/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/06/20/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

ftaoh my! I've made nearly 200 commits in lp:chromium-browser, and it's not even close to enter the repo. *sigh*00:10
=== rickspencer3-afk is now known as rickspencer3
BUGabundofta: he meant http://identi.ca/notice/552737300:20
ftawhat is vimeo?00:21
ftathe youtube like?00:21
BUGabundoyeah00:21
ftaal pelo?00:23
=== BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo
ftaBUGabundo, dtchen: care to try ff 3.5 rc2 from my PPA before I push it to karmic?00:30
micahg1fta: is it in the dailies?00:31
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg
ftanope, in ~fta00:33
ftathe dailies are already ahead :P00:34
ftathat's the thing with dailies, you're always ahead ;)00:34
micahgok00:34
micahgbut they're not labeled anymore\00:34
ftacorrect00:34
ftahm, no, in fact, i'm wrong, because of the naming, rc2 is ahead, even if codewise, dailies are fresher00:36
fta..grr.. that means once it's in karmic, dailies between now and 3.5 final will be rejected. damn00:39
BUGabundofta: busy taking a look at gwibber bugs?01:03
ftai did, sick of the crashes01:03
BUGabundoahha01:06
BUGabundo$ watch -n 10 gwibber01:06
ftabug 364322 too01:09
ubottuLaunchpad bug 364322 in gwibber "group search broken with KeyError: 'from_user' (identi.ca protocol)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/36432201:09
ftabeen broken for months01:09
ftahttp://popcon2.ecchi.ca/package/songbird.html#graph-2 :(01:11
BUGabundohhehe01:16
BUGabundogwibber team is not as active as desired01:17
BUGabundoand its not meant to be on the archive01:17
BUGabundoPPA is the only way for it01:17
BUGabundohttps://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/38950501:18
ubottuLaunchpad bug 389505 in gwibber "gwibber crashes in pango @pango_layout_check_lines" [Undecided,New]01:18
BUGabundoits a dupe of mine01:18
BUGabundoor not01:19
BUGabundofta: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/gwibber/+bug/380417/01:22
ubottuLaunchpad bug 380417 in gwibber "apt-get build-dep gwibber fails" [Undecided,New]01:22
BUGabundocan't invalidate that, due to networks prob01:22
BUGabundocan you please add this:01:22
BUGabundo"could have been that \n cant reproduce"01:23
BUGabundoand set it invalid?01:23
ftaeh?01:24
BUGabundolol01:26
BUGabundoreally01:26
BUGabundoI can't01:26
BUGabundolp timeouts,01:26
BUGabundodamn network01:26
ftadone01:31
ftai guess i could call rc2 just rc2, as moz apparently did01:31
=== BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo
=== nhandler_ is now known as nhandler
=== fenris- is now known as e-jat
asacoha10:38
asacso forgot to say that iam on short vac till tue10:38
asac(e.g. onback on bue)10:39
BUGabundoenjoy asac10:42
asacyeah. at least i have 3g connection here10:45
asaclast time i travelled here, i had no 3g on train10:46
BUGabundoasac: 3g? umts or GPRS?10:47
asacBUGabundo: i think gnomefreak is recovering. will be out till jul10:50
BUGabundothanks for the update asac10:50
BUGabundohope all goes well with John10:50
ftaasac, hi!11:57
BUGabundohey fta11:57
ftahi11:57
ftaasac, I fixed a bunch of stuff in 3.5rc2, will put the env leak patch in xul too12:11
BUGabundofta: known mem leaks?12:13
BUGabundohad a friend compaling about a few12:13
ftanope, the crash on startup12:18
ftaseems it helps xul 1.9 too, at least, it sure fixed songbird12:18
ftaBUGabundo, did you test 3.5 from my ppa?12:19
fta~fta12:19
BUGabundono12:21
BUGabundoI'm using daily 3.612:21
ftanot helping12:22
ftagrr, gwibber died12:24
ftaasac, if you're bored in the train, ^^12:25
BUGabundohahah12:25
BUGabundofta: chromium crashing a lot12:34
ftabacktraces?12:34
BUGabundowhat do I do with the .crash?12:34
BUGabundoapport does fire on them12:34
ftado you have the -dbg installed?12:34
BUGabundobut refuses to report, since they aren't on the archive12:34
BUGabundodon't think so12:35
BUGabundolet me get them12:35
ftainstall it, then cheat apport12:35
asacfta: thanks for putting env patch12:43
asacon more thing to get approval for ;)12:43
asacone12:43
* asac tries to upgrade12:44
asacjust getting 110K/s12:44
asacso taikes some time to test dailies12:44
asacfta: did you upload to archive?12:44
asac(3.5rc1 (aka rc2));)12:44
ftanot yet12:44
BUGabundofta: that gdb filled my disk :(12:45
BUGabundo350MiBs Free12:45
ftaasac, i remember you asked me something about the profile migration, what was it again?12:45
asaclet me think ;)12:45
ftaBUGabundo: hehe. no worse than the testsuite-dbg, the deb is about 700MB packed12:46
asaci cant remember :(12:47
ftaasac, abrowser?12:47
asacyeah i think we have a bug for that12:48
ftaasac, what i have so far: http://paste.ubuntu.com/200007/12:49
fta200007, nice. a few seconds earlier, i would have got 20000012:49
asacargh. slow net ... slow launchpad12:50
asacbug 33165412:51
ubottuLaunchpad bug 331654 in firefox-3.5 "abrowser profile migration is wrong" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/33165412:51
