=== Snova_ is now known as Snova === santiago-pgsql is now known as santiago-ve === lex79 is now known as lex79_ === lex79_ is now known as lex79 === rgreening_ is now known as rgreening [06:56] good morning [08:29] morning dholbach [08:42] hi directhex [08:55] * hyperair pokes dholbach [08:56] dholbach: remuco's in karmic? i don't see it =\ [08:59] hyperair: you're right - sorry, I was mistaken [08:59] dholbach: do NEW packages get autosynced? [08:59] yes [08:59] until we're in DebianImportFreeze [09:00] which isn't until June 25th [09:04] ah i see [09:04] dholbach: do main and universe packages get synced at different frequencies? [09:04] no, I don't think [09:04] dholbach: nautilus-share which i got uploaded to debian a short while ago was after remuco-server, but it's been synced already. [09:05] 0.7.2-8. [09:05] maybe it was an explicit sync request [09:07] hmm [09:07] maybe it was [09:07] so how long does it take for a package to get synced usually? [09:09] hyperair: I don't know - best to ask in #ubuntu-devel [09:11] okay === proppy1 is now known as proppy [09:27] hyperair: depends on when an archive-admin triggers the autosync [09:27] ah so it's not auto? O_o [09:35] no, only semi-automatic [09:36] heh [09:37] well i'll just continue waiting then [09:39] I'm currently not sure if NEW package are included in the autosyncs or if importing them needs to get triggered seperately by an archive-admin [09:43] according to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration#Syncs this doesn't happen automatic [09:45] hyperair: you could ask jdstrand to sync also NEW when he does the archive work today (it's his archive day today) [09:46] ah okay [09:46] nevermind, i'm in no hurry, as long as the package makes it in before debian import freeze =p [09:46] and featurefreeze === ShadowChild is now known as lukjad007 [11:01] Packages in Debian NEW *cannot* be synced, manually or otherwise [11:02] Only after they've been accepted out of Debian NEW [11:03] there's no way to access them, OTOH [11:04] OTOH? [11:04] maxb: er i meant just came out of NEW. [11:04] DktrKranz: it's remuco-server, which had been ACCEPTED some days ago [11:04] Ah, "new" not "NEW" :-) [11:04] =p [11:04] right [11:11] hyperair: heh === ember_ is now known as ember === ejat is now known as e-jat === asac_ is now known as asac [12:48] <_ruben> heh .. "funny" version .. Unpacking mysql-client-5.0 (from .../mysql-client-5.0_5.1.30really5.0.75-0ubuntu10.2_i386.deb) ... [12:53] this is used when a version needs to go backwards (which isn't possible) and one want to avoid adding an epoch (which will need to stay forever) [12:55] <_ruben> so there was a "faulty" 5.1.30 upload at some time i guess? which does seem wrong for a 5.0 package indeed ;) [13:02] looking a the changelog it seems it was done because the mysql 5.1 packages provided a package which was also build from mysql-5.0 which broke things (or so) [13:05] <_ruben> nice :) === ogra_ is now known as ogra === korn_ is now known as c_korn [14:24] Hi, what do I have to do to get someone to pay attention to bug 342782 ? [14:24] Launchpad bug 342782 in pyqwt5 "python-qwt5-qt4 will not install on Jaunty" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/342782 [14:28] LarstiQ: if there is a patch attached subscribe motu-sru [14:29] kklimonda: there are, though not really correct, due to python2.5 vs python2.6 site-packages/dist-packages differences. Still subscribe? [14:30] LarstiQ: I think the 'hack' probably gives enough hints at the proper solution, so it's worth subscribing. [14:30] LarstiQ: The odds go way up if you can get it to work for Qt3/Qt4 on both Python versions. [14:31] * ScottK worked on trying to figure that package out before release and didn't come up with a solution. [14:31] ScottK: aye, I'll try that if I have some time to burn, will subscribe first [14:32] LarstiQ: If you get it figured, ping me and I'll sponsor it. [14:33] ScottK: cool, I will if I do :) === effie_jayx_ is now known as keffie_jayx === yofel_ is now known as yofel [16:01] dholbach(or any MC member): is it too late to sign for the next MC meeting? [16:02] they say 7 days don't they? [16:03] Laney: yep [16:03] doesn't it say when the next one is? [16:04] 25th, the next Thursday... [16:04] In fact I'm a bit late... that's why i'm asking. [16:04] gaspa: I personally have no objections [16:07] dholbach: ok, thanks. [16:12] the diff.gz that gets generated during build is that only for the debian dir or can it contain patched sources as well? [16:12] slayton: the latter [16:12] if the packages uses a patch system already, it's good if you use that patch system for changes to the actual changes [16:14] ok... but sources that are changed from upstream don't require patch files to be accepted? [16:14] in revu [16:15] if you prefer working without a patch system that's fine [16:16] is it? [16:17] crap but permissible ;) [16:17] Laney: sure - we have a bunch of those in the archive [16:17] ask cjwatson for his opinion on patch systems :) [16:17] we do, but I wonder if w... [16:17] * Laney runs [16:17] dholbach, ISTR i did! [16:17] how did that end? [16:17] It's also quite invitable