[00:05] <DGMurdockIII> where can i get the code so i can use launchpad as the bug tracking software for the program im working on inkscape use it so there must be a way
[00:10] <lifeless> DGMurdockIII: what do you mean?
[00:11] <DGMurdockIII> hold on let me get a example
[00:23] <DGMurdockIII> (lifeless): how could i use launchpad like i could trac trac install it on my web site
[00:27] <kklimonda> DGMurdockIII: inkscape is developed on launchpad i.e. they host their code, bugtracker etc. there
[00:28] <kklimonda> ok, not code
[00:44] <nhandler> Is there anything I can do to open a bug like bug #1? I keep getting Time Out errors
[00:46] <nhandler> See, even ubottu times out ;)
[00:54] <mwhudson> hm, that shouldn't be happening :)
[00:54] <mwhudson> though in the case of bug 1, the timeout page is arguably more interesting :)
[00:54] <mwhudson> that seemed way too quick for a timeout
[00:55] <kklimonda> at least it's a bug you can fix in this decade ;)
[00:56] <mthaddon> works for me on edge - https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1
[00:57] <mwhudson> ubottu: :)
[00:57] <nhandler> mthaddon: That edge link worked for me. However, I get the timeout if I try to go to the non-edge URL (even though it will normally redirect me to the edge version)
[00:58] <mthaddon> I wonder if today's cherry pick b0rked things
[00:58] <mthaddon> nhandler: are you getting an OOPS id?
[00:59] <nhandler> mthaddon: Yeah, one second
[00:59]  * mthaddon tries himself
[00:59] <mthaddon> and of course, it works for me on non-edge too :(
[01:00] <nhandler> mthaddon:   (Error ID: OOPS-1264ED612)
[01:00] <nhandler> And the URL shown in the address bar is https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1
[01:00] <mthaddon> thx
[01:00] <nhandler> So it is redirecting me
[01:01] <mthaddon> should show up our OOPS reports - will have the QA folks look at it
[01:01]  * mwhudson finds slow queries about archive permissions in the log, boggles
[01:02] <mthaddon> does seem a little... odd
[01:02] <mwhudson> nhandler: do you have special permissions wrt archive management of any distros on launchpad?
[01:02] <mthaddon> mwhudson: and that's being repeated 5 times?
[01:03] <nhandler> mwhudson: Archive Management, no
[01:03] <mwhudson> well i don't konw
[01:03]  * mwhudson goes back to his own problems...
[01:08] <mthaddon> nhandler: if you're on the launchpad-users list an email to that might be a good idea - if not I can send to the devel list, but then you wouldn't know the outcome of the discussion
[01:09] <nhandler> mthaddon: I can send to launchpad-users, but do you think that it will accomplish anything? Would a question on answers.launchpad.net be more effective?
[01:09] <mthaddon> nhandler: either one - perhaps the question might be better, yeah
[01:27] <BUGabundo> guud evening!
[01:28] <BUGabundo> quick question
[01:28] <BUGabundo> running on edge: I opened a bug, subed to it with the ajax applet, then commented on it, and was still offered to sub to the bug
[01:28] <BUGabundo> known bug (not updating the all page) ?
[01:29] <BUGabundo> abentley: ping ^^^^^^^
[01:39] <abentley> BUGabundo: Sorry, I forgot to take my nick off the topic when I went off duty.
[01:39] <abentley> BUGabundo: Offhand, I don't know if it was a known bug.
[01:39] <abentley> BUGabundo: But now that you'
[01:40] <abentley> ve reported it, it must be :-)
[01:40] <BUGabundo> I haven't , yet
[01:40] <BUGabundo> I guess it would be a very hard bug to fix
[01:40] <BUGabundo> since that part of the site is static
[01:40] <BUGabundo> I'll file it
[01:40] <BUGabundo> is it malone, right?
[01:40] <abentley> BUGabundo: yes.
