[00:22] hm, something's wrong. many packages are waiting for publications for hours: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa [00:24] * wgrant hopes mthaddon is still around. [00:24] wgrant: ? [00:24] mthaddon: germanium's publisher is borked. [00:24] lemme take a look [00:27] wgrant: the most obvious thing I can find is this: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27844776/KhZe2ggKNzKhRabuIrKhzeLghK.txt - but I confess I don't know too much about the inner workings of this part of LP [00:27] Good lord. [00:27] That doesn't look good. [00:27] shows up 4 times in the ppa cron logs [00:28] Actually, it looks like it's only fta's PPA. [00:28] although it seems to come up just after: Processing http://ppa.launchpad.net/sabily.team/ppa/ubuntu - whether that means it's having a problem with that one or the next one I'm not sure [00:28] ubunets ppa was having trouble last night [00:28] worth checking that too [00:29] wgrant, nope, i saw another one: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ripps818/+archive/staging [00:29] lifeless: this is the only real error I can see in the current ppa cron log [00:29] fta: OK - I admit I only check a few recent ones. [00:29] mthaddon: Is it always that same file? [00:29] yeah [00:29] It'd be nice to unbreak things for the weekend. [00:30] And the easiest way to do that without waking people up is probably to just get somebody to delete the publishing in question... [00:31] wgrant, mine has some too.. months old: https://edge.launchpad.net/~fta/+archive/ppa/ kind of weird.. [00:32] fta: That's a bug with superseded binaries. Not the same thing./ [00:32] yep, figured that out, that's why i never complained before ;) [00:36] fta: Bug #378876 [00:36] Launchpad bug 378876 in soyuz "Superseded binaries shown as FULLYBUILT_PENDING" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/378876 [00:37] thx [00:39] wgrant: so who should be doing the deleting? the publisher or an admin? [00:40] mthaddon: An admin. [00:40] Or the user. [00:42] mthaddon: I suspect that just deleting the package from +delete-packages of the archive in question should do it. [00:50] :) [00:51] oops, damn focus === asac_ is now known as asac [02:05] O I have possibly had my head in the sand! but the download counter is a handy addition.. Thanks :) [02:19] Hi all, I was wondering if it's possible to change my team's name simply through the "Team name" thing under change details. I know that's what it's there for, but was hoping to verify it working beforehand. [02:20] Apparently, there have been a set of packages in one of my ppa's that has been pending publication for over 10 hours, what's the problem? [02:20] I need these packages published because another set of packages in the ppa rely on them as a dependency [04:22] Any launchpad sysadmins? [04:23] I've got packages in a PPA that are locked in pending [04:29] same here - https://launchpad.net/~xorg-edgers/+archive/ppa [04:31] interestingly the mesa was copied not even a minute after showing up on the other ppa but its published there, must have just been bad timing or its copied packages not going through [04:31] Some things seem to be getting published, but others are not. [04:42] lifeless: Do you know if anything further was done about the PPA issues? [04:43] yes :- nothing [04:43] Ah. [04:43] mthaddon couldn't see a bug describing what was going on enough to go and delete things arbitrarily [04:44] I guess Europe will wakt up in a few hours. [04:44] Of course. [04:44] spm: may have no llife [05:13] jml: how do I push up a new package ? [05:14] :!bzr push bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~libcpuinfo-developers/ubuntu/karmic/libcpuinfo/trunk [05:14] bzr: ERROR: Permission denied: "/~libcpuinfo-developers/ubuntu/karmic/libcpuinfo/trunk": : No such source package: 'libcpuinfo'. [05:14] lifeless: You'll be able to do it once you upload it to a PPA. [05:14] There's just no SPN created yet. [05:15] wgrant: yes, I know. [05:15] Ah. [05:19] wgrant: its an inconsistent restriction [05:19] wgrant: any ppa upload can break it; so why can't a bzr push [05:20] lifeless: That PPA uploads can break it has been considered a bug, though. [05:20] wgrant: that would be wrong though ;). [05:20] But I guess it could be useful, so maybe a push should create it. [05:21] But I'm not sure this source package branch model represents how things are going to work in the real world. [05:22] wgrant: All the more reason to test it [06:08] Am i doing something wrong here (against staging) - createbug = launchpad.bugs.createBug(description='bugdesc', title='test bug title', target='apr-util) - i get HTTP