17] amitk: are there some docs how that is working? [10:18] amitk: no, it doesn't look different, the modules are configured [10:21] mr_claus: after exiting from all editconfigs, updateconfigs will be run automatically. Make sure the modules are still there after that. [10:23] amitk: still there mean inside of config/amd64/config? [10:23] i checked .config inside of of build dir debian/build/build-xen/ [10:23] the modules are set to "y" too [10:24] and in config/amd64/config the modules set to "y" [10:25] ahh, sry, my fault [10:25] i'm blind, y means inside of kernel [10:26] seems the night was to long and my brain was afk [10:29] mr_claus: heh. Good catch. :) [12:27] Hi- is there a ppa for 2.6.30 that has the ubuntu sauce patches? [12:28] lamalex: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.30/ ? [12:29] that's not just upstream? [12:30] might be, just googled it [12:30] yeah i thought it was upstream [12:30] figured someone here would actually know [12:34] lamalex: there is a package for lpia [12:34] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/lpia/linux-source-2.6.30/2.6.30-8.9 [13:19] apw: how are the splitconfig patches looking? [13:19] they look ok in general, there is some purley cosmetic stuff in there which i don't know if you intended [13:19] also the rename is going to cause me pain. still have to actually test them, got sidetracked on some kms kernels [13:20] and writing up your new blueprint :) [13:23] apw: cosmetic changes such as getting rid of commented lines, etc.? [13:23] i saw a couple of what must be pure white space changes in there [13:24] the one which sticks in my mind was in the rename patch which has a couple i think [13:24] i need to review them agian once i've tested them [13:25] apw: there were a few space to tab conversions that I threw in there as I ran across them. [13:25] probabally waht they are then [13:28] amitk: I'll be taking a look at them shortly. I'm also gonna start working on the flavour changes [13:50] apw: uploading linux_2.6.30-9.10 [13:50] rtg reached my upload email then :) === bjf_afk is now known as bjf === Omegamoon is now known as Omegamoon|cookin === BenC1 is now known as BenC === Omegamoon|cookin is now known as Omegamoon|dinner === Omegamoon|dinner is now known as Omegamoon === thegodfather is now known as fabbione