=== mthaddon is now known as afk === abentley1 is now known as abentley === abentley1 is now known as abentley === abentley1 is now known as abentley === hggdh_ is now known as hggdh === abentley1 is now known as abentley === abentley1 is now known as abentley [06:49] how can I add another package to a newly created bug report: Bug #391949 [06:49] Launchpad bug 391949 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-71 "nvidia-glx issues on GeForce 2 go" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/391949 [06:50] arand: "Also affects distribution...". Or do you want to change it to a different package, removing the old one? [06:55] wgrant: I'd like to add nvidia-glx-96 along with current -71 as affected. [06:57] Ah, figured it now, a bit odd to go for distro when I'm only adding anothe pkh === stub1 is now known as stub [07:53] Is this error known on launchpad code? I see a piece of coding above the header: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/unetbootin/trunk http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/7985/screenshotznp.png [07:56] looks like java script [07:56] savvas: There have been about 7 bugs filed about that so far. [07:56] and it doesn't show up for me [07:56] try hitting ctrl-F5 [07:57] lifeless: You're an ~admin. [07:57] It's only shown if you don't have launchpad.Edit on the series. [07:57] wgrant: ah [07:57] wgrant: thanks :) [08:04] thanks wgrant :) === afk is now known as mthaddon === ripps_ is now known as ripps === sale_ is now known as sale === tdn_ is now known as tdn === mthaddon is now known as afk === afk is now known as mthaddon [10:55] hi [10:55] i have a problem :) [10:58] The following source cannot be copied: dhcpcd 1:3.2.3-4~drizzt1 in karmic (a different source with the same version is published in the destination archive) [10:58] but in https://launchpad.net/~timothy-redaelli/+archive/ppa i have not dhcpcd [10:58] drizztbsd: Not even an old deleted one? [10:58] yes, i have an old deleted one [10:59] That would do it. [10:59] should i wait some times to make the system purge? [10:59] The error message is slightly wrong, but it means pretty much what it says. [10:59] or should i make a (useless) version bump? [10:59] I'm pretty sure you'll never be able to have a source with the same version, because of the confusion that will cause. [11:00] Why is the version bump useless? [11:00] ok. thanks. i will do a version bump [11:00] It's a different package, isn't it? [11:03] noodles775: Ahhhh, I'm glad the package pages are finally get redesigned. [11:04] wgrant: you don't miss much do you ;). If you've got thoughts and suggestions, please add them! [11:04] wgrant: sorry for the scant notes... I just created the page to upload the photos... [11:05] noodles775: What's that table on the DSPR page? [11:05] * noodles775 looks [11:06] I don't see how the tick/cross makes sense. [11:06] Oh, are those representing the build status? [11:08] wgrant: yes, trying to summarise all the binaries produced by the DSPR (and their states) [11:08] Grr... forgot that f-spot doesn't rotate the original image... [11:11] noodles775: I strongly dislike F-Spot's approach at dealing with photos. [11:12] noodles775: Back to the build status... it's surely an implementation detail that the -doc is arch-all, and the build status is DAS-wide, so why show it in each row? [11:12] I'd put a download link there, not a build status icon. [11:15] wgrant: I thought that was what the dashes in intrepid-amd64/jaunty-lpia were indicating? [11:17] noodles775: They make sense if it's a build status matrix. [11:17] But the build statuses don't need to be represented in a matrix. [11:18] wgrant: other thoughts on how could you summarise all the relevant information? [11:19] noodles775: So, I'd put the build status in the header, next to the DAS name. The ticks/crosses/dashes then get replaced with download or DASBPR:+index links, with the -doc package's intrepid/amd64 and jaunty/lpia columns somehow indicating that they are special. [11:25] wgrant: I don't see how you could put the status in the header without collapsing multiple statuses (and hence not seeing which build failed etc.), but I'm probably not visualising your thoughts well... [11:25] if you've got a minute markup the image in gimp and I'll upload your version to the page too. [11:25] (sorry, *you* can upload your version :) ) [11:25] noodles775: Sure. [11:26] thanks! [11:27] But there's only one Build per DAS on that page, so there's only one status per DAS, so there should be no problem with putting it in each column header. [11:27] But let me attack it with GIMP. [11:28] noodles775: Ah, actually, that image is rotated. But Firefox doesn't respect the EXIF data. I smell a bug. [11:28] aha! [11:37] * wgrant waits for slow Australian uploads... [11:38] heh [11:38] noodles775: https://dev.launchpad.net/SoyuzPackageUI?