[00:15] mushroomblue: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas lets you search through the packages. [00:19] hi. anyone around for changing the repo of a vcs-import? [00:50] beuno: Doing a side-by-side comparison of old vs. new bug pages, the sprite changes have moved some of the icons a few pixels out of their ideal locations. They've less padding in some cases, more in others, and are off centre in places too (particularly person links). [00:54] Is anyone able to explain the differences of debian binary to source packages? [00:55] LCID_Fire: Source packages are built to produce binary packages. [00:55] Or do you mean technical differences? [00:56] wgrant: in detail I mean why are scripts not allowed in source packages? There is no way (AFAIK) to generate them... [00:58] LCID_Fire: What do you mean? [00:59] There are normally lots of scripts in a source package. But what in particular are you talking about? [01:00] wgrant: I have a package which is IMO "source". PPA complains it is "binary" due to scripts included. And I just don't get why, how, ... [01:00] LCID_Fire: Erm... that has nothing to do with scripts. [01:00] LCID_Fire: Can you pastebin the error message? [01:03] It says: "Upload rejected because it contains binary packages" - it fucks up somewhere in the flow of autotools, debianize and what not - I am so $%&§ confused [01:03] LCID_Fire: How did you build the package? [01:03] And how did you run dput? [01:04] "git-buildpackage --git-ignore-new" and then dput ../*.changes [01:04] LCID_Fire: What is before the .changes? === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk [01:04] wgrant: e.g. areca_7.1.2_amd64 [01:05] LCID_Fire: The _amd64 is your problem. You are uploading an amd64 binary package, as well as a source package. [01:05] LCID_Fire: Try adding -S to the git-buildpackage options, to force it to only build source. [01:05] Then upload the _source.changes. [01:06] there is no _source.changes [01:06] LCID_Fire: There is if you build with -S... [01:09] wgrant: you are right - and I am pissed that -S is not documented :( [01:09] LCID_Fire: It's documented in all of the documentation that I know of. [01:09] https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA#Building in particular. [01:10] But it's also in the manpages of the tools that build the packages. [01:10] man git-buildpackage does not say anything [01:10] git-buildpackages is a wrapper, so I wouldn't expect it to. [01:10] I would [01:11] It just passes all of the options through to debuild or dpkg-buildpackage, so that would be pretty strange. [01:11] Given that its manpage would have to track dpkg-buildpackage changes. [01:11] btw: should I wonder when the generated tar.gz is the same as before? [01:11] tar.gz, or orig.tar.gz? [01:12] there is no orig.tar.gz [01:12] Did you intend to build a native package? [01:13] I just want to upload the $%&§ package to ppa - and it turns out to be an epic struggle [01:13] (also, from git-buildpackage's manpage: [01:13] · Call debuild(1) (or the application specified via --git-builder) with arguments instructing it to ignore Git meta-data in the diff.gz, passing along all arguments given to git-buildpackage that don’t start with --git-. [01:13] ) [01:13] LCID_Fire: Nobody ever said packaging was trivial, I don't believe. [01:13] wgrant: yes but it should not be that hard! [01:14] Anyway, this is well into the realm of #ubuntu-motu, rather than here. [01:14] And I need to have breakfast. [01:14] ok, thanks so far [01:18] in man git-buildpackage it says: git-buildpackage will, * Build an orig.tar.gz if it doesn't exist. [01:24] The download icon overlaps the text associated with it now [01:24] as seen with lp #389749 [01:24] Launchpad bug 389749 in gnome-app-install "gnome-app-install crashed with AttributeError in itemIsInstalled()" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/389749 [01:35] cody-somerville: There are lots of sprite-related regressions - that one is known and fixed. [02:17] anyone reporting issues with registering gpg keys in launchpad? [02:18] i entered my fingerprint about 5 hours ago and never got the email to decrypt to finish the process [02:19] i even set a different email address for it to try to send to [02:19] still nothing yet [02:44] any ideas? [02:47] etank: A few other people have reported delayed emails. [02:47] how long of a delay? [02:48] etank: The other person who complained about OpenPGP confirmation emails said he didn't have it after half an hour, and never reported that it had come... [02:49] hmm. thats no good [02:49] i know that i waited for 5 hours and still no email [02:49] etank: Ask a question at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion, perhaps. [02:49] i updated a question there a few minutes ago [02:50] Where? [02:53] one sec [02:54] SamB, at 2am, I never have any idea :) [02:56] its an old on but https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/28068 [02:57] etank: It's really not a good idea to hijack questions like that. I'd suggest asking a new one, or it's likely to get lost. [02:57] i felt that the question was somewhat relevant [02:57] i can ask a new one though [02:58] It's not really relevant, and it is closed, so it's never going to get looked at. [02:59] jml: oh, you're one of those crazy australlians who's completely on the wrong side of the clock ? [03:00] * wgrant