[01:41] <BUGabundo> and abentley don't forget to remove your self
[01:41] <BUGabundo> I keep messing up all the  parts of LP, where to file bugs
[01:41] <BUGabundo> lol
[01:43] <BUGabundo> https://bugs.launchpad.net/malone/+bug/388747
[01:43] <BUGabundo> off to bed
[01:43] <BUGabundo> thanks
[03:44] <robert_ancell> Can I make a launchpad new bug link that has some fields already filled out? e.g. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+filebug?summary=test
[03:49] <kklimonda> hmm.. yes..
[03:49] <kklimonda> when apport sends crash report it fills summary field
[03:56] <wgrant> kklimonda: That's done by sending it in the blob, though. Which is awkward.
[03:57] <wgrant> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+filebug?field.title=test
[03:57] <wgrant> That works.
[03:59] <robert_ancell> wgrant: thanks
[03:59] <robert_ancell> wgrant: can I set tags on that too?
[04:01] <wgrant> robert_ancell: Add &field.tags=blah
[04:01] <robert_ancell> cheers
[05:03] <garyvdm> Hi - You use to be able to set a status whitebord for a branch. I can't find it now. Has it been removed?
[05:05] <lifeless> yes
[05:05] <garyvdm> :-(
[05:11] <wgrant> garyvdm: It was reincarnated as a description field yesterday.
[05:12] <wgrant> garyvdm: But it's only on edge.launchpad.net
[05:12] <garyvdm> wgrant: Cool - Let me go set it there.
[05:21] <nhandler> wgrant: Just to be clear, the description for branches is visible to everyone, correct?
[05:22] <wgrant> nhandler: Yes.
[05:23] <wgrant> nhandler: Well, to all those with access to the branch.
[05:23] <nhandler> wgrant: What type of access to the branch? Read access or commit access?
[05:23] <wgrant> nhandler: Read.
[05:24] <nhandler> wgrant: Ok, so that would only really affect private branches
[05:24] <wgrant> nhandler: Right.
[06:23] <MTecknology> If any rubber ducky wants a quick and easy question to blow out of the queue, https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/74591
[06:25] <spm> gawd I love it when folks give me lins to the projects/teams that want dealt with
[06:25] <spm> MTecknology: done
[06:26] <spm> *links
[06:26] <MTecknology> thanks :)
[06:26] <MTecknology> spm: any chance you could get rid of the milestones too?
[06:26] <MTecknology> I was just about to tack that on there :P
[06:27] <spm> MTecknology: the project owner should be able to do that now?
[06:27] <MTecknology> I'm trying to figured out where to delete the releases after the new layout :P
[06:27] <MTecknology> ok
[06:27] <wgrant> MTecknology: Trashcan next to the title on the release/milestone page.
[06:28] <MTecknology> hurray, we can finally do that ourselvse :D
[06:28] <MTecknology> haven't needed to for a while
[06:29] <spm> *you're* happy!?!?!?! ;-)
[06:29] <MTecknology> yup
[06:29] <MTecknology> and everyone else in the lp world
[06:36] <wgrant> No edge update today?
[06:36] <spm> nope
[06:38] <wgrant> spm: Why not?
[06:40] <spm> issues with one of the precursors to open saucing. an edge release at this point would have busted wide apart. so we disabled today to hopefully have that bit fixed by tomorrow.
[06:40] <wgrant> Ah.
[06:41] <wgrant> The production config removal?
[06:41] <spm> wgrant: you scare me sometimes.... :-P
[06:48] <MTecknology> spm: how accurate are the download counters??
[06:49] <spm> MTecknology: wrong question. :-) They are very precise. Accuracy is a *whole* nuther ball game.
[06:50] <spm> jokes aside, for your purposes? they're accurate.
[06:50] <MTecknology> 13 days  since last download seems to pop up a lot
[06:50] <MTecknology> that's unlikely that anyone downloaded a version that old though
[06:50] <spm> you'd be surprised
[06:51] <wgrant> One could blame spiders.
[06:51] <wgrant> Or stupid users.
