[00:28] <torkiano> hello, I'd like to request the package of a new version of autotools (1.11)
[00:28] <torkiano> How is the process? The same as new packages?
[00:29] <andresmujica> if it's already updated at debian https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess
[00:30] <andresmujica> but beware the sync is over this week if i'm not lost..
[00:31] <torkiano> It is not in debian
[00:32] <torkiano> andresmujica, 1.11 is important because a very usefull macro: AM_SILENT_RULES
[00:33] <torkiano> more info: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580062 and  http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/NicerBuilds
[00:33] <ubot4> Gnome bug 580062 in general "Add shave support to gnome-common" [Normal,Unconfirmed]
[00:33] <torkiano> andresmujica, Do you know a PPA with automake1.11 ?
[00:39] <andresmujica> https://launchpad.net/~bhavi/bhavi-upstream-testing
[00:39] <andresmujica> hmm
[00:39] <andresmujica> it's old..
[00:44] <andresmujica> probably is too late to make that change.. debian is still on 1.10, try at #ubuntu-devel probably they would help you more there..
[00:46] <torkiano> andresmujica, thank you!
[00:52] <andresmujica> torkiano: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512704
[00:52] <ubot4> Debian bug 512704 in automake "automake: New upstream version available" [Wishlist,Open]
[00:52] <andresmujica> this your upstream bug.
[00:53] <torkiano> andresmujica, mmm that is for 1.10.2
[00:54] <torkiano> :/
[00:54] <andresmujica> look further down
[00:54] <andresmujica> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512704#20
[00:54] <ubot4> Debian bug 512704 in automake "automake: New upstream version available" [Wishlist,Open]
[00:54] <torkiano> ohj great
[00:55] <torkiano> How is the process, then? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess ?
[02:00] <bcurtiswx> good evening all
[07:26] <thekorn> good morning
[07:27] <dholbach> good morning
[13:10] <torkiano> Hello, CAn anyone confirm bug #390909 ?
[13:10] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 390909 in automake "[needs-packaging] automake1.11" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/390909
[15:11] <bddebian> Boo
[15:22] <thekorn> hi bddebian
[15:25] <bddebian> Hi thekorn
[15:58] <oxocoffee> Not sure if this is proper channel t report/ask. But I have a c++ application that failes to build on Xubuntu 9.04. Here is simple and error. http://gcc.pastebin.com/m15221a77
[16:01] <charlie-tca> This channel is for reported bugs discussion and triageing. I would try in #xubuntu or #xubuntu-devel
[16:08] <charles_> anyone around with a ppc who can do a two-minute test for me?
[16:10] <charles_> the test: download http://beta.legaltorrents.com/get/459-image-pack-1.torrent, try to open it with Transmission, and see if it crashes as a result.  (ticket 377334)
[16:12] <billybigrigger> are you using 9.04 or 9.10?
[16:12] <billybigrigger> cause i know there is a bug with gtk file chooser, that will crash transmission or deluge or whatever if you try and change where the torrent is being downloaded
[16:12] <charles_> yeah, I saw a ticket for that in 9.10
[16:13] <charles_> OP reported this with Transmission 1.5x, so most likely it's 9.04
[16:13] <billybigrigger> fire up a terminal, run tail -f /var/log/syslog and make transmission crash
[16:13] <billybigrigger> paste the output here, should only be a single line
[16:15] <charles_> billybigrigger: I'm not seeing the behavior reported in 377334.  The OP theorized that it might be a ppc-only issue, which is why I'm looking a ppc user to confirm/refute
[16:15] <billybigrigger> well you can still try and debug and see what is causing the crash
[16:16] <charles_> how?  I'm not seeing the crash
[16:16] <charles_> I said that already :)
[16:17] <kklimonda> I was wondering what to do with bug 377334 myself. What is our policy about supporting unsupported architectures? ;)
[16:17] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 377334 in transmission "transmission crashes reproducable for certain torrents" [Low,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/377334
[16:17]  * kklimonda pokes ubo.. ok, he's out.. ;)
[17:45] <bcurtiswx> good morning everyone
[17:47] <hggdh> bcurtiswx, good morning
[19:38] <BUGabundo> Bom S. João para tds, e cuidado com as espinhas :))
[20:03] <hggdh> BUGabundo, wrong channel? ;-)
[20:03] <BUGabundo> naaa
[20:03] <BUGabundo> have you ever had one ?