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=package_release_details_wgrant.jpg [11:38] Those squares are my realistic imitations of the LP binary package icons. [11:38] And the lighter ones are my badly thought out way to represent that they're not really from that build. [11:41] (those package icons are links to the DASBPR) [11:44] bigjools: Regarding wgrant's mockup-suggestion above... do you remember why we needed to display the status in each row... I remember there being lots of discussion around that matrix display, but can't remember why? [11:44] I thought there must have been a reason for it. [11:44] But I can't see why... it's all or nothing, apart from arch-indeps. [11:44] Yeah, I'm pretty sure there was, but can't remember... [11:46] beuno might have some thoughts too... I think he was keen for download links there too from memory ^^^ === vxnick_afk is now known as vxnick [11:47] I'm torn over whether to give a view or download link. Maybe both, since the series name in the column header should make it wide enough. [11:49] I guess if you don't link to the DASBPR view, you have to find some other place to link to it. That could be awkward. [11:51] Unless it's possible to display/pull-in the relevant info in the drill-down for the binary? [11:52] I guess. [11:52] Speaking of that... how do you plan to do that? [11:52] There are several possible choices for which data to show there. [11:52] As the BPRs from different DASs don't have to be anything like each other. [11:53] huh? It's all generated from the one source package right? [11:53] Yes. [11:54] But the binary information is generated by the source, not encoded in it. [11:54] They should generally be pretty similar, but dependencies often differ. [11:54] Just dependencies? or other things too? [11:55] Anything can. But not much does. [11:55] I guess it's a matter of (1) what is most useful for the user, while also (2) what is possible within the constraints [11:55] aha [11:56] It would be really nice if the data model was simple, with one build per architecture and all binary data matching. But that's not how things work :( [11:58] Yup. === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch === abentley1 is now known as abentley === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell === magcius_ is now known as magcius === salgado changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: salgado | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | Open Sourcing: https://dev.launchpad.net/OpenSourcing [13:49] jml: hey. It seems my branch is banned? [13:49] jml: I am robin === magcius_ is now known as magcius [14:13] scut_tang, I don't think jml is around at this time. maybe I could help you? [14:20] how about adding support for html in ppa descriptions? [14:23] bjsnider, what exacly do you want HTML for? just to add some hyperlinks or something else? [14:23] styling [14:24] maybe links [14:24] even just bold/italic/underline would be nice [14:25] that sounds feasible. what do you think about that, bigjools? [14:25] * bigjools reads scrollback [14:25] yes, it would be nice [14:26] we could support a limited subset of HTML [14:26] I think there are more appropriate markup languages. [14:26] please file a bug [14:27] please file a bug saying you need markup, without specifying HTML :) [14:27] if i get html i can proceed to the next step: world domination [14:27] James Bond would win [14:27] bigjools: While you're here... did you see noodles775's question earlier? [14:28] sort of but I am missing a bunch of context [14:28] you all know to much now. i'll have to do something about that [14:28] bigjools: Why does https://dev.launchpad.net/SoyuzPackageUI?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=package_release_details.jpg have all of the statuses split out? [14:29] Rather than something like https://dev.launchpad.net/SoyuzPackageUI?