/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/07/07/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

BUGabundofta asac any one noticing huge slow downs on youtube videos on fullscreen? Firefox 3.6, flash 64bits00:15
BUGabundoworks ok on regular size window00:15
asacno00:15
asaci use 32-bits00:15
asacwith nspw00:15
micahgBUGabundo: I'd say check your video driver00:18
BUGabundonvidia00:18
micahgdid your last kernel update do anything to video?00:19
BUGabundono idea00:19
FFEMTcJDid 3.5 get put into the universe repo today?00:34
BUGabundoerr00:35
BUGabundobeen tehre since for ever00:35
FFEMTcJBUGabundo: the final release00:37
BUGabundooh.... forget about it!00:38
FFEMTcJ?00:38
micahgFFEMTcJ: yes, in Jaunty00:39
asacjaunty-security and -updates got it now00:44
FFEMTcJjust sudo aptitude install firefox-3.5  ?00:44
FFEMTcJnothing else needed?00:44
BUGabundowelll00:44
BUGabundoapt-get update may help ;)00:45
FFEMTcJdid that already00:45
asacfta: if you havent installed then yes. otherwise apt-get update + upgrade00:45
asacsorry00:45
asacFFEMTcJ: ^^00:45
BUGabundoahaah00:45
WebcamWonderThank you for fixing the thunderbird build! :)00:46
asacbug 39625200:47
ubottuLaunchpad bug 396252 in firefox-3.5 "Firefox 3.5 (Shiretoko): middle-click on link opens _two_ tabs" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/39625200:47
asacwelcome!00:47
WebcamWonderWho fixed it by the way? I am curious now!00:48
BUGabundoasac: lovelly bug00:48
BUGabundobut doesn't beat my Fullscreen one00:48
FFEMTcJits still showing up as shiretoko?00:49
asacWebcamWonder: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/thunderbird/thunderbird-3.0.head00:49
asacFFEMTcJ: thats normal00:49
asacFFEMTcJ: we dont change UI in security/stable updates00:49
FFEMTcJo00:50
asacand the brading is a top level UI thing00:50
WebcamWonderAhh, alrighty, thanks a lot :)00:50
asacthe other reason is that we only have the default browser branded00:50
asacin that way we dont have to obey trademark restrictions with the other build00:50
FFEMTcJso it wont have the firefox logo until karmic00:50
asacand also we want users to be able to distinguish both builds when they run them next to each other00:50
asacright00:50
asacwe explicitly put effort into allowing hem to be run next to each other00:51
BUGabundofta remember the flash grabbing bug? now it only grabs keyboard! mouse works ok!00:51
FFEMTcJhow can i make 3.5 default?00:51
asacFFEMTcJ: set firefox-3.5 %s in gnome -> preferences -> preferred applications00:51
asacthat should make it the default for most use cases00:51
FFEMTcJk00:51
FFEMTcJty00:52
asacbranding is not important00:53
asac;)00:53
BUGabundoerr00:53
BUGabundoasac: tell that to the debian guys :)00:53
asacwe provide that package as a service so ffox addicts can access it most easily ;) the other option is to not provide that package at all00:53
asacBUGabundo: branding is not important is basically what they say ;)00:53
BUGabundobeen using debian all day at new 2nd job00:54
* BUGabundo misses ubuntu00:54
asacwell. debian isnt that bad00:54
asaci used it for ages00:54
asaci like the pure gnome desktop ;)00:54
asaceven if it lacks behind a bit00:54
BUGabundoa bit?00:55
BUGabundo:)00:55
asacwell. look at how gnome evolves00:56
asacits not like they make considerable jumps in one or two release cycles00:56
asacso if you are just one or two behind you are not that far behind ;)00:56
asaci probably could live with hardy till its EOL if all the things i want to do work fine ;)00:56
asacand i wasnt supposed to run this karmic stuff ;)00:56
BUGabundoeeheh00:57
asacwhy not wait 3 years and then get a "wow" effect. thats all completely better ;)00:57
BUGabundokarmacian by job :)00:57
asacheh00:57
BUGabundoreally?00:57
asacyeah well.00:57
BUGabundoI think small steps, lots of them, are better00:57
asaci would run latest most likely in any case ;)00:58
asacits just that i could imagine to not do it and still being happy :)00:58
FFEMTcJid personally rather get rid of 3.0 and go competely to 3.5, but i guess i gotta wait for that..lol00:58
BUGabundoFFEMTcJ: why?00:58
BUGabundoI stop using 3.5 once it hit beta00:58
BUGabundonow using 3.6 and happy with its few bugs!00:59
asacFFEMTcJ: we have -daily ppa00:59
asacthats a godo thing00:59
asacnot too risky, but still fun00:59
BUGabundoand one of my fab addons is since last week fixed so YAY00:59
asacso if you have 3.5 and 3.6 (trunk( dailies00:59
asacand 3.6 breaks for a day, you can at least keep using 3.5 for that day ;)00:59
* BUGabundo wants to pin down 3.5 to archive but doesn't know how :(00:59
asacBUGabundo: why are you scared for 3.5 dailies?00:59
asacthey are less likely to break now that its "released" than before01:00
BUGabundo3g bw!01:00
BUGabundoI don't use 3.5 anymore, but like to keep it01:00
asacBUGabundo: you can give the archive a high priortiy01:00
asacBUGabundo: or give the ppa a low one01:00
BUGabundohow?01:00
asacthere is documentation on the web ;)01:00
BUGabundofta tried and failed01:00
asaci always need to check myself01:00
BUGabundooh really mr google?01:00
BUGabundo:)01:00
asacso for me:01:01
micahgBUGabundo: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/211603/01:01
asacPackage: fakeroot01:01
asacPin: origin ubuntu.intergenia.de01:02
asacPin-Priority: 100101:02
asacworked01:02
BUGabundothanks micahg. will try01:02
asacit prevents me from pulling the fakerrot from fta ppa01:02
asacubuntu.intergenia is the hostname of the archive mirror i am using01:02
BUGabundoasac: poor gwibber devs (and poor my inbox)01:02
micahgBUGabundo: that'll make the Ubuntu repos higher01:02
micahgby default they;re 50001:02
micahgBUGabundo: http://jaqque.sbih.org/kplug/apt-pinning.html01:03
asacmicahg: but does 450 vs 500 alreay hold back stuff?01:03
micahgyep01:03
asaci thought there are barriers in man preferences01:03
micahgit goes by higher priority01:03
micahg499 vs 500 would AFAIK01:03
asacmicahg: http://paste.ubuntu.com/211605/01:04
micahghmmm01:04
micahginteresting01:05
asaci think at least 50101:05
asacman apt_preferences01:05
BUGabundoPackage: firefox-3.501:05
BUGabundoPin: origin ppa.launchpad.net01:05
BUGabundoPin-Priority: 45001:05
micahgBUGabundo:01:05
micahgthat should install the one from the repo over the dily01:05
micahgdaily01:05
BUGabundoif so YAY01:06
ftaasac, it's no longer needed01:06
BUGabundothat what I want!01:06
micahgwell, I upgraded to 3.5 and it's not offering 3.5.1 dailies01:06
asacfta: what?01:06
micahgbut I get updates to everything else in dailies01:06
fta<asac> it prevents me from pulling the fakerrot from fta ppa01:06
asacoh good01:06
BUGabundomicahg: slow PPA builders01:06
asacwas it he library path?01:06
asacfta: did you remove it from ppa?01:06
BUGabundomicahg: fixed now01:06
micahgit worked?01:07
ftaasac, yes01:07
asacBUGabundo: why dont you want dailies?01:07
micahgBUGabundo: I don't want the 3.5 dailies :)01:07
asacBUGabundo: at least add the -security ppa then01:07
asacoh wait. that will break your pinning ;)01:07
asaclol01:07
BUGabundomicahg: haven't checked yet01:07
BUGabundoasac: (01:00:11 AM) freenode: 3g bw! (01:00:21 AM) freenode: I don't use 3.5 anymore, but like to keep it01:08
BUGabundoI use 3.6 and chromium any way01:08
BUGabundomicahg: $ sudo aptitude update E: Invalid record in the preferences file, no Package header01:10
micahgcan you post your preferences file to past.ubuntu01:11
micahg*paste01:11
BUGabundomicahg: nevermind01:11
micahgah01:11
BUGabundoI was being sooooooooooooooo dense01:11
BUGabundowon't even tell you what I did wrong01:11
asacsave01:11
BUGabundodon't want to have you laught all night along on my account01:11
BUGabundoasac: nope! worse01:11
asacworse than not saving is only not writing01:14
asacso most likely on a wrong pc ;)01:14
asacin a ssh shell ;)01:14
fta<asac> Pin: origin ubuntu.intergenia.de <= does it work?01:14
asacfta: yes01:14
ftai thought is was more like Pin: release o=LP-PPA-ubuntu-mozilla-daily01:15
asacat least for fakeroot it worked bak a few days01:15
asacfta: maybe thats a different format ... origin is just stupid by hostname01:15
BUGabundoasac: or writing the wrong stuff and not read it01:15
asaci wasnt capable to figure something more enhanced ;)01:15
asaci was happy when i could continue working ;)01:15
micahgfta: there are multiple ways to pin, as the perl mongers say TMTOWTDI01:16
ftafor me, origin means the Origin field, as in http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mozilla-daily/ppa/ubuntu/dists/karmic/Release01:16
micahgfta: run apt-cache policy01:17