[20:03] <hggdh> what S. Joao?
[20:04] <hggdh> yes
[20:15] <BUGabundo> oh really hggdh
[20:15] <BUGabundo> ?
[20:15] <BUGabundo> I thougth you lived all your live away from here
[20:16] <hggdh> no, not *all* live
[20:16] <hggdh> my father was portuguese...
[20:19] <hggdh> my mother daughter of european unknown stock, I was born in Brazil, and I live in the US. And married a german. So confusion abounds :-D
[20:20] <BUGabundo> haha
[20:20] <BUGabundo> poor kijs
[20:20] <BUGabundo> *kids
[20:20] <BUGabundo> if they ever try to do a family tree they will spend 80 days around the world
[20:21] <BUGabundo> hey seb128
[20:22] <seb128> BUGabundo: hi
[20:23] <hggdh> :-) yes they will... we have tried, but from my mother's side we have no clue. From my father's was easy, old family
[20:39] <hggdh> jcastro, ping
[20:39] <jcastro> hggdh: yo
[20:40] <hggdh> hi jcastro, I am interested in being a contact/liasson/whatever to Evo and coreutils
[20:40] <jcastro> oh awesome
[20:40] <jcastro> can you give me a day or two to get the roles/wiki and all that straightened out?
[20:41] <hggdh> yes, of course
[20:41]  * jcastro puts hggdh on the list-of-awesome.
[20:41]  * hggdh blushes. Hard.
[21:33] <hggdh> do we open code bugs against debian?
[21:34] <BUGabundo> err?
[21:34] <BUGabundo> hggdh: more details please
[21:34] <micahg> upstream?
[21:34] <hggdh> yes
[21:34] <micahg> if you have time :)
[21:34] <hggdh> ok, done
[21:35] <hggdh> now we wait for the ack from Debian before adding an upstream...
[21:35] <micahg> you mean in LP or debian bug tracker?
[21:35] <hggdh> debian bts
[21:35] <micahg> yep
[21:44] <micahg> hggdh: I'd say add the upstream now
[21:52] <hggdh> micahg, already done ;-)
[21:53] <micahg> :)
[22:59] <bcurtiswx> bdmurray: i just read your response to the bug control app.  you mentioned that the user should bring comments from upstream and add them to ubuntu.. can't we get the bug watch updater to do that?
[22:59] <bdmurray> bcurtiswx: well, the particular thing I was referencing was a workaround not all comments
[22:59] <BUGabundo> bcurtiswx: AFAIK only on BTS that install the LP plugin
[23:00] <bdmurray> That's correct comment syncing only works with BTS with the Launchpad plugin installed
[23:00] <bcurtiswx> well, would it be beneficial to us to have a program add comments upstream to our reports?
[23:01] <micahg> not always, I would suggest the triager subscribe upstream and post anything useful to LP
[23:01] <micahg> I do this for mozilla bugs and there's a lot of noise on their bugtracker
[23:01] <micahg> as well as developers working to solve the problem that the reporters don't need to see
[23:02] <bcurtiswx> micahg: ok, i was thinking that would be one of the few problems
[23:03] <bcurtiswx> i would now if i had the time, but im at a conference.. would someone add that to an appropriate bug triage wiki page?
[23:07] <bcurtiswx> actually i can, its only a sentence to the how to triage page
[23:11] <bcurtiswx> done
[23:12] <bcurtiswx> that just shows how boring this conference is :-X
[23:14] <hggdh> I do not remember many exciting conferences, or simposia, or whatever...
[23:15] <bcurtiswx> hggdh: lol
[23:15] <bcurtiswx> good point
[23:15] <hggdh> well, there was one I would like to have been to -- when my brother finished his sabbatical at MIT, he gave a presentation: "One year at MIT. And So what?"
[23:15] <bcurtiswx> hahahahaha
[23:16] <hggdh> he told me later it was well-attended ;-)
[23:18] <bcurtiswx> i would have been there
[23:28] <bdmurray> hggdh: Couldn't we get part of your evolution hook integrated?
[23:31] <hggdh> bdmurray, yes, of course
[23:32] <hggdh> I will check with seb tomorrow about getting it done