/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/06/29/#ubuntu-kernel.txt

eshaasehyperair: yes, the default ubuntu kernel supports it00:32
eshaasei'm testing out one of the ubuntu kernel team's 2.6.30 kernels and it works great except I don't have any audio, can someone steer me in the right direction please? Perhaps I need to compile in another module or something? I have a "Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio Controller"00:33
AceLaneshaase: maybe it just be muted, have you run alsamixer to check it?00:40
=== mcasadevall is now known as NCommander
eshaaseAceLan: yeah, i've checked and its not muted01:36
TheMusoeshaase: Have you tried with kernel 2.6.31, or a recent alsa-driver snapshot?01:42
eshaaseTheMuso: i'll try with 2.6.3101:53
eshaaseTheMuso: i know what alsa is but what is alsa-driver?01:53
TheMusoeshaase: Its the component of alsa that deals with the kernel drivers.02:22
TheMusoeshaase: Anyway try 2.6.31 as that should pretty much have the latest alsa code.02:22
TheMusobar a few bits that are not in the mainline kernel yet, but I don't think they will matter.02:23
eshaaseok, i'll give that a shot, brb02:46
lesshastehi08:48
lesshastecan anyone tell me when jaunty uses kexec to boot ?  I am trying to debug a problem where grub is skipped after a poweroff and it looks suspiciously like kexec is being used by jaunty08:48
lesshastebut I could be wrong08:49
anderskIs the kexec-tools package installed? 08:49
lesshasteandersk: no08:49
anderskIs there an /etc/init.d/kexec-load? 08:50
lesshasteno08:50
anderskWait--it's skipped after a _poweroff_, not after a reboot?  That isn't kexec, then. 08:50
lesshastethat's right08:50
lesshasteit's very odd08:51
lesshasterestart works as normal08:51
lesshastebut after shutdown -P or -h grub is skipped08:51
lesshasteand I/we have no idea how to start debugging it08:51
anderskMaybe this is some kind of grub savedefault thing?  I don't remember how that works. 08:52
lesshasteinteresting.. it does take 15 seconds to boot as well which just generally seemed fast to me08:53
lesshasteaccording to dmesg that is08:53
lesshasteandersk: I don't think it's that... my menu.1st is quite boring and has timeout 10 ,  http://pastebin.com/f607db10f08:57
anderskYour `default 8` is out of range; you have 7 entries (0-6). 09:00
lesshasteandersk: aargh.. I just gave you the wrong file sorry09:00
lesshastelet me fix that09:00
lesshasteandersk: ok  http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28500841/menu.lst09:08
lesshasteandersk: all the info is in the bug report https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/38993009:08
ubot3Malone bug 389930 in grub "grub menu skipped after shutdown" [Low,New] 09:08
lesshasteandersk: sorry for the delay09:12
lesshastehi tgpraveen 09:16
tgpraveenhi lesshaste09:17
lesshastetgpraveen: do you happen to know anything about the kernel? :) Everyone I ask turns out to be a newbie09:17
tgpraveenlol i am sorry i too am a newbie09:18
tgpraveenanyways ask what u want to and i see a lot of expereienced ppl in the chat list09:18
tgpraveenso someone will answer09:18
lesshastetgpraveen: they don't reply :(09:18
tgpraveenlesshaste: hmm they might be busy. my advice try the mailing list09:19
lesshasteis there a ubuntu kernel mailing list?09:19
lesshasteah yes.. I just found it09:21
lesshastemaybe a non newbie will arrive ...09:21
lesshastetgpraveen: out of interest.. are you here to ask a question too?09:21
tgpraveennot really just to browse around09:22
tgpraveenu know see what others are talking abt09:22
tgpraveenand out of  intrest what is your question09:22
lesshastewell..  after a poweroff (shutdown -h or shutdown -P) my laptop skips grub when it restarts09:23
lesshastebut after a restart (shutdown -r) it doesn't09:23
tgpraveenhmm i am not sure but that doesnt really sound like a kernel issue though i might be wrong09:24
tgpraveenmaybe u should try #ubuntu-devel09:24
lesshasteok09:26
lesshastetgpraveen: the problem is that there are just facts I am missing09:26