asacfta: ^^12:52
asacso the migration should use firefox5.12:52
asacand not abrowser12:52
ftaI'll have a look12:53
asacthx. thats one of the fewmilestoned bugs we have for 3.512:53
asacthe other is bug 38291712:53
ubottuLaunchpad bug 382917 in firefox-3.5 "ship opt-in enforcing apparmor profile for firefox" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/38291712:53
ftais that abrowser thing useful at all? i remember at uds, rick said it was confusing users and backed off by oem vendors12:54
asacit is useful12:54
asaci dont think that all oems backed ti fof12:55
ftafixed bug 388880 already12:55
ubottuLaunchpad bug 388880 in firefox-3.5 "Browse All Add-ons links to 404 " [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/38888012:55
asacwhat rick wanted to emphasize was more that we should keep ffox as default instead of unbranding12:55
asacat least i think12:55
asacok so the apparmor thing is already assined to jdstrand. so i guss we have to wait until he gives us a working profile12:55
asacjdstrand: seems the spec AppArmorFirefoxProfile needs to be finished. guess we should talk about that next week or so12:57
ftaBUGabundo, so, your backtrace?12:58
ftaBUGabundo, no need to re-run chromium if you have the crash file already13:00
ftaasac, we need a gnome-support-dbg too, it's missing13:06
asacright13:07
asacrightwanna add?13:07
ftabut i won't add it now, it will block the package in NEW13:07
ftabetter do it later as -ubuntu2, so xul and ff are already there13:07
asacfta: yeah. so one upload without and then directly one with it13:09
asacthats a good plan13:09
asacas long as we get rc1/2 out at the right time so we can provide input in case our users catch something13:09
asaci would like to blog about it and ask users to move away13:10
asacto 3.513:10
ftatested yesterday, all the systems addons are not compatible, we need to bump those13:10
asacfta: can we start doing a milestone archive in mozillateam? so jaunty+intrepiud+hardy folks can get it too13:10
asacgiven that we do dailies it probably will _just_ work13:11
asacfta: right thats part of the firefox 3.5 transition13:11
asacspec13:11
asachttps://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-karmic-firefox-3.513:11
asacthere are about a zillion of itmes13:12
asacbut i didnt add each individual extension13:12
asacwe should make a separate spec to track those i guess13:12
ftai give so thought to that, would have been nice to have a single team with 2 ppas: daily and releases.. but i guess it's too late13:12
asacfta: well. i think we can move dailies still13:12
asacmaybe we can talk to the launchpad folks and ask for a http redirect13:13
ftamozillateam/daily and mozillateam/releases instead of mozillateam-daily/ppa and mozillateam-relases/ppa13:13
asacat least we should not  block releases/milestones because daily is in a separate ppa13:13
asacyeah. mozillateam/daily mozillateam/milestones mozillateam/releases13:13
asacthat would be perfect13:13
asacoh ... we have to remember that once we make ffox 3.5 default in .head we cannot use the same branches everywhere i think13:14
asacat least if we dont want to migrate folks completely if they run a ppa13:14
asacwe could of course do the full transition in -daily too for hardy et al .... but that feels like HUGE amount of work13:14
asaci guess after we did this transition we might get new idea on how to better make branches usable everywhere13:15
asacmaybe moving the meta packages to a separate sourcepackage firefox-meta xulrunner-meta13:15
asacetc.13:15
asacwe oculd probably consider to do that this cycle if it helüps us running those daily/milestones builds13:16
asacok off ... ferry is arriving. will look whats going on either later today or tomorrow13:16
asaccu13:17
jdstrandasac: re apparmor> waiting on bug #375422 to be fixed15:20
ubottuLaunchpad bug 375422 in linux "apparmor fails to load at startup" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/37542215:20
BUGabundoboas noites20:49
ftagni20:49
ftagrr, why am i answering to that anyway..21:05
BUGabundoLOLOL21:06
ftahe doesn't know what he is doing21:06
BUGabundoeehhe21:07
BUGabundoAcessories -> add/remove21:07
BUGabundoas long as gwibber as .desktop21:07
BUGabundolol21:07
ftaone more listener21:17
BUGabundoah?21:20
ftathat guy21:38
BUGabundolol21:45
ftanoone cared to try 3.5 rc2 :(21:50
BUGabundoohh21:50
BUGabundoI've read the same about RC121:51
BUGabundoonly 900 testers21:51
ftaall builders are busy building gcc22:01
ftano ff today22:01
dtcheni'm running whatever's in u-m-d22:05
dtchen3.5~hg20090617r25988+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1 (firefox-3.5), 1.9.1~hg20090620r26000+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1 (xulrunner-1.9.1)22:06
ftadtchen, it was in ~fta, i need to create a ppa for moz releases :P22:08
BUGabundofta: one more for you on identica! #songbird22:08

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!