[04:24] <ryanprior> What repository should I get Firefox 3.5 from?
[04:24] <ryanprior> The packages from ubuntu-mozilla-daily don't work with Jaunty Jackalope (lots of unresolvable dependencies)
[04:26] <ryanprior> Crap, just figured it out. The PPA line I copypasted specified the Karmic component.
[04:26] <micahg> they work for me?
[04:26] <micahg> did you add the ppa
[04:26] <micahg> ?
[04:26] <micahg> :)
[11:06] <fta> hi
[11:06] <fta> quiet here
[11:18] <asac> fta: hi
[11:27] <asac> fta: didnt check libjpeg yet. still doing all the planning.
[11:27] <asac> hope i get the task splitup for all the specs done by today
[11:27] <asac> so i can work on fixing stuff
[11:28] <fta> planning?
[11:31] <fta> ix:~/bzr/jpeg/build-area/libjpeg6b-moz-6b+moz~bzr20090614r9$ make test
[11:31] <fta> rm -f testout*
[11:31] <fta> ./djpeg -dct int -ppm -outfile testout.ppm  ./testorig.jpg
[11:31] <fta> JPEG parameter struct mismatch: library thinks size is 464, caller expects 428
[11:31] <fta> make: *** [test] Error 1
[11:32] <fta> that's:
[11:32] <fta>   if (structsize != SIZEOF(struct jpeg_decompress_struct))
[11:32] <fta>     ERREXIT2(cinfo, JERR_BAD_STRUCT_SIZE,
[11:32] <fta>              (int) SIZEOF(struct jpeg_decompress_struct), (int) structsize);
[11:35] <asac> fta: planning: specs/tasks
[11:36] <asac> fta: so maybe djpeg loads the system lib?
[11:38] <fta> hm, right
[11:39] <fta> and it has a rpath
[11:39] <fta> doesn't look good
[11:40] <fta> if we have to rebuild everything
[11:49] <asac> fta: yeah. seems more difficult than expected
[11:54] <asac> fta: problem would be that would probably become lsb incompatible (even more)
[11:54] <asac> so we need to coordinate with all major distros at least
[12:02] <fta> how can we test 1st?
[12:05] <fta> i'm surprised it's failing like that. i thought the moz lib was interchangeable with ours
[12:05] <asac> fta: seems not
[12:06] <asac> you said they changed int to int16, so thats probably accounting for this
[12:07] <fta> i just tried to set int16 to int but it's the same error
[12:10] <fta> hm, double click in the url is broken in ff3.6?
[12:11] <asac> what does double click do (never used it)
[12:12] <fta> select the whole url
[12:13] <fta> it's triple click now :(
[12:13] <fta> but double click should do something, like select a word, not nothing
[12:20] <asac> ah thats what you mean
[12:27] <asac> *sigh* mozilla bug 497792
[12:34] <asac> hmm ... so one identi.ca acconut wasnt enough for bugabundo ;)
[12:34] <asac> http://www.brainbird.co.cc/bugabundo
[12:34] <asac> i have now two subscriptions from him
[12:38] <fta> what's the difference?
[12:38] <fta> except for the theme?
[12:43] <asac> seems he doesnt use identi.ca anymore
[12:43] <asac> some custom laconica install maybe?
[12:51] <fta> ctrl T broken too?
[12:51] <fta> wtf?
[12:52] <fta> i probably need to restart or something
[12:52] <fta> no time for this crap
[12:52] <asac> heh
[12:52] <asac> X is falling apart ;)
[12:52] <asac> since sat my system alwways locks up if screen goes into powersave mode
[12:52] <asac> so i dont do that anymore ;)
[13:10] <asac> zbraniecki: hi. you pinged me a few days ago and i didnt follow up. do you still need something?
[13:10] <zbraniecki> asac: just wanted to give you an update on sw-TZ case.
[13:10] <zbraniecki> it seems that seth is leading this on our side
[13:11] <zbraniecki> and when I told him about our discussion here
[13:12] <zbraniecki> he said that he sent several emails to them both over the last days with no reply
[13:12] <zbraniecki> and that he's updating them on the case
[13:12] <zbraniecki> he also got a linguistic review from a third party on both translations
[13:12] <zbraniecki> and was about to send the results to both teams for feedback
[13:12] <zbraniecki> so it's an active case, not an abandoned one
[13:13] <zbraniecki> yet he agreed it would be better to post it in the bug for the reference
[13:13] <zbraniecki> so it should get back on track now
[13:13] <asac> ok great. thanks for the update
[16:02] <Nafallo> asac: bug 387329
[16:11] <asac> Nafallo: not fixed in latest jaunty?
