[00:04] <soreau> Can someone please fix this? http://pastebin.com/m14c52dca
[00:05] <soreau> This happened in Intrepid too, same package. -unsupported was 0.7.6 but Intrepid shipped with compiz-0.7.8 and mvo fixed it
[00:05] <soreau> Obviously, since they're not the same versions the plugins provided by the package simply do not work
[00:05] <tormod> soreau: please file a bug
[00:46] <slangasek> hrm, is there no way to unsubscribe a team from a blueprint?
[00:48] <pwnguin> well, you could implement it :)
[00:51] <phil_ps> I'm writing a program that needs binutils-dev, specifically BFD
[00:51] <phil_ps> debian says not to link against the libbfd
[00:52] <phil_ps> do I keep the source of bfd with my source
[00:52] <slangasek> pwnguin: huh?
[00:53] <pwnguin> it was a joke, but maybe i misunderstood
[00:54] <pwnguin> doesn't implementing a blueprint eventually retire it?
[00:54] <slangasek> oh, implement the blueprint
[00:54] <slangasek> I have no idea, I assume I'm now stuck subscribed to the blueprint indefinitely
[01:09] <Hobbsee> slangasek: i presume you have to unsubscibe fomr the bug linked to the blueprint
[01:21] <slangasek> Hobbsee: there's no linked bug; someone subscribed ubuntu-release to https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/karmic-fedora-directory-server-inclusion and there's no 'undo' button
[01:21] <Hobbsee> slangasek: yeah, I noticed that yesterday.  There is a linked bug, i'll look it up.
[01:25] <Hobbsee> slangasek: the related bug is at https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/27463 which pitti has unsubscribed us (again, i think) from.
[01:26] <Hobbsee> slangasek: i suspect that blueprint unsubscription is automatic, when you get unsubscribed from the bug that's sending you the mail fo the blueprint
[01:27] <Hobbsee> hrm, that bug is linked to a different spec.
[01:28] <Hobbsee> darn.  i don't know
[01:35] <Hobbsee> slangasek: yeah, you're stuck.  https://launchpad.net/bugs/50875
[01:42] <slangasek> Hobbsee: yeah :/
[15:08] <iulian> ScottK: Hey.  I'm trying to merge python-qt4 with Sid but I'm a bit confused because of libqt4-phonon-dev.  You mentioned in the changelog that you replaced libphonon-dev with libqt4-phonon-dev but the current Karmic version still has libphonon-dev in B-D.
[15:08] <iulian> ScottK: Am I missing something?
[16:45] <ScottK> iulian: I may have neglected to actually make the change.  We do want to build-dep on libqt4-phonon-dev
[16:45] <ScottK> iulian: We may need a newer qscintilla first (look at the Debian bugs on python-qt4).
[17:24] <iulian> ScottK: Hmm, I cannot find anything about qscintilla...
[17:29] <iulian> ScottK: There's only one bug opened in Debian against python-qt4.
[18:05] <mohan_> hi.. i am using ubuntu jaunty 64bit..
[18:06] <mohan_> where can i get Realtime Kernel?
[19:29] <lamont> tkamppeter: afk
[19:29] <lamont> ack, even
[19:48] <tkamppeter> lamont: hi
[19:49] <c3o> assallmaua'laikum brohter...
[19:49] <c3o> hai all
[19:50] <c3o> any hacker on this room brother... am need to talk
[19:50] <c3o> http://www.google.co.id/search?hl=id&client=firefox-a&rls=com.ubuntu%3Aen-US%3Aunofficial&q=bridge+management+system&btnG=Telusuri&meta=
[19:50] <c3o> am need develop it can help me....
[19:51] <c3o> NEED HLEP
[19:51] <ikonia> c3o: stop
[19:52] <ikonia> c3o: this channel is for development discussion
[19:52] <ikonia> not a "help" channel, and the way you are addressing the channel is not helpful
[19:53] <c3o> yup am now that brohter..
[19:53] <c3o> from kubuntu am get this room for discussion
[19:53] <c3o> about bms
[19:53] <ikonia> ok - so stop screaming "HELP"
[19:53] <ikonia> and discuss it
[19:53] <c3o> did you now that? am need develop it with kubuntu / ubuntu
[19:53] <c3o> :D
[19:53] <ikonia> yes
[19:54] <c3o> let start :D
[19:54] <ikonia> so disuss
[19:54] <lamont> tkamppeter: you had postfix questions for me?
[19:54] <c3o_> any script for run bms application for bridge management system
[19:55] <ikonia> no
[19:55] <c3o_> wow...
[19:55] <c3o_> ikonia, can  you tell me some room for newbee like me...
[19:55] <c3o_> am want lean ubuntu / kubuntu
[19:55] <ikonia> c3o_: #ubuntu
[19:55] <ikonia> #kubuntu
[19:56] <c3o_> thanks brother...
[20:00]  * lamont wanders off
[20:00] <tkamppeter> lamont, the problem is described in bug 141641 and in http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2407
[20:01] <c3o_> wine we need develop the best wine for emulator exe ?
[20:01] <c3o_> any ide ?
[20:02] <tkamppeter> lamont, the lsb package, required byu all third-party packages based on the LSB, including desktop apps and printer drivers, pulls postfix. This leads to an MTA daemon running which is often not needed and it also requires from users who want to install a desktop app or a printer driver to answer the debconf question which kind of mail server they want to have.\
[20:05] <c3o_> nice
[20:11] <ScottK> tkamppeter: Sounds like an LSB question, nothing directly to do with Postfix.
[20:15] <ikonia> c3o: this channel is not for that sort of discussion, I suggest you leave it and join #ubuntu
[20:16] <c3o> hai.. any time we mush give the sort discussion. what the hell it
[20:21] <tkamppeter> ScottK, it is already under discussion on the LSB mailing list ...
[20:21] <ScottK> OK
[20:22] <ikonia> c3o: this channel is for ubuntu development discussion - you're not developing on ubuntu, you want to learn how to use it, this channel is not the right place,
[20:23] <c3o> oke brother oke am out
[20:23] <c3o> fuck of ubuntu
[20:23] <c3o> all brother not care with me
[20:24] <ikonia> thank you
[20:52] <directhex> ikonia, could have been worse!
[20:52] <ikonia> very true
[21:34] <lamont> tkamppeter: and that's why lsb-base is so much sweeter as a dependency than lsb-core, and why we dropped lsb-core from the default install back in, oh, hoary or breezy, iirc
[21:34] <lamont> as in, what cares about lsb core these days, and why?
[21:36] <lamont> because, unless it's Linux Server Base, there's no good cause for there to be an MTA in it
[21:36] <lamont> and even then, it's questionable
[22:29] <lool> kirkland: Heya, you might be interested in this OOPS with ecryptfs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/387073
[22:32] <lool> kirkland: There are two other oopses against linux with ecryptfs, they have differing backtraces though
[22:37] <Quintasan> hmm, anyone knows which version of squashfs-tools is used to generate squasfs system on livecd? I'm having problems mounting it