Error 400: Bad Request [06:10] try ubuntu/+source/apr-util [06:11] lifeless: same error... [06:11] stefanlsd: oh well, worth a crach [06:11] *crack [06:11] lifeless: thanks though :) [06:15] stefanlsd: target can't just be a string. [06:15] stefanlsd: Either get hold of a SP object, or pass 'https://api.staging.launchpad.net/beta/ubuntu/+source/apr-util [06:16] wgrant: kk. thanks. what is an SP object? [06:17] stefanlsd: A source package. Get one using IDistribution.getSourcePackage() [06:19] wgrant: kk. thanks [06:23] stefanlsd: In future, you can get more details about most errors by catching the exception and checking the 'content' attribute. [06:33] wgrant: do you know of an example of doing that i could see? [06:36] stefanlsd: Of what? [06:37] wgrant: catching the exception and checking the 'content' attribute... [06:37] try: (foo) except Exception,e:print e.content [06:38] That's a bit broad, but would work. [06:38] its an example ;P [06:38] its terribly broad, but then so is 'bad request' [06:39] True. [06:39] ok. thanks. will try it [07:10] lifeless: thanks for filing that bug. [07:10] it's a known one, but maybe I hadn't filed it already [07:10] jml: no worries. If its a dup its a dup. [07:10] I filed uhm 5 lp bugs today I think. [07:10] lifeless: we're thinking maybe of using --create-prefix as a way of handling that case. [07:10] maybe 6. [07:11] jml: I'm interested in why you think special flags are needed, but am going out to a movie now. [07:11] lifeless: cos we also don't want people accidentally making packages called subinut [07:11] jml: Allow deletions too. [07:11] * lifeless is gone [07:11] lifeless: ciao [07:13] jml: I like the --create-prefix idea. [07:14] I think it makes sense, and is consistent with bzr's behaviour on non-magic servers. [07:36] just a question .... can 2 launchpad ID get merge ? [07:36] e.g : ~idA merge with ~idB = ~idA [07:37] e-jat: https://launchpad.net/people/+requestmerge [07:37] wgrant: ok thanks .. [07:55] wgrant: how about merging a team .. [07:55] is it possible too ? [07:56] e-jat: I believe so, but you have to ask an admin to do it - https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion [08:22] thanks .. [08:52] Hi all, I was wondering if it's possible to change my team's name simply through the "Team Name" thing under change details (/~team/+edit). I know that's what it's there for, but was hoping to verify it working beforehand. [08:56] Flannel: That's what it's for. [08:57] And it works. [08:57] There are complications if you have a PPA or mailing list, but I think it'll refuse to do anything in those cases. [08:57] wgrant: Any side effects or other things I need to worry about it? [08:58] Flannel: Other than the complications I meantione above and URLs changing, no. [08:58] Alright, thanks. [10:02] jml: so, I think it would be better to just allow the push [10:02] jml: given that we allow branch deletion elsewhere in launchpad [11:54] cprov: Morning - can you unbreak germanium's publisher? [11:54] wgrant: I'm on it already [11:55] cprov: Great. [11:55] something related to this bizarre piece of work -> https://edge.launchpad.net/~ppa-pkg/+archive/ppa [11:55] Is it the missing LFA that was found this morning, or something else? [11:55] Oh, wow. [11:56] That's an impressively dangerous thing. [11:57] wgrant: yes, a copy with an expired LFA blocked the job [11:57] cprov: An LFA from an obsolete SPR? [11:58] wgrant: and expired BPR, actually, but yes, our *own* mess, not users' [11:58] Right. [11:58] That makes sense. [11:59] I initially suspected an expiry issue, but I thought copies of those were blocked. [11:59] wgrant: not yet :-/ [12:00] cprov: Ah, damn. [12:00] da ?!?! is that [12:00] let me just ensure the publisher is unleashed and I will file a bug. [12:00] 3K packages? [12:00] lifeless: Yeah, it *does* makes sense. In a dangerous sort of way. [12:00] cprov: what is it [12:00] ? [12:00] lifeless: Packages to install every PPA on Launchpad. [12:01] *blink* scary [12:01] wgrant: well, it doesn't, it could avoid all the packaging cruft and have a single package for managing PPA installation [12:01] cprov: I guess so. [12:01] This wasn't discussed with you before it was created? [12:01] wgrant: even it he updates the local PPA inventory daily or something. [12:02] wgrant: no it wasn't [12:02] Bug #316431 [12:02] Launchpad bug 316431 in soyuz "Package copying should not allow obsolete packages to be copied" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/316431 [12:02] wgrant: I saw him posting the solution here and there [12:02] wgrant: you are my hero! thanks. [12:02] I 'like' the way that all of those exceptionally