fta 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net karmic/main Packages01:17
fta     release v=9.10,o=LP-PPA-chromium-daily,a=karmic,l=Ubuntu,c=main01:17
fta     origin ppa.launchpad.net01:17
micahgthere you go :)01:17
ftabut origin ppa.launchpad.net is not enough, i have several ppas01:18
BUGabundo$ apt-cache policy firefox-3.5 | pastebinit01:18
BUGabundohttp://paste.ubuntu.com/211609/01:18
micahgtrue, you can pin multiple items at once if you want01:18
micahgbut for me, pinning ppa.lp.net works great01:18
micahgI only want to override official archives for a few things01:18
BUGabundoI'll test tomorrow and see if it works01:18
BUGabundo*if* we get a daily for 3.5 eheh01:19
ftaBUGabundo, http://paste.ubuntu.com/211610/01:19
BUGabundoso its pinned01:19
ftamine, yes, not yours01:19
BUGabundowell I already had it !!!01:20
micahghttp://pastebin.com/f69befa2e01:20
BUGabundoit won't downgrade on it self01:20
BUGabundojust not upgrae01:20
BUGabundo_ I hope _01:20
ftawell, it's not pinned, it just prefers universe01:20
asacfta: maybe you need to use something like01:20
micahgBUGabundo: yours will upgrade itself01:20
asacrelease v=*,o=LP-PPP-....,a=karmic,l=Ubuntu,c=*01:20
asace.g all?01:21
asacotherwise i dont know why yours doesnt work01:21
BUGabundo     3.5+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 45001:21
BUGabundo *** 3.5.1~hg20090706r26039+nobinonly-0ubuntu2~umd1 45001:21
asacask mvo tomorrow ;)01:21
BUGabundosomething is not fine here01:21
BUGabundoboth have 450?01:21
ftamine is ok01:21
micahgwhere's the from BUGabundo?01:21
BUGabundomicahg: $ apt-cache policy firefox-3.5 | pastebinit  http://paste.ubuntu.com/211609/01:22
micahgah01:23
micahghmm01:23
micahgmine is 0, but I didn't pin the package01:23
BUGabundook bed time for me! 1:30 am and I'll be up at 7:30 to leave for work01:24
asaccu01:24
* BUGabundo $ do radom_pool (bath;sleep;breakfast;work);01:25
asacsleep is for the weak ;)01:25
BUGabundoI know01:26
BUGabundobut I must01:26
asacme too ;)01:26
BUGabundoI like my pillow01:26
asachehe01:26
BUGabundosure it would be much better if some one else was there with me01:26
asaci usually dont want to sleep, but i always want to sleep longer :)01:26
BUGabundobut... that's next01:26
BUGabundonaa01:26
BUGabundoI'm an easy wake up01:26
BUGabundobut sleep hard01:27
BUGabundo:;)01:27
BUGabundoif that even makes sense after translated01:27
asacfta: is http://paste.ubuntu.com/211620/ better?01:41
asac(thats with .31)01:41
ftayou still have those Slow...01:43
asacanyway openarena works perfect on highest resolution01:44
asac1920*120001:44
asacdoesnt help me with my commercial games though :(01:44
asaclet me start ut200401:45
asacwhich is probably the one with least graphics need01:45
ftafor me, the problem with openarena is the sound :(01:47
asacyeah01:48
asacno good ;)01:48
asacfta: right openarena sound had some strange noise01:48
asacthought that was ok ;)01:48
asachttp://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/07/06/1759225/Examining-the-HTML-5-Video-Codec-Debate?from=rss01:57
asacfta: ^^01:58
ftai mean, i loose sound after a few minutes in o-a02:05
asachmm didnt see that02:07
asaci will play it now and then sleep02:07
asacgood night ;)02:07
asacmay the sound be with me ;)02:07
ftagood night02:10
FFEMTcJasac: what is the daily repo?02:43
jetsaredimFFEMTcJ: in case no one mentioned it already... https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa04:05
gnomefreakanyone know what the name of the text node mouse? it enables you to use mouse in TTY and text mode?05:32
gnomefreakfound it its is called gpm :)05:40
micahgcool05:41
gnomefreakeagles0513875: you needed me for something 12 hours ago or so?05:42
gnomefreakmorning micahg05:42
micahgalmost morning for me :)05:42
gnomefreak:05:43
gnomefreakits 12:24AM here i slept aound an hour05:43
micahg(11:42:18 PM) gnomefreak: morning micahg05:44
gnomefreaksorry 12:4205:44
gnomefreak.:00:44:10:. <      gnomefreak > sorry 12:4205:44
gnomefreakswitching to X i hope05:46
gnomefreakwell that sucks. i fixed X but still have 5 TTY's running05:48
* gnomefreak really hates working on mozilla-devscripts anyone feel like adding and changing some code?05:51
gnomefreakupdates finish i have to restart and fix X again05:52
gnomefreakmicahg: do you use gwibber by chance?06:00
micahgno sorry06:00
gnomefreakmicahg: ah its all good i cant wait for asac in morning06:00
indushi team06:46
indusany ideas why ff 3.5 in repos final still says shiretoko and the menu entry says beta?06:46
micahg1indus: what do you mean menu says beta?07:52
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg
kaushalhi08:13
kaushalwhen is the official release of Firefox 3.5 will be released in Ubuntu Hardy ?08:13
micahgkaushal: you're best shot of getting an answer is probably after noon UTC08:14
stefanlsddoes FF3.5 require xulrunner-1.9.1 ?08:27
micahgyes08:29
indushello ya menu entry mouseover says beta09:53
indusff 3.509:54
indusyesterday evening i got final version but it still says shiretoko09:55
indusbut it took me to the welcome page  ' you have been upgraded to 3.509:56
indusanyone?09:56
=== asac_ is now known as asac
eagles0513875morning asac10:03
eagles0513875the bug i posted someone posted a syslog already ill post the 2 dmesg errors i get10:03
asaceagles0513875: taht doesnt help10:07
asaci mean i dont need syslog from someone who possibly might see a different issue10:07
eagles0513875it needs to be my syslog10:07
asacwell. if its your bug then yes10:07
eagles0513875gotcha will duplicate it a bit later once i finish what im working on at the moment10:07
asaci will ignore the logs from other folks that think thy see the same problem10:07
asack10:08
induscan anyone comment?10:37
indusyesterday evening i got final version ff 3.5  but it still says shiretoko10:37
asacindus: thats all ok10:38
asacno official branding in jaunty10:38
asacwe only brand our default browser officially10:39
asacalso we explicitly want both to be installable side by side10:39
indusasac: ok thank you,but mouse over still says beta10:39
asacand having same branding would be confusing10:39
asacindus: where?10:39
indusasac: in menu10:39
indusapps>internet>shiretoko10:40
indussays beta10:40
asacindus: what does it say exactly?10:40
asacindus: can you file a bug about the beta thing please10:40
asacthanks10:40
asacand give me the bug id ;)10:40
indusaargh iam at work now but iam 99 % sure firefox web browser beta10:40
asack10:41
asacplease file a bug so we can fix and document it (and it doesnt get forgotten)10:41
asacindus: but its the final version10:41
asac;)10:41
asacbe assured10:41
indusasac:yes i know cos i got redirected to page 'congrats etc'10:41
asacgood10:42
indusasac: also,is blue logo(old one ) intentional , and 2nd question10:42
asac11:38 < asac> no official branding in jaunty10:42
asac11:39 < asac> we only brand our default browser officially10:42
asac11:39 < asac> also we explicitly want both to be installable side by side10:42
induswhen ff 3.5 is so much better than 3.0,Why keep 3.0 in jaunty10:42
asacand same branding would make them undistinguishable on your desktop10:43
indusasac: ya that is true10:43
indusasac: maybe have blue logo with a big grin saying its faster and better :)10:43
asacits our promise to not just upgrade to new upstream version in stable updates10:43
asacthere are lots of improvements10:44
asacbut there are surely regressions and some extensions might not be compatible yet etc.10:44
indusasac: ok i guess thats another topic for discussion so ill leave it for now10:44
asacso users that install a stable ubuntu release dont expect that suddenly in the morning stuff starts to break that worked before10:44
indusasac: shall i file the bug in launchpad now?10:44
asacindus: for the "beta" in tooltip, yes.10:44
indusasac: i think ill wait because i didnt restart my PC after that, and the menu entries do misbehave sometimes10:45
asacyeah10:45
indusasac: ill file in evening once i get home and check10:45
asacindus: dont need to wait10:45
asacits a bug10:45
asacjust file it10:46
asacand give us bug id ;)10:46
asaci verified that in code10:46
indusasac: aah cool ok10:46
indusasac: i go file now brb10:46
indusok done10:53
indusasac: #39646010:54
indusasac: please assign to correct package etc iam bad at that still10:55
asacbug #39646010:57
ubottuLaunchpad bug 396460 in firefox "Firefox 3.5 'final' tooltip in menu says beta" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/39646010:57
indusasac: how do i fix this bug10:58
asacindus: no need to i assigned it to me so it will get eventually fixed10:59
