/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/07/09/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

micahgasac: bug 39721100:02
ubottuLaunchpad bug 397211 in firefox-3.5 "Shiretoko user agent string breaks compatibilty with major websites" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/39721100:02
BUGabundohehehe00:08
asacmicahg: answered ;)00:18
micahgty00:18
asacanyone used the gtk-vnc plugin at some point?00:20
BUGabundonop00:20
asacwasnt there kind of a "my screen mirroring" vnc thing somewhere?00:22
* asac intalls x11vnc00:23
asacgood that works00:25
fta69/310/100:30
ftaasac, anything special to do to ship a setuid binary in a package?00:32
asacask on -devel ;)00:34
asaci would think no00:34
asacbut that sholdnt be done for normal apps00:34
ftait's not a normal app00:35
asacwhast so "special" ;)00:38
asacjust kidding00:38
asaci dont think something special is required. if its root setuid entering mir would definitly trigger a fully grown security review ;)00:38
asacgood- gtk-vnc ported00:39
asacXulrunner - universe - port package miro: TODO00:40
asacXulrunner - universe - port package gnome-web-photo: TODO00:40
asacXulrunner - universe - port package couchdb: TODO00:40
asaclet me do couchdb00:40
asacineresting00:56
asacmy gtk-vnc ppa upload got a i386 builder in 30 minutes or so00:56
ftamaybe there's an unfair queuing00:58
asacgnome-web-phoo error01:05
ftai hope they add a lot more boxes soon01:06
asactoo bad ... there is no GetDocumentTitle in any xul 1.9.1 header01:06
fta<fta> d'oh! http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/ppa-queues2.png01:07
fta<fta> it's bad as it means it's impossible to produce a single daily01:07
fta<fta> when a given package finally gets built (after 24h+), it ftbfs with "State: Failed to upload" because the next version is already01:07
asaci think the daily trend is still down ;)01:09
asacmeaning, more get buld per day than not ;)01:09
asacguess same bug for gnome-web-phtot01:18
asaclp says it is building on i38601:18
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ffox35/+build/111130201:18
asachmm01:18
asacits really building01:18
asacwtf ;)01:18
asaclets see if it just disappears in a few minutes again01:19
asachmm gtk-vnc was really build as well01:19
* asac confused01:19
asacmaybe "main" packages have a higher score than univers?01:20
asaccould be ... at least for real archive its that way i think01:20
asacthe initial build score is slightly higher for main afaik01:21
ftacouchdb failed01:31
asachuh?01:33
ftagot 2: https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ffox35/+build/1111274/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.couchdb_0.9.0-2ubuntu3.ffox35_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz01:33
* BUGabundo fta is faster then email 01:33
BUGabundolol01:33
asacpango bustage?01:33
asacor did i mess it up01:34
asachmm01:34
asacodd01:35
asacok couchdb really needed some js porting ;)01:53
asacguess i locally tried agains 1.9 and didnt notice01:53
micahgasac, there's a bug that works for me on ff3.5, but the OP hasn;t responded in months01:55
micahgbug 25764901:55
ubottuLaunchpad bug 257649 in firefox-3.5 "focus annoyance in Firefox when using a Master Password" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/25764901:55
asacmicahg: invalidate01:59
asacmicahg: ping him02:00
asacmaybe he had no chance to try jaunty yet02:00
asacif he doesnt reply at all, you can invalidate02:01
asacok02:01
* asac off02:01
asaccu tomorro02:01
micahgthanks asac02:01
micahgngiht02:01
indushi08:10
industhis is probably extremely minor,but08:11
induswhen we start firefox 3.5,the icon similar to the windows hourglass icon is active even though firefox has started08:12
indusfor about 5 seconds08:12
induswhats with that08:12
=== asac_ is now known as asac
gnomefreakasac: what is Eeebuntu? and is it supported officially by us10:52
gnomefreakasac: do we want to or even have to support packages in Eeebuntu?11:42
asacgnomefreak: depends11:43
asacif they find bugs that are also in ubuntu, yes.11:44
gnomefreaklightning bug only on Eeebuntu11:44
asacbut only if it comes from eeebuntu devs actually11:44
asacgnomefreak: show it me and i can tell11:44
gnomefreakok let me see if i can find it11:45
gnomefreakasac: bug 39720911:46
ubottuLaunchpad bug 397209 in thunderbird "Lightning callendar doesn't appear in thunderbird" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/39720911:46