lesshastetgpraveen: does ubuntu have some mechanism for kick starting the kernel extra quick that could be causing this09:27
lesshastetgpraveen: I also notice the boot time is very fast09:27
tgpraveenlesshaste: karmic or jaunty?09:28
lesshastejaunty09:28
tgpraveenhmm dont really know. dont ask in #ubuntu-devel for jaunty09:28
tgpraveeni guess u should file a bug report on launchpad09:29
lesshastehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/38993009:29
tgpraveenand wait for somebody to answer here09:29
ubot3Malone bug 389930 in grub "grub menu skipped after shutdown" [Low,New] 09:29
lesshaste:)09:29
lesshasteit got assigned to the wrong place I think09:29
tgpraveenyes gnome power mgr isnot the right package09:30
lesshastenor is grub09:30
lesshastewhere it is assigned now09:30
=== sonicmctails is now known as mcasadvall
apwsmb, we expect compat-wireless to be newer than the kernel in general right?09:50
apwnewer but still compatible09:50
smbapw, a) yes (I would) and b) hopefully (as in compat).09:51
smbapw, why?09:51
apwam trying to update lbm, but it seems behind mainline for one accessor09:53
apwso i suspect its not been updates since the merge window closed09:53
apwso i guess fixing it (i think its gonna be easy) is worth it else we cannot upload it, nor linux-meta09:53
smbapw, Have you checked with the compat-wireless sources or just with what we have in lbm?09:55
apwthis is after using the update script to get the latest version from the repo09:56
smbOk, which driver do we talk of?09:56
apwupdates/compat-wireless-2.6/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c09:58
smbProbably the other approach would be to go with the slightly outdated driver in lbm until the sources get updated. After all lbm is only best-effort and opt-in09:58
apwis the file with the error, sounds like a simulator too09:58
smbOh, it actually fails to build09:58
apwwell i think the problem is that _all_ versions would not compile, cause its out of date wtf to the mainline kernel09:58
apwyeah fails to build right now09:58
apwi may have fixed it, but i am just trying to gauge if it is correct to fix it in this context, i think it likely is09:59
smbI would say yes. Better to have a compiling package at that stage10:00
smbWe would likely pick up an updated upstream as soon as there is one10:00
smb(upstream being the compat-wireless sourcE)10:00
apwright ... it working is the bit that i see as best effort.  we need something in the package which builds and installs at least10:01
apwok .. good then i think i am going the right way :)  thanks10:02
smbYes, that sounds much sensible. I guess so. :) NP10:02
lesshastehi all10:08
lesshasteI have sort of fixed my weird grub error but ... what part of linux is running when the grub menu is showing?10:09
lesshastepresumably not the kernel yet10:09
_rubengrub is10:10
_rubenbios -> grub -> linux10:10
lesshaste_ruben: ok... so my problem is that grub doesn't display on the screen after a poweroff10:11
lesshaste_ruben: so you can't see the menu10:11
lesshaste_ruben: it does display after a restart (shutdown -r now) 10:11
_rubensounds like a bios issue10:11
lesshaste_ruben: it is running in both cases I now realise10:11
lesshasteis there anything grub could do in theory to initialise whatever the BIOS has failed to?10:13
lesshasteactually.. is it worth trying grub2?10:13
_rubenwell .. if grub doesnt show up at all, there's nothign grub can do .. unless grub breaks after getting started but prior to outputing anything10:16
apwlesshaste, the kernel is definatly not involved in the loading the kernel, all that is grub code10:17
apwi assume this behaviour is not affected by kexec being installed/not install.  ie. if you remove kexec nothing changes10:17
apw(it cannot be related of course as kexec only executed once the kernel is up)10:18
* kdub is having a hard time finding a bug to be useful with :(10:33
hyperaircould i persuade someone here to compile acpi-cpufreq as a module?10:35
