maxb | It's weird how some people say ftbs and some say ftbfs | 00:01 |
---|---|---|
* maxb is in the ftbfs camp | 00:02 | |
Sarvatt | that was fast, x11proto-dri2 synced :) | 00:29 |
* bryce grins | 00:33 | |
bryce | actually, slangasek said it was already autosync'd? | 00:33 |
Sarvatt | it wasnt when i looked at aptitude show x11proto-dri2-dev this morning! odd | 00:35 |
Sarvatt | -vv rather | 00:35 |
Sarvatt | theres xserver 1.6.2 rc2 | 00:36 |
RAOF | Do we want to pull in the couple of libdrm-nouveau patches needed to libdrm to pull in a new nouveau snapshot into Karmic? I can pull them into libdrm git on alioth if so. | 00:36 |
bryce | RAOF, sure as long as it doesn't conflict with -ati's | 00:39 |
bryce | Sarvatt, yeah dunno, was it only in debian experimental before? (which wouldn't get autosync'd... however I didn't mention that in my sync request) | 00:41 |
RAOF | bryce: What part would conflict with -ati's? ATI doesn't yet ship a libdrm-radeon (at least in any libdrm release) as far as I can see? | 00:41 |
RAOF | I guess the ttm & drm modules from nouveau-kernel-source *would* conflict with ATi's stuff in 2.6.31, but that'll only be pulled in by x-x-v-nouveau. | 00:42 |
jcristau | Sarvatt: dri2 1.1 ought to be compatible with 1.0 | 08:37 |
jcristau | it's not, but that's a bug. | 08:37 |
tjaalton | jcristau: does it concern mesa too? I mean, would something break if mesa was built against it? | 11:02 |
jcristau | tjaalton: the issue seems to be in the server/driver interface, so no | 11:07 |
tjaalton | ah, great | 11:14 |
=== mvo is now known as mv | ||
=== mv is now known as mvo | ||
tjaalton | mesa and xorg uploaded | 15:58 |
=== seb128_ is now known as seb128 | ||
tjaalton | huh, seems I didn't fix the mesa build properly | 16:19 |
tjaalton | since lpia failed already | 16:19 |
tjaalton | Sarvatt: did you apply the exact same patch from jcristau, or modified? | 16:20 |
tjaalton | anyway, need to do some shopping and then head back home.. I'll sort this out once there | 16:21 |
jcristau | heh, missing ; | 16:22 |
tormod | dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/xserver-xorg_1%3a7.4+3ubuntu1_i386.deb (--unpack): | 17:44 |
tormod | trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/hal/debian-setup-keyboard', which is also in package hal | 17:44 |
tormod | sorry that was fixed 15 minutes ago I see | 17:45 |
tjaalton | yep :) | 17:48 |
tjaalton | and looks like the mesa build went fine too | 17:48 |
bryce | tjaalton, thanks for the mesa and xorg uploads! | 17:49 |
tormod | finally mesa 7.5 in karmic \o/ | 17:50 |
tormod | well failed to build all over the place though | 17:51 |
tormod | tjaalton: jcristauheh, missing ; | 17:52 |
tjaalton | tormod: yes, uploading a new one right now | 17:53 |
Sarvatt | tjaalton: i modified it because of the missing ; and linked a fixed up one last night but it looks like you already worked it out, sorry about that | 18:05 |
tjaalton | Sarvatt: yeah, it's good now | 18:05 |
A|i | since upgrading to 9.04, my ubuntu freezez randomly | 18:06 |
* Sarvatt cheers at all the uploads today | 18:06 | |
A|i | when it freezes, nothing works, i have to force the machine to restart | 18:06 |
tormod | is it normal that I have xlibmesa-gl-dev installed? can't see what depends on it | 18:09 |
tormod | A|i, what card do you have? | 18:09 |
A|i | tormod, radeon 9600 | 18:10 |
A|i | yes, it's unsupported in jaunty | 18:10 |
tormod | A|i, unsupported, why? is it agp? | 18:10 |
A|i | tor, i mean the amd/ati driver cannot be used as jaunty uses the new xorg | 18:11 |
A|i | this is really frustrating | 18:11 |
