[00:19] Keybuk: still around? [09:06] mbiebl: am back around now [09:07] Keybuk: morning [09:07] morning [09:07] just wanted to let you know, that I stumbled upon a bug in 0.5.2 [09:07] which I then reported as 388753 [09:08] a bug not present in 0.5.1? [09:09] not sure, but iirc not [09:10] I was also wondering, when you plan to land more of the exiting stuff in trunk [09:10] like the new process monitoring etc. [09:10] currently the only difference I see between trunk and the 0.5 branch, is that 0.5 uses D-Bus for it's support utils [09:11] The D-Bus stuff was a bit of a nightmare [09:11] so I wanted to get that out of the way first, and make a release with it [09:11] otherwise it would have forever been over my head [09:11] (along with our security guy's knife :p) [09:11] ah, nice ;-) [09:12] going to start merging in the netlink stuff from today [09:12] needs some main loop changes first [09:13] looking forward to it. [09:14] when do you head into London? Sunday? [09:14] yeah [09:14] will be there around 14:00 [09:16] cool [09:16] you can't miss our office building really - it's the only tall one ;) [09:16] I get down sometime Sunday evening [09:17] cool [09:18] Will the office building be open on Sunday? [09:18] no :p probably not [09:19] there's free wifi at the hotel though [09:19] plus London's nice to wander around [09:19] weather is supposed to be good [09:20] yeah, I planned to do explore London a little on sunday afternoon [09:22] so I guess we will meet on sunday evening in the hotel then. [09:25] looking forward to it. [14:23] Keybuk: is this part of the time stuff you fixed recently? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506679 [14:23] and did that make it to 0.3* [14:37] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/upstart/+bug/388873 [14:38] the same guy just filed that in LP [14:38] * Keybuk links them [14:38] handy tip btw [14:38] (+) Also affects distribution [14:38] Distribution: Fedora [14:38] Source Package Name: upstart [14:38] URL: paste bugzilla URL [14:38] links the two together, and syncs information from BZ into LP [14:39] it's not fixed, because I didn't know about it until literally minutes ago ;) [14:39] going to confirm shortly [14:42] Keybuk: theres 2 more things I want to try to get into 0.3.11: The state transfer stuff, and the -f option for shutdown (reboot has it, shutdown seems to be missing it for some reason) [14:42] err, do you mean -f ? [14:43] -f and -F on shutdown did strange things [14:43] yeah [14:43] we have a BZ complaining about it [14:44] * sadmac2 wonders if jkatz' ticket about wanting upstart to eject CDs is still open... [14:44] again, please do file bugs in LP if you have them in BZ and link them ;) [14:44] never rolled that one, for reasons of "eeeew" [14:44] it makes sense to file all your bugs upstream [14:45] happily [14:45] damn, mbiebl wandered off, was going to nag him too :p [14:47] Keybuk: I'm a support engineer now, and the triager knows I have upstart knowledge, so come RHEL 6 all upstart bugs in RHEL will probably be going through me [14:48] (unless they find so many that I can't handle them all :) [15:56] Keybuk: I still don't see your patch in linus [15:56] akpm has it [15:57] it's somewhere in the firehose, it may not be part of the torrent yet ;) [15:58] Keybuk: yeah. You didn't actually send it to Linus, I was wondering how it was going to get there :) [15:59] you don't have to send everything to Linus [16:00] yeah, but when you send a patch to lkml you usually CC /someone/ who gives a particular damn (unless you're just looking for reviews) [16:00] right, Ingo and akpm saw it first [16:02] sadmac2: use Also affects when adding BZ links [16:03] Keybuk: yeah. Figuring that out from the update emails :) [16:04] did you notice what I did on bug #388745 ? :p [16:05] changed the summary [16:06] I replied with a sentence with "however" without a following comma ;) [16:08] oic [19:02] Keybuk: still there? [19:05] yes [19:06] see scrollback from 22:27 UTC yesterday? [19:10] I don't keep scrollback [19:14] what did you ask? [19:15] Keybuk, joshk: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/06/17/%23upstart.html [19:15] big brother is watching [19:17] hi, which dbus has function dbus_message_iter_abandon_container() ? stable 1.2.14 doesn't have it and upstart wants it [19:18] that irclog was actually useful [19:18] arekm: you need to apply the patch specified in the release notes [19:18] joshk: you need to add "console output" to the job that runs rc.local [19:20] Keybuk: just the word? [19:20] like, in a comment or something? [19:20] joshk: on a line of its own. no comment [19:20] oh [19:20] to the *job*.. huh. [19:20] okay, and that'll kill the splash screen and display the output? [19:21] joshk: it won't kill the splash screen unless the splash screen is designed to die when input is requested or strange output occurs. [19:22] hmmm.. ok then. thanks [19:25] sadmac2: ok, builds now but fails at [19:25] BAD: wrong value for dbus_message_get_reply_serial (reply), expected 2 got 3 at tests/test_dbus_message.c:155 (test_message_error). [19:25] test [19:29] arekm: odd, the test suite is not _always_ perfect [19:29] though that implies something a little strange [19:32] also UPSTART_INIT_DAEMON isn't defined in sources so build fails (0.5 bzr branch) [19:35] arekm: *cough* fixed and push [19:53] sadmac2: don't suppose you put the debug symbols from your upstart builds anywhere? [19:53] Keybuk: upstart-debuginfo-.arch.rpm [19:54] do you have older versions around? [19:54] Keybuk: how old do you need? [19:54] upstart-0.3.9-22.fc11.3586.rpm [19:54] plus debuginfo [19:54] i386.rpm [19:54] sorry [19:55] should be i586 [19:55] build policy bumped our minimum 32-bit arch [19:55] Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): [19:55] upstart-0.3.9-22.fc9.i386 [19:55] from your BZ :p [19:56] Keybuk: koji.fedoraproject.org is our build system. Its purged now and again, but its not terribly aggressive. All the packages are there. [19:56] * sadmac2 finds that upstart version [19:56] Keybuk: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=93252 [19:56] specifically: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/upstart/0.3.9/22.fc11/i586/upstart-debuginfo-0.3.9-22.fc11.i586.rpm [19:57] those are fc11? [19:57] not f9? [19:57] oh, f9. missed your update [19:57] we have that one too [19:57] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=80006 [19:58] And if you need more: [19:58] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5768 [19:58] Keybuk: what are you inspecting? [19:59] BZ #506679 [20:01] ah. [20:02] wow. this guy filed an f9 bug a week before EOL [20:02] impressive [20:05] hmm [20:05] still doesn't seem to match [20:06] I can't apply his core files to your bianries [20:06] notting: ^^prelink?? [20:08] sadmac2: shouldn't affect corefiles, iirc [20:09] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/upstart/+bug/388873 [20:09] core files are attached there [20:09] if you run gdb on them, do you get better results? [20:11] I don't have an F9 box handy [20:11] * sadmac2 should probably be doing something about this IOMMU thing he's working on