hyperairas opposed to compiled into the kernel10:36
hyperairbug #35523210:36
ubot3Malone bug 355232 in linux "acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/35523210:36
smbkdub, what feels like the main problem? Too unspecific data or unknown areas?10:36
kdubsmb: unknown areas in working with all the tools, i suppose10:44
lesshasteapw: thanks...it's all a little mysterious to me10:44
kduband managing the configurations, and ways to test10:45
kdubsmb: it feels like the headache that always happens from going from theory to practice, if you know what i mean10:45
apwkdub ... heh don't be dissheartened, its a steep curve getting into the kernel for sure10:46
smbkdub, I guess so. Probably the way to go is pick one and ask for things on how to proceed here10:46
apwtherre are few packages the same size ... ooffice, X server, little else10:46
apwsmb, perhaps have a sneak look and see if there is something simple on there, a nice cherry-pick or something10:47
smblesshaste, Mysteriously I think grub just uses the simple text mode that should be initialized by the BIOS. Do you get any visual feedback (like bios screen)?10:47
lesshastesmb: I can enter the bios setup by pressing esc or f1... but after a poweroff I just see the Toshiba logo and actually there is a slight change to the screeen when I assume grub is loaded10:48
smbapw, Maybe. I have not looked into the community section but probably a lot there are old ones without much feedback...10:48
lesshastesmb: little bits of the top of the lettering become blacked out :)10:48
lesshastesmb: did I misunderstand the question?10:48
apwlesshaste, normally there is a shift of font, to my eye the font gets 'shorter' vertically when the kernel loads the console fonts up10:49
smblesshaste, No, that was what I meant. Is there any control in the BIOS about which gfx should get initialized. Not sure this is a dead lead, but on some laptops I could select at least whether lcp or crt should be primary. On some destops there was a selection about agp or pci sometimes...10:50
apwsmb, sometimes they allow disabling the 'onboard' graphics so that if you stick in a second card it uses that ... perhaps thats got turned on when there is not one installed10:51
lesshastethe only "display" options I see are "power on display = auto-selected" which can be changed to LCD+Analog RGB10:52
lesshastethere is a mysterious "execute-disable bit capability" ?! :)10:53
lesshasteeverything else is fairly clear10:53
apwlesshaste, that enabled NX support in the processor10:54
apwor more specifically prevents disabling of the NX support in the processor10:54
apwto allow buggy OSs to boot in the face of the new support10:54
apwNX allows us to mark the stack non-executable to prevent overflows being so useful10:54
lesshastethanks10:55
lesshastethere is also an option for virtualisation technology I see :)10:55
apwyep same thing, turns off support for vmx extensions to prevent OSs which don't expect it from blue-screening, erm, i mean crashing :)10:56
lesshaste:)10:56
lesshastebioses should really come with man pages10:56
lesshaste:)10:56
apwwhat make of machine is this?10:56
lesshastetoshiba tecra a910:56
apwnnng.  what is toshiba up to10:57
lesshasteI was going to post to the grub mailing list10:57
lesshastebut I see they don't support anything before grub2 anymore10:57
smblesshaste, One desperate thing to try might be to uncomment the default line in the grub menu.lst that does some colouring. Not that Toshiba did something nice as setting default colours to black on black...10:59
smbBut I cannot remember anything in grub to enable a specific video mode... apw or cking do you?11:00
apwthere is a terminal command i think, never seen it required tho11:01
ckingdo you need to change colours in grub 0.97?11:01
smbcking, It is unclear whether colours are enough. Just brought up that and there would be a default line in the standard grub menu11:02
smbThe general symptom is that grub menu does not display after cold start but after reboot11:03