indusasac: just want to know the process so i can fix bugs11:00
indusasac:bug  #39646011:00
ubottuLaunchpad bug 396460 in firefox "Firefox 3.5 'final' tooltip in menu says beta" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/39646011:00
indusupdated description11:01
indushmm i did i aswear11:01
indusasac: cant i change the bug description?11:02
indusdont11:04
indusdone11:04
indusok cu laters11:04
asachttp://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/161-FAQ-Why-is-my-firefox-3.5-still-called-Shiretoko.html11:28
kaushalhi again11:39
kaushalreposting my query again11:39
kaushalwhen is the official release of Firefox 3.5 will be released in Ubuntu Hardy ?11:39
asackaushal: there was never a package called firefox-3.5 in hardy11:40
asacadding packages to stable releases is far out of ubuntu policies11:41
asackaushal: if you are asking about where we provide backports, thats not understood yet.11:41
asacfta2: there?11:41
fta2asac, yes11:42
asackaushal: we have 3.5 dailies ... those should be pretty stable11:42
asacfta2: so where can i upload the backports to? do we want to create a subppa for mozillateam? or go to webtech ... or what ;)?11:42
* asac wants to stick his head in the sand :)11:42
kaushalasac: i did not understand about 3.5 dailies11:43
kaushalwhat does that mean ?11:43
asackaushal: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa11:43
asacthats the ppa where you get dailies of firefox 3.511:43
asacnow that 3.5 is final11:43
asacit should be more or less stable11:43
asacbut of course its not _stable_ in the sense that only QAed stuff gets released there11:43
kaushalasac: so it would be backported in hardy about 2-3 weeks11:44
kaushal?11:44
asackaushal: where do you read 2-3 weeks?11:45
kaushalah just a wild guess11:45
asacwell. if we can agree on a place to put that, it can happen withing a few minutes11:45
kaushalcool11:46
asacbut agreeing on a place is kind of hard atm  ;)11:46
kaushal:)11:46
kaushalso fta2 is the final authority :-)11:48
fta2asac, i'm not sure. we need to talk to the lp guys see if we can hae a redirect, then re-organize everything, it's a mess at the moment11:50
asacyeah let me do that now11:50
asacasked11:52
fta2where?11:53
asaci sent some msg11:53
asacfta2: hmm i think hardy apt didnt support redirects11:53
asaclets hope it was fixed in hardy11:53
asaci remember something surrouding hardy11:54
gnomefreakwho knows python tuples? im confused12:14
asacwhat do you wnt to know?12:18
gnomefreaktuples are mutable and immutabple however the values can not be changed at all you would have to change the varible12:19
gnomefreakhow can it be mutable in that case12:19
gnomefreaktuble ecample (missing some chars) fun = happy happy can not be changed you have to change fun to change happy12:21
gnomefreakbtw 3.5 is broken12:30
gnomefreaki take that back ubufox is broken12:33
asacgnomefreak: i have the fix committed for ubufox12:37
asacnext uplaod will fix it12:37
asaccurrent version has maxVCersion 3.012:37
gnomefreakasac: thanks. new max version is? 3.5 or 3.612:41
asacfta2: are you ok with me uploading devscripts to debian and keeping ubuntu mozillateam as maintaier?12:48
asacor should i create a branch and change maintainer there?12:48
asac(we probably would need to have ubuntuX version then etc.)12:48
asacfta2: you want anything in 0.13 still?12:50
asacfta2: otherwise i would upload that to debian now i guess12:50
gnomefreakok what the hell was that12:51
* gnomefreak thinks of installing something else :( gdm restarted while i was checking email :(12:51
asacgnomefreak: thats a bug happeneing when you dist-upgrade12:52
asacgnomefreak: there was a mail about that yesterday12:52
asacthat you made fun off12:52
asacremember ;)?12:52
gnomefreaki wwasnt running updates12:52
asacmaybe you have automatic updates enabled?12:52
gnomefreaki made fun of it?12:52
asacotherwise something crashed ;)12:52
gnomefreaknope not me12:52
gnomefreakgdm crashed is my best guess12:53
asac19:41 < gnomefreak> lol @ next gdm will break system. mines already frigging broke12:53
asac19:42 < gnomefreak> what could happen to it now12:53
gnomefreakall i did was hit enter while writing email12:53
gnomefreakok i remember that i guess i found out what else could happen12:53
gnomefreaksadly pitti said we cant fix it12:54
gnomefreakim guessing Xubuntu is broken as well since it uses gdm12:54
gnomefreakls /var/crash12:54
gnomefreakdamn12:55
gnomefreaknoting in /var/crash12:55
asacgnomefreak: he said you should go to terminal12:55
asacand update12:55
asacthere12:55
asacthen all is fine12:55
gnomefreaki tlaked to pitti last night about gdm12:55
gnomefreakasac: i already have ubuntu312:55
asacthen all is good12:56
gnomefreakim still missing the open apps in lower panel system beep sound ect...12:56
asacwell. i have lots of sound nowadays12:57
asacseems libcanberra took over the world ;)12:57
asacnow i get annoying errors sometimes like in old windows days ;)12:57
asac*boing* boing boing12:57
gnomefreak:)12:58
gnomefreaki hate the new sign in crap when gnome loads12:58
gnomefreakand it wont save it (only error i get)12:58
gnomefreakdoing updates again to see if maybe there is a ubuntu612:59
gnomefreakubuntu4 even12:59
gnomefreakyep another gdm update12:59
gnomefreakand libcanberra updates13:00
kaushalasac: i would be eagerly waiting for Firefox 3.5 in Hardy for another 2 or 3 days13:01
kaushal:)13:01
kaushalsince Firefox 3.5 is very fast13:01
gnomefreakthanks for reminding me. that is the email i was writing when gdm died13:02
asackaushal: so the dailies are no option for you to get it now?13:02
gnomefreakasac: how about we move 3.5 to mozilla PPA for hardy -> intrepid since 3.5 is in jaunty already.13:02
gnomefreakasac: dailys have 3.5.113:02
kaushalasac: you said its not recommended13:02
gnomefreaki dont think 3.5 is there anymore13:03
asackaushal: yeah. maybe you are right. if you look for LTS experience, its probably not the right choice ;)13:03
* gnomefreak guesses i dont have to comment on that bug :) thanks13:03
asacwe are probably too bleeding edge in this team ;)13:03
asacmost run 3.6 (trunk) daily here ... and it usually doesnt break for me13:04
kaushalasac: Let me know when it is ready in Hardy :)13:04
gnomefreakasac: if i get time i will spin them for stable PPA but i want to get on SM2 and m-d13:04
asacfta2: bug 396488 came out of it13:04
ubottuLaunchpad bug 396488 in soyuz "support mirroring PPAs" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/39648813:04
asacfta2: as a mid-long term solution13:04
gnomefreakoh yeah13:04
gnomefreakgood i dont have to worry about it than :)13:05
* asac prods to get medium importance at least13:05
gnomefreakkaushal: please telll me you are Heinz13:06
gnomefreakasac: did you push final 3.5 to Jaunty?13:07
gnomefreak!info firefox-3.5 jaunty13:08
ubottufirefox-3.5 (source: firefox-3.5): safe and easy web browser from Mozilla. In component universe, is optional. Version 3.5+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 (jaunty), package size 907 kB, installed size 3524 kB13:08
asacgnomefreak: yes13:09
gnomefreaki just read it was b4 but as you see above its final :) so i let them know13:10
gnomefreakah revo434 is why they may thinks its still beta13:12
stefanlsdasac: when we uploaded gears, you mentioned we should build it against xulrunner-dev and not xulrunner-1.9.1-dev.  For FF 3.5, looks like we need 1.9.1, ok that we build against xulrunner-1.9.1-dev?13:16
gnomefreakwe kind of have to13:16
gnomefreakatleast for Karmic13:17
gnomefreakis gears working now?13:17
stefanlsdmm. oki. will do that for now13:18
asacstefanlsd: so the .xpi doesnt work with 3.5?13:20
asacwhat are they doing different during build?13:20
kaushalgnomefreak: what does that mean ?13:21
stefanlsdasac: xpi doesnt work with 3.5.   there is some new code upstream in svn that makes it work.   so i was going to update version. not sure what they are doing different. i know gecko 1.9.1 is there...13:21
gnomefreakasac: are you planning on playing with m-d again (after adding yourself as uploader13:21
gnomefreak)13:21
asacstefanlsd: can you find the code that makes it work?13:22
asacgnomefreak: i am planning to upload it to debian13:22
asac(for quite some time)13:22
asacdebian bug 52822513:22
ubottuDebian bug 528225 in wnpp "RFP: mozilla-devscripts" [Wishlist,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/52822513:22
asacerr13:23
stefanlsdasac: i could get a diff between the svn versions, but i suspect its lots of changes13:23
asacif i go there the bug title is different13:23
asacisnt it?13:23