[16:11] <asac> hmm
[16:12] <asac> seems to be  anew string ;)
[16:12] <asac> let me check
[16:12] <Nafallo> asac: post check I can see if it's reproducible on my Nokia.
[16:13] <Nafallo> s/check/work/
[16:18] <asac> Nafallo: ok attached patch and evaluation
[16:19] <Nafallo> asac: cute!
[16:20] <asac> Nafallo: attached more, can you try to get feedback on the patch please so i can get this upstreamed?
[16:20] <asac> ;)
[16:20] <asac> (if you know him)
[16:22] <Nafallo> asac: commented on his facebook status that led me to the bug :-)
[16:22] <asac> k ;)
[17:02] <fta> asac, your turn to try ppabot, ripps is all set now ;)
[17:05] <asac> great. currently wondering a bit about what i actually want ;)
[17:05] <asac> (e.g. nm trunk? or branch? or both)
[17:05] <asac> anyway. moving out to do some shopping while this trunk thing builds ;)
[18:11] <fta> Crtl R is broken too? wtf, all controls?
[19:13] <BUGabundo> boas tardes
[19:13] <fta> gni
[19:18] <asac> fta: i dont have any issues ;)
[19:18] <fta> asac ?
[19:19] <BUGabundo> fta: on chrome on hardy I guess ?
[19:24] <asac> 19:11 < fta> Crtl R is broken too? wtf, all controls?
[19:24] <fta> i restarted ff, same. maybe it's gnome.
[19:24] <asac> could be... but i have latest and it works well
[19:26] <BUGabundo> humm frozen FF?
[19:26] <BUGabundo> I had that last nighr
[19:26] <BUGabundo> wouldn't respond to keyboard but mouse worked
[19:26] <BUGabundo> every other app, was OK
[19:27] <fta> yep, some thing like that, just ff
[19:28] <fta> oh, my ff is 1 day older than xul.
[19:29] <asac> bug 530255
[19:29] <asac> fta: that could be it ;)
[19:29] <asac> fta: wati depends works now, so higher dependency bar again?
[19:30] <fta> er? wati depends ?
[19:30] <asac> fta: auto build when depends are fulfilled
[19:30] <asac> wait depends
[19:31] <fta> i probably last updated when ff was not yet built/published
[19:31] <fta> i tweak the build-deps, not the deps
[19:32] <asac> fta: well i mean build-deps obviously
[19:32] <asac> but i think you introduced a one day offset
[19:32] <asac> we dont need that anymore
[19:32] <fta> nope, i didn't
[19:32] <asac> (probably unrelated to this) ;)
[19:33] <asac> bug #530255
[19:33] <asac> debian bug #530255
[19:35] <nion> asac: so here i am
[19:35] <asac> nion: hey ;)
[19:35] <asac> so yeah. bluekuja is gone.
[19:35] <asac> nion: the patch changes API?
[19:35] <nion> when did you last hear from him?
[19:36] <nion> asac: yes but ctorrent doesn't build a library
[19:36] <asac> hmm. ok
[19:36] <nion> it's an upstream patch anyway... so it could be better :)
[19:37] <nion> asac: when did you have mail contact to him last time?
[19:38] <asac> nion: i am not sure .. i dont think i have any archive with his mails still
[19:38] <BUGabundo> killing pulseaudio, killed firefox yay :(
[19:38] <asac> > 1year
[19:38] <nion> oh ok so it has to be quite some time
[19:38] <asac> fta: when was bluekuja last in here?
[19:39] <asac> do you still have it in your log?
[19:39] <asac> (or was bluekuja even before your times ;))
[19:39] <fta> Nov 18 16:19:24 * bluekuja has quit ("Sto andando via")
[19:39] <asac> nion: the patch looks ok. how about uploading the unstable and hoping that someone uses it and complains?
[19:39] <nion> ok but that should be sufficient in order to orphan the package :)
[19:39] <fta> but he was idle
[19:39] <asac> fta: which year?