lesshastesmb: interesting!11:03
lesshasteI'm just checking if there is a bios upgrade too11:04
smbkdub, We will try to find one bug to start of tomorrow, if that i ok with you...11:09
lesshastesmb: well... it turns out it has been reported before https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub/+bug/37482312:05
ubot3Malone bug 374823 in grub "GRUB menu not showing up at cold boot" [Undecided,New] 12:05
ckinglesshaste: from what I can recall, grub does not twiddle with BIOS video modes at all, so this is part of the problem.12:30
lesshastecking: yes I think the solution may be to try grub212:30
lesshastecking: as no one at grub will fix a legacy bug in any case12:30
ckingunless there is a really compelling reason to put the effort into addressing this for legacy grub12:31
lesshastecking: just another annoying bug :)  You can always just memorise the order of entries in menu.1st :)12:31
lesshasteor boot and then restart12:31
ckingyeah, but that's unpleasant.12:32
lesshasteright12:32
lesshastebut I somehow suspect it won't come under "compelling" for the developers12:32
Unggnuhi all13:19
UnggnuIs it possible that the 2.6.30-10 initramfs script has changed? I always got the wrong keyboard layout with it while 2.6.30-9 works fine. The keyboard layout entry in console-setup seems to be the same in both initrds. Any idea?13:20
UnggnuI need the correct keyboard layout for dm-crypt13:23
cjwatsonUnggnu: known bug, if you want to figure out what's going wrong feel free as I haven't had a chance yet. bug 39221813:32
ubot3Malone bug 392218 in console-setup "Console font not accepted after boot up" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/39221813:32
cjwatson(the description is a bit too specific, don't worry about that ...)13:32
cjwatsonlesshaste: I rather suspect grub2 *will* work better, as it initialises a graphical mode by default and therefore is bound to twiddle the video mode13:32
Unggnucjwatson: thx13:33
=== BenSee is now known as BenC
UnggnuBtw. I got around 10 seconds boot time with the 2.6.30-8 in Karmic I guess13:37
Unggnuwith fastboot13:37
masterkernelcan someone tell me what the stable-review patches on kernel.org are13:37
Unggnubut after -9 I got around 1413:37
masterkerneland what is fastboot?13:39
Unggnua boot option13:39
UnggnuAround 2 seconds faster in my case13:39
masterkernelcan it be used in jaunty?13:39
Unggnuno13:39
UnggnuSince 2.6.2913:39
masterkerneleven with a new kernel?13:39
UnggnuIf it is >=2.6.29 yes13:39
masterkernelcool. i'll have to try that13:40
UnggnuIsn't much anyway. I just wondered why there is a difference of four seconds or around 40% between this two kernel releases13:40
Unggnumasterkernel: http://lwn.net/Articles/314808/13:41
masterkernelthanks Unggnu13:44
_rubenhrm .. just did a dist-upgrade (including kernel) on my jaunty system .. now it fails to boot because it cant find my lvm13:51
apw<apw> smb, do you know if it is safe to upload -lbm when the kernel's packages are not yet accepted?14:00
apw<apw> the only mention of fastboot is the BSDism, meaning do not check the disks on reboot14:00
smbapw, As far as I know it is save as it will depwait for the kernel14:01
apwok cool then ... smb i have a karmic -lbm for upload ;)14:01
smbapw, I suspected that much. Will have a look14:02
apwin the normal place :)14:02
* smb thinks that sound like conspiracy :)14:03
apwsmb, ok the git tree is pushed too14:04
apwiit is also built in my ppa: https://edge.launchpad.net/~apw/+archive/daily/14:04
apwheh yeah, i am out to confuse you with all the changing about14:05
smbWell I can see in debdiff that is a little scary14:05
* apw has a look14:08
apwsmb, you got a link to the debdiff or doing that locally?14:09
* apw feels he is missing a trick somewhere14:10
smbapw, I did it locally but slightly wrong. So it is probably not as scary as the diff between that and Jaunty ;-) Doing it right in a sec14:10
apwheheh14:10
* apw does the same, the diff looks ok i think14:13
