[13:43] * Keybuk finally figures out what about D-Bus davidz has been bitching about all this time [13:59] *contemplates versioning the D-Bus interface* [13:59] I wonder whether anyone would mind if I did that, and just kept revving it [14:25] Keybuk: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509113 [14:25] Keybuk: I'm about to close that as WONTFIX. Any special message or reason I should keep it open? [14:29] Yeah, versioning the interface would be a good thing. [14:30] sadmac2: we're going to move to .conf, so I guess you could say it's an open bug [14:31] How about .job? [14:31] Keybuk: matter of policy really [14:31] sadmac2: yeah, depends how you deal with upstream bugs ;) [14:31] ion: yeah that's the other thing. .event is wrong wrong and terribly wrong [14:31] ion: confuses jobs and instances and crap [14:32] right, the fact people think things in /etc/event.d are "events" is the whole reason to rename it in the first place [14:32] they're things run "on" events [14:32] :-) [14:32] things in /etc/apm/suspend.d are not suspenders [14:34] Keybuk: unless apm is advanced pants management [14:41] :D [14:41] :-D [14:42] I sincerely don’t get the .d naming convention for directories. [14:42] it made sense once [14:42] if you have /etc/foo.conf [14:42] then you'd grow /etc/foo.d/*.conf [14:42] Why not /etc.d/apm.d/suspend.d to make it absolutely clear they are directories, in case someone forgets how stat works. [14:43] yeah, that's where it got silly [14:43] new directories should never have had a ".d" [14:43] Yeah, i get that, but for instance, there never was an /etc/event.conf or equivalent. [14:43] event.d was chosen on the spur of the moment because at least three other things used it ;) [14:44] Keybuk: what other things? [14:45] sadmac2: apm, powerman, d-bus [14:45] /etc/apm/event.d, /etc/power/event.d, /etc/dbus-1/event.d [14:45] ;P [14:45] * sadmac2 gets an old powerman5000 song in his head. === Md_ is now known as Md [23:15] * Keybuk wonders how he ended up with a 50,000 line C file [23:15] :-D [23:21] ironically this is the code that tests the dbus binding proxy code [23:21] it's twice the size of the file that tests the object end using raw dbus