[01:25]  * BUGabundo $ do radom_pool (bath;sleep;breakfast;work);
[01:33] <kklimonda> great, my nautilus crashes when I try to access any remote share..
[01:35] <kklimonda> oh, this one is related to ubuntuone..
[01:54] <kklimonda> any idea how to delete all packages with dbgsym in their name?
[01:54] <kklimonda> aptitude complains that there is more than 40 packages with this string..
[01:55] <kklimonda> i know I could do some voodoo with awk, grep or sed
[01:55] <kklimonda> but maybe there is a simple way of removing them all?
[02:28] <micahg> kklimonda:  sudo apt-get remove .*dbgsym
[02:29] <kklimonda> thanks
[07:25] <anakron> hi all
[07:51] <dholbach> good morning
[08:10] <persia> Anyone else having issues running "ubuntu-bug" in karmic?
[08:20] <anakron> only typo errors :)
[08:20] <anakron> good night in chile
[08:20] <anakron> persia..a question
[08:21] <anakron> how i can recover my signing key if i delete it ?
[08:21] <anakron> can i import it?
[08:21] <anakron> or it is lost...
[08:22] <anakron> because i can't sign any package, signing key is not availiable
[08:26] <persia> anakron, If you delete your key, it's gone.
[08:26] <persia> You can restore from your backup.
[08:26] <anakron> where?
[08:26] <persia> If you don't have a backup, you can do something with your revocation certificate.
[08:26] <anakron> how
[08:27] <persia> If you don't have a revocation certificate, you won't make that mistake again :)
[08:27] <persia> where?  Wherever you backed up your data.
[08:27] <anakron> :)
[08:27] <persia> How?  I'm not sure.  I've never had to revoke a key.
[08:27] <anakron> ill must create another one...
[08:28] <anakron> i have some packages...all of them with differents keys :S:S
[08:28] <anakron> i cannot be trusted XD
[08:28] <persia> Indeed.
[08:37] <micahg> does someone know how to fix an apport-collect misconfiguration?
[08:37] <micahg> bug 392418
[08:37] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 392418 in firefox-3.0 "Firefox 3 does not render t-mobile page correctly" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/392418
[13:38] <YoBoY> hi, where can i look/report for a bug concerning the packages lists who are in the repositories? my concern is the i18n files are not in utf-8
[14:15] <Le-Chuck_ITA> Here is better than on #ubuntu
[14:15] <Le-Chuck_ITA> it seems to me that I find the cause of an old bug
[14:16] <Le-Chuck_ITA> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/gnome-panel/+bug/69012
[14:16] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 69012 in gnome-panel "Dragging a menu from the main menu does not allow to press ESC to cancel" [Unknown,Confirmed]
[14:16] <Le-Chuck_ITA> it seems to me that the last focused window has the focus while dragging, so if you press ESC, it's captured by that window.
[14:24] <Le-Chuck_ITA> Hi dholbach, I recall you are interested in usability problems of the default destkop or am I making confusion with somebody else?
[14:25] <dholbach> Le-Chuck_ITA: likely a confusion :)
[14:25] <Le-Chuck_ITA> ok thanks anyways :)
[14:26] <dholbach> try #ayatana
[14:39] <Le-Chuck_ITA> thanks dholbach
[14:39] <Le-Chuck_ITA> but I just wanted to see if I can do more for a bug in the gnome panel, is ayatana appropriate?
[14:39] <dholbach> or #ubuntu-desktop
[14:43] <Le-Chuck_ITA> ok thanks
[15:20] <Kangarooo> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/370535 im having same problem. can't unzip tar.gz even in console and archive manager says this            This is what it says if I double-click on one of these tar.gz files: tar: This does not look like a tar archive tar: Skipping to next header tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors        what should I do?
[15:20] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 370535 in file-roller "won't open tar.gz in 9.04" [Low,New]
[15:26] <bddebian> Boo
[16:41] <andresmujica> >
[16:41] <andresmujica> Hi!
[16:42] <andresmujica> in about 20 mins we'll have our monthly meeting at #ubuntu-meeting
[16:46] <hggdh> andresmujica, thanks for the reminder
[16:48] <andresmujica> hggdh: np
[16:59] <andresmujica> ok, it's time again..