trivial packages use cdbs to build :-/ [12:02] I knew I'd seen that bug somewhere. [12:04] cprov: How'd you unbreak it? Just unpublished the [SB]PPHs? [12:04] wgrant: unpublished the faulty binaries. [12:06] cprov: Thanks. [12:07] jeez, those chromium debug binaries are big! 670 MiB of pain. [12:07] Yep. I wonder if it includes symbols for all of the embedded libs too. [12:08] Since Chrome has embedded copies of pretty much everything that it uses. [12:08] wgrant: yeah, a shiny monolith. [12:08] Heh. [12:20] \o/ [12:24] Ah, now I'm less confused. I forgot that SPRs don't expire. [12:32] 17 hours without retry? https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa/+build/1074410 [12:32] https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa [12:32] Hopefully it's just that bug that cprov fixed a couple of days ago. [12:34] fta: binaries were not published (due to the publisher problem) builds could not be retried. [12:34] cprov, wasn't that fixed yesterday? [12:35] i mean, ~12h ago [12:35] fta: `retry-depwait` will run again in 20 min and will hopefully succeed [12:35] fta: 50 minutes ago. [12:35] fta: no, it wasn't [12:35] oh, ok [12:35] * fta waiting :) [12:36] * cprov can't wait either ... so he runs the script manually. [12:36] Heh. [12:36] cprov: Wouldn't it make more sense to run it more frequently now? [12:37] Or does it take a while? [12:37] wgrant: PPAs publishing frequency changed, yes, it would make more sense if we retry builds more often. [12:40] fta: done. [12:40] thanks [13:03] okay, all fixed, lunch then *incident* report === cprov is now known as cprov-afk [13:07] Anyone else getting timeouts on https://bugs.staging.launchpad.net/ubuntu ? [13:09] staging does run on reduced hardware [13:10] but its working for me [13:10] It'll often work after a couple of retries. [13:10] Presumably the DB server cache gets warm enough. [13:10] page indices into memory [13:10] yes [13:10] thats what I'd assume too [13:13] cprov-afk: Bug #320398 [13:13] Launchpad bug 320398 in soyuz "Copy UI allows copying into Debian series in Ubuntu PPAs" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/320398 [13:13] oh yeah. works now. happens quite often on staging. and everytime i ask, it starts working.... (maybe a irc bot that picks it up and pokes something. hehe. :) [13:14] stefanlsd: Just refresh a few times, I guess. [13:26] wgrant: yes, have to fix that as well [13:26] cprov-afk: Oh, they're separate? OK. [13:27] wgrant: yes, very ... I've only found that last one because NCommander's PPA had that. [13:27] wgrant: and was being published every cycle. [13:29] * cprov-afk really goes (back in 2h) [14:41] is the ftp upload for ppa down? i get a connection refused [14:42] germanium *is* having bad luck today. [14:42] <\sh> zsquareplusc: me too (c) aol.com [14:42] cprov-afk: ^^ [14:45] <\sh> zsquareplusc: me too (c) aol.com [14:45] <\sh> grmpf wrong window [16:11] is ppa.launchpad.net not working? I'm unable to upload a package with dput (errno 111 connection refused) [16:12] croxis: welcome to the club :( [16:12] Ok, at least it isn't me :) [16:17] uploads to ppa.launchpad.net should be ok now. [16:17] it worked here, yes. thanks [16:21] great. [16:26] awesome! thanks [17:47] hello all, I have been trying to make modifications to a team (adding new members and editing team details) and it keeps saying that launchpad has had problem ... the most recent error is (Error ID: OOPS-1260ED418) === AWachert2 is now known as Wachert === Wachert is now known as Wachert|AfK [20:11] how to fix the "Cannot find svn repository root." problem [20:15] eagle00789: depends what you want. if you just want a branch from a part of the repository, try "bzr branch .." [20:15] it's from the automated import === ralf_ is now known as Ralf_J [20:26] so any clue?? [20:27] not me. i did the import myself and i just saw that error with svn-import. but branching directly from the svn repo url worked fine [20:27] ok. anybody else who knwos a sollution?? [20:30] the PPA is assigned to the group not the project. whats the best way to show that there is a PPA for the project? include it as text in the projects description? [20:30] i've got no clue... [21:08] sorry, my isp disconnected me [21:08] they are working in my area to improve the connection [21:10] but my question still stands. [21:10] how to fix the Cannot find svn repository root. error [22:07] bah. how do i get rid of a "packages" entry on a project homepage? [22:31] staging having issues again... timeout reporting bugs [23:47] how do i get rid of a "packages" entry on a project homepage? i created them by mistake (well, they link to the wrong place)