/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/06/24/#ubuntu-meeting.txt

BryanLBasilOkay.  Thanks anyway, beuno.  Sorry about the slow typing, everyone.  My hands are cold. :P00:00
pleia2BryanLBasil: I agree with beuno, great start but I'd like to see more sutained involvement +000:00
beunoBryanLBasil, I'm an official Ubuntu translator for spanish, so I'll be very happy to help you out join the team00:00
Technoviking+) from me also, a great geat start, keep it up and you will be fine.00:01
BryanLBasilbeuno: thanks a lot, that would be great.00:01
beunosmiley vote!00:01
Technoviking+0, sigh00:01
nixternal+1 from me00:01
greg-gBryanLBasil: I agree with everything about your current progress and future, I just want to see what you look like in 3 months. +000:01
pleia2BryanLBasil: also, I noticed that a magazine is on your todo list - are you familiar with Full Circle Magazine and the new Ubuntu User Magazine?00:01
BryanLBasilpleia2: Those are virtual magazines, right?00:02
pleia2BryanLBasil: Ubuntu User is print00:02
BryanLBasilpleia2: Any way that I can contribute?00:02
pleia2BryanLBasil: Linux Pro Magazine released it, presumably you'd go through them00:02
BryanLBasilAre they on LP?00:02
BryanLBasilGreat.00:02
nixternalanyone else?00:10
nixternalvote wise that is00:10
BryanLBasilMay I suggest something, while I'm in a room full of ubuntu members? ;-)00:10
nixternalgo for it00:10
BryanLBasilOn the /Membership page on the ubuntu wiki, it mentions that you should have at least 2 months of sustained contribution.00:11
nixternalI think everyone was waiting for you to catch up on answers and made it a bit quiet in here for you to do so :)00:11
BryanLBasilBut it seems that over time,00:11
BryanLBasilthat expected time period has increased.00:11
pleia2BryanLBasil: I'd really like to see you get more involved with the Georgia LoCo team and have some solid contributions to the Marketing team as well :)00:11
BryanLBasilI can't help but feel I've wasted your time00:11
beunoBryanLBasil, I agree00:12
BryanLBasilSo, if it could be changed to, say, 6 months, meetings would go by a lot faster.00:12
beunowe need to look into that00:12
VantraxThat is a pretty fair observation BryanLBasil, I have seen that as well. Perhaps that does need to be looked at00:12
nixternalBryanLBasil: oh heck no dude, you didn't waste my time...I am grabbing some wallpapers from ya now :)00:12
BryanLBasilnixternal: haha. :-)00:12
nelleryPerhaps someone should bring that up with the CC?00:13
greg-gBryanLBasil: not at all. In fact, I think your contributions to the Answers tracker and your plans make you a good candidate, but I can't really +1 for what I've seen thus far.00:13
BryanLBasilgreg-g: Don't worry.  I'll be back soon if it doesn't happen today. :P00:13
beunoBryanLBasil, but I still think you need to get a little bit more involved, polish those translations, make a few more connections in the community, etc.  You're a great candidate, and if you keep this up, you will wizz through here in 3 months00:13
beunoBryanLBasil, you've applied for all the right reasons, and you should be proud of your accomplishments00:14
greg-gBryanLBasil: and I'll be waiting for you :)00:14
Technovikingnellery: I will00:14
nixternalBryanLBasil: I don't think they weren't saying you didn't have enough time in, you obviously do, they just wanted to see a bit more sustainability and more/cleaner involvement00:14
nixternalyour time is good, I just think they have misworded their responses00:14
BryanLBasilbeuno: Thanks a lot. Sorry I didn't see that sooner.00:15
BryanLBasilnixternal: Ah.00:16
BryanLBasil:-)00:16
beunoBryanLBasil, you've done something very valuable today, which is bring up the 2 month rule to our attention. Now we have work to do. So thank you00:16
nixternalI am from Chicago, and thus far I am the only one to not muck up the english tongiht :p00:16
* nixternal runs and hides00:16
bratscheheh00:16
BryanLBasil"tongiht"?00:16
nixternalshush00:16
nixternalhahaha00:16
nixternalthat's how we spell it here in Chicago00:17
BryanLBasilSure, sure.00:17
ajmitchnixternal: things are different there, aren't they?00:17
nixternaleverything is different here00:17
bratscheTheir fingers freeze off in the cold, so it's to be expected that they can't type. ;)00:17