[19:39] <nion> asac: yeah will do that after some days
[19:39] <fta> Apr 29 20:03:39 <bluekuja>        cya
[19:40] <asac> 2008?
[19:40] <asac> or 2007 ;)?
[19:40] <asac> ok i guess 2008
[19:40] <fta> hold on
[19:40] <nion> wow
[19:40] <asac> nion: yeah that matches my understanding
[19:40] <asac> nion: i can upload the patch on wed to sid when i get back to my system with debian on it
[19:40] <asac> (to unstable)
[19:41] <nion> asac: no need, im a dd
[19:41] <asac> sure
[19:41] <nion> alright, then thank you very much guys! that helped a lot
[19:41] <asac> no problem
[19:41] <fta> asac, yep 2008
[19:41] <asac> the patch looks ok
[19:41] <nion> asac: thanks for reading
[19:41] <asac> but i am an outsider for that code ;)
[19:42] <asac> nion: welcome. cu.
[20:00] <asac> hmm. i karmic slower? building trunk browser takes ages today here on notebook
[20:00] <asac> is
[20:01] <micahg> hi asac
[20:01] <BUGabundo1> on everything else, it faster to me asac
[20:01] <BUGabundo1> only IO is slower then JJ, that was slower then II
[20:01] <asac> hi micahg
[20:01] <asac> BUGabundo1: why is it that IO is slower?
[20:02] <BUGabundo1> asac: kernel bug? no idea
[20:02] <micahg> asac: I didn't get to doing the bugilla _> LP matchup this weekend
[20:02] <asac> micahg: what does "matchup" mean? what was your goal?
[20:02] <BUGabundo> asac: never managed to trigger a reason for it!
[20:02] <micahg> to close out issues for 3.0.11
[20:02] <BUGabundo> but I know for sure my disk IO is now slower
[20:02] <BUGabundo> of course a format and ext4 would help
[20:02] <asac> micahg: ah ok ;)
[20:03] <micahg> but I did watch for regressions
[20:03] <micahg> and didn't see too many bugs
[20:03] <BUGabundo> need to buy a new 1.5TiBs disk, I guess
[20:03] <asac> yeah please test ext4 for me ;)
[20:03] <Nafallo> /dev/sda2 on / type ext4 (rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,commit=600)
[20:03] <micahg> 1 user apparently didn't upgrade xulrunner with FF which broke it
[20:03] <asac> micahg: were there any regressions?
[20:03] <micahg> not that I've seen
[20:03] <asac> micahg: hmm. that should still work though i think
[20:03] <fta>  /dev/sdc1 on /big type ext4 (rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro)
[20:03] <asac> most likely user just didnt restart properly (old problem)
[20:04] <fta>  Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
[20:04] <fta> /dev/sdc1             917G  200M  913G   1% /big
[20:04] <BUGabundo> Nafallo: that commit is to change the default value from 30 mins?
[20:04] <asac> fta: does it work flawlessly? do you have any mission critical things on there?
[20:04] <Nafallo> BUGabundo: something laptop mode set for me.
[20:04] <fta> no idea, new disk, it's empty
[20:04] <BUGabundo> /dev/sda1 on / type ext3 (rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro)
[20:04] <BUGabundo> /dev/sda5 on /home type xfs (rw,relatime)
[20:05] <asac> xfs ;)
[20:05] <fta> i asked gparted for ext3, got ext4 instead :S
[20:05] <asac> maybe thats why io is getting slower ;)
[20:05] <asac> minority FS
[20:05] <asac> lol
[20:06] <asac> so seems ff trunk currently fails in crashreporter bits ... --disable-crashreporter now
[20:06] <fta> it's supposed to be a 1TB disk, i get 917G, i've been robbed!
[20:06] <BUGabundo> fta: GiB vs GB
[20:06] <BUGabundo> all over again
[20:07] <BUGabundo> asac: XFS *is* much faster then ext3. I made this disk schema back on hardy alpha!
[20:07] <micahg> fta: ext3 used preallocated 5%
[20:07] <micahg> don't know about ext4
[20:07] <fta>  /dev/sdc1            984506441728 209342464 979296088064   1% /big
[20:07] <Nafallo> micahg: same default
[20:08] <micahg> BUGabundo: 1TB (1000) = 976.5625GB(1024)
[20:09] <BUGabundo> micahg: heeh
[20:29] <fta> asac, weren't we supposed to rename the channel?