asacstefanlsd: so the branch now doesnt support 3.0 at all13:23
asac?13:23
asacor are there some build mechanisms that make it work if build for 3.0?13:24
gnomefreakstefanlsd: try adding 3.5 to install.rdf see if you can bypass the xulrunner-dev13:25
gnomefreak!info flashplugin-installer jaunty13:25
fta2asac, feel free to upload m-d to debian13:25
ubottuflashplugin-installer (source: flashplugin-nonfree): Adobe Flash Player plugin installer. In component multiverse, is optional. Version 10.0.22.87ubuntu2 (jaunty), package size 18 kB, installed size 176 kB (Only available for i386 amd64 lpia)13:25
stefanlsdgnomefreak: that doesnt work.13:29
stefanlsdasac: im checking if the 1.9.1 xpi works on 3.013:29
stefanlsdseems like it doesnt tho...13:30
asacstefanlsd: that wont work i am sure13:30
asacyeah13:30
asacthe glue is not backwrard compatible13:30
asacbut the 3.0 glue should work with 3.513:30
asacthats why i am curious what was changed13:30
asacmost things can be done in a way that they work on both13:30
asace.g. like different chrome13:30
asacstefanlsd: what happens if you try 1.9.0 xpi in 3.5?13:31
stefanlsdasac: http://code.google.com/p/gears/source/detail?r=3369    - that the diff where they 'added' 3.5 support13:31
fta2asac, why mirror instead of redirect?13:33
asacfta2: because mirror is easier to do in lp13:33
asacjust a link13:33
asacon filesystem13:33
gnomefreakanyone using 3.0.11 can you please let me know if you see the pics on this site http://www.ortuzek.hu/ajanlo13:33
stefanlsd7113:33
stefanlsd 13:33
stefanlsd -13:33
stefanlsd 13:33
stefanlsd 13:33
stefanlsd         <em:maxVersion>3.0.*</em:maxVersion>13:33
stefanlsd 13:33
asacfta2: also apt doesnt support redirects until _jaunty_13:33
stefanlsd 13:33
stefanlsd 13:34
asacdidnt13:34
stefanlsd 13:34
stefanlsd 13:34
asacstefanlsd: whats that?13:34
stefanlsd 13:34
stefanlsd 13:34
asaci cant read what you write ;)13:34
stefanlsd 13:34
stefanlsd 7113:34
stefanlsd +13:34
gnomefreakstefanlsd: change maxversion to use 3.513:34
stefanlsd 13:34
stefanlsd 13:34
stefanlsd 13:34
stefanlsd 13:34
stefanlsd         <em:maxVersion>3.5</em:maxVersion>13:34
stefanlsdbleh. ooops. sorry13:34
stefanlsdthey break it themself in the install.rdf13:34
gnomefreakasac: looks like maxversion from install.rdf13:34
asacplease PASTE :-P13:34
asacgnomefreak: thtas not the  problem13:34
gnomefreakpastebin it13:34
asacthe problem is that they just exit13:34
stefanlsdnodnod13:34
asacstefanlsd: can you try to /trunk/gears/base/firefox/module.cc13:35
asacchange that so it accepts both: 3.5, 3.013:35
gnomefreakasac: thanks for tbird fix13:35
asacstefanlsd: e.g. not the #iof else things13:35
asacstefanlsd: then build for 3.013:35
asaci would think it should work after fixing install.rdf maxversion13:35
asacwith that change13:35
stefanlsdasac: ok. will give it a shot13:36
asacat least if that commit is really the only commit they needed13:36
* gnomefreak smoke13:45
asacfta2: want me to sponsor or own this upload?13:49
fta2asac, well, sponsor if possible. i guess you need nothing from me, right?13:50
gnomefreakasac: did you want me to push sm changes to mozilla...dev branch or will you grab it from my branch than merge. Also did you want me to spin for jaunty and below?13:52
asacfta2: need?13:52
asacgnomefreak: i will merge it before upload13:53
fta2asac, i mean, everything is in the branch, no need for me to give you a debdiff/diff.gz or whatever13:53
asacfta2: no. i can just upload whats in the branch. i closed the branch now, maybe check13:54
gnomefreakasac: fta2 what are the chances or just changing the location link in m-d to grab 2.0 instead of 2.1?13:55
asacoh wait13:55
asacyour uploaders mail should be the one you use for changelog13:55
asacdone13:56
asacrev 20113:57
asac20213:58
asacfta2: please check. the bits are ready for upload otherwise13:59
asacok out for a few minutes13:59
gnomefreakin seamonkei-2.0.conf http://pastebin.mozilla.org/661268 changing http://hg.mozilla.org/index.cgi/comm-central/log 2 to new location for 2.014:00
gnomefreakseamonkey-2.0.conf14:00
bdrungasac: is there any bugreport for firefox-3.5 incompatible plugins?14:03
fta2asac, looks ok14:05
gnomefreakstefanlsd: is that latest version of gears?14:05
gnomefreakthat maybe wrong thing to change it looks fairly generic14:05
stefanlsdgnomefreak: yeah. thats pretty much the tip14:06
gnomefreaki dont get it. it looks like it should grab 2.0 not 2.114:06
gnomefreakstefanlsd: just checking14:06
gnomefreaki dont think mozilla can help me with this file :( fta2 do you see anything in the pastebin that catches your eye on why 2.1 is being grabed and not 2.0?14:08
gnomefreakthat is the meat of the file the rest is just comments14:08
gnomefreakmozclient.pl doesnt have anything of use so it has to be the .conf file that needs updating14:11
asacfta2: uploaded14:12
asachttp://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html14:12
asacwith some luck there will be a batch soon14:13
asac;)14:13
gnomefreakeverything looks right damnit14:13
asacbdrung: i think we shouldnt rely on bug reports. instead we should make a table on the wiki were we verify them ;)14:13
asacat least i am likely to miss those reports ;)14:14
gnomefreakasac: btw flashgot is done ready for review14:15
gnomefreakok rules looks good to damnit14:15
bdrungasac: before we start updating all those plugins, it would be good if mozilla-devscripts can automatically detect the supported versions.14:19
fta2gnomefreak, they reorganized their stuff upstream. just had a quick glance, it seems sm is still in comm-central (meaning no release branch) but it's now possible to build it with mozilla-central (to create sm 2.1a1pre) or mozilla-1.9.1 (to create sm 2.0b1pre)14:21
gnomefreakfta2: how would i build it from 2.114:22
fta2not sure yet, and I don't really have time right now, i'm at work14:23
gnomefreakjust changing version of tarball wont help im sure14:23
fta2no14:23
gnomefreakfta2: thats fine thanks for looking14:23
gnomefreakwhere did i come up with b3 :( goes looking14:24
asacbdrung: thats extensions then (not plugins)14:28
asacbdrung: yes. and we also should do some improvements wrt to where we install them etc.14:28
asacalso considering the targetApplications etc.14:28
asacwe had some discussion with the debian ext team about that14:28
asacstay tuned14:28
* gnomefreak likes the idea14:30
asacbdrung: so ... the new policy is to install extensions in /usr/share/extension-package-name14:30
bdrunggood to know.14:30
asacand create links to: /usr/share/mozilla/${APPID}/${extension-uuid}14:30
asacwe should make mozilla-devscript do all that automagically14:30
* gnomefreak liking this more nad more14:31
asace.g. parse install.rdf for the extension-uuid ... then parse changelog for all targetapplications and create those links14:31
bdrungautomagically... nice word14:31
gnomefreakasac: for some reason i am remembering some dont have uuid14:31
asacall have uuid14:31
bdrungparse changelog for targetapplications? why not install.rdf?14:31
asaccan be either {UUID-...} format or app@domain.tld ;)14:31
asacbdrung: did i say changelog? installrdf is what i ment14:32
gnomefreakyeah14:32
asac(obviously)14:32
asacif its a native extension it should go to /usr/lib/extension-package-name and /usr/lib/mozilla/${APPID}/${extension-uuid}14:33
fta2asac, NEWed14:38
asacfta2: NEWed? you mean they already processed it;)?14:39
asacor that its in NEW ;)?14:39
asachttp://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html14:39
asacnot yet visible there.14:39
asacguess needs a batch or something14:39
fta2well, i received a NEW mail14:40
asacyeah14:40
asacthe page above is the new queue14:40
asacwhich is pretty digested as it seems ;)14:40
asaci think they do it in 2monthly batches ;)14:40
asacso with some luck they process it in a week ;)14:40
bdrungwith some luck the package passes NEW before Ubuntu 10.04 ;)14:42
asacnah ;)14:44
bdrungmy packages waiting there since 3 weeks14:46
asacthat means that you now have to wait 3 weeks less ;)14:47
gnomefreakand 3 months more ;)14:48
bdrungthe trembe had an end. the packages were also uploaded to ubuntu directly.14:52
bdrungi have to install ubuntu now14:53
fta2lol, http://home.kairo.at/blog/2009-06/weekly_status_report_w26_2009 (the last part)15:07
asacheh15:09
asacyeah15:09
gnomefreakwhen i read that on the mailing list it sounded like a great idea and i stand by that fully15:11
gnomefreakthe browser aspect is the only think i am worried about15:14
gnomefreaktbirtbird3 doesnt have the names of the person writing the email ( i loved that feature15:15