nixternalnice one00:18
ajmitchmy fingers are just about frozen now :P00:18
nhandlerbratsche: Only some of us can't type ;)00:18
BryanLBasil+100:18
nixternalOK, I am back00:21
nixternalhello? am I the only one here now?00:23
bratscheHi :)00:23
nixternalhehe00:24
boredandbloggingnixternal: think we lost quorum00:24
greg-gwe may have just lost quorum, unfortunately, we're trying to find another person00:24
nixternaluh oh00:24
bratsche:(00:24
greg-gbut it doesn't look good :(00:24
BryanLBasilWas I the last person to show up?00:25
bratscheNo.00:25
bratscheI think I'm next.00:26
pleia2yeah, bratsche you'll be next if we can get quorum00:26
greg-gwe have bratsche left, but it isn't looking like we'll be able to vote, or at least, have the vote count00:26
boredandbloggingbratsche: yeah, just trying to get quorum00:26
bratscheYeah I know.00:26
* bratsche waits patiently :)00:26
greg-gthanks :)00:26
zehriquegreg-g: may I vote for now on?00:29
bratscheI think you have to be on the membership board.00:29
nixternalzehrique: ya, have to be on a RMB00:30
greg-gzehrique: no, only the board members are able to vote. But thanks for the offer :)00:30
nixternalwe are trying to track other RMB members from other parts of the world00:30
nhandlerzehrique: Voting is restricted to the membership board, but you can still express your support for people applying to become members00:30
zehriqueOK, guys. Thanks for the feedback.00:30
zehrique:)00:31
greg-gbratsche: finding the quorum is proving difficult. I think we're going to have to end this meeting, unfortunately.00:32
bratsche:(00:32
greg-gsorry about that00:33
bratscheYeah, I understand.00:33
bratscheIs there another meeting scheduled soon?00:33
greg-gthat I am unsure of.00:33
BryanLBasilEMEA is00:33
BryanLBasilon the 7th.00:33
bratscheOr if not, could I present my case and another member of the board could vote later or something?00:34
greg-gactually, one moment.....00:34
nixternalpersia: around at all with a few minutes to spare?00:34
BryanLBasilbratsche: If this doesn't work out, and you don't want to wait for the next Americas, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Membership/RegionalBoards/EMEA00:34
nixternallifeless, elky? few minutes to help out finish up one more member for this evening?00:35
nhandlerSo, are we going to wait and see if we can pull a member from the Asia membership board? Or are we just going to end the meeting?00:37
nixternalwe are trying, but it isn't looking good00:37
nixternalhate to leave 1 hanging00:37
bratscheThanks for trying!  If it doesn't work out then I understand.00:37
Vantraxthats a little disapppointing, is it usually difficult?00:38
pleia2Vantrax: well, the meeting went over an hour, we tend to lose quorum after that00:39
pleia2were hoping to get through more, but :\00:39
Vantraxfair enough00:39
nixternalwould be cool if we could deputize people :p00:40
bratscheheh00:40
nelleryhow many do you need?00:40
nixternalprobably 100 ;p00:40
Vantraxisnt that the CC's job nixternal00:40
wiebelhausYou guys must have called me and I missed it?00:40
nixternalhrmm, what about Kubuntu Council members?00:40
nixternalhehe00:41
bratscheUh oh, then I have no chance to make it ;)00:41
bratschehehe00:41
nhandlerWhat about MC ;)00:41
nixternalnhandler: ya00:41
nixternalif we can do MC then we have nhandler00:41
pleia2ok, sorry folks, we're going to have to end the meeting00:43
pleia2we're going to shoot for having another in 2 weeks :) so watch the board page for the meeting time update00:43
bratschepleia2: Cool, thanks very much!00:43
greg-gbratsche: see you in 2 weeks! :)00:44
bratscheSee you then!00:44
BryanLBasilnixternal: can you start a chat with me?00:44
nixternalisn't like bratsche is going anywhere00:44
nixternalBryanLBasil: can we do it a bit later, I have a date in which I am close to being late for :_)00:44
BryanLBasilAh.  Understandable. :-)00:44
nixternalhehe, at least someone understands :)00:44
BryanLBasilOf course.00:44
bratscheI'm going to guadec, but I think that's over by then.00:45
nixternalyou mean the Desktop Summit, it isn't all about GNOME for once ;p00:45
* nixternal runs really fast before getting beat up00:45
bratscheheh00:45
* bratsche hides00:45
bratscheI believe the official term for it now is Guademy! ;)00:46
