[00:00] anyway, i think its made for releases where its clear how to get the tarball if you want to reproduce something [00:00] but i agree its probably more in line with the original spirit of it ;) [00:01] we discussed that last year or 2 years ago in the motu channel, we ended-up with get-current-source doing what you want [00:01] asac: any idea when ff3 [00:01] .5 will hit jaunty? [00:01] fta: what i want? ;) [00:02] tarball matching d/changelog [00:02] most of my rules files are providing that too [00:03] right. i remember get-current-source now [00:03] but we had problems implementing that for mozillas accurately, right? [00:03] or was that just with CVS? [00:04] we need a reverse mapping for the tags. it's fine when it's a snapshot as it contains the proper rev-id [00:04] or date [00:05] yeah thats what i thought [00:05] what do you think of http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=15889 ? [00:05] i wonder if bzr merge-options would be something we could use to have bzr branches that can reproduce the tarball if needed [00:05] merge-upstream ;) [00:05] not sure if bzr is up to that nowadays ;) [00:06] e.g. mirroring daily progress of moz central for instance [00:07] fta: sounds wrong for gnome. but chrome folks have to deide whether the want a unique experience accross platforms [00:07] the problem with bzr mirrors is that we loose the upstream revisions, it's a pain when filing bugs [00:07] or a slightly different one [00:07] that obeys native laf [00:07] fta: i dont mean bzr mirrors [00:08] fta: bzr builddeb has a merge-upstream feature now [00:08] or is it bzr? [00:08] anyway ... its basically if you get a new tarball, you say: merge-upstream and then it will update the internal upstream branch [00:08] and in future you can export tarballs independently that have matching checksum [00:08] so its basically just a recorded "orig" bump [00:08] like when you say "new upstream snapshot" [00:09] that would be equivalent to a merge-upstream commit combined with bumping changelog [00:09] so workflow would be: [00:09] ./debian/rules get-orig-source [00:09] bzr merge-upstream *orig.tar.gz [00:10] and then you can just do bzr bd --export-upstream ... to get the upstream [00:10] orig.tar.gz [00:11] bzr help merge-upstream [00:11] Takes a new upstream version and merges it in to your branch, so that your [00:11] packaging changes are applied to the new version. [00:11] [00:11] You must supply the source to import from, and the version number of the [00:12] new release. The source can be a .tar.gz, .tar, .tar.bz2, .tgz or .zip [00:12] archive, or a directory. The source may also be a remote file. [00:13] not mentioned how to export it on demand though ;) [00:13] maybe its all automagic [00:13] and it creates .bzr-builddeb/default.conf or something [00:17] i guess its immature ;) [00:17] * asac stops testing that feature [00:20] asac: any idea on FF3.5 in Jaunty, people keep opening bugs... [00:23] it's in the security ppa [00:23] https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-security/+archive/ppa [00:24] i also get may share of emails about that [00:24] -may+my [00:24] ok, but it's going into jaunty-updates/security, right? [00:25] not my call [00:25] asac: ^^^ [00:26] i dont know how i can be more clear ;) [00:26] Karmic and Jaunty users: [00:26] * just install the currently available firefox-3.5 package from universe and wait. The final bits will be there really soon. * If you want to have them earlier, enable ubuntu-mozilla-security PPA where the bits will land first. [00:26] I read it :) [00:27] but that's what I'm telling people also [00:27] good... plan hasnt changed yet ;) [00:27] I just anticipate people asking: Are we there yet? [00:28] BTW, asac, bd murray has an extension that you can configure to replace the script you had [00:28] I just tried it [00:28] the package hasnt been rolled to -security yet ;) [00:28] It lets you set importance, status, and replies [00:28] micahg: yeah. greasemonkey [00:28] yeah [00:30] micahg: i dont like greasemonkey. firing off a command is more efficient for me than waiting for launchpad ;) [00:30] i used greasemonkey for some time [00:30] but yes, its defintly an improvement. [00:31] ok, well, I think it'll help me some [00:31] and I"m testing it for FF3.5 right now :) [00:32] works fine for me [00:32] oops [00:32] wrong windeow :) [00:37] heh [00:38] was informational anyway ;) [00:48] fta : #6Million done! [00:49] BUGabundo: 6 mil what? [00:49] BUGabundo, ? was that a challenge? [00:49] looks like spam to me [00:49] fta one year old! [00:49] micahg: dents [00:49] http://identi.ca/notice/6000000 [01:04] * BUGabundo caminha [01:36] hi [01:36] asac: around ? [01:38] asac: new flashblock to merge : http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~rzr/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu/revision/18 [01:39] i'll use lp to notify it [08:52] ola [08:53] 3g busted in NM ppa [08:53] so dont upgrade ;) === asac_ is now known as asac [10:28] hi asac , can you release http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~rzr/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu ? [10:29] * asac looking [10:29] rzr: does it work with 3.5? [10:30] i havent check [10:30] maybe i should upgrade to karmic [10:30] rzr: 3.5 is also in jaunty [10:30] firefox-3.5 [10:30] also you can pick the final 3.5 for jaunty from the ~ubuntu-mozilla-security PPA [10:30] so let's check this [10:33] i see i had 3.5 , and never ran it [10:33] b4pre [10:34] asac: ok captain it works [10:37] good [10:38] rzr: ok merged. i also added a .bzr-builddeb/default.conf with the upstream revision info ... please update it next time too [10:38] ok great [10:39] this has be merged in jaunty later , right ? [10:39] uploaded [10:39] rzr: no [10:39] rzr: unless there are serious bugs resolved we wont update jaunty [10:39] ok [10:40] then i'll open them :) [10:40] or wait someone to do it [10:41] because i am not sure it works as expected [10:44] btw let me thank you for uploading [10:45] rzr: could you please keep the changelog during merge at UNRELEASED and then do a final commit with "debcommit -r" ? [10:45] (next time) [10:45] its better to know when there was what release ;) [10:45] ok will do [10:45] rzr: is there no hope that we will get a better upstream version? [10:46] rzr: like the version they release on amo? [10:46] amo ? [10:46] if not ... maybe we can spot the real release and reversion the snapshot? [10:46] rzr: addons.mozilla.org [10:47] * rzr scratches his head [10:47] no i donno how [10:49] rzr: do you remember this topic at all? [10:49] our snapshot has a completely different versioning what they release there ... right? [10:50] (sorry if i confuse flashblock with some other extension that has this phenomenon) [10:50] we only add that snapshot suffix [10:50] that's the same prefix [10:50] 1.3.14~a2+snapshot20090627-0ubuntu1 [10:50] Flashblock 1.5.11.2 [10:51] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/433 [10:51] the issue was about the 1.3.14~a2 which now goes before 1.3.14 they will release later [10:51] 1.3.14 is more compatible than 1.5.11.2 [10:51] works w/ seamonkey and friends [10:52] Install Flashblock 1.5.11 [10:52] for Firefox 1.5 to 3.6a [10:52] Netscape 9 and Flock Install Flashblock 1.3.14 [10:52] for SeaMonkey, Firefox 1.0.x [10:52] and other browsersah ok [10:52] rzr: whats the difference? [10:52] is there any? [10:52] i see no advantage to use 1.5 [10:52] hmm [10:52] whats the difference then? [10:52] i havent check [10:52] why do they release a 1.5? [10:52] good question [10:52] 2009-06-27: Flashblock 1.5.11 released for Firefox 1.5 to Firefox 3.6a (trunk), Netscape Navigator 9, Flock, and Intel Midbrowser. [10:52] 2009-06-27: Flashblock 1.3.14 released for Firefox 1.0 to 3.6a, Mozilla Suite 1.7.x, Seamonkey 1.0a to 2.0, Netscape 7 to 9.0, and Flock. [10:52] whats going on ;) [10:52] for netscape9 maybe [10:52] crazy guyxs [10:53] no intel [10:54] i donno of this browser is it a branded version of fennec ? [10:54] midbrowser? [10:54] yea [10:54] i developed that at some point [10:54] intel doesnt use it anymore [10:54] they do something with mutter and trunk xulrunner now [10:54] we have it in the archive even [10:55] oh its removed again i think [10:55] ok i'll test it out on my tablet [10:55] you can run midbrowser in normal desktop too [10:55] sure but it's more use on my freerunner or nit [10:55] +ful [10:56] btw, have you tested thoses android+ubuntu hacks ? i am about to write an article about this [11:02] rzr: not personally, i saw demos on it during UDS [12:02] hi Trouble [12:03] Hello there! [12:04] Trouble: are you in troubles ;) j.k. [12:14] asac: I got it now [12:15] asac: no need for full path just to be in top level src dir [12:16] yeah ;) [12:16] thx [12:18] asac: my problem was that initially i was trying it inside debian/patches directory and it was not working [12:21] yeah [12:21] rzr: did you ever get a confirm mail for the flashblock upload? [12:22] let me check [12:36] asac: Lol no - Thankfully I'm not. Though my irc client highlights every time someone else is in trouble (and mentions "trouble") :_p [12:45] lol [12:46] asac: no mail from lp today maybe delayed [12:56] hmm [12:56] ok [12:56] the package is in though [12:56] i actually thought i would get a mail [12:56] maybe i already deleted it === ejat is now known as e-jat [13:53] asac, i fixed