/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/06/21/#ubuntu-motu.txt

rippsIs it possible to make an optional build-depend, one that installs if the distro supplies it, but to keep on building going even if it doesn't?00:35
directhexripps, yes00:37
directhexwait, no00:38
directhexnot build-time00:38
directhexonly binary deps can do it00:38
rippsI see some packages use 'packageA | packageB;' the only difference, there's no packageB for me.00:39
directhexpiped build-depends don't actually work00:39
directhexi mean, they work, but they don't work work00:39
directhexthe main archive software used by debian, sbuild, ignores them00:40
rippsI have a package I use to install a package and it's backports via fta's ppa-script, the issue is that later versions of ubuntu have a library has package which adds additional functionality if it's installed at compile time, but will ignore it if it isn't around. I want to this one package to install properly on all the distros from this single source00:43
ftaripps, i have the same need, but i don't have a solution for that yet.00:47
ftaripps, for chromium-browser, i would like to build with binutils-gold whenever it's available (karmic) and stay with the regular binutils otherwise (jaunty..)00:48
ftaripps, one idea is to backport the build-dep but it's not always wanted or possible00:49
ftaripps, another idea is to fork the packaging branch :(00:49
masterkernelIs it all right if I upload my program to both REVU and mentors.debian.net?00:51
directhexyes, but PLEASE double-check that the orig.tar.gz is the same in both, and will always be the same in both when using a get-orig-source rule (or uscan on a watch file)00:52
=== lukjad007 is now known as ShadowChild
hansolo669hello when i try to bzr push it give me the error:      "bzr: ERROR: Cannot lock LockDir(http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Emythbuntu-documentation/mythbuntu/documentation/.bzr/branch/lock): Transport operation not possible: http does not support mkdir()"  i have run "bzr launchpad-hansolo669"(my launch pad name(user name is hansolo669)) and it looks like it workd but then still gives the error. i have also made a 02:42
lifelessdon't type so much on a single line. IRC truncates02:43
lifelessanyway, push to lp:mythbuntu-documentation/mythbuntu/documentation02:43
lifelessbut you need to run bzr lp-login hansolo669 first02:44
hansolo669oh ok02:44
hansolo669thanks02:44
=== santiago-pgsql is now known as santiago-ve
hansolo669now it says theres no mythbuntu documentation " No such project: mythbuntu-documentation"02:47
wgranthansolo669: Prefix 'mythbuntu-documentation' with a ~02:48
hansolo669ok will try that02:48
hansolo669thanks it worked02:49
JimHanssonHi all; tried to upload package to REVU but my package never made it there, I have found one page telling me i need my gpg key added to REVU but the mailaddress does not work(admin@tiber.tauware.de) is there a new address that need to send my gpg key to or has the process for REVU changed?03:42
nhandlerJimHansson: Have you added your GPG key to your LP profile and logged into REVU?04:03
JimHanssonyes04:07
nhandlerJimHansson: What is the package?04:08
JimHanssongtest  and gmock04:08
JimHanssonnhandler: do I also need to upload ssh keys?04:14
nhandlerJimHansson: No, you shouldn't need to04:15
nhandlerJimHansson: Give me a few minutes to look into this04:16
JimHanssonnhandler: ok04:16
nhandlerJimHansson: Do you have a link to your LP profile?04:21
JimHanssonhttps://launchpad.net/~jim-hansson04:22
nhandlerJimHansson: How are you uploading the package to REVU?04:27
JimHanssondput04:29
JimHanssonnhandler dput REVU *-sources.changes04:30
nhandlerJimHansson: And could you pastebin the REVU section of your /etc/dput.cf file? Also, does dput show that it was uploaded?04:30
JimHanssonnhandler: i get *source.revu.upload file04:31
JimHanssonnhandler: revu.ubuntuwire.com, /incoming, anonymous04:33
JimHanssonnhandler: http://pastebin.com/d4f21a94e04:35
nhandlerJimHansson: I'm not sure what is wrong. I'm not seeing any errors in the error log. I can talk to some of the other REVU admins tomorrow and get back to you04:38
JimHanssonnhandler: it was some time ago(weeks) i tried it, maybe i should try again.04:39
nhandlerJimHansson: You didn't mention that part. Please try again now04:40
JimHanssonnhandler: already uploaded04:41
JimHanssonnhandler: removed .upload file, now it is uploaded04:42
nhandlerJimHansson:04:42
nhandlerLooks like it worked JimHansson: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/gtest04:42
JimHanssonnhandler: cool, thanks for your help04:43
nhandlerYou are welcome JimHansson04:43
JimHanssonnow i only need to figure out where I go from here04:44
nhandlerJimHansson: I would start by resolving the warnings displayed by REVU04:45
JimHanssonnhandler: yes that need to be fixed, thanks once again04:47