bratscheMaybe I can boost my Karma in 2 weeks.  I was blown away by BryanLBasil's karma. :)00:47
greg-gbratsche: get to answering questions :)00:47
BryanLBasilbratsche: Thanks. :-) I remember I did a couple of translations and had 52 karma, and the day after I answered some questions, I had 470+. haha.00:48
bratscheSo far most of the work I've been doing is for upstream, but now I'm starting on something hosted in Launchpad bzr.. more karma, here I come! ;)00:48
BryanLBasilGood luck. :-)00:49
bratscheThanks!00:50
bratscheSee you all in a couple weeks!00:50
=== lukjad007 is now known as ShadowChild
=== Richie is now known as YDdraigGoch
CoringaoHello everyone, sorry for being late. :(03:42
=== WelshDragon is now known as YDdraigGoch
=== nellery_ is now known as nellery
=== maxb_ is now known as maxb
=== ShadowChild is now known as lukjad007
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== ogasawara_ is now known as ogasawara
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach
=== al-maisan_ is now known as al-maisan
evand1hi-a16:00
robbiew#startmeeting16:00
MootBotMeeting started at 10:00. The chair is robbiew.16:00
MootBotCommands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]16:00
=== ember_ is now known as ember
robbiewhowdy16:00
robbiewevand1/evand: hi16:00
robbiewlol16:00
mvo!16:00
evand1heh16:00
mterryHello!16:00
al-maisan:)16:00
xivulonhi16:01
Keybukyo!16:01
cjwatsonhello16:02
robbiewjames_w: awake?16:02
james_whi!16:02
robbiew;)16:02
james_wI am now16:02
robbiewliw and slangasek are out16:02
robbiewso...let's start16:02
robbiew[TOPIC] DebianImportFreeze16:03
MootBotNew Topic:  DebianImportFreeze16:03
robbiewmerge merge merge!!!16:03
* Keybuk considers putting together a list of people and the number of merges they have done16:03
robbiewcjwatson: anything to add?16:04
Keybuk(just for dholbach revenge <g>)16:04
dholbachKeybuk: hu?16:04
dholbachah ok16:04
robbiewdholbach: sponsorship vs merges16:04
robbiew;)16:04
dholbach... whatever :)16:04
mterryIs it useful for me to do merges then sub sponsors, or is sponsoring almost as much work as doing the merge onself?16:04
dholbachmore sponsoring!16:04
cjwatsonpersonally I find sponsoring merges to be about the same amount of work as doing the merge myself16:05
cjwatsonthat doesn't mean it's necessarily a bad thing, since it encourages new contributors16:05
cjwatsonrobbiew: nothing in particular :)16:05
cjwatsonwe have 65 packages in main that have not yet been merged16:06
robbiew:/16:06
cjwatsonsome of those aren't a big deal16:06
evand164, I merged partman-efi not too long ago16:06
robbiewk...moving on16:07
robbiew[TOPIC] glibc16:07
MootBotNew Topic:  glibc16:07
robbiewdoko is in OEM...so....16:07
cjwatsonfrex the Debian changes to tasksel are basically just Debian task changes irrelevant to us; installation-guide doesn't really matter urgently; kernel-wedge is typically more trouble than it's worth16:07
cjwatsonetc. but everything ought to have been looked at16:07
robbiewwho's "interested" in looking after glibc this cycle...I believe we need to update to a new version, no?16:08
robbiew2.1016:08
dokowe should. it's easy if we decide on eglibc, it requires re-merging if we stay with glibc16:09
* mterry feels like he should, as he kicked doko out16:09
robbiewheh16:09
mterrydoko, a decision didn't happen at UDS?16:09
robbiewno16:10
robbiewwhich means (to me) that we stay on glibc this cycle...and move for Karmic+116:10
dokothe "difficulty" will be not to drop patches which are not in glibc but in eglibc. and then watch the eglibc commits, what Debian does submit to eglibc ...16:10
mterrydoko, i.e. apply all patches to eglibc to glibc?16:11
robbiewdo we NEED to update this cycle?16:11
cjwatsonthere's zero point in just applying patches from eglibc to glibc, IMO16:12
cjwatsonif we're going to merge we should merge; otherwise we should stay where we are16:12
cjwatsonno point in a halfway house16:12
dokoand no poing in glibc-2.10?16:12
robbiewor is it just something that would be nice...if doko was around fulltime on the team16:13
robbiewespecially since I think the LTS is going to be 10.1016:13
cjwatsonthe idea of somebody new to glibc attempting to construct a glibc 2.10 package without help from Debian does not fill me with enthusiasm16:13