gnomefreak)15:15
gnomefreakis PA still being used?15:19
* gnomefreak just got the new email for m-d15:21
fta2asac, moved the bot at 170015:26
asacnice15:27
asaci think we could also build at lunchtime15:27
asacat least if we need another respin there wouldnt be build still queued ;)15:27
asacwhich might feel a bit rouge to others waiting for their builds ;)15:27
eagles0513875asac: getting syslog now for ya15:28
asaci lost context15:28
asac;)15:28
eagles0513875thanks for your patience with me bro15:28
gnomefreakeagles0513875: did you still need me?15:32
eagles0513875just outa curiosity for jaunty were any patches applied to plasma-widget-networkmanager to fix the wpa connection issue that jaunty had15:32
gnomefreakthats not the same as networkmanager is it? this one is built by KDE guys i thought15:34
eagles0513875the plasma-widget-network-manager that is the one built by kde guys15:36
eagles0513875cuz i think there might be a regression but im not sure if any patches were applied to fix the wpa issue that was in jaunty cuz its resurfaced again for me in karmic with a later svn snapshot15:36
asaceagles0513875: i dont see anything related in the last few uploads: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-widget-network-manager/15:37
eagles0513875asac: the issue was after jaunty was released15:37
eagles0513875regarding wpa connection issues15:37
asacyes i remembered15:38
gnomefreakwell thats a shitty regression15:38
asacgnomefreak: wpa being broken? ;)15:38
eagles0513875ya it is15:39
eagles0513875cuz im able to connect with wicd as well as the gnome network manager15:39
gnomefreakasac: yeah15:39
gnomefreaki just lost my fucking tbird profile :(15:39
eagles0513875im gonna get a syslog as well as the 2 dmesg messages that might hint on the issue15:39
eagles0513875:(15:39
asaceagles0513875: do you know where plasma saves the connection information?15:39
eagles0513875kwallet15:40
eagles0513875at least the password15:40
asaceagles0513875: not the password15:40
asacthe rest15:40
asac;)15:40
eagles0513875no i do not15:41
eagles0513875let me get ya syslog and the 2 messages thta might be of use from dmesg15:41
eagles0513875asac: you want me to paste whole thing or last chunk where wifi issues start surfacing15:50
* asac has to log out because he lost his window decorations ;)15:52
asaceagles0513875: i dont know. i would really suggest to file the bug upstream and catch with them15:55
eagles0513875asac: whats the key commands to copy and paste over ssh using nano15:55
asacNM has changed its passphrase approach a bit, so maybe thats causing the problems now15:55
eagles0513875now the 2 messages arent showing up in dmesg either15:55
asac(though i am not even sure i already uploaded that to karmic)15:55
asaci dont know nana15:55
asacnano15:55
eagles0513875what bout with vi15:56
asaci never copied out of an editor15:56
asacuse a terminal15:56
eagles0513875bah im on windows using ssh15:56
asacscp15:56
asacthats a terminal then15:56
eagles0513875but im having trouble copying whats in the syslog#15:57
asaci havent used windows so long that i cant remember ... isnt there a sftp tool?15:57
eagles0513875humm ok16:01
eagles0513875viva kate16:03
gnomefreaki would use pastebinit not sure if you can from ssh though16:03
eagles0513875i need to save the file anyway to upload it to launchpad16:04
gnomefreaksaves alot of copy+paste16:04
gnomefreakoh to Lp i thought paste bin16:04
eagles0513875im saving the file to this desktop from the laptop using samba16:04
eagles0513875nooo16:04
eagles0513875https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-widget-network-manager/+bug/39618016:04
ubottuUbuntu bug 396180 in plasma-widget-network-manager "plasma-widget-network-manager regression with connectiong to wpa connections" [High,Confirmed]16:04
gnomefreakyay now i have nightlies for ubuntuone16:04
eagles0513875grats16:04
gnomefreakthanks :)16:04
gnomefreaki am thinking about reinstalling Karmic maybe it will fix my lower panel bug16:05
eagles0513875need to try my luck at packaging with kvirc svn snapshot16:05
eagles0513875from what i have been hearing that the live cd isnt working16:06
gnomefreakeagles0513875: i heard same but its on 64 bit that i heard16:06
eagles0513875i normally use 64bit but i upgraded from jaunty16:06
eagles0513875asac: putting up syslog now16:07
gnomefreakoh damn yay mounting is working again16:07
eagles0513875asac: syslog is up if you give me the go ahead ill file it upstream :)16:08
eagles0513875feel free to take a look as well gnomefreak16:09
gnomefreakfast-user-switch-applet: Depends: gdm but it is not going to be installed  wtf is apt talking about16:09
eagles0513875asac: just realized somethign we need someone on 32bit to see if the same issue exists on 32bit with trying to connect to wpa16:09
gnomefreakfast-user-switch-applet: Depends: gdm but it is not going to be installed16:10
gnomefreakopps16:10
* eagles0513875 think apt = on crack :P16:10
gnomefreakgdm:16:10
gnomefreak  Installed: 2.26.1-0ubuntu416:10
* gnomefreak wonders if gdm breakage is causing this16:10
eagles0513875woohoo plasma workspace crashed on me while installing wicd16:11
gnomefreakwhere the hell is the login manager now?16:19
gnomefreakto change login screen and options16:19
eagles0513875lol your head must be spinning gnomefreak16:21
gnomefreakeagles0513875: it is, everything is leaving me :( gnome-art used to install it but it doesnt anymore and its not in the admin menu16:22
eagles0513875im no gnome expert16:22
eagles0513875gnomefreak: any advice as to my bug should i just upstream it16:22
gnomefreakeagles0513875: not sure havent looked sorry. also not a newwork guy thank god16:23
eagles0513875lol16:23
eagles0513875its ok16:23
eagles0513875cuz right now its annoying tthough but the older svn snapshot in jaunty works and the current one in karmic is broken16:23
eagles0513875or there was a regression16:23
gnomefreaki might be wrong but karmic isnt using newest svn maybe newest svn would help?16:27
gnomefreakassuming there is one16:28
gnomefreakto do list: fix firegpg, fix m-d, update SM2, build SM2.1, backup everything important, maybe reinstall, find loginmanager. anything im forgetting?16:29
eagles0513875im sure there is for the plasma-widget-network-manager16:29
gnomefreakget someone to review and upload flashgot16:29
eagles0513875gnomefreak: rebuild everything :P16:30
* gnomefreak done with important build (SM1.1.17)16:30
gnomefreakwaiting for a nudge into NEW16:31
* gnomefreak running out of pationce on m-d bull shit16:32
gnomefreaktheres no o in that is there :(16:32
gnomefreakwe should really remove bluetooth crap from default install16:33
gnomefreakits a mem/proc hog even when you dont use it. cant remove it all either16:33
gnomefreakif you want bluetooth install it :)16:34
eagles0513875lol16:34
eagles0513875how big are the packages and dependencies after install though16:34
gnomefreaknot sure but more than i need16:34
eagles0513875i have to be honest even from a kubuntu users stand point such as myself i dont really need bluetooth cuz the laptops i have dont have bluetooth built in16:37
asacgnomefreak: we want to extend our bluetooth features actually16:40
eagles0513875asac: i uploaded the sys log and am waiting for further advice16:41
gnomefreakasac: extend it by making a meta package :) there is no way to get rid of bluetooth packages without removing other kind of important packages16:44
gnomefreaksome you can remove16:44
eagles0513875asac: i think though it shouldnt be installed by default unless for instance it finds a blue tooth card in lets say a laptop cuz for me in certain cases both the laptops i have dont have bluetooth built in16:45
gnomefreakhm that is odd16:46
eagles0513875what is gnomefreak16:46
* gnomefreak can package rsync but i still cant figure out how the hell to use it for simple actions like downloading and updating downloads16:47
asaci think the solution is to start bluetoothd through udev16:47
asacwhich afaik is currently planned16:47
asacso its installed, but wont be running if you dont have bt devices16:47
gnomefreakeagles0513875: i typed something andf it didnt show up or error command in status window16:47
eagles0513875:)16:47
eagles0513875hehe16:47
gnomefreakasac: that is much nicer :)16:47
gnomefreaki have it disabled in start up however it still runs16:48
eagles0513875hehe16:49
eagles0513875asac: im gonna go ahead and upstream the bug :)16:49
gnomefreaki guess im going to cook and eat lunch now since i have time to waste while tar is going it only has 3 gigs or so to compress16:49
eagles0513875nice gnome16:50