tormod | A|i, you don't need fglrx | 18:11 |
A|i | tormod, i'm using the free driver (which sucks) | 18:12 |
A|i | it's very slow | 18:12 |
tjaalton | tormod: nope, I don't have it here and I have a lot of headers installed | 18:12 |
A|i | tormod, the worst part is that, when it freezes, i lose data on my ntfs drives | 18:13 |
tormod | tjaalton, thanks. this was a recent, clean install of karmic but I have been through xorg-edgers packages etc | 18:13 |
tormod | A|i, it can be a bit slower than fglrx but should be useable. and definitely not lock up. is it AGP? | 18:14 |
A|i | tormod, yes | 18:14 |
Sarvatt | thats installed by a metapackage tormod, are you sure you didnt come from hardy or something? :D | 18:15 |
A|i | tormod, any idea how to avoid the freezing? googling shows many people have this problem in jaunty, but no solution | 18:15 |
tormod | Sarvatt, as I said, clean karmic install - from your kms cd :D | 18:15 |
Sarvatt | apt-get build-dep anything? | 18:16 |
tormod | A|i, link to bug report? | 18:16 |
tormod | Sarvatt, good idea. I guess those do not show up in apt-cache (r)depends | 18:17 |
A|i | tormod, here is one: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1141320 | 18:17 |
tormod | A|i, that is not a bug report | 18:17 |
A|i | tormod, but it's very difficult to trace this problem | 18:17 |
A|i | i know, i don't know if anyone has submitted one | 18:17 |
tormod | A|i, I know, but you can't expect developers to search the forums for bugs to fix | 18:18 |
A|i | tormod, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/364828 | 18:19 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 364828 in linux "Ubuntu 9.04 freezing" [Undecided,Invalid] | 18:19 |
tormod | A|i, there is not much harm in filing a new bug and attaching info | 18:19 |
tormod | A|i, that bug was closed because it was fixed. | 18:20 |
A|i | it wasnt | 18:20 |
tormod | A|i, the reporter could not reproduce it any longer -> closed. anyway it was nvidia cards | 18:21 |
tormod | A|i, those bugs are highly specific to each driver and often a family of cards | 18:22 |
A|i | tormod, yes, but re-constructing this bug is impossible | 18:22 |
A|i | i dont really have much to report | 18:23 |
A|i | it doesn't get logged too | 18:23 |
tormod | A|i, I know but please file a bug using "ubuntu-bug xserver-xorg-video-ati" | 18:23 |
tormod | this will attach relevant information | 18:23 |
tormod | A|i, let me ask for the 3rd time: is it an AGP card? | 18:24 |
A|i | tormod, yes, i answered yes, how can i verify this? is there a command? | 18:24 |
tjaalton | probably needs an AGP quirk? | 18:24 |
tormod | the log that will be attached to your bug report will confirm this | 18:25 |
tormod | yes very probably an AGPMode issue | 18:25 |
tormod | A|i, sorry I missed your "yes" in all the talk | 18:26 |
A|i | what should agpmode be set to? | 18:26 |
tormod | A|i, trial and error, your choices are 1,2,4 or 4,8 depending on your card | 18:26 |
tormod | A|i, please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Quirks#ATI%20AGP%20Mode%20Quirk | 18:27 |
tormod | A|i, if you follow up (on launchpad) with this info we can easily fix it | 18:27 |
A|i | tormod, i think my agp goes up to 16x, and in bios i set it to 8x, does ubuntu overwrite this again? | 18:29 |
tormod | I don't think AGP x16 exists... | 18:30 |
A|i | tormod, it is similar to this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/349229 | 18:31 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 349229 in xserver-xorg-video-ati "[RV350] system freeze randomly, need hard reset" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 18:31 |