[20:30] <Nafallo> fta: #maintainer_asac ? ;-)
[20:31] <NCommander> asac, so ... debugging thunderbird ...
[20:32] <BUGabundo> fta: LOL
[20:32]  * BUGabundo ReDent Seal of Approval
[20:33] <fta> BUGabundo, ?
[20:33] <BUGabundo> fta: check *any* SN now!
[20:37] <NCommander> asac, *grumbles* any ideas how to go about this?
[20:38] <BUGabundo> Nafallo: what is the prob
[20:40] <Nafallo> BUGabundo: your tab is out of order. get a new keyboard.
[20:40] <Nafallo> (at least I think so)
[20:41] <BUGabundo> Nafallo: eheh sorry
[20:41] <BUGabundo> NCommander: what is the prob?
[20:41] <NCommander> BUGabundo, evil segfault on ARM
[20:42] <fta> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/LinuxSandboxIPC
[20:42] <NCommander> BUGabundo, https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/385325/comments/5
[20:42] <fta> Gas factory?
[20:42] <BUGabundo> fta: AHAHAAHAAH
[20:43] <fta> BUGabundo, don't redent that
[20:43] <BUGabundo> won't
[20:43] <BUGabundo> its not THAT funny
[20:44] <BUGabundo>  AHAHAAHAAH
[21:09] <BUGabundo> fta: I'm sorry ! did I offended you?
[21:10] <fta> no, i was joking
[21:10] <BUGabundo> ahh
[21:10] <BUGabundo> please put a smile or a /sarcasm in there next time
[21:10] <BUGabundo> otherwise I won't get it, and take it serious
[21:10] <BUGabundo> ;<
[21:11] <fta> that was intentional
[21:11] <BUGabundo> ah
[21:11] <BUGabundo> to scare me!
[21:11] <BUGabundo> you are a bad bad man ;)
[21:25] <asac> fta: not sure about rename ;)
[21:25] <fta> asac, i don't know who's idea it was, i just remember we discussed it during UDS, with jorge
[21:26] <asac> NCommander: there are still optimizations in the backtrace. did you use --disable-optimize option?
[21:27] <asac> fta: jorge came up with it
[21:28] <BUGabundo> humm
[21:28] <NCommander> asac, yes. I'm currently testing a patch lool found, so it might get fixed
[21:28] <BUGabundo> fta: I sugested that long time ago
[23:01] <fta> @time
[23:03]  * BUGabundo did you mean date?
[23:03] <BUGabundo> Mon Jun 15 23:03:10 WEST 2009
[23:03]  * BUGabundo is now know as timebot
[23:05] <fta> just wanted to see if i was still online, lp died on me with no such host
[23:06] <BUGabundo> humm !ping next time
[23:10] <yoasif> hey, anyone feel like looking at this bug? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/seamonkey/+bug/377456
[23:33] <BUGabundo> fta: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=13096
[23:34] <fta> so?
[23:35] <BUGabundo> nothing
[23:35] <BUGabundo> just keeping you in the loop
[23:35] <BUGabundo> my bug is now a dupe of that one
[23:43] <billybigrigger> anyone here running jaunty/karmic and notice that you can't keep book marks in FF 3.x
[23:44] <BUGabundo> nope
[23:44] <BUGabundo> but i do notice probs keeping history
[23:46] <billybigrigger> we talked about this yesterday in +1 :P
[23:46] <billybigrigger> i didn't know there was a -mozillateam chan though :P
[23:46] <BUGabundo> I know
[23:46] <BUGabundo> eheh
[23:47] <BUGabundo> I notice. you poped up the sec I mentioned it
[23:52] <micahg> billybigrigger: ar eyou running 3.0.11?
[23:52] <billybigrigger> yes
[23:52] <micahg> have you tried a new profile?
[23:53] <billybigrigger> negative
[23:54] <micahg> ok, can you try that pleas
[23:54] <micahg> e
[23:54] <micahg> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs?action=show&redirect=DebuggingFirefox#Try with a new profile
[23:57] <billybigrigger> great, now i have 0 bookmarks :P
[23:57] <billybigrigger> but it works, thanks
[23:57] <micahg> well, you can export them from the other profile
[23:59] <billybigrigger> wow that makes a bloody mess after importing
[23:59] <billybigrigger> is it supposed to?
[23:59] <micahg> idk