eagles0513875wish i could help ya out on this monster of a win machine im on16:50
fta2asac, https://edge.launchpad.net/builders/ :(16:51
asaceagles0513875: i uploaded a new snapshot to the NM ppa16:53
asacyou can try it once its built16:54
eagles0513875ok keep me posted plz :)16:54
eagles0513875asac: also running the git source of lmms which seems to not be starting it core keeps dumping16:55
fta2"once its built", lol, 6 hours16:56
fta2or more, at this rate16:56
asaceagles0513875: no ... you try once the built has finished16:56
asaci cannot really keep you updated all the time16:56
asachttp://launchpad.net/~network-manager/+archive16:56
eagles0513875ok ty16:56
asacthats where the build will become available16:56
asachttp://launchpad.net/builders16:57
asachuge backlog16:57
asacso will take half of a day i guess16:57
eagles0513875ok16:57
eagles0513875i have a solution while i wait to get wifi to work16:57
asachttp://identi.ca/notice/616098217:01
asacdtchen: ^^17:01
asacfta2: ^^17:01
asacdtchen: unping17:01
asaceagles0513875: sudo apt-get install build-essential fakeroot devscripts; sudo apt-get build-dep plasma-widget-network-manager; dget https://edge.launchpad.net/~network-manager/+archive/ppa/+files/plasma-widget-network-manager_0.0+svn992686~asac-0ubuntu1~nm1.dsc; dpkg-source -x p*.dsc; cd pla*-*/; dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b17:03
asaccd ..17:03
asacsudo dpkg -i *.deb17:03
asacto build it on your own and install it17:03
eagles0513875?17:03
asacgo in a empty directory first ;)17:03
eagles0513875hehe you lost me there for a sec lol17:03
asacits just copy paste17:04
eagles0513875asac: to install the widget form source all that wright17:04
asacyeah17:04
fta2asac, i know, i graph them17:05
fta2asac, http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/ppa-builders.png17:05
eagles0513875ty asac17:06
* fta2 should use R17:06
asacfta2: you also need a  queue/builders line17:07
fta2i have it in another graph17:09
fta2but i'm tired of manually generating them, hence R17:10
fta2there was a talk at UDS, remember?17:10
asacabout builders metrics?17:10
fta2no, statistical data analysis, or something like that17:17
asaci guess it will fail17:18
asacbummer i hat kde build systems ;)17:18
fta2asac, http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/ppa-builders2.png17:25
asacseems a few have really replied to my FAQ about branding explaining to me why its not yet branded ;)18:05
LokiHey, I had a quick question, I uninstalled the 3.5.1 package from the PPA, but for some reason when I load the applcation I get a blank X window and it isn't loading for some reason18:15
asacLoki: you uninstalled?18:22
asacor downgraded?18:22
Lokiapplication*18:22
asaci dont get your question, sorry. maybe rephrase18:23
LokiOkay, I will rephrase it. I am installing FF 3.5.1 from the ppa to replace/supplement the main install of 3.0, and for some reason when I try to open the 3.5 installation I get a blank X window18:24
Lokiand not a browser window, so I am confused on why, and was hoping for ideas18:25
asacLoki: try with a fresh profile first18:26
asace.g. move $HOME/.mozilla directory to a save place18:26
asacand start18:26
Lokidid that18:26
asacensure that no firefox 3.5 is running18:26
Lokistill did the same issue18:26
LokiAlright let me make sure no others are running18:26
asacstart it using strace -f -eopen firefox-3.5 2>&1  > /tmp/ffox.log.txt and post that log file after reproducing18:26
asacLoki: yeah. first check that nothing is runing18:27
asacthen move your .mozilla away and try18:27
Lokino other FF-3.5 is running18:27
asacLoki: try to also close the other firefox18:27
asacbefore starting it for first time18:28
Lokiall that was in the txt file was *NOTICE* No previous firefox profile found, starting with a fresh one18:30
Lokiand still got a blank X window18:30
asacok18:31
asacLoki: so start it using -safe-moed18:31
asac-safe-mode18:31
asacfirefox-3.5 -safe-mode18:31
asacif that doesnt help, go with plan B i gave you above (strace ...)18:31
LokiThat was with strace18:32
asacLoki: read what i wrote18:32
asacthe whole line18:32
Lokithe log file ONLY had, the profile line in it18:33
asacwell try again then18:34
micahgasac: it turns out the HTML5 video thingy was because of the user agent18:34
asachmm18:35
asacLoki: the command was wrong18:35
asacLoki: try &> /tmp/...18:35
asacinstead of the whole 2>&1 thing18:35
Lokiasac: pastebinning it18:39
Lokihttp://pastebin.com/d1493c72618:46
asacLoki: cant see something obvious.  maybe with -eopen gives more hints if you can get that paste binned18:54
Lokiasac: http://pastebin.com/d5e0fa3ca19:00
NCommanderasac, ping?19:15
NCommanderor fta ping19:17
Lokiasac: it is only 2 lines differnce, but seems to be the same19:17
NCommanderI have a changeset for icedove to fix it on armel (merge of ubuntu patches, it works)19:17
debfxis it a known bug that it's not possible to select the default theme in ff 3.5?19:21
Lokidebfx: do you think that is the issue in my case?19:23
asacLoki: withjout -eopen it should be really a lot of more lines19:24
asaclike 10 times as much19:24
asacdebfx: no thats not known. i am using the default theme for instance19:25
asacNCommander: whats up?19:25
debfxLoki: no, that's unrelated to your issue19:25
NCommanderasac, its the same changes we made for TB2 in Ubuntu for icedove19:25
debfxasac: when you install another theme, it's not possible to switch back to default19:26
asaci know19:26
Lokiasac: ah one moment19:26
NCommanderasac, I'm uploading a branch to LP, and submitting a merge proposal, care to look it over? :-)19:26
NCommanderasac, (I can also upload to Debian if you wish ...)19:26
asacdebfx: works for me19:27
asacinstalled macOSX theme19:27
asac(the one suggested when i search for "theme" in the addons -> get extensions tab19:27
asac)19:27
asacNCommander: no just the branch is what we want19:27
asacNCommander: use the version you prepare in the branch name ;)19:27
asacbut what am i telling you that ;)19:27
* NCommander kicks his ARM box19:28
NCommanderUgh, its like its having a mini-seizure :-/19:28
Lokiasac: http://colobus.isomerica.net/~loki/ff.txt pastebin crashed when i pasted it19:33
ftaasac, i guess you're aware of FIREFOX_3_0_12_BUILD119:45
debfxasac: I tested it on jaunty and karmic, maybe related to kde?19:49
asacfta: yes19:51
asacdebfx: i have no ideas based on this. i would suggest that you file a bug using ubuntu-bug firefox-3.5 command19:56
asacand then wait19:56
asacLoki: ^^19:56
asacdebfx: could be KDE .. but more likely related to some other extension/theme you have installed19:56
asacLoki: most likely we will get more bugs oin this19:57
asacLoki: do you have network? e.g. a "lo" device at least?19:57
debfxtested it on a fresh profile19:57
asacwhy is your host named like it is (karma...)19:57
asacdebfx: did you try a different theme at least19:58
asaci mean it could be the theme that you use that borks this19:58
Lokiasac: yes, i have eth0, lo, sixxs19:59
debfxasac: yeah I used different themes, on a fresh profile it doesn't even show the Theme tab in the add-ons window19:59
Lokiasac: and karma is the server name, and local.wolfnix.net is the domain I have established off of mine for my home network19:59
asacLoki: thought you only get white window20:00
Lokiasac: I do.20:00
asacLoki: how can you navigate to any site20:00
Lokiasac: firefox 3.0, and another install of a browser20:00
asacLoki: but you start with a fresh profile20:01
Lokiasac: yes20:01
asacthere is no reason why firefox-3.5 would go to a site if you start with a fresh profile20:01
LokiIt didn't go to a site?20:01
Lokikarma, is my hostname20:01
asacso you automatically update your name through dns?20:02
Loki6 Townsend West20:02
Lokiwhat do you mean?20:03
asacyeah. so file a bug using ubuntu-bug firefox-3.5 command and let me think. maybe i get an idea when i next look at it.20:04
asacits odd ... dont see any obvious20:04
asaccould be that you have a bad driver20:04
asacbut thats unlikely - even though we had really weird bugs20:05
LokiDoes it matter I had 3.5b4 installed before this?20:05
asacno20:05
asacshouldnt20:05
asacit might matter if you tried to install manually something at some point20:05
asacbut i dont think thats the case for you now20:05
LokiNope, it isn't20:05
LokiFor browsers o dpm20:05
asacmaybe you also dont have xulrunner-1.9.1 updated to latests?20:06
LokiI don't install by hand20:06
asaccheck which version you got from it20:06
asacseems to be ok though20:06
asacthats why its odd20:07