[06:51] <spm> same same :-)
[06:52] <MTecknology> well, I'm trashing them anyway :P
[06:52] <MTecknology> on https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu-drupal-releases/+milestone/6.3.2, theres "" at the end of the title..
[06:52] <MTecknology> Is that my fault?
[06:53] <wgrant> MTecknology: That was a bug a couple of weeks ago.
[06:53] <wgrant> The codename in the AJAX milestone creation dialog put in an empty string.
[06:53] <wgrant> Try editing and saving the milestone without changing it.
[06:53] <MTecknology> ok
[06:54] <wgrant> Maybe the bug was also in the normal form, as that milestone is oldish..
[06:54] <MTecknology> all better :)
[06:54] <MTecknology> thanks
[06:55] <wgrant> Excellent.
[06:55] <MTecknology> well, my annoying rubbery ducks is done for the night :)
[06:55] <MTecknology> how've you guys been?
[09:19] <robin> Hey,Bug 382795 is fixed?
[11:23] <DeSian> hi
[11:23] <DeSian> https://translations.launchpad.net/wordpress/2.8
[11:24] <DeSian> we need Approve
[11:24] <DeSian> https://translations.launchpad.net/wordpress/2.8/+imports
[11:38] <jml> leonardr, hello
[11:38] <leonardr> jml, hi
[11:39] <jml> leonardr, I wrote a thing: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jml/launchpadlib/cred-cache/+merge/7608
[11:39] <leonardr> jml: thanks, let me see what i can do with it
[11:39] <jml> leonardr, thanks.
[11:40] <jml> leonardr, sorry for the crappy cover letter -- please feel free to ask me questions to make up for the lack of info
[11:51] <leonardr> jml: it looks pretty good but i need to put it on the back burner for a bit. due to pending build process improvements i can't do any launchpadlib work for a while, probably until sometime next week
[11:51] <leonardr> can i get back to you?
[11:52] <jml> leonardr, yep, that's fine.
[11:52] <jml> leonardr, it's definitely not urgent and would much rather a better build process :)
[12:01] <clem> Hi, I'd like to get a translation template renamed, can I ask here or shall I go to the Launchpad questions?
[12:11] <leonardr> jml: remind me if it seems i forgot about it
[12:11] <jml> leonardr, will do :)
[12:11] <jml> thanks.
[12:11] <leonardr> np
[12:30] <henninge> clem: yes, please file a questions about that so we know you are the owner.
[12:36] <clem> henninge: ok, thanks
[13:14] <wolfred> hi, adding bugs does not work
[13:15] <wolfred> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/+filebug      I enter data and press Continue and nothing happens at all
[13:16] <wolfred> anyone want to look into that?
[13:18] <salgado> intellectronica, didn't you look at a problem on the +filebug page a couple days ago?  maybe it's the same problem that wolfred is experiencing?
[13:18] <wolfred> if I do not enter any field, then I get the error message that I must enter data
[13:19] <wolfred> if I enter any data then NOTHING happens, not even a data form is submited - nor AJAX request, just nothing
[13:19] <wolfred> perhaps JS to verify code on client side is messed up
[13:19] <wolfred> firefox on linux
[13:21] <intellectronica> wolfred: are you using edge or the normal servers?
[13:22] <intellectronica> wolfred: also, what project are you trying to report a bug on? did you try the project's +filebug page?
[13:23] <intellectronica> wolfred: finally, it seems to work for me. can you please give more detailed instructions on how to reproduce what you're experiencing?
[13:43] <wolfred> intellectronica:
[13:43] <wolfred> 1. open https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/+filebug
[13:43] <wolfred> 2.  set field package to:   pidgin
[13:43] <wolfred> 3. set field Summary to:  test
[13:43] <wolfred> 4. press Continue submit button
[13:43] <wolfred> and nOTHING happens (no HTTP request, no AJAX request, nothing)
[13:46] <intellectronica> wolfred: works fine for me on both edge and production
[13:47] <intellectronica> wolfred: can you complete this by using the pidgin package filebug page?