smbapw, Mostly yes. I am a bit confused by that strange change of compat-wireless master fom 2009-06-12 to 2009-06-10...14:15
apwthat was an error in my previous version, a missunderstanding of how thye were named14:15
apwit should always have been -1014:15
apwi did it on the 12th but the tree i took was the 10th tree, and i miss recorded that14:15
smbapw, And your changeslog in the package might be different from the tree ?14:17
apwhow so?14:17
smbI just pulled and in git 1-7 has two lines, while in the package diff it looks like 514:18
apw  [ Andy Whitcroft ]14:20
apw  * Update compat-wireless to master-2009-06-1914:20
apw  * Bump ABI14:20
apw  * update compat-wireless to track changes to skb dst accessors14:20
apw  * update compat-wireless to track changes to ALIGN(foo, NETDEV_ALIGN)14:20
apw  * update compat-wireless to track removal of FIRMWARE_NAME_MAX14:20
_rubenhmm .. booting the -11 kernel does work .. must be something flakey with -13 or its initrd14:23
lesshastesmb, hi again14:49
lesshastesmb, I fixed the grub problem in the end14:49
smblesshaste, So what did you change?14:50
lesshastesmb, I upgraded to grub2, in short14:50
lesshastesmb, which has completely different display routines it seems14:50
lesshastesmb, upgrading to grub 2 is not exactly user friendly at present, at least on jaunty14:51
lesshastebut with a little editing it worked14:51
smblesshaste, Hm, guess that counts as a work-around. I wonder what the heck is then worng with the grub1-yourbios interaction...14:52
lesshastesmb, it's a good question.. did I show you the duplicate bug with the people talking about workarounds?14:53
lesshastesmb, I feel I fixed this bug more or less on my own.. I hope someone at ubuntu will at least read https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/389930 now!14:57
cjwatsonsmb: grub1 doesn't reinitialise the video mode itself *shrug*14:57
ubot3Malone bug 389930 in grub "grub menu does not display after cold boot" [Low,New] 14:57
lesshastecjwatson, the sudo apt-get install grub-pc command made a real mess of menu.lst14:57
cjwatsonlesshaste: huh? several people have read it. It now sounds like updating to grub2 is sufficient, and since grub2 will be the default in karmic, it sounds as though there's effectively nothing to do14:57
cjwatsonlesshaste: made a real mess how?14:57
lesshastecjwatson, there is a point where it says it has used "kopt" to find a command line and asks you to check it14:58
lesshastecjwatson, it presented a blank line 14:58
lesshastecjwatson, then when I just pushed on it added several lines with 80 or so copies of some ansi character that looks like an A14:58
lesshasteto menu.lst14:58
cjwatsonnothing wrong with that14:59
lesshastethis apart from it still using root instead of uuid14:59
cjwatsonit's a divider14:59
cjwatsonthe uuid thing was broken in jaunty but is fixed in karmic14:59
lesshastecjwatson, well someone could close the bug I suppose :)14:59
lesshasteand the duplicate14:59
_rubenouch .. i found out why my -13 kernel wouldnt boot .. i used tasksel to remove "virtual machine host" .. which removed lvm2 !!14:59
lesshaste_ruben, eek!15:00
_rubenreinstalled lvm2 .. it updated initrd .. et voila .. it boots15:00
lesshastecjwatson, the blank line is correct? It's quite confusing for a poor unsuspecting user15:01
cjwatsonlesshaste: looks like it means you have no special parameters beyond the defaults15:01
lesshastecjwatson, sort of... it also added back in default parameters15:01
lesshastecjwatson, I had removed quiet and splash15:02
lesshastecjwatson, and it added them back it seems15:02
cjwatsonfeel free to file a bug. hardly qualifies as making a real mess though.15:02
cjwatsonthe only thing that seems like a real problem is the root/uuid stuff, which like I say is fixed in karmic.15:02
lesshasteok15:02
cjwatson(real problem: by which I mean that otherwise it should still have booted fine)15:03
lesshastecjwatson, no I thought the A characters were the mess. I didn't realise they would be harmless and was too scared to test it15:03