Bug 331654 days ago [13:53] Launchpad bug 331654 in firefox-3.5 "abrowser profile migration is wrong" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/331654 [13:54] fta2: yes [13:54] fta2: but not in jaunty ;) [13:54] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bug/331654 [13:54] Ubuntu bug 331654 in firefox-3.5 "abrowser profile migration is wrong" [High,In progress] [13:54] we need this as pseudo-SRU bug [13:55] security team busted my plans to push this through -security [13:57] configure: error: [13:57] *** Checks for JPEG2000 loader failed. You can build without it by passing [13:57] *** --without-libjasper to configure [13:57] what the hell is that [13:57] ;) [13:57] maybe everyone can move to jpeg2000 ? ;) [13:59] where does that come from? [14:00] gtk [14:00] ./configure [14:00] its on git head [14:00] but i think i saw that before [14:01] libjasper-dev - Development files for the JasPer JPEG-2000 library [14:01] libjasper1 - The JasPer JPEG-2000 runtime library [14:01] libjasper-runtime - Programs for manipulating JPEG-2000 files [14:02] seems to be not decoding, but manipulating and coding [14:16] asac: i noticed that it appear in the changelog , but not in the current versions [14:16] now it's ok [14:16] https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashblock [14:17] i suppose it's updated once built [14:38] so xulrunner-1.9.1 and firefox-3.5 ended up in jaunty-propose :/ [14:39] ? [14:41] :D [14:41] fta2: too much garbage in the upload for direct -security fastpath [14:42] http://identi.ca/notice/6020569 [14:42] i didnt want to back out all [14:42] well i offered to do it [14:42] but so far things go smooth ;) [14:45] * asac late lunch for real [14:56] mozilla bug 502208 [14:56] Mozilla bug 502208 in Mail Window Front End "Folders do not display, most actions generate _treeElement undefined errors" [Critical,Unconfirmed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502208 [14:57] our tbird 3 daily is busted as it seems [14:57] maybe missing a file or something [14:57] * asac off for lunch for real real real ;) [15:13] asac, i don't use tb at all so i don't know when it breaks, and i don't have much time to fix it anyway. if noone else volunteers, maybe i should drop it from the daily [15:23] fta2: its ok. [15:23] nobody mentioned it so its probably recent breakage [15:24] the idea of dailies is that they break ;) [15:24] so we notice ;) [16:18] fta2: did daily run already happen? or in 40 min? [16:19] ok added missing files for tbird [16:19] lets hope dailies get ready soon so i can verify ;) [16:19] 40min [16:19] great [16:20] * asac glances at builders [16:20] seems there is potential for digesting them ;) [16:20] i386 2 builds waiting in queue [16:20] amd64 13 builds waiting in queue [16:20] lpia 14 builds waiting in queue [16:21] most builders are doing something else apparently [16:22] hmm [16:22] Building lpia build of firefox-3.6 3.6~a1~hg20090702r29966+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1~hardy in ubuntu hardy RELEASE [ubuntu-mozilla-daily/ppa] [16:22] is that a late comer? [16:22] lpia [16:22] xul was broken, i fixed it earlier today [16:22] thx [16:22] only on lpia? [16:23] no, all [16:23] * asac still wondering why he doesnt get any build failure mail anymore [16:35] http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/ppa-builders.png [17:24] * asac gets crazy [17:24] half of day debugging why ffox 3.5 doesnt honour hint_style [17:24] it vanishes from font_options somehow [17:41] * asac feels crazy ;9 [17:42] guess have to take a break [18:30] * asac confused by system/moz-cairo mix in a --disable-system-cairo build [18:51] guud evening [18:51] hi [18:52] hey asac [18:56] hello [18:57] hello mbana [18:59] micahg: [18:59] 14:54 < asac> we need this as pseudo-SRU bug [18:59] 14:55 < asac> security team busted my plans to push this through -security [18:59] 14:57 < asac> configure: error: [18:59] yes? [19:00] asac: which bug? [19:00] micahg: so firefox-3.5 is now in proposed ;) [19:00] ah [19:00] ok [19:00] :) [19:00] thanks [19:01] micahg: too many non-security changes in packaging [19:01] fta: ping [19:01] so monday most likely [19:01] ok [19:03] are the packages in teh security ppa and proposed the same? [19:03] BUGabundo, ? [19:03] We've had some possible user agent bugs [19:04] fta if you have too many dent from me, you can instead follow my other OMB account! it only has 6 dents/day [19:04] http://www.macno.org/denticator/?service=brainbird.co.cc&user=bugabundo [19:04] fta http://www.macno.org/denticator/?service=&user=fta&chart=flash [19:04] Absolute average: 682 dents since 2009-01-11 (174 days): 3.92 dents/day [19:04] micahg: yes [19:05] pfft [19:05] DirectFB