[02:50] <cwillu> johanbr, I did, I haven't yet, and I will :p
[02:52] <cwillu> johanbr, https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380807
[02:52] <ubot3> Malone bug 380807 in linux "[karmic, intel] Laptop locks up moments after resuming from suspend" [Medium,In progress] 
[04:23] <rwlove> I was wondering if someone could help me with a SSD that is showing up in lsscsi/dmesg, but not by fdisk or the jaunty partitioner
=== bjf is now known as bjf_afk
[15:43] <masterkernel> hello
[15:43] <masterkernel> I am the author of KernelCheck -- http://kcheck.sourceforge.net/
[15:44] <masterkernel> I need someone to package it since I can't be the maintainer since I wish to remain anonymous
[16:07] <maxb> I've not noticed anything saying that you're obliged to reveal your real name when submitting a package to Ubuntu?
[16:17] <masterkernel> The folks over at mentors.debian.net said nobody would sponsor my package unless I reveald my name
[16:20] <ivoks> nobody in ubuntu would sponsor you packages either
[16:20] <ivoks> but could you your source to build package
[16:21] <masterkernel> ?
[16:21] <ivoks> still, there should be copyright holder
[16:21] <ivoks> s/you/use/
[16:21] <masterkernel> the co-author has his real name in there
[16:22] <ivoks> so he is copyright holder?
[16:22] <masterkernel> and I can use the source to build the package
[16:22] <masterkernel> there are two upstream authors: he and I
[16:23] <masterkernel> so I guess we'd both hold copyright
[16:24] <ivoks> then your name is needed
[16:24] <ivoks> i guess
[16:25] <masterkernel> what if I remove my name as the upstream author? i guess i'd have no rights then
[16:25] <ivoks> correct :)
[16:26] <masterkernel> i was in contact with a guy about a year ago who said it was possible according to the debian-legal guys, for the name Master Kernel to be the author, but I never got the specifics and we broke off
[16:27] <ivoks> well, i'm not sure about the legal stuff, but i guess that copyright holder should be real person with real name
[16:48] <lesshaste> hi
[20:01] <NCommander> Is anyone around here good with makefiles and the kernel packaging to help me run down the ports FTBFS issue?
[21:05] <dtchen> TheMuso: we should identify regressions via calls for testing of increasing the HDA prealloc buffer (/proc/asound/card*/pcm*/sub*/prealloc*, given in KiB).  At least openSUSE and Fedora increased it from 64 KiB to 2 MiB.
[21:06] <dtchen> TheMuso: that change alone accounts for significantly fewer "glitch" HDA reports
[22:55] <eshaase> I have Jaunty and I'd like to use 2.6.30, is it recommended that I install karmic's kernel package or should i use kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa's?
[23:16] <dtchen> eshaase: neither would be a supported configuration, but if you find you need the Ubuntu sauce, use karmic's
[23:23] <eshaase> dtchen: ok, thanks
[23:38] <needRS232wizard> howdy heavy hitters.
[23:40] <needRS232wizard> Why would a USB serial adapter not work at bauds > 1200?  Tested on Debian Woody 3.0 and Hardy Heron (PPC and x86)?
=== needRS232wizard is now known as uart
=== uart is now known as uart_
[23:52] <ppurka> can i ask a question to you devs?
[23:52] <ppurka> i want to know where i can get the ubuntu specific patches for the 2.6.30 kernel
[23:57] <ppurka> no one knows how to get the ubuntu specific kernel patches for the 2.6.30 kernel?
[23:58] <Nafallo> !weekend
[23:58] <ubot3> It's a weekend.  Often on weekends, the paid developers, and a lot of the community, may not be around to answer your question.  Please be patient, wait longer than you normally would, or try again during the working week.
[23:58] <ppurka> k thx ubot3
[23:59] <uart> help
[23:59] <ppurka> I will try some other day
[23:59] <uart> oops ^_^  thanks also to you Nafallo & ubot.
[23:59] <uart> \quit bye
[23:59] <ppurka> oops.. thanks goes to you Nafallo :P