cjwatsonthey're a horizontal line when interpreted in the relevant character encoding15:03
lesshastealso, I see that it was expecting kopt= lines now15:03
cjwatsontitle           `echo ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── | iconv -f utf-8 -t cp437`15:03
cjwatson... is where that divider comes from15:04
lesshasteas opposed to parameters after the kernel name15:04
cjwatsonCP437 being one of the old DOS code pages15:04
cjwatsonlesshaste: yes, that's how you were supposed to edit the grub1 menu.lst file15:04
lesshasteyes15:04
lesshastewell sort of.. :)15:04
lesshastethe default isn't like that15:04
lesshasteso you can't blame the user for copying the default15:04
cjwatsonif you just edit the bit after the kernel name and not kopt=, then the next update-grub will overwrite your changes15:05
lesshasteright15:05
cjwatsonI don't blame the user, I blame the incredibly dreadful old menu.lst format.15:05
lesshaste:)15:05
cjwatsonbut there's only a limited amount we can do about that15:05
cjwatsonI'd rather focus effort on making the new world better15:05
lesshastecjwatson, oh about your comment in the other channel, having just edited menu.lst by hand I was a little nervous it wouldn't boot at all :)15:06
lesshastein any case, grub 2 works so all is great... I assume the docs will be tidied up by the time karmic comes out...15:07
lesshastenow onto the next bug :)15:07
cjwatsonwe probably ought to do something with defoptions= in menu.lst15:08
lesshastecjwatson, more important would be to fix the upgrade script for jaunty15:08
lesshastecjwatson, is it much more work than just copying the karmic fix?15:08
cjwatsonI'm not interested in fixing the upgrade script for jaunty, really15:08
cjwatsonit was a proof of concept so that we could get some degree of testing15:08
lesshastewould you mind if someone else fixed it?15:09
cjwatsonwe aren't really intending the majority of people to upgrade to grub2 in jaunty, just a few intrepid (ahem) souls15:09
cjwatsonnot especially15:09
lesshaste:)15:09
cjwatsonbut I'm not sure it would meet the stable update guidelines15:09
cjwatsonkarmic and beyond is what we're actually interested in for grub215:09
cjwatsonit's unlikely that you'll be able to do a really good job of jaunty without a much more sweeping update, which would definitely not meet the stable update guidelines15:10
lesshasteok..maybe it should just be removed for jaunty15:10
lesshasteas it is broken15:10
cjwatsonit's not broken15:10
lesshasteand added in some super flaky repository15:10
cjwatsonit's just not as good as it could be15:10
cjwatsonbut that applies to lots of software15:10
cjwatsonwe can't remove packages once they land in a release anyway15:10
lesshastewell broken in the sense that a normal user might not be able to boot their computer after using it15:10
cjwatsonwe used the jaunty package for a systematic test on lots of hardware15:10
cjwatsonthe results were actually very good15:11
cjwatsonso I'm not all that worried15:11
lesshasteok.. I know when I am defeated :)15:11
cjwatsonI'd be fine with us fixing the root/uuid thing in a jaunty update15:11
cjwatsonthat's fairly obvious and self-contained15:11
cjwatsonbut I don't think we should commit to really extensive work on jaunty's grub215:11
lesshasteI think that's what I was saying!15:11
lesshastewhat did you think I meant?15:11
cjwatsonyou could have been talking about any of the things you were commenting on in the grub2 upgrade, such as the kopt/defoptions thing15:12
lesshasteah no15:12
lesshastejust the root/uuid thing15:12
cjwatsonor the fact that jaunty's installer doesn't know that grub2 can boot of LVM15:12
cjwatsonoff15:12
cjwatsonor any of the other things we know are broken in jaunty15:12
lesshastewell in any case, thanks for the help15:13
lesshasteand good luck with the grub work in general15:13
cjwatsonthere is actually a bug open on jaunty for the root/uuid thing15:13
cjwatsonso if somebody wants to have at that, they should go right ahead :-)15:13