Lokiii  xulrunner-1.9.1                        1.9.1.1~hg20090706r26039+nobinonly-0ub XUL + XPCOM application runner20:07
Lokiii  firefox-3.5                            3.5.1~hg20090706r26039+nobinonly-0ubun safe and easy web browser from Mozilla20:08
asacwhen was the last build that worked?20:09
Loki3.5~b4~hg20090330r24021+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 (/var/lib/apt/lists/us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_jaunty_universe_binary-i386_Packages)20:10
asacLoki: you directly upgraded to ppa?20:10
asacLoki: does downgrading fix it? (both packages=20:10
LokiNo upgraded to ubuntu's 3.5+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.120:10
LokiThat is when i started to get the errors, and then switched to the PPA to try to fix it, still got the same issues20:11
LokiHow do I specifcally install 3.5~b4?20:12
asacLoki: apt-get install packagename=package-version packagename2=package-version2 packagename3=package-version320:12
asacthe version is on https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.520:13
asacand20:13
asacthe version is on https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-1.9.120:13
LokiThe following packages have unmet dependencies:20:22
Loki  firefox-3.5: Depends: firefox-3.5-branding but it is not going to be installed or20:22
Loki                        abrowser-3.5-branding but it is not going to be installed20:22
NCommanderasac, merge request filed20:22
NCommander(LP was being slow)20:23
Lokifix installing.20:23
LokiWTF20:23
Lokiasac: the downgraded verison did work20:25
asacthat sounds scary20:26
LokiI have a question20:27
LokiI moved my .mozilla to .mozilla.backup20:27
LokiWHY is it loading it?20:27
NCommanderasac, https://code.launchpad.net/~mcasadevall/thunderbird/icedove-2.0.0.22-2/+merge/8334 - whenever you get a chance, no rush20:28
asacsure20:29
Lokiasac: why is it loading a mozilla.backup20:32
Loki:|}20:32
Loki:|20:32
LokiBecause once i moved it FROM .backup20:32
Lokiit worked...20:32
asacheh20:33
asacso it was profile?20:33
asaci guess you didnt properly stop a running firefox20:33
asacthats still my bet20:33
LokiThere was no firefoxs running20:33
Lokifor some reason it was loading a profile from ~/.mozilla.backup/20:34
asacguess a bug in the migration script20:35
asacfta: ^^20:35
Lokiwell after i moved it away from .backup20:35
Lokiit disbaled 3 things20:35
asacmaybe the migrator copies from .backup?20:35
ftaasac, ?20:35
Lokia old xul, firefox3.0 and ubuntu3.0 branding20:35
asacno migrator script is ok20:36
ftait's not looking for ~/.mozilla* but for ~/.mozilla/firefox-3.*20:36
asaci still think you didnt properly stop all processed20:36
asacfta: right20:36
asacfta: i was just told that my card should work with compiz and should be fast ;)20:37
asaclol20:37
LokiWell I moved .mozilla to .mozilla.backup it is beside methat it loaded20:37
=== ripps_ is now known as ripps
asacLoki: yes. but running processes will not see that move20:38
asacas open files keep the same fd if you move on same partition20:38
asacanyway20:38
asacits your profile. some bogus extension20:38
Lokibut there was no processes running, I made sure o.o20:38
LokiAnyways, it is working now20:39
Lokiand whats odd asac, is i copied the profile back, after stopping all of the processes, it ran fine20:41
Loki:|20:41
LokiAnyways, it works now ^^ which is good.20:41
gnomefreakthis is really turning into a frigging nightmare20:42
asacgnomefreak: dont be desparate20:43
asacall will be fine ;)20:43
gnomefreakthis is _not_ funny damnit20:45
micahgwhat's wrong gnomefreak?20:45
gnomefreakso not funny. asac fix this shit20:45
gnomefreakmicahg: gdm crashed while copying over an .iso and a 2gig backup when i hit enter after typing in here20:46
* gnomefreak really tired of this20:46
micahgugh20:46
micahgon Karmic or Jaunty?20:46
gnomefreakkarmic20:46
micahgoh20:47
micahghow many projects is asac trying to maintain?20:47
gnomefreakonce copied over im booting jaunty and burning to dvd the 2gig backup and the 4gig music20:47
gnomefreakmicahg: firefox* tbird*20:47
gnomefreakn-m and im sure a few other things20:47
gnomefreakhe needs to fix my gdm20:47
gnomefreakcant but still needs too :)20:48
gnomefreakubufox he maintains as well (i would love to take that off his hands it seems fairly easy to maintain)20:50
micahgspeaking of ubufox...20:51
gnomefreakwhat about it?20:51
micahgasac: is there going to be an ubufox upgrade for 3.5?20:52
gnomefreakalready done20:52
micahgI've been without ubufix for months20:52
micahg*ubufox20:52
gnomefreakit has been fixed im guessing just waiting for upload20:52
micahgI thought he fished it20:52
gnomefreakwe talked about that 10 or so hours ago :)20:52
micahg*finished it20:52
* micahg was sleeping 10 hours ago20:53
gnomefreakasac: FFEMTcJ once 3.0 is removed from Karmic how about pushing 3.6 like we did with 3.5 in Jaunty20:53
gnomefreakwtf is that20:53
gnomefreakfta2: ^^^20:53
gnomefreaksorry FFEMTcJ20:53
micahg3.0 is being removed from karmic?20:54
gnomefreakanyone seen reed lately?20:54
gnomefreakmicahg: yep20:54
micahgI guess it makes sense20:54
micahgit will be EOL before karmic is20:54
gnomefreakblueprint is done and assigned as i revall just waiting for it to happen20:54
micahgI'm assuming 3.5 will move to main as well20:54
gnomefreakyes20:54
gnomefreakit will be default browser20:55
gnomefreakwhen i left a month ago we had ~15 or so people in this channel. i come back and we have ~44 people what did i miss some kind of free money?20:56
* gnomefreak could really speak to reed, but it will wait20:57
* gnomefreak smoke and pray this finishes before next gdm crash be back20:59
micahggnomefreak: why not run Jaunty and Karmic in a VM ffor testing21:00
gnomefreakmicahg: that would make sense and fix my gdm issues. i like the hard way i guess :)21:05
* gnomefreak needs to learn how to do 2 thinkgs with rsync one of these days21:05
* micahg is afraid to run +1 until beta21:05
micahgin production21:05
gnomefreaki have 5 installs of Ubuntu on 4 boxes i can afford to run testing on one of them :)21:06
micahgsure, as long as you don't care what happens to the box :)21:07
gnomefreaknto really this box is mainly for packaging and testing anything important is used on a stable box. hell i still have feisty on one and breezy on one21:08
gnomefreakmy laptop cant run anything newer than feisty on it, its older than dirt21:10
micahgreally?21:10
micahg10+ years?21:10
gnomefreakyep its a p1 200mhz 128 ram21:10
micahgugh21:11
gnomefreakyes its like a 95 give or take a year21:11
gnomefreakit has a 40gig HD in it :)21:11
micahgyou could probably runny debian lenny with blackbox or something21:11
micahgsome real light weight window manager21:11
gnomefreakyeah but honestly its not worth it. i have it only for trilug meetings21:12
gnomefreaki had fluxbuntu on it for a long time21:12
micahgfluxbuntu?21:12
gnomefreakmicahg: ubuntu distro with fluxbox as default21:13
micahgcommunity supported?21:13
gnomefreaknot sure if they are still working on it21:13
gnomefreakmicahg: yeah ubuntu doesnt support it21:14
micahgok21:14
gnomefreakyep it is still being developed21:14
gnomefreaki just joined the channel and topic has karmic in it21:15
gnomefreak#fluxbuntu is the channel21:15
gnomefreakjoejaxx was head of the project not sure if he still is oor not21:16
gnomefreakanyone know who the grub maintainer is for us (or at least the person that works on it most?21:30
gnomefreak)21:30
micahggnomefreak: looks like cjwatson21:39
gnomefreakmicahg: thanks. be back need to boot jaunty for a bit21:41
BUGabundoola22:01
ftagni22:01
BUGabundohey fta22:05
BUGabundoguys John has returned!!!22:17
BUGabundoWOOT22:17
gnomefreakive been here for 2 days22:18
gnomefreakmaybe 322:18
BUGabundono no!!!22:21
BUGabundoI didn't see you here yesterday22:21
gnomefreaki updated seamonkey 1.1.17 yesterday22:22
BUGabundowoot22:24
gnomefreakbe back in a few something isnt right22:24
BUGabundook22:24
ftaasac, who was the guy skilled with themes a few days ago? do you remember?22:24
asachmm22:26
asacthemes?22:26
ftaoh, psyke8322:27
asacah22:27
ftahe's not here22:27
asacwhat was his complaint again?22:27
ftabug 32786322:27
ubottuLaunchpad bug 327863 in murrine-themes "non-zero GtkRange::trough-border value produces strange boxes in Firefox" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/32786322:27
asacyeah22:28
asacright i remember22:28
ftabut i'm looking for someone who can help with this: http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/darkroom.png22:28
gnomefreaki cant find a way to format a usb stick there used to be a way to do it22:28