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=package_release_details_wgrant.jpg [14:31] I don't remember [14:31] that was drawn up nearly 5 months ago! [14:31] Oh, I see. [14:32] I'm kinda busy with other stuff right now, can you ping me next week and I'll re-read stuff over the weekend [14:32] Sure. Thanks. [14:35] wgrant: any of your input would be great though, we're implementing this stuff after we open source [14:42] someone suggested using Markdown in bug 30002, which is a different bug than mine but a similar request [14:42] Launchpad bug 30002 in launchpad-foundations "Cannot add HTML markup (or other formatting) in descriptions" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/30002 [14:42] bigjools: Although nobody seems to actually know exactly what is happening and when with regard to open sourcing any more... [14:42] wgrant: why do you say that? [14:43] bigjools: All the concrete dates have been removed from the wiki, August is cited as a possibility, and things change every few days. [14:45] wgrant: well check with kfogel if you have questions, he's the person who edits that page [14:46] bigjools: Thanks. [14:46] kfogel: Around? === henninge_ is now known as henninge [15:24] salgado: I am sorry to reply to you so late. [15:24] scut_tang, no worries [15:27] salgado: My situation is so complicated. jml knows more about that. Do you know when does he have time? [15:28] scut_tang, later today, probably. right now it's quite late on his side [15:34] salgado: OK, thank you ~ [16:45] wgrant: hey === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] === Edwin is now known as Guest3421 [17:33] if the subversion structure has changed for a project that is being mirrored on launchpad, how do I change the URL? === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara [18:18] when I register a release URL pattern, can it have more than one * in it? === mthaddon is now known as afk [18:32] sinzui, ^ [18:37] mxpxpod: No, only one pattern. I believe there is a bug requesting support for multiples. The pattern is very flexible you can provide a general one that can match a lot of urls [18:37] sinzui: I'm trying to match http://downloads.dojotoolkit.org/release-1.3.x/release-1.3.x-src.tar.gz [18:38] sinzui: so I kind of need multiple *'s === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado [18:43] mxpxpod The is a regular expression, a python one. [18:43] sinzui: oh, you can use regexps? [18:43] mxpxpod: The example is showing .*, and the code certainly is a Python RE [18:45] http://downloads.dojotoolkit.org/release-1.3\..*/release-1.3\..*-src.tar.gz is overly precise. '.' is both in the name and in the pattern So the match is fuzzier than the explaination appears [18:45] ah [18:46] and how often are those checked? [18:47] mxpxpod: I think the productreleasefinder extracts a safe place to start crawling pages, and it if find a link that patches that pattern, it downloads the file and attaches it to the series [18:48] sinzui: so, you have to have the series already created? [18:48] mxpxpod: it runs twice a day, but it is batched. A site should be scanned a couple times a week [18:48] wait, that's not what I mean [18:49] will it attach the files it finds to a release already created? or will it create releases for you? [18:49] mxpxpod: series (where you set the url pattern) -> milestone -> release. [18:49] The PRF will create the milestone if it does not find it. [18:49] ah, cool [18:49] mxpxpod: that too. It makes milestones and release as needed [18:50] mxpxpod: The PRF has been borked for a few weeks A fill fix will land early next week [18:52] sinzui: thank you [19:12] can someone fix the "Read about uploading" link to https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA#Uploading instead of "PPA/Uploading"? The wiki page https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/Uploading redirects to the first page, but as https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA#Uploading?action=show&redirect=Packaging%2FPPA%2FUploading and doesn't go to the bookmark #Uploading in firefox 3 [19:13] (next to "Upload packages" at e.g. https://edge.launchpad.net/~medigeek/+archive/ppa ) [19:15] savvas, could you file a bug for that and I'll ask mrevell to take a look for the next release? [19:15] on my way :) [19:15] matsubara: against launchpad project? [19:16] I mean.. file the bug for launchpad project [19:16] savvas, btw, add to the bug report that the link only appear to the owner of the PPA [19:16] savvas, yep, file on launchpad and I'll take on from there [19:17] ok I'll let you know :) [19:20] thanks savvas [19:21] lol, debugging code visible in edge [19:22] http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/yui-lp.png [19:23] fta, it's fixed and will be re-rolled tomorrow [19:23] fta, bug 391594 [19:23] Launchpad bug 391594 in launchpad-registry "Undelimited script included