A|i | but they dont talk about agp? | 18:31 |
A|i | tormod, how can i find out my current agp mode? | 18:33 |
tormod | A|i, well they should if the reporter has an agp card :) but anyway file your own bug. different cards - different bugs and quirks | 18:33 |
tormod | A|i, grep "agp..Mode" /var/log/Xorg.0.log | 18:35 |
A|i | (II) RADEON(0): [agp] Mode 0x1f000a0a [AGP 0x1106/0x0282; Card 0x1002/0x4152 0x174b/0x7c19] | 18:35 |
A|i | tormod, the above is not 1,2,4,8? | 18:36 |
tormod | A|i, it's bit encrypted: the last "a" in the Mode says this is an 4/8 card. | 18:38 |
A|i | tormod, but does it say if it is currently on 4 or 8? | 18:39 |
tormod | and the mode is 4 IIRC. try setting 8 | 18:39 |
A|i | ok, thanks | 18:39 |
tormod | well try both and you'll see | 18:39 |
A|i | ok,.. i'm going to restart x and wait for it to (not) to happen! | 18:40 |
* tormod looks for his agp mode parsing script | 18:41 | |
* hyperair is annoyed that the key repeat settings seem to not get set correctly for newly plugged in keyboards | 18:57 | |
tormod | for radeon hangs new in Jaunty there is also http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21849 | 19:05 |
ubottu | Freedesktop bug 21849 in DRM/Radeon "many lockups since 2.6.30-rc1" [Critical,Resolved: fixed] | 19:05 |
tormod | (since the 2.6.30-rc1 stuff in question was backported to the Jaunty kernel) | 19:06 |
bryce | how things going tormod? | 19:06 |
tormod | bryce, fine thanks, but too much nice weather for any serious hacking | 19:06 |
bryce | tormod, is it time for us to update -ati? I think we've done updates to all the other drivers so far, I haven't checked where -ati is at tho | 19:06 |
bryce | hehe, quite true | 19:07 |
tormod | it is always time to update -ati :) at least the 6.12 branch is a no-brainer | 19:07 |
tormod | there has been many card-specific fixed, PCI ids and such | 19:09 |
tormod | now is a good time to snapshot master, before they put kms in there | 19:09 |
bryce | tormod, ok we can pull in a new snapshot; is the current one in xorg-edgers good, or is there a different commit id that is more stable? | 19:10 |
tormod | I haven't heard about any regressions | 19:10 |
tormod | I would pull up to bb04... just before the kms preparation | 19:12 |
tormod | which I have in my PPA I think | 19:12 |
bryce | bug tracker seems reasonably quiescent | 19:13 |
Sarvatt | Check if the composite op is supported in R200CheckComposite. isnt in the one on edgers | 19:13 |
tormod | yeah that's bb04 | 19:14 |
Sarvatt | the got commited like 10 minutes after i uploaded the package lol | 19:14 |
bryce | mm, that change is listing as e1a582fd in my tree; maybe I'm on a branch | 19:15 |
bryce | # On branch 6.12-branch | 19:15 |
bryce | aha | 19:15 |
tormod | the 6.12-branch is for SRU and old ladies, I think master is pretty safe at this point | 19:16 |
bryce | hehe | 19:17 |
bryce | ok sonny | 19:18 |
Sarvatt | maybe we should clean up .gitignore and lastcommit files in auto-xorg-git? noticed some stuff hanging around in orig.tar.gz while making debdiffs | 19:18 |
bryce | good idea | 19:19 |
Sarvatt | could the lastcommit, delete it before creating the orig then make it again after if we need it to hang around? | 19:19 |
Sarvatt | could delete rather | 19:19 |
Sarvatt | wow, i cant speak today! | 19:19 |
tormod | I'd say leave it in, but do not add it to the orig.tar.gz | 19:20 |
Sarvatt | oh that too, could add --exclude=.gitignore --excluse=.lastcommit right? | 19:20 |
tormod | yes | 19:20 |