thing is not fixed in thebes yet [19:07] bug 304033 [19:07] Launchpad bug 304033 in gwibber "Gwibber doesn't display updates (due to newer webkit/pywebkitgtk builds)" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/304033 [19:08] MEDIUM [19:08] crazy guys [19:08] aaaahaha [19:08] asac: well it did affect a bunch of users [19:08] works for me! it always has! [19:08] only was affected by a similar bug for 1 day [19:09] its still broken in karmic [19:09] guys you should really care for the archive [19:09] and not only ppas ;) [19:09] yeah [19:09] asac: it shouldn't even be in archive!!! [19:09] it can!! [19:09] it doesnt help if you run the .head if noone pushes stuff to the archive [19:09] better keep running archive and bug folks to update gwibber [19:09] gwibber is one of those apps that only works on a PPA with often releases [19:09] i dont think so [19:10] why would that be the case [19:10] its just undermaintained from what i understand [19:10] or we need to change the rules [19:10] what rules? [19:10] gwibber doesnt brake in a stable release [19:10] and allow packages to change features on stable release [19:10] BUGabundo: thats not the problem for this case, is it? [19:10] eheh [19:10] the jaunty version still works from what i know [19:10] won't comment on it :) [19:11] but no support for jaiku, redent, etc [19:11] well [19:11] or even SSL-less laconica [19:11] thats a differnt story [19:11] its features [19:11] but thats not a regression [19:11] * BUGabundo searches for a power socket [19:11] what you see in karmic is a regression [19:13] * BUGabundo finds a power socket in the max reach of power cord :\ [19:14] asac, gwibber never releases anything, so it's a random snapshot or nothing [19:14] yep [19:14] that's right [19:15] *if* they had releases, they might be able to fix asac prob! [19:15] but they don't even have branches for head and releases [19:16] i will push a random snapshot but i need to figure out what are those -u2 [19:17] fta: well. if the random snapshot is stable enough its ok [19:17] i am commiting now the not-committed releases [19:19] what are you both talking about? [19:20] some guy pushed changes to karmic without using the bzr branch [19:20] who and what? [19:20] right since this cycle everything is supposed to be in bzr right? [19:24] fta: yes. i replayed them now and merged from daily. let me check if its good [19:27] what were the changes? [19:28] Bah! ... and Ah! ;) [19:28] first was no change upload [19:28] second unfixed libwebkit version [19:29] public timeline is broken for me? [19:29] you see that too? [19:29] was there public before? [19:30] ah ok [19:30] its a bug [19:30] i didnt have any public timeline enabled [19:30] the tab shouldnt be there then [19:30] or indicate that one has nothing to expect [19:31] asac: if you remove it there's no way to get it back [19:31] unless you close and start again [19:31] eheh [19:31] it hsould just be hidden and not removable? [19:31] how do i remove it? [19:31] ctrl+w [19:31] ah its a view [19:31] view -> public timeline [19:31] or mouse middle click [19:31] works [19:31] comes back for me [19:32] nope [19:32] not for me [19:34] asac: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/gwibber/+bug/357206 [19:34] Ubuntu bug 357206 in gwibber "[wishlist] Public Timeline Tab" [Wishlist,Fix released] [19:34] humm [19:34] doenst work for me [19:34] LOL [19:34] oh wait. diff bug [19:34] LOL [19:34] nvm [19:35] BUGabundo: in View menu [19:36] I saw it [19:36] pressed and pressed again [19:36] didn't reopen [19:36] then again I don't have the pubic feed enable [19:36] let me try that [19:37] darn it! it crashed before I got there [19:41] asac: ok seems to work [19:42] thats what i mean ;) [19:42] BUGabundo: feel like jumping the gun and trying NM trunk? [19:43] humm [19:43] will it work?? [19:43] already running modem manager trunk [19:43] i think it should work better than the nm 0.7.1 with modemmanager at least [19:43] ok [19:43] https://edge.launchpad.net/~network-manager/+archive/trunk [19:43] then I need to remobe MM? [19:43] thats NM 0.8~a ... and NMA [19:43] 0.8?? [19:43] BUGabundo: the modemmangaer is a copy ... just add the ppa and upgrade [19:43] BUGabundo: yes nm trunk is 0.8 [19:43] I keep MM ppa? [19:44] or remove it? [19:44] BUGabundo: dont need to ... i coped the mm to the trunk ppa too [19:44] and will keep doing so [19:44] i am seriously thinking about pushing that to karmic [19:44] just need initial feedback ;) [19:45] and you pick the crist here [19:45] ok ok [19:47] thought you like new stuff ;) [19:48] I do! [19:49] but I also like it working [19:49] eheh [19:49] The following packages will be REMOVED: [19:49] modemmanager{u} [19:49]