[13:48] <intellectronica> wolfred: also, as an aside, you shouldn't file bugs on ubuntu packages like this, and in fact we're going to disable this shortly. use the menu in the program itself
[13:50] <wolfred> why so??
[13:50] <wolfred> this is so retarded
[13:50]  * wolfred swings his clue bat
[13:51] <wolfred> how to use the menu if in program itself, when the errors is that the program doesn't start at all
[13:51] <intellectronica> wolfred: please refrain from using this type of language here
[13:52] <intellectronica> the reason is that the ubuntu qa team feel that bugs without the extra debug information are not very useful, and hard to work with
[13:52] <intellectronica> if you can't use the program itself to file the bug, you can still use the ubuntu-bug program
[13:52] <wolfred> yeah, and when the bug is that the program does not start?
[13:52] <wolfred> last time I checked this program it failed
[13:53] <intellectronica> wolfred: check https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs for the full story
[13:53] <intellectronica> wolfred: anyway, i'd like to find out why this isn't working for you. i can't reproduce the problem with filing bugs you are reporting
[13:54] <wolfred> ok I tried that, and the bug reporting page executed via ubuntu-bug  does not work in the exact same way - I enter Continue and nothing happens
[13:54] <wolfred> it says also "Extra debug information will be added to the bug report automatically."
[13:55] <wolfred> but
[13:55] <wolfred> if I leave the Summary field empty, then the HTTP request happens, and I get the error message as expected
[13:55] <intellectronica> wolfred: that is very strange. i really can't reproduce it. could you please try using a different browser, to make sure that this isn't some kind of problem with your installation?
[13:56] <intellectronica> oh, interesting
[13:56] <wolfred> also, the logout button is not working
[13:56] <wolfred> clicking logout took me to URL https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+filebug/+logout
[13:56] <wolfred> If this is blocking your work, let us know by sending an message to feedback@launchpad.net. Include the error ID  OOPS-1265G879  in your message.
[13:56] <intellectronica> wolfred: this oops will be available in a few minutes, so i'll have a look
[13:57] <intellectronica> this is all very strange and surprising
[13:57] <wolfred> cool, opening the link above to devpad.cannoical crashed my firefox
[13:57] <wolfred> perhaps my hardware is broken, what the...
[13:57] <intellectronica> wolfred: can you try with a different browser, to see if you get the same problems?
[13:58] <wolfred> btw I have 100% filled home dir. perhaps this is causing all this crazy things
[13:58] <intellectronica> wolfred: that's quite possible
[13:59]  * wolfred delets some pr0n
[13:59] <intellectronica> wolfred: so, please try to stabilise your system, and also try using a different browser, and if the problems persist, let me know. i'll also check the oops as soon as it's available, maybe that will give us a clue
[14:01] <wolfred> oh cool my firefox profiles got nuked.  Im so happy I backuped yesterday
[14:01] <wolfred> probably because of hard drive.  I will check again later then after cleaning uo
[14:01] <wolfred> up
[15:20] <tseliot> hi, does anybody know how I can set my email address as the contact address of a team?
[15:21] <tseliot> launchpad complains that my email address is already registered in Launchpad and is associated with me
[15:21] <tseliot> cprov: ^^
[15:25] <cprov> tseliot: Uhm, I think you can't set one of your email addresses as a team contact address
[15:25] <cprov> tseliot: it has to be an address that is not registered in LP (i.e not owned by any existing user)
[15:26] <tseliot> cprov: ok, so there's no option to contact only the owner of the team, right?
[15:27] <cprov> tseliot: no, unless you set a new address that  goes to your inbox, but is not registered in LP
[15:29] <tseliot> cprov: ok, I would like not to spam the members of ubuntu-core-dev. This is why I asked
[15:29] <cprov> tseliot: let me check for a relevant bug in this area
[15:29] <tseliot> thanks
[16:22] <stas> Hi guys, can somebody help me with this question?