lesshaste:)15:13
lesshasteI have a lot more serious bugs to report now :)15:13
cjwatsonbug 37687915:13
ubot3Malone bug 376879 in grub2 "grub2 installer modifies grub 0.97 menu.lst incorrectly and fails to chainload grub2" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/37687915:13
lesshastelike the one that stops my dvd player working at all15:14
lesshastebye for now15:15
lesshasteand thanks again15:15
cjwatsonapw: actually, ^- that's still assigned to you. fancy producing a diff against jaunty?15:16
apwcjwatson, will check it out thanks for the prod15:17
manjosmb, I want to update stuff under ubuntu tree in karmic.. what is the usual procedure ? can you point me to a wiki ? 15:47
smbmanjo, The current procedure would be ask apw 15:48
apwheh ... manjo yep i saw that mentioned in our 'whats next' email15:49
apwlet me get this damn package uploaded then we can talk about it15:49
manjook15:49
apwas i have started looking at ndiswrapper15:49
manjoyeah I am doing the same 15:49
manjoprobably we are duplicating effort15:49
apwmanjo, i think i have it done already ndiswrapper 15:49
apwam uploading a test kernel now15:49
manjoah cool... so I can take that process and rinse repeat15:50
apwwe obviously need to coordinate :)15:50
manjook will wait for you ping 15:50
apwcool as15:50
* manjo breaks for coffee15:52
lesshasteI am sorry this is probably a faq but can I install jaunty kernel on hardy?16:25
lesshastemy dvd drive doesn't work16:25
lesshasteapw: have you got a repository for newer kernels for hardy by any chance?16:37
apwlesshaste, jaunrty kernel will need other deps you don't have so ... unlikely to work16:38
apwintrepid might work16:38
lesshasteapw: I was looking at https://launchpad.net/~apw/+archive/ppa and thinking that might be you16:38
apwyeah that is me16:39
apwnothing new in there for hardy tho16:40
lesshasteah16:40
lesshasteI am trying to work out why my dvd drive doesn't work16:40
lesshasteI thought testing a new kernel might help16:40
lesshasteI get lots of lovely errors :)16:41
lesshasteI assume trying to install a jaunty kernel and just letting it resolve dependencies is a bad plan16:42
lesshastethe problems look similar to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/223780 but I can show you dmesg if you like as it is full of juicy information and errors :)16:43
ubot3Malone bug 223780 in linux "hdc: status error: status=0x59 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest Error }" [High,Fix released] 16:43
lesshasterebooting...16:46
lesshastethis bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/223780 is pretty fatal for me.. my system completely locks if i try to use brasero for example16:59
ubot3Malone bug 223780 in linux "hdc: status error: status=0x59 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest Error }" [High,Fix released] 16:59
lesshastehard locks I should say16:59
lesshasteis hardy too old for anyone to worry about?17:00
lesshasteupgrading to jaunty looks somewhat painful :(17:01
apwhardy is supported still.18:14
smbWhat worries me a little bit is "As a result cable detection18:23
smbbecomes less reliable when compared with 2.6.24 but the affected drives are18:23
smbuseable again."18:23
Keybukhmm19:49
KeybukLinux had another one of those "oh noes! no memory!" fits19:49
Keybukwhen there was plenty19:49
apwKeybuk, did we use to record the dmidecode output somewhere, or did i imagine that20:09
apwKeybuk, running i386?  ZONE_NORMAL exhausted, or KVA ?20:10
Keybukapw: I've seen it on i386 and amd6420:13
Keybuknot sure what the latter bit means20:13
Keybukapw: the kernel exports dmi information under /sys20:13
apwkernel virtual address space20:13
apwKeybuk, in hardy?20:13
Keybukjaunty and karmic20:13
apwyeah thats my memory too20:14
apwjust thought i remembered something early boot slurping it up for something, hal perhaps to use20:14
Keybuk/sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/20:14
apwon older releases20:14

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!