crushes SamB with midday. [03:00] wgrant: https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/74778 [03:17] guess i will let it sit until tomorrow and see what happens. === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler [05:52] How can I change the project a branch is associated with? [05:53] do I need to make a new banch? [05:56] MTecknology: I believe the UI for moving branches was removed ~2.2.5. You might be able to do it through the API, but I'm not sure. [05:57] alrighty. I can just branch/push/delete [05:57] do you know why it was pulled? [05:57] No. [05:58] But my guess is that it was probably something to do with the UI needing to be more complex to accomodate source package branches. [05:58] And since it's such a rare action... [05:58] ya. I just noticed a lot of branches I have are assigned to the wrong project [05:59] gr, I thought tinying things up was going to be easy but I made a mess [06:02] MTecknology: You can do it easily through the API, if you want. [06:02] (I just tried it) [06:03] how do I do that? [06:03] somehow https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-drupal-theme-devs/ubuntu-drupal-theme/6.x is showing up under https://code.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu-drupal-releases [06:03] MTecknology: Do you know how to use launchpadlib? [06:03] no [06:05] MTecknology: Install python-launchpadlib, and see https://help.launchpad.net/API/launchpadlib#Getting%20started. Once you get past the auth stage, I'll tell you what to do. [06:05] thanks [06:05] wgrant: any ideas why it's showing up like that? [06:06] MTecknology: Make sure you replace STAGING with EDGE in that example [06:06] MTecknology: It's because it's set as the series branch. [06:06] oh [06:07] https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu-drupal-releases/6.x/+edit [06:07] thanks :) [06:07] Change the branch there to something else. [06:07] And it will go away. [06:07] :D [06:19] wgrant: why can't we remove blueprints? [06:19] MTecknology: No idea. [06:20] can I attach it to a person instead of a project? [06:20] A blueprint? No. That wouldn't make sense. [06:20] I just want to get rid of it :P [06:21] Mark it Obsolete. [06:21] kirkland: ({) [06:21] wrong channel - that wasn't bitlbee :P [06:23] kirkland: sorry [06:26] wgrant: If I retarget a blueprint for a different project, will the karma go with it? [06:28] MTecknology: I don't think so, but I couldn't be sure. [06:29] wgrant: k, I just wanted to know if the karma would be attached to the other project. I have no idea how karma is actually assigned [06:31] anyway, time for work [06:31] wgrant: thanks for the help :) [06:31] MTecknology: No problem. [06:33] wgrant: last question - is it possible to rename a project? [06:33] or only teams? [06:33] MTecknology: An admin can rename the project for you. [06:34] you mean a rubber ducky? [06:34] :P [06:34] Yes. [06:34] I'll file a request when I get off work [06:34] thanks again [06:34] np [06:37] wgrant: nvm - I asked it. [06:37] I'm sure it'll be you to take care of it since you're around now. Thanks in advance if you do. Time to run [06:43] MTecknology: Er, I have no such power. === mthaddon is now known as afk [08:37] is it possible to change the key a PPA is signed with? [08:58] nellery: I imagine the sysadmins can, if there is a problem with it. [08:58] nellery: if you actually mean 'can you choose the key', the answer is no. [08:59] lifeless: thanks [08:59] you can however, sign the key that is used to sign PPA builds [09:00] if you want to certify it. This is effectively the same as it being your key [except you can't sign things with it yourself] === Hellow_ is now known as Hellow === tdn_ is now known as tdn [12:35] james_w: ping; package branches where are they on lp? [12:35] jml: if perchance you're around === RoninX341 is now known as etank [13:08] still no email to finish the process to verify my gpg key on launchpad [13:08] now it has been 10 hours [14:41] "verify"? [16:30] Can a Driver of a project add upload files to a series? [16:32] allenap: do you know? [16:37] MTecknology, you mean the driver you set in bugs? [16:37] here - https://edge.launchpad.net/drupal-ubuntu-countdown/+edit-people [16:38] beuno: I want to know is the driver will be able to add a download file to a series. Reading that it looks like they can make the series, but it doesn't explain that to where my tired mind can comprehend [16:39] MTecknology, they should be able yes, otherwsie its a bug [16:39] thanks :D [16:39] that's exactly what I need them to be able to do [16:39] I want to give the ubuntu-website team some control over that [18:44] hi [18:45] launchpad is all about the "Timeout error" right now [23:27] Does Loggerhead have permalinks? [23:28] RenatoSilva: Permalinks? [23:28] permanet links [23:28] for the source code [23:29] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Erenatosilva/%2Bjunk/moin.macro.childpages/download/renato_silva-20090620220448-vcluh5vueefsrn2i/childpages.py-20090620220344-3uvqg24v5ninpo1x-1/ChildPages.py [23:29] I don't think this link will always be the same [23:31] I mean something like http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~renatosilva/+junk/moin.macro.childpages/head:/download:/ChildPages.py [23:37] Links to specific revision IDs won't change. [23:37] Things like "head:" obviously will.