=== funkyHat_ is now known as funkyHat === mrooney1 is now known as mrooney === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson [01:11] Hi all [01:12] i'm trying to get a source from another distro [01:12] i added a new line to the sources.list, run an update.. [01:12] and then used apt-get source package -t intrepid [01:13] but can't make it work,.. need to do anything more? [01:13] dannylo, you added a deb-src line? [01:14] yep [01:14] i added: deb-src http://uy.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ intrepid main [01:14] i did it once, but can't make it work tonight :( [01:16] dannylo, try passing the -t statement first [01:16] i.e. apt-get -t intrepid source foo === asac_ is now known as asac [01:25] nope... :(.. should i add the 'deb' line also? [01:36] yep, i added the deb line and worked.. didn't remember that [01:39] can someone try pbuilding http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/pidgin-mbpurple , I was told it FTBFS but it is building fine for me =/ [01:42] binarymutant_: maybe that was a problem on my part [01:43] * maxb cowbuilds [01:43] dannylo, did the source package name not match the name you were apt-get sourcing? [01:44] perhaps my pbuilder is acting up [01:44] they match [01:44] binarymutant_, nellery: build successful here [01:45] maxb, thanks :) [01:45] hrm, what is pbuilder doing now [01:45] sorry binarymutant_, I'll review and advocate if it's good [01:45] nellery, thank you :) === jldugger_ is now known as pwnguin === binarymutant_ is now known as binarymutant [03:39] if anyone has the time to advocate http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/pidgin-mbpurple I would be very appreciative =) === jldugger is now known as pwnguin === rmcbride_ is now known as rmcbride [07:11] good morning [07:11] dholbach: grub2 morning :-P [07:12] juanje: I take it you're happy with grub2? :) [07:14] dholbach: hehe... no really yet. I just tried in my old macbook with hardy and it was crashing. But now I got Guadalinexv6 (jaunty) and I'll give it another chance [07:15] juanje: good luck with that! [07:15] dholbach: hehe Thanks :-) [07:34] quick question; is it considered a bad practice to mark your own bugs in launchpad to "In Progress" if the problem is acknowleged upstream? [07:34] (and fix available upstream) [07:34] rawler, -> #ubuntu-bugs, but most people don't do that. [07:35] or should I wait for some dev to confirm and mark state? [07:35] Generally, just because upstream is fixing it isn't considered sufficient that it is being fixed in Ubuntu. That said, if you want to track it, assign it to yourself, set in-progress, and mark it complete when the fix is applied. [07:36] okies.. leaving it untouched, but myself on CC.. :) [07:36] meanwhile, if someone have a couple of free minutes, I've got a package in dire need for sponsorship.. :) http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=tetzle [08:43] Hi guys :) [08:44] Just want to ask a quick question: I'm working on a bug that requires me to look at the code from a jaunty package, however I am running karmic. Is there anyway to get the jaunty source using apt-get? [08:45] Have the Jaunty deb-src lines in your sources.list (or sources.list.d), and apt-get source -t jaunty $SOURCEPACKAGE [08:46] Alternatively, work out what version of the source package Jaunty has, and ask for "apt-get source $SOURCEPAKCAGE=$THEVERSION" [08:49] RAOF: Thanks, I used the second method and it worked a treat [08:49] :D [09:32] bah, he's left [09:32] * maxb wanted to suggest pull-lp-source [09:53] vorian, bug 387231, it builds for me and in my PPA, are you sure it FTBFS? [09:53] Launchpad bug 387231 in revelation "revelation 0.4.11-4ubuntu1 FTBFS" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/387231 [09:57] Hew: how can that diff fixes a ftbfs? [09:57] is that .py called by some test? [09:58] gaspa, a Debian patch failed to apply on the .py file because it was previously modified by Ubuntu, and I forgot to revert the change. [09:59] that debdiff reverts to the native version of the .py [09:59] ok ,I see. [09:59] see the ubuntu1 revelation build log, and also the ubuntu2 that successfully builds in my PPA [10:00] just seeing. [10:01] Hew: anyway, attach the build log in the bug. [10:02] for ubuntu1? ok, thanks for the advice. [10:02] no, for ubuntu2 [10:02] oh ok [10:05] gaspa, once I do that, do you think I should resubscribe u-u-s? [10:05] Hew: I'd wait for an answer by vorian. [10:05] ok I'll wait a bit more :-) [10:13] I need review work on this when we are done packaging: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/iFolderPackaging [10:13] both simias and ifolder are now running under Jaunty [10:18] Hi all, i have dependency problems on jaunty, is i'm at the right place to ask about it? [10:18] prob: http://pastebin.com/m32924a73 