[01:45]  * BUGabundo $off ; $echo You can't off me; $sudo off; $echo ahaha you trieeeddddddzzzzzzzz
[02:28] <CarlFK> this worth reporting, and against what?  /etc/adduser.conf # This is the list of groups that new non-system users will be added to
[02:28] <CarlFK> # Default: #EXTRA_GROUPS="dialout cdrom floppy audio video plugdev users games"
[02:29] <CarlFK> by default, users are not in the video group.  not sure about the rest
[04:27] <kamusin> Hello
[04:28] <kamusin> am having problem with my audio and I'm submiting a report. I marked gnome-media package is that correct?
[04:30] <cactaur> Is this a problem with audio in general? Like no sound?
[04:30] <kamusin> is a problem with gnome-volume control
[04:31] <kamusin> doesn't work
[04:31] <kamusin> I can't decrease or increment volume
[04:32] <kamusin> audio is still playing even if I press mute button
[04:34] <cactaur> Does it work with alsamixer?
[04:36] <kamusin> negative, only with remote control (because I use my LCD television)
[04:37] <kamusin> with alsamixer only can mute and unmute audio
[04:37] <cactaur> Then it seems like an alsa-base problem. Try filing against that.
[04:38] <kamusin> ok, thanks cactaur
[05:14] <mrooney> cactaur: haha, I don't think that was a bug at all
[05:14] <mrooney> I think kamusin was sending digital audio the TV
[05:14] <mrooney> and digital is either on or off, no volume
[05:14] <mrooney> you have to control it at the app level or the tv level
[05:33] <cactaur> Oh, <.<
[18:43] <dcraven> I suspect bug 395641 should be tagged as Wishlist if someone would like to have a look and update it as such :)
[18:43] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 395641 in gnome-control-center "metacity compositing not displayed in system->preferences->appearance" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/395641
[18:45] <BUGabundo> oh looky e-jat. how was your afternoon?
[18:45] <kklimonda> hey BUGabundo
[18:46] <BUGabundo> oh look another stranger
[18:46] <BUGabundo> [[]]
[18:46] <kklimonda> :)
[18:47] <e-jat> BUGabundo: nite .. not afternoon :)
[18:48] <e-jat> ?
[18:48] <BUGabundo> 19h here, I still see the sun! sooooo afternoon
[18:50] <kklimonda> you will see it in 3 hours - will it still be an afternoon? :P
[18:50] <BUGabundo> kklimonda: its like xtmas!
[18:50] <BUGabundo> its when ever a man wants ahaha
[18:52] <kklimonda> i see.. ;)
[18:52] <felixc> hello all: I'm just starting out with helping out with bug triage, and I'm wondering what the procedure is for bugs reported in other languages? I couldn't find anything in the wiki that suggested an appropriate response...
[18:52] <felixc> if it matters, I have a basic understanding of the language, and so I could translate the report/communicate with the submitter
[18:53] <kklimonda> Translate it into English
[18:54] <felixc> cool, thanks
[18:54] <BUGabundo> felixc: yeah, usually asked the user to reply in english
[18:55] <BUGabundo> on Answers there are some users doing multi-language support, but its not supported in bugs
[18:57] <felixc> gotcha
[18:57] <felixc> I'm preeeety sure the bug is invalid anyway, but I'll translate the report and ask the submitter for clarification
[19:00] <BUGabundo> felixc: what is the language?
[19:00] <BUGabundo> maybe I can take a look
[19:01] <BUGabundo> or the bug by any mather
[19:12] <felixc> BUGabundo: French, 395802
[19:12] <BUGabundo> bug 395802
[19:12] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 395802 in gnome-terminal "Unable to perform upgrade" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/395802
[19:13] <felixc> oh, that's nifty -- sorry, didn't know of that feature
[19:13] <felixc> (also, my french is verrrry rusty)
[19:13] <BUGabundo> right
[19:14] <BUGabundo> transform that bug into an answer
[19:14] <BUGabundo> its not a bug
[19:14] <felixc> okay, that's what I thought
[19:14] <felixc> sounds like the submitter somehow got "sudo" in where "deb" should be
[19:14] <BUGabundo> then help him remove the wrong line on sources.list
[19:14] <felixc> probably adding a new repo or something
[19:14] <BUGabundo> yep
[19:14] <BUGabundo> wrong repo in the sources
[19:14] <BUGabundo> without it, can't help further
[19:15] <BUGabundo> ask him to upload a copy of it
[19:16] <felixc> I considered that, thought the "grep" comment I posted was a more succint way of getting that information... do you think I should follow up again asking for the whole file then?
[19:19] <maco> there's supposed to be a launchpad greasemonkey package now right? where can i find that?
[19:20] <micahg> maco: https://launchpad.net/~gm-dev-launchpad/+archive/ppa
[19:20] <maco> micahg, thanks
[19:23] <BUGabundo> felixc: what ever helps you help him
[19:23]  * BUGabundo humm that's a song isn't it !?
[19:23] <BUGabundo> hey maco micahg
[19:29] <maco> micahg, are all of them in there? or just certain ones?