bryce | so... you guys have a preference, should I pull tormod's package from his ppa, or pull sarvatt's and apply bb04 as a patch? | 19:21 |
tormod | mine is using experimental, sarvatt's is from debian-unstable | 19:22 |
tormod | I am not sure if there is a difference | 19:22 |
Sarvatt | unstable was newer when i looked | 19:22 |
Sarvatt | http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-xorg/driver/xserver-xorg-video-ati.git;a=summary | 19:22 |
bryce | ok, sounds like sarvatts+patch is the way to go | 19:23 |
tormod | might be some pci id changes in debian/ | 19:24 |
tormod | or you use auto-xorg-git to roll your own :) | 19:24 |
bryce | in debian/patches ? | 19:24 |
Sarvatt | i dont know, you probably want to remove the hooks for ati anyhow so i would use another | 19:24 |
tormod | I just checked http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-xorg/driver/xserver-xorg-video-ati.git;a=history;f=debian;hb=refs/heads/debian-unstable | 19:25 |
tormod | there is a pci id difference from experimental | 19:25 |
Sarvatt | yeah unstable doesnt install them | 19:26 |
tormod | yes, maybe you don't want that git commit ID patch we add through the hooks | 19:27 |
bryce | hmm | 19:27 |
tormod | doesn't hurt though | 19:27 |
bryce | btw, I nuked the karmic fglrx and nvidia packages from edgers; they're in karmic already. I saw we were up to 99% full on the ppa | 19:27 |
tormod | I've asked for more space, maybe you can kick your colleagues :) | 19:28 |
bryce | I'd like to keep the jaunty versions a bit longer since I'd asked folks to test those, but we can drop them later since they're in x-updates | 19:28 |
tormod | yes, I won't miss the blobs in xorg-edgers | 19:29 |
bryce | tormod, ok is there a bug# or person I can reference? | 19:29 |
tormod | bryce, I asked on soyuz answers.lp.net | 19:29 |
bryce | yeah in the future I think I should post them to x-updates myself rather than going through xorg-edgers to avoid clashing with other libs in edgers | 19:30 |
Sarvatt | we could move hardy and intrepid to another PPA via binary copies and clean it up :D | 19:30 |
tormod | well there is not much for intrepid and some people are using it for hardy (LTS and all that) | 19:30 |
tormod | would be nice if they fix launchpad to filter releases by default, or as a ppa setting | 19:31 |
Sarvatt | desktop support ended though (excuse excuse!) :D | 19:31 |
Sarvatt | bryce actually gave me a link that lets you filter it, you can do it manually screwing with the url lol | 19:32 |
bryce | tormod, ah I notice you requested on the original space request, but it seems to have scrolled off the list so maybe they've not noticed; I'll file a new request | 19:32 |
tormod | oh is that true? isn't it until 9.10 or something? | 19:32 |
tormod | bryce: it's there if you filter on Open | 19:32 |
tormod | I hope the soyuz people filter on open, another thing that could have been default :) | 19:33 |
Sarvatt | https://edge.launchpad.net/~xorg-edgers/+archive/ppa?field.series_filter=jaunty | 19:34 |
tormod | isn't LTS supported on the desktop until next LTS? | 19:34 |
tormod | maybe we can add those links in the header of the page? | 19:34 |
Sarvatt | trying to find where i read it, i think it was like 18 months desktop and the rest is just security updates so that would put it at 9.10 then | 19:36 |
tormod | oh for lock-ups in jaunty there is also https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/355155 | 19:36 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 355155 in linux "Clocksource tsc unstable leads to lockups in Ubuntu Jaunty" [High,Triaged] | 19:36 |
bryce | tormod, LTS's are supported for longer than just the next LTS | 19:38 |