[16:22] <stas> https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/74540
[16:32] <danilos> bigjools, cprov: ^
[16:33] <bigjools> got it
[16:33]  * bigjools answers it
[16:40] <geser> if a package is copied from jaunty to karmic (both main archive) should it get a new build record for karmic?
[17:01] <bigjools> geser: no
[17:06] <geser> bigjools: so there is no way to rebuild a package it karmic which failed to build in jaunty except an upload to karmic?
[17:07] <bigjools> geser: I'm pretty sure that's the case, yes.  Is it likely to build in karmic anyway, if it failed in jaunty?
[17:07] <bigjools> which package is it?
[17:07] <geser> in that specific case not, but I wanted to know once I resolved it
[17:07] <geser> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/doxia-sitetools/+builds
[17:13] <geser> bigjools: this has the slight disadvantage that it doesn't appear on the FTBFS list for karmic as it doesn't have a build record for karmic
[17:15] <bigjools> hmmm right
[17:16] <bigjools> cprov, do you have any suggestions?
[17:17] <bigjools> geser: what you could do is also check for no build records and flag those separately
[17:19] <geser> will probably do it: I guess I need to scan all source packages, but as it only needs to be done once at the beginning of each new distro it should be a problem if it takes some time
[17:46] <tdn>  (Error ID: OOPS-1265H1260)
[17:46] <tdn> I get Timeout Error every  time I try to report a specific bug.
[17:50] <tdn> I write this in summary: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/net/core/dev.c:1536 skb_gso_segment+0x143/0x1f0()
[17:50] <tdn> I have tried *many* times now.
[18:58] <mthaddon> tdn: maybe report it with a different title and then change the title later?
[19:12] <tdn> mthaddon, but isnt this a bug in launchpad, if this title triggers a timeout?
[19:13] <mthaddon> tdn: it is, and the OOPSes will be seen by QA people
[19:13] <mthaddon> Ursinha: ^
[19:13] <Ursinha> me
[19:14] <Ursinha> let's read all backlog
[19:15] <tdn> mthaddon, ok.
[19:19] <Ursinha> tdn, so, you enter the filebug page, and it loads, right?
[19:19] <Ursinha> tdn, "WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/net/core/dev.c:1536 skb_gso_segment+0x143/0x1f0()" is the title of the bug?
[19:20] <tdn> Ursinha, yes.
[19:20] <tdn> Ursinha, yes.
[19:24] <Ursinha> it's timing out consistently for me, I'll investigate that tdn
[19:24] <Ursinha> thanks for letting us know
[20:37] <AlexC_> g'morning Earthlets
[20:37] <AlexC_> a while back I uploaded some translations for my project, since then - some langauge strings have been deleted/edited/added, and I am wondering how to merge the new .pot files we have, with the ones on Launchpad
[21:04] <eagle00789> in my app i'm using language files wich are built like this:
[21:04] <eagle00789> [AboutBox]
[21:04] <eagle00789> 00000001=Over...
[21:04] <eagle00789> 00000002=Toolbar Uninstaller
[21:04] <eagle00789> 00000004=© 2007 Decomputeur.nl
[21:04] <eagle00789> 00000005=Bedankt aan:\nTwistedMetal voor de icoontjes en veel van de toolbars in
[21:04] <eagle00789> how can i use launchpad translation for that??
[21:07] <AlexC_> eagle00789: you can't, you need to use Gettext
[21:15] <eagle00789> i now that.that's why i
[21:16] <eagle00789> that's why i'm asking
[21:16] <AlexC_> and hence my reply of "you can't"
[21:17] <AlexC_> unless you were to convert that into pot format, translate - convert back to your own format. Which will still ended up using Gettext, at least - it's formats
[21:17] <eagle00789> i'll refraise my question. what changes do i need to make to this layout to get it working with launchpad's translation part
[21:18] <eagle00789> when i search for pot with gnugettext on google i always get stuff related to powerpoint as pot is powerpoint template file
[21:18] <AlexC_> eagle00789: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettext has example pot format
[21:18] <AlexC_> as does Launchpad really - just click the link to download the .pot/po/mo files
[21:20] <eagle00789> this would invlovle so much work to get it translated and back to my own format, that it isn't really worth doing...