sources.list : http://pastebin.com/m6711ca15 [10:20] # [10:20] ERROR: Module alias not properly enabled: /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/alias.load is a real file, not touching it [10:20] have you created that file in the past? [10:21] if not, remove it, and run sudo dpkg --configure -a [10:21] yup, i have copied my old config before === azeem_ is now known as azeem [10:21] MetaMorfoziS: looks like it's supposed to be a symlink or something, not a real file [10:22] Ok, i try to mv /etc/apache2 /etc/apache_old [10:23] it still cries [10:23] http://pastebin.com/m66c612d0 [10:23] MetaMorfoziS: no, don't ove the entie directory. Just move the alias.load file. [10:24] move the directory back, ove the alias.load file, and ty again [10:24] but why that solves the dependency problem? [10:24] (add m's and r's where appropriate, my keyboard is dying) [10:24] :s [10:25] MetaMorfoziS: because it lets the package that the othe bits rely on to upgrade properly [10:25] so then they, in turn, can upgrade [10:25] now i have removed apache2, moved /etc/apache, now try to install it again [10:25] it must work, no? [10:25] t [10:26] should do [10:26] very intresting [10:26] thank you, it worked [10:26] :) [10:27] you're welcome [10:28] MetaMorfoziS: what you did was the equivalent of removing some of the stairs in a staircase, while someone was walking up them. Then they went splat. [10:28] put the stairs back, they can get up the stairs fine [10:28] :-) [10:28] oh, and adding a giant box, so people couldn't get past it [10:29] yes, it asked about to overwrite the config in the modules [10:29] sounds about right [10:29] and for first i said no then yes... === erhesrhsrtb54vyh is now known as Elbrus [12:31] ping cody-somerville, jdong_: bug 382215 [12:31] Launchpad bug 382215 in amule "Update aMule to 2.2.5 ASAP (security issue fixed)" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/382215 [12:49] All recent armel builds fail (last successful build ~15 hours ago); whats [12:49] the right place to report it? [13:09] does it fail for a common reason? or are the failures different? [13:14] there is a common reason, at least for packages using autotools [13:14] "configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables" === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan === mdomsch is now known as mdomsch_bos [14:38] jpds: I've seen you've changed update-maintainer. Isn't the ML change decision for after Archive Reorganization? === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach [14:55] hi guys, is there anybody working on the asterisk merge? [14:57] foolano: ask the last uploader [14:57] ...I wonder if I have any merges to do [14:58] yes, damn and blast [14:59] Laney: weren't you the last uploader? [14:59] i was checking https://merges.ubuntu.com/universe.html [15:00] foolano: That just means I sponsored it [15:00] I don't know what that comment means though - maybe it could be synced now? === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson === yofel_ is now known as yofel [15:32] Hello, why does mutt build-depend on elinks instead of elinks-lite ? [15:32] in ubuntu that is [15:37] AnAnt: I don't know why we deviate from Debian there. Perhaps you could ask the person who made the change first? [15:42] AnAnt: I guess it's because elinks-lite was in universe till 2009-05-04 [15:42] oh [15:43] why isn't 'links' (as Debian do) good enough? [15:45] I don't know the differences between links, links2 or elinks [15:45] quite [15:47] but presumably Debian would choose for the same reasons we would [15:47] and links is in universe [15:47] unless it's to do with the server cd or something [15:47] so can't be used as a B-D for mutt [15:48] that'll be it [15:48] aha, so elinks-lite was in universe till karmic ! [15:50] RainCT: Might as well do it now. :) [15:51] AnAnt: any reason why you are asking? [15:52] geser: elinks has a lot of deps, and I don't think that mutt needs all the bells & whistles of elinks to make its docs [15:53] geser: probably elinks-lite is just fine for it [15:53] AnAnt: if you prepare a merge (there is a new mutt in unstable) and plan to change this, please think also to change the recommends from exim4 to default-mta [15:54] geser: I am preparing indeed [15:54] geser: ok, done [15:55] does debian have default-mta? [15:56] IIRC exim4 provides it there [15:56] no [15:56] I remember seeing a mail about it, will try to find it [15:56] * Laney is all about small deltas [15:57] * exim4-daemon-light now Provides: default-mta. See #508644. [15:57] excellent [15:57] that's a virtual package [15:58] can one recommand : virtual package | virtual package ? [15:58] I guess so [15:59] I'm sure that this is not accepted neither in Depends nor Build-Deps [15:59] why do you need to? [15:59] Laney: why do I need to