bryce | aiui, dapper is just now going away | 19:38 |
* tormod actually runs hardy on some lab computers | 19:38 | |
Sarvatt | clocksource tsc unstable is just a harmless error message with how it checks it on bootup though... | 19:39 |
bryce | https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+question/75728 | 19:39 |
tormod | Sarvatt, the bug has importance=high ? | 19:40 |
Sarvatt | i havent looked at that bug yet but i'm just going to go out on a limb and guess they have vbox or kvm modules loaded | 19:40 |
Sarvatt | i get clocksource tsc unstabled on every pc that is able to change its frequency dynamically | 19:41 |
tormod | Leann triaged it to High so there must be something to it | 19:42 |
Sarvatt | oh tormod, I'm sorry, i was thinking of 6.06 desktop support. sheesh :) | 19:53 |
tormod | omg the 355155 bug mentioned has become a metoo black hole | 19:56 |
Sarvatt | because of the title!!! | 19:56 |
Sarvatt | everyone with multiple cpus or cpus that can change frequency get that in dmesg! | 19:56 |
Sarvatt | its not a bug, it just means it cant use TSC as the clock source which is intentional, it falls back to acpi_pm | 19:57 |
Sarvatt | sudo cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource | 19:58 |
Sarvatt | sudo cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource | 19:58 |
bryce | 231 comments, not bad | 20:01 |
tormod | tjaalton, seems like the new xorg (?) broke X via gdm. startx works | 20:02 |
* bryce adds comment, "This bug affects me too! But I have different hardware. When will it be fixed???" | 20:02 | |
tormod | Warning: Could not generate /etc/X11/xorg.conf.failsafe for vesa driver | 20:03 |
tormod | bryce, go back to windows :) | 20:03 |
tormod | and my keyboard layout is lost | 20:04 |
* Sarvatt makes a note to not reboot anytime soon :D | 20:06 | |
Sarvatt | oh man, right as I said that i noticed my battery had .5% power left | 20:09 |
Sarvatt | g-p-m wont stay open longer than 30 minutes or so lately for me so i've been checking it manually | 20:10 |
* Sarvatt makes a new bug saying Cannot allocate resource for EISA slot 1 error in dmesg causes lockups in Jaunty | 20:13 | |
tormod | did anyone else try restarting X after the last updates, or find out something_ | 20:19 |
Sarvatt | how did you even install all of the updates? | 20:19 |
Sarvatt | or did you not notice the error? | 20:19 |
Sarvatt | oh now its published, sweet | 20:20 |
tormod | from the general silence I suppose everybody is staring at their text consoles :) | 20:24 |
Sarvatt | i'll try now | 20:24 |
rick_h_ | tormod: well I stopped gdm on boot | 20:25 |
rick_h_ | and setup an .xinitrc | 20:25 |
rick_h_ | and so have things 'working' | 20:25 |
rick_h_ | but I was a moron and updated when I shouldn't have so taking my licks | 20:25 |
rick_h_ | although booting my WM this way is causing issues with my fun .Xresources/.Xmodmap stuff | 20:26 |
tormod | rick_h_, you can just run startx instead of making an .xinitrc right? | 20:28 |
rick_h_ | tormod: yea, but to get awesomeWM started as my default WM I exec awesome in my .xinitrc to get the right WM | 20:28 |
jbarnes | bryce: you'll want cec9fc6f6cffce186606f39982d0d78ff7c63bbf from the 2d driver | 20:29 |
jbarnes | should fix the dpi differences people have been seeing, along with the display properties applet in the kms case | 20:30 |
tormod | if awesomeWM has a desktop file you can choose it in a gconf setting somewhere | 20:30 |
rick_h_ | yea, I have it setup as a default in gdm and it works ok there. | 20:31 |
tormod | rick_h_, I see | 20:31 |