[21:22] <eagle00789> maybe not: http://translate.sourceforge.net/wiki/toolkit/ini2po
[21:44] <kolby> I forgot my gpg passphrase.  How can I retrieve it?
[21:45] <jpds> kolby: You can't.
[21:45] <kolby> jpds: should I just make a neew key?
[21:45] <jpds> Yep, that's the way to do it.
[21:45] <kolby> jpds: thank you.
[22:42] <bdmurray> Is the +participation page for people not having images intentional / deliberate?
[22:47] <beuno> bdmurray, link?
[22:47] <beuno> I've done a massive change to Launchpad
[22:47] <beuno> and some icons are broken
[22:47] <beuno> fixing them as I find them
[22:48] <bdmurray> https://edge.launchpad.net/~brian-murray/+participation
[22:48] <bdmurray> on not edge the icons show up
[22:48] <beuno> bdmurray, could you file a bug and assign it to me?
[22:48] <beuno> I'll fix it today
[22:48] <bdmurray> beuno: also bug attachment names overlap the green download icon
[22:49] <bdmurray> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/389116
[22:49] <bdmurray> beuno: sure! thanks
[22:49] <beuno> ah
[22:49] <beuno> ok
[22:49] <beuno> bdmurray, so 2 bugs  :)
[22:49] <bdmurray> beuno: alright then! ;)
[22:50] <beuno> bdmurray, thanks
[22:50] <beuno> (fixing the one where packages on bugtasks don't show icons right now)
[23:10]  * wgrant is slightly concerned about the removal of the magic date.
[23:10] <beuno> wgrant, magic date?
[23:10] <wgrant> beuno: July 21st
[23:10] <beuno> wgrant, removal?
[23:10] <wgrant> beuno: The wiki was altered to be more vague about it.
[23:11] <beuno> wgrant, no idea why, but, don't worry, it will be opened by or before that
[23:11] <wgrant> beuno: OK.
[23:13] <eagle00789> how long does it usually take for a new translation template to be approved
[23:40] <eagle00789> anyone??
[23:43] <beuno> eagle00789, 48-72hs usually
[23:43] <eagle00789> ok. thx
[23:45] <wgrant> beuno: Do you know about the spec subscriber icon breakage? I haven't seen a bug about that one.
[23:46] <beuno> wgrant, linkify me!
[23:46] <wgrant> There's a strange display: block on the link text.
[23:46] <wgrant> https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-karmic-lts-debian-release-coordination
[23:46] <wgrant> Oh.
[23:47] <wgrant> That's not strange, it's just that the img is usually in the a.
[23:48] <beuno> wgrant, ah. No, can you file a bug and assign it to me, etc?
[23:49] <wgrant> beuno: Sure.
[23:49] <beuno> thanks wgrant
[23:51] <wgrant> Bug #389247
[23:51] <wgrant> beuno: ^^
[23:52] <beuno> wgrant, thanks!
[23:52] <eagle00789> you guys know that the first two bug links link to mozilla?? they do not link to launchpad
[23:53] <wgrant> eagle00789: What do you mean?
[23:53] <eagle00789> look at the links above. there are 3 of them.
[23:53] <eagle00789> [00:51]	<wgrant>	Bug #389247
[23:53] <eagle00789> [00:51]	<ubottu>	Launchpad bug 389247 in blueprint "Blueprint subscriber icons broken" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/389247
[23:54] <wgrant> Huh?
[23:54] <eagle00789> bug 389247 links to mozilla
[23:54] <wgrant> eagle00789: That's your IRC client being stupid.
[23:54] <wgrant> They are not links.
[23:54] <eagle00789> ok. thx
[23:54] <eagle00789> sorry for mentioning then