* robbiew is apparently typing to himself :/16:13
cjwatson(the package in Debian experimental is eglibc 2.10 ...)16:13
dokowell, if 10.10 is the lts, then we maybe can stay with 2.9 for now16:14
cjwatsonmy personal preference would be to merge up to what Debian currently ship16:14
cjwatsonand leave it at that, modulo bugfixes16:14
cjwatson(i.e. eglibc 2.9)16:15
robbiewok...so I suppose we don't touch glibc this cycle,  since I can't seem to find enough interest to do so16:15
cjwatsonbut emphasis on personal16:15
dokocjwatson: but using eglibc? fine with me, but I remember we did decide else ...16:16
robbiew[TOPIC] Karmic Status and Roadmap16:16
robbiewhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/FoundationsTeam/ReleaseStatus/Karmic16:16
robbiewI've deferred a few more features16:16
robbiewand have things in order...pretty much16:16
MootBotNew Topic:  Karmic Status and Roadmap16:16
cjwatsondoko: we failed to decide, AFAICS, despite various attempts to do so16:16
* robbiew is apparently having weird irc issues16:16
dokocjwatson: whoever works on this, there are currently three different branches on lp (glibc-2.9, eglibc-2.9, eglibc-2.10)16:18
mterryrobbiew, you've dropped status colors a couple times in that wiki.  Was that intentional?16:18
cjwatsonI think I might have put the status colors in the wrong column, but ...16:19
robbiewmterry: yes...moved deferred items to a separate section16:20
robbiewand the red was really to highlight no owners16:20
robbiewmy status was in alpha stage ;)16:20
robbiewnow the colors will stay or transition to the "previous status" area16:20
mterryrobbiew, OK, there was a green status on the rsyslog thing twice, but it got dropped.  wasn't sure if I/cjwatson had been doing it wrong16:21
robbiewhmm16:22
robbiewmaybe I overwrote it16:22
* robbiew will be more careful16:22
robbiewin any case, I don't think anyone needs to worry about setting colors for their work...let me worry about that stuff ;)16:23
cjwatsonah, that's a relief, I hadn't been sure16:24
robbiewlol16:24
robbiewyeah...let the manager do that tedious crap ;)16:24
robbiewas a reminder, please try to put in milestones in your blueprints16:24
cjwatsonok, shall we just give updates in weekly catch-up calls then?16:24
robbiewcjwatson: yes....that was the plan16:25
robbiewsome have calls only every two weeks16:25
robbiewbut I can use irc quite well ;)16:25
cjwatsonhah16:25
robbiew[TOPIC] Platform Sprint16:25
MootBotNew Topic:  Platform Sprint16:25
robbiewbook your tix16:26
robbiewand complete the wiki please16:26
robbiewhttp://wiki.canonical.com/UbuntuPlatform/Sprints/Karmic16:26
MootBotLINK received:  http://wiki.canonical.com/UbuntuPlatform/Sprints/Karmic16:26
mterrybooked, will wiki later today16:26
robbiewwhoops...the LTS update item was from last week :/16:27
mterryI have to skip the last day, fyi.  My poor planning16:27
robbiewmterry: you and Keybuk will be missed16:27
robbiewand assigned work16:27
robbiew:P16:27
mterryheh16:27
robbiew[TOPIC] Sponsorship Queue16:27
MootBotNew Topic:  Sponsorship Queue16:27
robbiewthat's all I'm going to say...we all know about it16:28
robbiewno sense in nagging too much ;)16:28
robbiew[TOPIC] Good News16:28
MootBotNew Topic:  Good News16:28
robbiewany?16:28
cjwatsonI trimmed a bunch of space off the live CD initrd16:28
robbiewthe Debian guys didn't run away screaming from our Boot sprint16:29
mvokernel-crashdumps progressing nicely (hopefully the reporting etc is all done now)16:29
robbiewcjwatson: woot!16:29
robbiewmvo: nice!16:29
cjwatsonpartly with generic improvements to various bits of initramfs software, partly by switching it over to lzma (though that doesn't quite seem to have stuck yet, I'll check into why). Total space gained is somewhere around 4MB16:29
robbiew[TOPIC] AOB?16:30
MootBotNew Topic:  AOB?16:30
* mterry doesn't know what "AOB" means16:30
cjwatsonany other business16:30
mterryah16:30
cjwatsonboth Robbie and I are going to be out on Friday16:30
* doko is away now16:31
cjwatsonrobbiew: did we decide that slangasek would represent us at the release meeting, or do we need somebody else to do so?16:31
robbiewI think he is a proper rep ;)16:31
robbiewevand1 is also out Friday...and tomorrow16:31
evand1and monday16:31