[19:31] <kklimonda> anyone from bug control could check bug 394473 and see if it can be made public ?
[19:31] <ubot4> kklimonda: Bug 394473 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/394473 is private
[19:36] <micahg> maco: I don't know what's out there
[19:47] <hggdh> kklimonda, I subscribed you
[19:47] <hggdh> (do no0t have the time to check for private data right now)
[19:47] <BUGabundo> hggdh: heh hey Carlitos
[19:47] <maco> bdmurray, what happened to the lp_karma gm script? it used to display icons, but the compiled one doesn't
[19:47] <kklimonda> hggdh: thanks
[19:48] <hggdh> BUGabundo, yo you
[19:48] <hggdh> maco, ah, thanks, I was wondering what I had done wrong ;-)
[19:49] <dcraven> So I've updated a package locally (bug 395576), but now I don't know what to do with what I have... I've done the debuild -S and built the new package with pbuilder. Now what? heh
[19:49] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 395576 in gnome-web-photo "Please upgrade gnome-web-photo to 0.8" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/395576
[19:49] <dcraven> Needs to be reviewed I'd imagine since I'm new at this.
[19:50] <BUGabundo> dcraven: maybe try on #ubuntu-motu ?
[19:50] <dcraven> Good idea. Thanks BUGabundo.
[19:54] <maco> dcraven, run "debdiff <oldpackage>.dsc <newpackage>.dsc >> <newpackage>.debdiff"
[19:54] <maco> dcraven, attach that debdiff to the bug, and subscribe either ubuntu-motu-sponsors or ubuntu-main-sponsors depending where it is
[19:58] <kklimonda> is an account name considered "sensitive data" ?
[19:58] <kklimonda> it doesn't contain a name nor last name
[19:59] <maco> i dont think so
[19:59] <maco> watch for passwords & 16 digit numbers (credit cards)
[20:00] <maco> dcraven, correction, that should be ">" not ">>" in case you've already done it once, you want to overwrite it, not append (dtchen just pointed that out)
[20:07] <BUGabundo> kklimonda: depends on the user
[20:07] <BUGabundo> I usually avoid posting it
[20:07] <BUGabundo> even being my nick!
[20:33] <dcraven> maco: Oops. I uploaded the diff.gz as per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess
[20:34] <maco> dcraven, ooh youre doing a new upstream version?
[20:35] <dcraven> maco: Yes. 0.6 in the repo, 0.8 upstream.
[20:35] <maco> dcraven, ah ok nevermind then. thought you were doing a bugfix update
[20:35] <dtchen> upload it to REVU
[20:36] <dcraven> dtchen: I added the diff.gz to the bug, and added ubuntu-universe-sponsors to the subscription list.
[20:37] <dcraven> Reading about REVU now. I used it a long time ago, but I forget :/
[20:38] <maco> ive only used it once, so i forget too
[20:39] <dcraven> dtchen: The wiki (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/REVU) says do *not* use REVU in this case (new version upstream).
[20:39] <dcraven> I don't want to get fired already :)
[20:40] <dtchen> dcraven: nevermind, then.
[20:41]  * dcraven goes to find another one.
[20:57] <yofel> anybody an idea how to get an apport crash report for a nautilus crash that isn't noticed by apport?
[20:58] <kklimonda> yoasif: are you sure that apport is running?
[20:58] <yoasif> kklimonda, you're not asking for me, are you?
[20:58] <kklimonda> yofel: ^^^
[20:59] <kklimonda> yoasif: my bad :)
[21:01] <yofel> doh - kklimonda: you're right
[21:01] <yofel> now why isn't it running?
[21:01] <yofel> it's enabled in /etc/default/apport
[21:02] <kklimonda> yofel: apport is enabled by setting some magic string in /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
[21:03] <kklimonda> yofel: see if it's there (something like "|apport %p %s %c")
[21:03] <micahg> kklimonda: that's not what the wiki says
[21:03] <micahg> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Apport#How%20to%20enable%20apport
[21:03] <yofel> it says: |/usr/share/apport/apport %p %s %c
[21:03] <micahg> ah
[21:03] <micahg> you're getting into the guts of it
[21:04] <kklimonda> yofel: hmm.. then it should be fine.. is nautilus segfaulting? check dmesg to see if it's there
[21:04] <yofel> [30152.310004] <6>nautilus[10399]: segfault at 0 ip 00007faa08f63690 sp 00007fffaa78d338 error 4 in libglib-2.0.so.0.2102.0[7faa08f06000+c5000]
[21:06] <yofel> maybe something broken in 2.6.31-1 ?
[21:07] <kklimonda> yofel: maybe crash files are in /var/crash/ and only a dialog window doesn't show up?
[21:09] <yofel> ok... i have a /var/crash/_usr_bin_nautilus.1000.crash file with 000 permissions O.O
[21:10] <yofel> how did that happen...
[21:11] <yofel> now it works, thanks for the time kklimonda
[23:37] <mrooney> Anyone know of a metabug or anything for https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/395677 ?
[23:37] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 395677 in update-manager "dist-upgrades should not be recommended for hardware with known regressions/issues" [Medium,Confirmed]