in product series pages" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/391594 [19:23] matsubara: bug 392239 [19:23] Launchpad bug 392239 in launchpad "[PPA] "Read about uploading" link doesn't go to the anchor bookmark #Uploading" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/392239 [19:24] ok [19:24] thanks savvas [19:24] sure, anytime! [19:29] In my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~ts.sch.gr/+archive/ppa) I have a package (sch-scripts - 9.04.6) which displays both "published" and "build status: building" - is this normal? [19:30] alkisg, it shows up as published for me [19:31] matsubara: I see the "building" icon in the "Build Status" column, and it doesn't display up with apt-get update... :( [19:32] I tried refreshing the browser cache or using a different browser - I don't think it's a caching issue [19:34] alkisg, can you file a bug on soyuz and attach a screenshot? [19:34] matsubara: sure, thanks [19:34] alkisg, thank you [19:41] matsubara: https://bugs.launchpad.net/soyuz/+bug/392244 - thanks again [19:41] Ubuntu bug 392244 in soyuz "Package both "published" and "building" at the same time" [Undecided,New] [19:42] thanks alkisg [19:47] is there a way to move a project to another URL? [19:48] mxpxpod, you mean changing the last (the project's name) part of the URL? [19:48] salgado: yes [19:49] mxpxpod, yes, that's possible but that would cause existing links to break [19:49] mxpxpod, what's the project you want to rename, and what would it be renamed to? [19:50] salgado: oh, I was just wondering if it can be done [19:53] mxpxpod, ok, I asked because we can also add aliases to projects, so one project could have two different URLs [19:54] oh, cool [19:55] the reason I ask is that at the dojo toolkit, we're looking at hosting methods... but we have kind of a strange set up... dojo and the dojo utilities are part of the "core", which means they should be under the "dojo" project in launchpad [19:56] but from what I can see, I can only register one thing with a project in dojo [19:56] does that make sense? [19:57] mxpxpod, by project you mean a project group? [19:57] I think so [19:57] mxpxpod, do you know what's the distinction between a project and a project group? [19:58] I think so... firefox is a project, mozilla is the project group [19:58] yeah, that's it. [19:58] so, it sounds like I need a "dojotoolkit" project group [19:58] that's what I was going to suggest [20:00] how do I go about creating a project group? [20:00] mxpxpod, you need to request it at https://launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion [20:00] and then one of the admins will create it for you [20:06] salgado: thank you [20:09] salgado: now, I just wait? ;) [20:13] mxpxpod, yes. I'll assign it to the admins and you'll get an email once they've dealt with it [20:21] help [20:21] i need to make someone a admin [20:22] on my launchpad [20:42] Is there a limit to how many official tags that would display for a project? [20:45] bdmurray, off the top of my head, no [21:00] wgrant: I just sent a mail to launchpad-users@ about the flexibility in the open-sourcing date. === afk is now known as mthaddon === salgado changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: - | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | Open Sourcing: https://dev.launchpad.net/OpenSourcing === salgado is now known as salgado-afk === apachelogger is now known as hsitter [23:24] is there a preferred way to host a .zip file on launchpad? it's basically a tgz and prebuilt binaries of source, so i dont really want to put it in with the source branch... [23:25] SoulBlade: Throw it in the Downloads section? [23:25] ooh a downloads section [23:25] didnt even know there was one [23:25] <-- not smart [23:25] hey all [23:28] err where do i go to actually upload the file? [23:31] ah nm [23:35] does anyone know the name of the project for code hosting on lp? [23:35] i want to file a bug [23:36] launchpad-code [23:36] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-code [23:37] thanks RAOF === btQuark is now known as btQuark2 === btQuark2 is now known as btQuark [23:42] can i ask question on launchpad and in where if question is about installing neatbeans and ruby on rails so i can programm RoR with Netbeans but in Ubuntu/Linux but with Canonical recomendet way/maintained way. So with apt-get or synaptic. [23:49] beuno: Should I still assign CSS sprite bugs to you immediately? [23:57] hey guys i am using cygwin and bzr [23:57] but cygwin does not know how to handle ssh conenctions