robbiewor evand...whatever he calls himself16:31
evand1heh16:31
robbiewcjwatson: I'll remind slangasek tomorrow about our absence..since he'll be working UK hours16:32
robbiew#endmeeting16:32
MootBotMeeting finished at 10:32.16:32
robbiewthat's all she wrote!16:32
mvothanks16:32
evand1thanks16:33
al-maisanCheerio!16:33
henohello!17:57
bdmurrayhi17:57
* fader waves.17:57
pedro_hola!17:57
eeejayhey folks17:57
cr3eeejay: yo mama17:58
* ogasawara waves17:58
davmor2hello17:58
sbeattiehey17:58
henolet's start!18:00
heno#startmeeting18:01
MootBotMeeting started at 12:01. The chair is heno.18:01
MootBotCommands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]18:01
henoagenda as usual: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Meetings18:01
henoUbuntuBugDay highlights -- pedro18:01
pedro_Last Thursday we had a hug day based on Empathy: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/2009061818:01
pedro_was a good hug day for us, since the upstream maintainers were around to help us solving questions18:02
pedro_and we've submitted a good quantity of bugs upstream as well18:02
henoexcellent!18:02
pedro_showard helped us during the hug day, kudos to him18:02
pedro_and tomorrow we're having a hug day based on Banshee : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/2009062518:03
henopedro_: should we have a bug day for 100 paper cuts?18:03
pedro_mm that's a good idea18:04
henoI understand there has been a flood of reports18:04
henoget the whole DUX team to triage them ;)18:04
pedro_yeap there's quite a lot of bug email noise coming from there18:04
henoI can speak with them tomorrow about that18:04
pedro_we're receiving a lot of bug mail from nautilus for example18:05
henowill a bug day just create more unwanted bug noise?18:05
pedro_most of them comments from users18:05
pedro_well we can at least help the DUX team to reduce the new bugs there18:05
pedro_there's ~280 new open bugs18:05
pedro_nah don't think it's going to generate even more noise, since the tasks are already open18:06
pedro_would be nice to have more eyes looking at those18:06
henoand help them understand the implications of blogging to request that people file more bugs about all their little annoyances ;)18:06
pedro_yes please ;-)18:07
henook, I'll talk with them18:07
pedro_awesome! thanks18:07
henothanks pedro for the report18:07
heno[TOPIC] SRU Verifications -- sbeattie18:07
MootBotNew Topic:  SRU Verifications -- sbeattie18:07
pedro_my pleasure18:07
sbeattieFirst off, thanks to Neil Hoggarth, Peter Adolphs, Benjamin Drung, Lennart Jütte, Ryan, Anoop, Gerhard Radatz, and Neil Wallace for testing and posting results for SRUs this week.18:08
sbeattie8.04.3 SRUs are progressing, though there's more still to do.18:08
sbeattieWe tried to run a testing day on monday focusing on that: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/UbuntuTestingDay/20090622 but didn't get much uptake.18:09
henono green :(18:09
sbeattieSo more help is requested; in particular, help with the hardware specific issues outlined in the announcement http://blog.qa.ubuntu.com/node/55 would be useful18:09
davmor2Yes sorry I wasn't around much Monday :(18:10
sbeattieYeah. I did a few, but ended up struggling most of the day trying to reproduce the apache mod_ssl one.18:10
henosbeattie: have you looked into the forum testing community?18:11
sbeattieNot yet, but thanks for the tip, I'll poke around there.18:11
sbeattieOh, I should note that hardy isos started get spun on monday.18:11
henocr3: heve we run any 8.04.3 ISOs yet?18:11
heno(in cert testing)18:12
faderheno: We have run some18:12
faderThey have been tested on the server hardware18:12
cr3heno: automated or manual?18:12
henocan we get a view of the coverage?18:12
sbeattieOne issue that I discovered last night is that the livecds were being built with proposed enabled, but the server installer was not.18:12
henocr3: automated, first of all18:13
cr3fader: server hardware for 20090624 and desktop hardware too for 20090623.1 (isn't /cdimages awesome!?)18:13
sbeattieI believe it's been fixed this morning, but will probably take a day to propogate.18:13
faderheno: It's in the certification site; I will export to a webpage so that it is more visible18:13
sbeattiefader|cr3: much appreciated!18:13