rick_h_ | but since gdm is blowing up on me and locking up my X and all this way is working | 20:31 |
rick_h_ | and once I get my blown up screen from GDM, ctrl-alt-1-6 won't give me a terminal either | 20:31 |
tormod | rick_h_, intel? | 20:32 |
rick_h_ | yea | 20:32 |
rick_h_ | T61 | 20:32 |
tormod | the joy of kms I suppose | 20:32 |
rick_h_ | well I knew better. I am heading out of town and figured I'd do updates before I left | 20:33 |
rick_h_ | then boom :) | 20:33 |
tjaalton | tormod: how could that be? | 20:34 |
tormod | tjaalton, did you not experience it? | 20:34 |
tjaalton | I should probably try :) | 20:35 |
tormod | dog food :) | 20:35 |
tjaalton | testing ftw | 20:35 |
tormod | I guess gdm fails to start x then failsafeX fails because it tries to run dexconf (which it should not any longer, right?) | 20:36 |
tjaalton | which kernel? | 20:37 |
tormod | 2.6.30-10-generic | 20:37 |
tjaalton | .31 fails here, intel claims no modes | 20:37 |
tjaalton | ok | 20:37 |
tormod | 2.6.30-10.12-generic to be precise | 20:37 |
tjaalton | I'm still running -8, because of the dpms hanger | 20:38 |
tjaalton | anyway, upgrading now.. | 20:38 |
jbarnes | Sarvatt: just fixed the bug where in KMS mode outputs didn't have the EDID blob | 20:41 |
Sarvatt | yes, very broken and I couldnt figure out why. its forcing failsafe mode no matter what for some reason | 20:41 |
jbarnes | which makes the display applet easier to use and will probably fix the dpi differences between kms and ums | 20:41 |
Sarvatt | actually had to boot up windows here so i can look through the changes to try to figure it out | 20:41 |
Sarvatt | oh nice! | 20:41 |
Sarvatt | it might be a bit until i can update edgers, in windows atm because of problems in karmic :D | 20:42 |
jbarnes | ouch | 20:42 |
bryce | jbarnes, thanks | 20:42 |
tormod | this looks messed up: | 20:43 |
tormod | gdm[14980]: DEBUG: Loading locale string: Welcome (null) | 20:43 |
tormod | gdm[14980]: DEBUG: Key file does not have key 'Welcome' | 20:44 |
tormod | or maybe not | 20:44 |
bryce | heh, guess xorg should have been staged on xorg-edgers first | 20:45 |
tjaalton | I'll debug it goddammit :) | 20:45 |
tormod | heh this is messed up: | 20:45 |
tormod | DEBUG: gdm_server_spawn: '/usr/X11R6/bin/X | 20:45 |
tormod | X11R6 ? | 20:45 |
bryce | well, the good news is half the desktop team was just complaining a few hours ago that are using xorg-edgers too much and not putting stuff in ubuntu quickly enough for people to test ;-) | 20:45 |
tjaalton | tormod: good catch | 20:46 |
tjaalton | so gdm needs fixing.. seb128? :) | 20:46 |
seb128 | tjaalton, what is broken? | 20:46 |
tormod | been too long without any X breakage, about time we get some fun | 20:46 |
Sarvatt | are we not creating the symlink to X in the postinst now? | 20:46 |
tjaalton | seb128: gdm.conf still references /usr/X11R6/bin/X which is finally gone | 20:47 |
tjaalton | seb128: it should use /usr/bin/X instead | 20:47 |
seb128 | tjaalton, and you uploaded that? | 20:47 |
seb128 | tjaalton, without testing? | 20:47 |
tjaalton | seb128: why yes :/ | 20:47 |
seb128 | bah | 20:47 |
seb128 | great | 20:48 |
tjaalton | the package has a Breaks for it, but the debian version | 20:48 |
tjaalton | I could fix that | 20:49 |
seb128 | well that will be as quick to fix gdm now | 20:49 |
tjaalton | ok.. | 20:49 |
seb128 | but that means anybody upgrading between now and some publisher run later will have broken xorg | 20:49 |
tjaalton | right | 20:49 |
seb128 | we should not give upload rights for base components to people not testing before upgrading | 20:49 |