rippsCan someone please fix python-gnome2-extras in karmic? I think the problem is in the python-gdl dependency.05:46
geserripps: bug 38972809:48
ubottuLaunchpad bug 389728 in gnome-python-extras "Uninstallable in Karmic due to bad dep on libgdl, FTBFS if rebuilt" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/38972809:48
kpircI need a reviewer for my 'cadabra' package on REVU (it's a symbolic computer algebra system). Any takers?10:26
=== ShadowChild is now known as lukjad007
alefteris$ reverse-build-depends something11:56
alefterisreverse-build-depends: unable to find sources files.11:56
alefteriswhat am I doing wrong?11:56
geserhave you a deb-src line in your sources.list?11:58
alefterisgeser, yes, I have11:59
alefteristhen I get and the following warning: Did you forget to run apt-get update (or add --update to this command)? at /usr/bin/reverse-build-depends line 234.12:01
geserdid you run "sudo apt-get update"? and it exited without error?12:01
alefterisyes, update finishes fine, upgrade has some packages that can't be upgraded (because of new version of kernel and restricted stuff?)12:04
alefterisyou think it has to do with the problem?12:05
geserno, upgrade has nothing to do with it, update just fetches the list including the one you need for reverse-build-depends12:06
geserdoesn't it still works?12:06
alefterisno, I still get the same errors12:08
geserhmm12:09
Ampelbeinalefteris: can you pastebin your /etc/sources.list ? what happens if you run 'sudo reverse-build-depends package' ?12:21
Ampelbeinalefteris: also try 'reverse-build-depends -s -u package'12:23
Laneysudo?12:23
alefterisAmpelbein, tried the last command, didn't help, my source are at http://paste.ubuntu.com/200735/12:26
Ampelbeinalefteris: what package are you trying? could it be one from the ppa's you have in your sources.list?12:31
alefterisAmpelbein, cdbs for example12:32
Ampelbeinalefteris: ok, can you try 'reverse-build-depends -d cdbs 2>&1 | grep DEBUG' and pastebin the output?12:39
alefterisAmpelbein, found it, by default it will search for karmic sources, so I need to spesify --distribution jaunty :)12:39
Ampelbeinalefteris: ah, ok.12:40
Ampelbeini'm on karmic so I didn't notice12:40
alefterisI can search for packages that have debhelper as a build-dep with: grep-dctrl -F Build-Depends debhelper -s Package /var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_jaunty_universe_source_Sources14:20
alefterisbut how to search for debhelper >= 7?14:20
alefterisgrep-dctrl man page mentions a --ge switch (greater or equal), but I can't figure our how to use it :(14:22
Ampelbeinalefteris: i think that switch is only for version comparisons. Use a regexp to find it, like 'grep-dctrl -F Build-Depends -r --pattern debhelper.\(\>=.7.* -s Package /var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_karmic_*_Sources'14:41
alefterisAmpelbein, thanks a lot :)14:47
Ampelbeinalefteris: got disconnect, did you receive my messages?14:49
alefterisAmpelbein, yes, thank you :)14:49
LCIDFireHi all14:56
LCIDFireWhen a package is build in ppa - how does one give e.g. autogen.sh execute rights? What does test -x do?14:58
slytherinmaxb: do you plan to request sync for libjaudiotagger-java15:02
masterkernelHello, I am in need of a reviewer for my package, kernelcheck. It is a GUI tool that can automatically (custom) build any 2.6 kernel from the upstream source with any patches the user wants.15:18
slytheringeser: did you manage to get libjboss-buildmagic-java build to work?15:39
geserhuh? I didn't know that I should look at it15:41
c_kornI don't have access to a file on the german mirror: http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/p/portaudio19/libportaudio2_19+svn20090620-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb 403 Forbidden15:46
p3rrorhello15:54
p3rrori uploaded a package using dput15:55
p3rrorbut it still invisible in the revu.ubuntuwire.com website15:55
p3rrorplease can you tell me what happened ? maybe there are a delay15:56
geserc_korn: I don't have a problem to wget your URL (IP: 141.76.2.131)15:56
c_korngeser: hm, now it also works here. (am I getting mad?)16:06
=== danielm is now known as Guest97290
=== Guest97290 is now known as danielm
maxbslytherin: I was thinking about that - but I wanted to ask you about the s/default-jdk-builddep/default-jdk/ change - am I right in believing that it's purely a matter of convenience / efficiency of buildd time, and is fine to be dropped if it's the only remaining change?16:12
=== azeem_ is now known as azeem
=== paulproteus_ is now known as paulproteus
slytherinmaxb: i would like to see that change go in debian, but as long as debin package builds fine in karmic chroot i am fine with dropping it. Still we have 4 days till DIF, so see if you can forward the change.16:56
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