ftaGtkStyle->bg[GTK_STATE_SELECTED] is probably not the right choice22:28
gnomefreakthe dark themes need to be fixed all of them22:29
asacfta: for what?22:29
BUGabundognomefreak: good old DD ?22:29
asacfor the window border?22:29
ftathe orange thing22:29
gnomefreakBUGabundo: DD?22:29
gnomefreakused to be a gui to do it22:29
BUGabundo$ sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb122:30
BUGabundognomefreak: or GPARTED!22:30
asacfta: you mean the window decoration frame being orange on the top?22:30
ftayep, the background behind the tabs22:30
asaci think its wrong, but its been googles choice22:31
asac;)22:31
ftawhich is light blue by default22:31
ftawell, they want to improve that22:31
asacwhat do they want to use instead?22:31
asacmeaning: whats the question ;)?22:32
ftawhat should they use instead of GtkStyle->bg[GTK_STATE_SELECTED] to assign a color to that part of the window that looks nice on both clear and dark themes22:33
gnomefreakBUGabundo: thanks22:33
BUGabundognomefreak: you are most welcome22:34
micahgasac: what to do if anything about the user agent issue with FF3.5 and html5 video22:36
ftamicahg, ?22:36
micahgshiretoko flags as not FF3.5 on some sites22:37
micahgthen they don't show the HTML5 video22:37
asacmicahg: its a website problem22:37
asacthey shouldnt test for firefox22:37
asacbut for gecko22:37
micahgso, they should test for Gecko 1.9.1 in the user agent?22:38
ftathey should not use the user agent at all22:39
asacmicahg: they shouldnt test for user agent at all imo22:39
asachttp://www.bluishcoder.co.nz/2009/02/fallback-options-for-html5-video.html22:39
fta<video> has a fallback feature22:39
ftayep, right22:39
micahgok, what's my next step in the bug?22:40
asacfta: i cant tell which color is better. i think they want to do something new and so thats a empirical thing to find out ... maybe they need to use a special style so that themes can adapt to make chrome look proper22:40
micahgasac: dailymotion was also trying to push people to d/l FF22:40
micahgto try the HTML5 video22:40
asacmicahg: which bug is it?22:41
asacits invalid imo22:41
asactelling them they should complain to the website author22:41
asacshowing them the link from above maybe22:41
micahgbug 39432122:41
ubottuLaunchpad bug 394321 in firefox-3.5 "Shiretoko doesn't show up as supporting HTML5 video tag" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/39432122:41
micahgI"m sure more bugs will come in, that's why I want to figure out what to tell them.  That links a good start22:42
ftaso it doesn't work for debian either22:43
micahgfta debian doesn't have 3.5 AFAIK22:45
asacmicahg: i invalidated the bug22:46
asacand posted the problem to the website22:46
asacfeel free to complain through contact form as well ;)22:46
micahgok, but I think they were also evangelising for FF3.5, would the fallback allow that as well?22:47
asacmicahg: of course22:47
asacthey can display they same they currently displayed22:47
BUGabundoI wish debian had icewaeal 3.5 :(22:49
asacits in experimental i think22:49
asacor in mikes people.debian.org account22:49
fta!info iceweasel experimental22:49
ubottu'experimental' is not a valid distribution: dapper, dapper-backports, hardy, hardy-backports, intrepid, intrepid-backports, jaunty, jaunty-backports, karmic, karmic-backports, kubuntu-backports, kubuntu-experimental, kubuntu-updates, medibuntu, partner22:49
asachttp://glandium.org/blog/?p=37622:49
ftapfff22:49
fta!info iceweasel sid22:49
ubottu'sid' is not a valid distribution: dapper, dapper-backports, hardy, hardy-backports, intrepid, intrepid-backports, jaunty, jaunty-backports, karmic, karmic-backports, kubuntu-backports, kubuntu-experimental, kubuntu-updates, medibuntu, partner22:49
BUGabundoasac: its not!22:50
gnomefreakfta: the bot doesnt know debian packages22:50
micahghttp://pastebin.com/f54171f8622:53
micahgasac: I'm adding your comment to my greasemonkey list22:54
* gnomefreak needs greasemonkey scripts (usful ones)22:56
gnomefreakwhy do people use karmic and PPA's if they dont know what they are doing :(22:57
ftabecause it's koowl22:57
gnomefreakhe has what 9PPA's i think he said22:57
ftawho?22:58
gnomefreaksomeone in karmic channel. BUGabundo you have his nick?22:58
gnomefreakgdm crashed in the middle of it22:58
BUGabundoeheeh22:59
BUGabundoI have the log, yes22:59
micahggnomefreak: https://launchpad.net/~gm-dev-launchpad/+archive/ppa22:59
gnomefreakmicahg: thanks22:59
BUGabundoZorael^222:59
gnomefreakBUGabundo: good if he asks about PPA's again send him to -ot23:00
gnomefreak n2023:01
gnomefreakplease23:02
gnomefreaksorry locked up again23:03
asachttp://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/07/07/1925254/Is-IE-Usage-Share-Collapsing23:08
BUGabundomicahg: fta F11 fullscreen fixed :)23:15
ftaasac, almost nothing built more than 7 hours after today's push :(23:21
BUGabundobtw23:22
BUGabundothat PIN to 3.5 seems to work23:22
BUGabundoI didn't got an update23:22
BUGabundo:))))23:22
* BUGabundo laughs about no PPA builds23:22
gnomefreakwhat broken 3.5 update?23:22
BUGabundognomefreak: 3.5 is not broken23:23
BUGabundoAFAIK23:23
gnomefreakoh i thought you pinned it due to it being broken23:23
asacfta: well. atm almost everything on the builders is at least moz daily ;)23:23
BUGabundognomefreak: no.. last night LONG discussion23:24
BUGabundoI have several PPAs, but I didn't want to have daily 3.5, just 3.623:24
BUGabundoso I needed to pin it down to archive23:24
BUGabundomicahg finally provided me with the correct way23:24
BUGabundoand fta got himself on a new mess23:24
FFEMTcJjetsaredim: thanks for the link23:25
asacfta: i asked now ... lets see if i get an answer ;)23:25
asacbut i guess he sleeps now23:26
gnomefreakgood since there are no nightly 3.5 builds its now only 3.5.123:27
gnomefreakBUGabundo: hint !pinning23:27
* gnomefreak hated writing that23:27
fta3.5.1 *is* the nightly of the 3.5 branch23:27
gnomefreakfixing it23:27
ftaasac, eh?23:28
ftaasac, asked what? to whom?23:28
asacasked what the builders are doing when they are not avail ;)23:28
gnomefreakfta: sort of. i would have thought it was a security update but its an alpha package so im not sure what version it is23:29
BUGabundognomefreak: $ pastebinit /etc/apt/preferences http://paste.ubuntu.com/212287/23:29
gnomefreakalot of people or 1 person alot of times is waiting for PPA builders23:29
ftaasac, i guess it's QA stuff. we had many sessions at UDS about that, i guess it's finally happening23:29
gnomefreakBUGabundo: ill likely crash gdm if i try to open it23:30
gnomefreakat this time23:30
BUGabundognomefreak: eheh23:30
ftagnomefreak, 3.5.1~ is not an alpha, it's the future minor update of 3.5, no more alpha/beta/rc in the 3.5 branch23:31
gnomefreakok must have been something else i was looking at earlier than sorry23:31
ftaas i see it, it's probably the best and safest thing to run23:31
gnomefreakcan we rename it to firefox once 3.0 is removed23:32
gnomefreakand use official branding23:32
fta3.0 will not be removed, but demoted to universe, iirc (asac, correct me if i'm wrong)23:32
gnomefreaks/and/ /23:32
asacfta: we hope we can remove it23:33
gnomefreakdont see why that would be an issue23:33
asacfta: at end of karmic cycle ffox 3.5 will be at 3.5.3 or .423:33
ftaabout branding, asac is to blame, if it was only me, it would have been done since RC23:33
asacso that should be stable enough for everyone23:33
gnomefreakhe doesnt want to brand 223:34
gnomefreakofficial anyway23:34
asacgnomefreak: idea is to brand it officially when we make it the dfault browser23:34
gnomefreakasac: good23:34
* gnomefreak not so crazy tonight than :)23:34
asacfta: so yeah. its QA stuff going on23:35
asacin the back23:35
gnomefreakdo we have all PPA builders busy? everyone keeps saying that they are waiting for PPA builds23:44
andrew_sayersWhat's the recommended course of action for people wanting to install FF 3.5 in e.g. Hardy?23:49
ftagnomefreak: where are they asking that? and which builds do they want? theirs or ours?23:54
BUGabundoandrew_sayers: to use the mozilla security ppa23:57
BUGabundofta on +1, U1, devel23:58
micahgBUGabundo: I thoguht asac was still working o nthat23:58
BUGabundono idea23:58
BUGabundoI though it was ready23:58
BUGabundomaybe I'm wrong23:58
BUGabundoit has happened before :p23:58
andrew_sayersBUGabundo: Brilliant, thanks.23:58
micahgandrew_sayers: AFAIK, the team is still trying to determine the best way to distribute it to hardy23:59
gnomefreakandrew_sayers: use our PPAftthiers ive sen in in motu and ubuntuone23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!