tormod | they can still use "startx" | 20:49 |
seb128 | sorry for the rant looking at fixing gdm now | 20:49 |
tjaalton | np, deserve it | 20:50 |
tjaalton | too much vac :P | 20:50 |
tjaalton | well, say I didn't use gnome or gdm, this bug would have gone unnoticed anyway ;) | 20:52 |
tjaalton | I'll let the forums know | 20:53 |
Sarvatt | ahh yeah * Don't ship the /usr/X11R6/bin symlink in x11-common. Break gdm << | 20:54 |
Sarvatt | 2.20.7-5. | 20:54 |
seb128 | tjaalton, gdm change uploaded, you might still want to update the break to gdm <= 2.20.10-0ubuntu3 in the next upload | 20:57 |
tjaalton | seb128: yeah, will do | 20:59 |
tjaalton | seb128: thanks for the quick update, and sorry for the trouble at this hour! | 21:00 |
seb128 | no problem, happens to everybody | 21:00 |
tjaalton | uploaded | 21:07 |
tjaalton | Sarvatt: fixed livecd-rootfs to not touch xorg.conf anymore | 21:25 |
tjaalton | pushed to bzr | 21:25 |
Sarvatt | phew, editing the links to use /usr/bin/X instead in gdm.conf did fix it for me, there were multiple places it was calling it in there so it threw me off since i only edited the first :D | 21:25 |
bryce | hey sarvatt, I've a handy script you might find useful... I'll post to ubuntu-x@ | 21:28 |
Sarvatt | gotta love etckeeper :) http://sarvatt.com/downloads/0001-saving-uncommitted-changes-in-etc-prior-to-apt-run.patch.txt | 21:36 |
Sarvatt | oo, what about bryce? | 21:36 |
bryce | changelog merges | 21:37 |
Sarvatt | oh nice! | 21:38 |
=== seb128_ is now known as seb128 | ||
=== seb128 is now known as seb128_ | ||
=== seb128_ is now known as seb128 | ||
Sarvatt | holy heck g-p-m output is rediculious | 21:43 |
Sarvatt | 200k of output into .xsession-errors in 5 minutes :D | 21:45 |
bryce | -ati snapshot uploaded to karmic | 21:53 |
bryce | Sarvatt, I also stuck it in xorg-edgers, although that probably wasn't necessary | 21:53 |
bryce | Sarvatt, tormod: xorg-edgers can move on to focus on -ati+KMS work now :-) | 21:54 |
Sarvatt | jbarnes: very nice! just looked over the changes, new one is uploading right now | 21:54 |
tormod | bryce, can you ping apw about a newer kernel again? :) | 21:54 |
bryce | sure | 21:55 |
Sarvatt | yeah we need a linux-libc-dev that has all the radeon KMS stuff that doesnt get built if its not enabled in staging as far as i can see | 21:55 |
bryce | ah, Sarvatt, could you write up what's needed in an email to ubuntu-x@? Then I'll forward that along | 21:56 |
bryce | I need to get re-caughtup on kms stuff, I've been focused just on bug stuff exclusively this last week | 21:57 |
bryce | ok, time to go do DEQ/DMV stuff... bbiab | 22:12 |
tjaalton | jcristau: the fdi file change probably makes sense for debian too | 22:40 |
tormod | bryce, I would link to bug_1734 on your blog, but it requires a login. | 23:06 |
apw | bryce, i keep forgetting, how is radeon kms in stock karmic userspace | 23:33 |
tormod | apw? | 23:37 |
Sarvatt | not working, they are *just* getting it up at least with kms and no libdrm-radeon1 as of a few hours ago in -ati | 23:37 |
Sarvatt | funny, it requires libdrm-radeon1 to build kms support, but says "It won't build against libdrm radeon yet either" | 23:39 |
Sarvatt | oh nevermind, the check in configure.ac is just there to check further if it should build dri2 support if DRM_MODE is yes and that part isnt working | 23:41 |
Sarvatt | yeah that mesa rules change for sure fixed things, 16 builds with no failures now.. that was annoying me for a month having to babysit the retry button every day :D | 23:44 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!