for pacakges that use DVCS. [16:18] Laney, respectfully, of course! [16:18] I think that we should encourage best practices for our new contributors [16:18] what that means depends on who you talk to [16:18] and circumstances of course (DVCS being one) [16:18] whenever I have to use quilt, I'd prefer straight patches to the source :) [16:18] straight patches to the source are easy. [16:19] until they stop applying, then they suck [16:19] having had to detangle a mess of diff.gz patches, they aren't fun [16:19] patch systems are useful because they have an "off" switch, more than anything else [16:19] in any case I wouldn't want to overrule a package maintainer for no good reason [16:20] if it makes your job easier, do whatever you like, but I don't see a lot of use in setting up a policy for it [16:20] no, of course, keep the maintainer's decisions [16:20] and if it's the first patch, check whether the package conforms to some kind of group policy - i.e. add a patch system if the package follows a policy which mandates one [16:21] so if you're sponsoring a new package, should you question it? [16:55] Laney: thank god for splitdiff === ejat is now known as e-jat [17:52] sebner: are u gonna merge flightgear? [17:55] mok0: wll, if you want to do it you are free to take it as I have 3 more weeks of military service todo with hardly any time [17:56] sebner: no time for flight simulator, huh? [17:56] sebner: ok, I'll take care of it [17:57] mok0: heh, you don't need if you don't want to. It's just that I'm not really sure if I have enough time for it this weekend or the next one [17:58] sebner: I doing at least one merge a day, so I was looking for one :-) [17:58] sebner: most are reserved [17:59] ajmitch: Looks like I won't be able to deal with FDS after all....my main server cluster was just taken out by the severe storms this morning. [17:59] ajmitch: Lightning struck within 30 feet and the EMP fried my systems. :-( [17:59] * kb9vqf is on his laptop for now [17:59] Sorry! :-( [17:59] mok0: heh, fine then. I'm also happy to have a new version and when I have more time in future I'm going to play flightgear a lot :D [17:59] mok0: i was looking at putting together a system where last contributors get notified of a new merge (sometimes you dont even know!) and then a way to say, feel free for someone else to take it... [18:00] stefanlsd: nice... in principle though, all merges are "free" since we have joint maintainership. [18:01] There have been complaints that the "last-merger-ping-required" policy has slowed down merging [18:02] mok0: yeah, although we like to defer to the last uploader as they may have some specific knowledge.. also, I guess people trying to trying to show contributions dont enjoy other people doing there merges... [18:03] stefanlsd: at this point though, the merges have been sitting there since the archive opened a month and a half ago [18:03] mok0: i think it has slowed merges alot! also some of the last mergers are not around anymore... [18:04] stefanlsd: right [18:05] mok0: my thinking is that the last merger would get notified. if he doesnt do the merge or object to anyone doing it, or say its free - in a certain time period, it would move to a feel free to merge [18:05] stefanlsd: ... is that something you would implement of top of MoM? [18:08] mok0: its just thoughts at the moment. not sure where exactly where its gonna go (ideas welcome!0 [18:09] stefanlsd: kk... I think it would fit nicely there [18:09] mok0: kk. thanks. i will look into it there... [18:20] Is there a guide somewhere on how to take a debian sid package, change a few dependencies and build a package for Ubuntu (jaunty)? === menesis1 is now known as menesis === andreas__ is now known as andreas === andreas is now known as ahasenack [18:49] is there a cdbs variable that can be used to determine which version of GCC is used? [18:52] slayton: "CC" [18:52] azeem, ty [18:54] when will the next daily build be available? [19:09] omg can't we just set up a filter on the ML which rejects any mail containing the word "mono"? :P [19:13] RainCT, what if there is an outbreak of disease? [20:03] RainCT_, a new flame war? yays :| [20:04] oh, someone trying to push the gnote suggestion on pure "zomg" grounds [20:07] directhex: Yeah, I'm starting to get annoyed of such mails.. A few more of them and I'll switch from "anti- but I don't really care" to "pro-mono" ;) [20:08] RainCT_, these folks don't seem to understand the harm they do to their argument by acting like f... in a tiresome manner. [20:10] somone in some #chan (I think here) pointed me to some site that would search PPAs... anyone know what I am talking about? [20:10] or... anyone know where I can find dia-trunk.deb [20:11] the version in jaunty has huge issues exporting svg, want to try trunk before I go wining about it [20:12] CarlFK: This link should work: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas [20:13] CarlFK: Or there's this (unofficial [20:13] page: http://ppa-search.appspot.com/ [20:14] bingo. lets delicious it this time... === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan === kirkland` is now known as kirkland