slytheringeser: my bad. we discussed about maven related bootstrapping. I got confused17:00
=== paul__ is now known as Elbrus
slytherinp3rror: what was the command you used17:01
geserslytherin: I've looked into it but have to postpone the solution I wanted to try as one build-dependency is FTBFS (doxia-sitetools). Once this is resolved I should be able to give it a try to bootstrap it with the Debian deb.17:03
slytheringeser: I don't see doxia-sitetools on FTBFS page17:33
geserslytherin: because it FTBFS in jaunty already and didn't get retried in karmic (therefore there is no build record in karmic which could be shown on the FTBFS page)17:37
geserslytherin: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24381838/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-i386.doxia-sitetools_1.0-alpha-11-3_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz17:37
geserslytherin: see also http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518446 . I could get it build with the packages mentioned in the 2nd comment but only when I took the debs from Debian. I didn't manage to get doxia from experimental to get build in karmic.17:40
ubottuDebian bug 518446 in doxia-sitetools "doxia-sitetools: FTBFS: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException" [Serious,Open]17:40
slytheringeser: I will drop a mail to Debian maintainer asking to upload them to unstable.17:43
geserslytherin: does it make sense when it doesn't build in Ubuntu? (it's not that we couldn't sync from experimental if needed)17:45
AndrewGe1Hi. I've uploaded a patch to fix a package. I've subscribed ubuntu-universe-sponsors. Is there anything else I need to do?17:50
=== AndrewGe1 is now known as AndrewGee
geserAndrewGee: wait17:51
AndrewGeegeser: Okay. Thanks :) Just making sure I wasn't missing anything else :)17:51
geserAndrewGee: what's the bug number so could give it a quick look?17:51
AndrewGeegeser: #38704317:52
gesertechnically it looks OK17:57
AndrewGeegeser: Great17:58
slytheringeser: he often builds packages against his personal repository.17:59
LCIDFireQuestion: Why does a gcc compile an app fine on my machine but complain about a missing (put present) header file on the ppa build?18:10
LCIDFirewhere is the gcc search path located?18:12
slytherinLCIDFire: did you try building the package on your machine using pbuilder?18:14
LCIDFirenope18:14
slytherinLCIDFire: you should try then you will know what is missing in the packaging.18:15
LCIDFireslytherin: great - that's exaclty what I was searching for - thanks18:16
slytherinLCIDFire: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto18:18
LCIDFireslytherin: do I have to run this stuff with sudo?18:20
slytherinLCIDFire: yes18:21
slytheringeser: sent mail to Debian maintainer. let's see what happens.18:24
LCIDFireslytherin: do I have to wonder if it does not work out of the box?18:39
geserLCIDFire: url to the build log?18:39
LCIDFiregeser: http://pastebin.com/d2fa39e4218:42
mrooneydirecthex: is mono in a pretty good state in Karmic? I was thinking it would be a good idea for me to test a bunch of these memory related bugs there and see the results in 2.4 vs 2.018:44
geserLCIDFire: have you universe enabled in your pbuilder?18:46
LCIDFiregeser: don't really know how to enable18:49
geseron the wiki page about pbuilder there should be action about it18:50
geserLCIDFire: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto#Universe%20support18:50
LCIDFiregeser: what is the if doing - I don't get it18:51
geserLCIDFire: some of the packages you need are in the universe component and as only main is enabled by default in your pbuilder they aren't found18:53
LCIDFiregeser: now I get it - the if is for building on debian18:53
geserah, the if on the wiki page18:54
LCIDFiregeser: are the packages deleted after I leave pbuilder?18:54
geserLCIDFire: the "temporary" directory is deleted after every pbuilder run but the downloaded debs are cached18:55
=== ripps_ is now known as ripps
LCIDFiregeser: hope so - it takes forever to download19:05
geserLCIDFire: see /var/cache/pbuilder/aptcache/19:18
LCIDFiregeser: thanks - it worked20:17
=== IVBela1 is now known as IVBela
ryanakcaCould someone give me a hand with debsign please? http://paste.ubuntu.com/201004/ ... I have 'DEBSIGN_KEYID' environment variable exported...20:38
geserryanakca: btw why do you sign a _i386.changes file?20:42
ryanakcageser: I've done it for a while, I'm not sure, but iirc, it was because dput complained that it wasn't signed when I was dputting my .debs to my local repository. I might be completely wrong though.20:46
geserah, that makes sense20:47
jacobif anyone's feeling energetic, mind doing a quick review of gfire? http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=574422:38

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!