fadercr3: You were one step ahead of me :)18:13
henofader: thanks. can you present that at Friday's meeting?18:13
faderheno: Will do.18:14
cr3heno, fader: it seems like the desktop images for hardy aren't being tested, I'll see if they need special massaging18:14
davmor2sbeattie: I can check out the wifi hardware but I don't have any of the others18:14
henofader: in fact, I will most likely not make that meeting due to traveling; can you represent QA there?18:14
faderheno: Absolutely.18:14
sbeattiedavmor2: that'd be great!18:15
henosbeattie, cr3: please attend as well18:15
sbeattieheno: will do.18:15
cr3heno: will do18:15
henoI was very pleased with out presence there last week btw!18:15
henomainly because we're in good shape on specs ;)18:15
cr3heno: would it be appropriate to announce automated testing of live cd images during the meeting on Friday?18:16
sbeattiecr3: yes indeed.18:16
cr3... so that we could show we're also in good shape on implementation :)18:16
henocr3: yes, provided we can post some actual results18:16
heno(to be scraped from the cert site I guess)18:17
cr3heno: fader, schwuk and I will make it happen18:17
henocool18:17
henosbeattie: anything else on SRUs?18:17
sbeattieThat's pretty much it.18:17
henoconflict-checker work is worth mentioning Friday too18:17
cr3heno: what's the progress on that?18:18
heno[TOPIC] Spec Roadmap review -- heno18:18
sbeattieYep, though one of us needs to go through, do some analysis, and file bugs based on the results.18:18
MootBotNew Topic:  Spec Roadmap review -- heno18:18
fadersbeattie: Can we talk about that after the meeting?18:18
henocr3: 'good progress'18:18
sbeattiefader: sure thing!18:19
henoSee https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/RoadMap18:19
henoAll specs green! (approved)18:19
fader\o/18:19
henoI'll add some implementation icons as well18:20
henoeeejay: you'll add a ubiquity automation spec right?18:20
henocr3: and you'll add a filters spec?18:20
eeejayheno: oops, yeah. i'll do that now18:20
henogreat, thanks18:20
cr3heno: depending on my findings, I'm afraid that I'm still at the point where this might lead to a dead end. that is life of research18:21
henoanyone have comments on the roadmap this week? anyone blocked in their spec work?18:21
henoI'll take that as good news18:22
henoAny other topics?18:22
bdmurrayJust in case no one saw it negated tag searching has landed in Launchpad18:23
heno\o/18:23
sbeattiebdmurray: woot!18:23
pedro_\o/!18:23
bdmurraysbeattie that might be interesting for finding non hardware specific sru verification bugs18:23
henobdmurray: any news on +filebug redirecting?18:23
bdmurrayheno: I've not heard anything about it18:24
henoOK, I'll catch up with Tom18:24
bdmurraygreat18:24
bdmurrayIs anybody using the Firefox extension I've made of the launchpad greasemonkey scripts?18:25
sbeattiebdmurray: yes, I am. Working well.18:25
ogasawarabdmurray: I am18:25
bdmurrayCool, that's what I wanted to hear. ;-)18:25
bdmurrayI think lp_patches is kind of broken now but I'll look at it this week18:26
henoSo I can set that spec to 'beta available'?18:26
bdmurrayYes, that sounds good18:26
henoall, feel free you update spec status as you work on them, btw18:27
henook, looks like were done18:27
heno#endmeeting18:27
MootBotMeeting finished at 12:27.18:27
davmor2bye]18:29
=== fader is now known as fader|lunch
=== fader|lunch is now known as fader
slangasekrobbiew, cjwatson: oh hmm, I'm to be representing Foundations at the release meeting?  I thought one of you was still around Friday?21:33
=== asac__ is now known as asac
cjwatsonslangasek: I believe Robbie's travelling, and I'm on a swap day23:19
cjwatsonslangasek: which I can rearrange if necessary, but I'd rather we just found another representative if need be :)23:19
slangasekwould be nice if someone else could represent, my head gets hot when I wear too many hats23:20
slangasekI can do it, though, presuming someone else can feed me the status beforehand :)23:21
=== asac_ is now known as asac
cjwatsonslangasek: I'll hunt around tomorrow then23:40
cjwatsonslangasek: I thought I'd asked you about this yesterday and you said yes, but you must have only caught half the conversation :)23:40

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!