[17:59] <micahg> ping bdmurray
[20:08] <yofel> anybody here an idea what happend with apport in karmic? It's disabled by default in my fresh alpha2 installation here
[20:09] <charlie-tca__> yofel: appears to be disabled by default now.
[20:09] <yofel> why that?
[20:10] <charlie-tca__> Don't know. It doesn't seem real smart, if we want the bug reports filed with apport now as much as possible
[20:10] <charlie-tca__> I just discovered it yesterday, though
[20:10] <yofel> my point exactly
[20:25] <Ampelbein> charlie-tca__: it's only the automatic crash reporter that's diabled, not the "help -> report a problem" function or "ubuntu-bug".
[20:25] <Ampelbein> charlie-tca__: so we still get apport bug reports
[20:27] <Ampelbein> but as the number of automatically filed reports always outnumbered the reports that can be dealt with it's a good thing to have them disabled by default and only let apport catch the crash on request.
[20:27] <kklimonda> especially that at the beginning of the dev cycle there are going to be a lot of crashes, for example right now there is a wide problem with gtk+
[20:28] <kklimonda> if we had apport enabled by default we would be swarmed by duplicates
[21:41] <james_w> is anyone else seeing /var/log/dist-upgrade attached to bugs not working?
[21:41] <james_w> e.g. bug 396744
[21:41] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 396744 in ca-certificates "errors in actualization to ubuntu 9.04 with pakage "ca-certificates"" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/396744
[21:41] <james_w> is it just because the file is empty on the user's system or something?
[21:53] <hggdh> micahg, may I PVT you?
[21:58] <micahg> hggdh: yes
[21:58] <micahg> I think :)
[21:59] <hggdh> heh
[22:01] <BUGabundo> ola
[22:04] <kklimonda> BUGabundo: you got this work? you are getting later and later online :)
[22:05] <BUGabundo> :(
[22:05] <BUGabundo> yea tuff job
[22:05] <BUGabundo> plus went to the gym (latter then usual)
[22:11] <hggdh> ola, BUGabundo
[22:11] <BUGabundo> hey hggdh
[22:11] <hggdh> did mapi work?
[22:20] <BUGabundo> nope :(
[22:21] <BUGabundo> but then again they have OWA disabled for sub-contraced users
[22:21] <BUGabundo> I so don't like my new job _job_
[22:59] <micahg> pign bdmurray
[23:00] <hggdh> heh
[23:04] <bdmurray> pogn micahg
[23:40] <micahg> hi bdmurray, it seems that I can't save scripts with the gm extension
[23:40] <bdmurray> micahg: do you mean save custom replies?
[23:42] <micahg> yes
[23:43] <bdmurray> and with which version of firefox is that
[23:47] <micahg> 3.5
[23:48] <bdmurray> Do you get the replies saved dailog box?
[23:50] <micahg> yes
[23:50] <micahg> but it doesn't save
[23:51] <micahg> where is the .xml file?
[23:51] <micahg> that's my guess
[23:51] <bdmurray> It doesn't write to the xml file
[23:52] <bdmurray> rather it should update your prefs.js file
[23:52] <micahg> hmm
[23:52] <bdmurray> you could check about:config
[23:53] <micahg> I see
[23:53] <micahg> but it doesn't show the new one I wrote
[23:53] <bdmurray> and use improvements as a filter
[23:53] <bdmurray> improvements.pref.name would be better
[23:54] <micahg> yes, there are 27 in tehre
[23:54] <bdmurray> than look for the one you saved
[23:54] <micahg> one I saved is not
[23:54] <bdmurray> I have 27, one of which is the one I saved
[23:55] <micahg> comment27 or 27 total?
[23:55] <micahg> either way it's more than me
[23:55] <bdmurray> 28 total name27
[23:55] <micahg> which browser?
[23:55] <bdmurray> 3.0
[23:57] <bdmurray> the same function that adds a custom response saves the initial ones
[23:59] <micahg> Do I click save stock replies or save changes?
[23:59] <bdmurray> save stock replies