what ? [15:59] have the alternate dep [16:00] well, I don't think that I can Recommend a virtual package either [16:00] so it wouldn't try to install postfix if an other MTA is already installed [16:00] I think it should be (at least that's how it is in Deps): real-package [|virtual package] [16:00] :q [16:00] oops [16:01] so I think exim4 should be left as it is (or maybe changed to postfix) [16:02] Laney: Usually the smiley is: :p [16:02] the whole idea behind it was that we don't have to change exim4 to postfix in every package [16:03] you are supposed to recommend default-mta | mail-transport-agent [16:03] only one thing provides the former afaik [16:04] AnAnt: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2009-June/028289.html [16:04] Hmm, anyone else seen this compiler error: [16:04] /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.4.0/../../../../lib/crti.o: could not read symbols: File format not recognized [16:04] geser: good find, that's what I thought [16:04] AnAnt: it mentions Depends there so I assume it's also good for Recommends [16:05] ok [16:06] and how about Build-Depend on elinks-lite instead ? is that a good idea ? [16:07] if it works [16:07] you could suggest that to debian to [16:08] o [16:18] is there a way to change the directory that debuild/dpkg-buildpackage puts files into? (I mean .dsc, .build, .deb etc) [16:18] e.g. if I want it to be ../debs instead of ../ [16:33] ok, who should I subscribe for mutt's merge request ? [16:33] u-u-s ? [16:33] it's in main isn't it [16:33] ? [16:34] oh, yes [16:34] so, who should I subscribe ? [16:37] ubuntu-main-sponsors [16:38] done ! LP 388515 [16:38] Launchpad bug 388515 in mutt "Candidate revision mutt_1.5.20-1ubuntu1" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/388515 [16:38] isn't there a tool like requestsync for the merges ? [16:40] please forward the changes for discussion [16:41] Laney: huh ? [16:41] to Debian [16:41] Laney: what's the tool to forward ubuntu patch ? [16:41] submittodebian, but you probably want to do it by hand [16:41] as there are two separate changes [16:49] is default-mta instead of exim a wishlist ? [16:49] or normal ? [16:54] I'd file it as normal and assume the DD will change it if he sees it more as a wishlist [16:54] how would i convince them to use elinks-lite instead of links ? [16:55] that's a good question, perhaps it's one of those ubuntu-specific changes we need to carry around [16:55] It doesn't take them any time to say thanks but no thanks [16:56] just say "we've made this change because of x and y, here's why it won't make life any worse than you. How about considering it? If not, no hard feelings" [17:01] done ! === bluesmoke_ is now known as Amaranth [17:02] Laney: you can use submittodebian twice and edit the patches accordingly [17:02] AnAnt: right [17:04] if anyone has the time to revu http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/pidgin-mbpurple I would be very appreciative =) [17:39] geser: are you on regina-normal? === joaopinto is now known as joaopinto_ [19:06] fta: Hey. FYI, parallel installation of metacity and mutter should be possible soon :). Several patches related to this have been landing those days [19:09] hey guys, could somebody tell me who I could ask for help on the state of bug 280188 ? [19:09] Launchpad bug 280188 in zenity "libgtkada2-bin : trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/gdialog', which is also in package zenity" [Low,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/280188 [19:09] the 'fix' makes the package unusable [19:09] *the libgtkada2-bin package [19:10] since uninstalling zenity is short to impossible [19:58] hm [19:58] * directhex finishes comparing gnote 0.5.0 to tomboy 0.14.0 === Snova_ is now known as Snova [20:05] if anyone has the time to revu http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/pidgin-mbpurple I would be very appreciative =) === Snova_ is now known as Snova [20:36] Hi. What should be the status of a SRU bug? Confirmed or New? [20:36] it's for Bug #345208 [20:36] Launchpad bug 345208 in pythonmagick "[SRU]PythonMagick is not usable because of missing functions" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/345208 === fabrice_sp_ is now known as fabrice_sp === pochu is now known as pochu_ === korn_ is now known as c_korn === dashua__ is now known as dashua [22:24] hew, still about? [22:32] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/audacious-plugins/+bug/383307 [22:32] Launchpad bug 383307 in audacious-plugins "Please merge audacious-plugins 2.0.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,Confirmed] [22:32] why is it taking weeks to get accepted :( === effie_jayx_ is now known as effie_jayx === pochu_ is now known as pochu === joaopinto_ is now known as joaopinto === ember_ is now known as ember