gnomefreakits only in Eeebuntu so im thinking no we dont11:50
asacgnomefreak: maybe the guy has upstream .xpi installed?11:56
asaccommented11:57
gnomefreakthanks i forgot about that option11:59
gnomefreaki think i just found the problem with that damn script now to try it11:59
asacwhich script are you talking about?12:00
gnomefreakrsync12:00
gnomefreaknope its right12:00
gnomefreakthe command works but the same command in script fails with12:03
gnomefreakrsync: link_stat "/daily/current/karmic/alternate-i386.iso" (in cdimage) failed: No such file or directory (2)12:03
gnomefreaki guess i kinow what im working on today :)12:03
asacah12:04
asaci dont know12:04
asacto advanced for my basic downloading skills12:04
gnomefreak:) that makes 2 of us, hell i didnt know bash had a do_download() function12:04
* gnomefreak stands by #'s should not afect the script running12:07
gnomefreak(code 23) at main.c(1524) is odd to me since this is a bash script (sort of simple)12:09
gnomefreakmaybe these comments do affect the script12:12
gnomefreakok bash shouldnt care if use space or tab mix like python does so that cant be it12:21
gnomefreakholy shit i think i fixed it12:22
gnomefreaki did i did!!!!!12:22
asacheh12:22
asaccongrats12:22
gnomefreakit _was_ the spaces should only have 1 not the the others in scriopt12:23
gnomefreakasac: thanks12:23
gnomefreaks/the/like12:23
* gnomefreak tied up for next 1hou or so12:23
gnomefreakasac: the 3.6 X bug you were working on how do you reproduce it?12:25
asacgnomefreak: you mean the BadWindow ?12:25
asaci am not sure12:25
gnomefreakyes12:25
asacit happens at some point12:25
asacand then i cannot start firefox anymore12:25
asachttp://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58152612:25
gnomefreakasac: disable ubufox12:25
ubottuGnome bug 581526 in gdk "XID table corruption from reuse of XIDs, resulting in leak, incorrect window destroyed status ("unexpectedly destroyed"), and crash" [Critical,Unconfirmed]12:26
gnomefreakim not getting errors12:26
asacBug 22062812:26
ubottuLaunchpad bug 220628 in libxcb "[MASTER] firefox-3.0b5 received an X Window System error: 'BadIDChoice'" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/22062812:26
asacyeah12:26
asacit seems to dpeend on sometihng odd12:26
asacmost likely graphics driver related12:26
asacbugabundo sees it too12:27
asaci have to ask him about his chipset12:27
gnomefreaki have nvidia 173 if that helps12:27
gnomefreakjust running it doesnt fail for me12:28
gnomefreakasac: you or him have compiz enabled by chance?12:28
asacyes12:29
gnomefreaktry for the hell of it to disable it12:29
* gnomefreak doesnt use compiz. too many problems12:30
gnomefreakmd5sum is wrong in the updated version of iso but my file is right. I balme script again12:34
gnomefreakseems its missing the first # only12:36
gnomefreakthe site shows it right site matches mine12:36
gnomefreakoh well cant complain it still works :)12:36
gnomefreakok next problem, just dont have one that i know of atm12:38
gnomefreak!info gdm karmic12:46
ubottugdm (source: gdm): GNOME Display Manager. In component main, is optional. Version 2.26.1-0ubuntu4 (karmic), package size 915 kB, installed size 7224 kB12:46
gnomefreakstill ubunt412:46
gnomefreak!info mautilus karmic12:47
ubottuPackage mautilus does not exist in karmic12:47
gnomefreak!info matilus karmic12:47
ubottuPackage matilus does not exist in karmic12:47
gnomefreak!info nautilus karmic12:47
ubottunautilus (source: nautilus): file manager and graphical shell for GNOME. In component main, is optional. Version 1:2.27.2-0ubuntu1 (karmic), package size 1227 kB, installed size 3280 kB12:47
gnomefreakohhh12:47
gnomefreakasac: anything i have pending that you know of or can i attempt another karmic install?12:48
asacno go ahead12:49
asac;)12:49
asacdont loose your data12:49
gnomefreakim badcking up right now12:51
asacgnomefreak: i am sending a mail to flashgot author about the licensing. i will CC you (no need to reply)12:53
gnomefreakyou gotta love ubuntuone :)12:53
asacheh12:53
asaci didnt test it yet (shame on me)12:53
gnomefreakasac: thanks what is wrong with it?12:53
gnomefreakits in top level dir IIRC12:54
gnomefreak:)12:54
asacwell. its better to have the licensing in all files12:54
asacexpecially there a re a few files that have a license header12:54
asacwhich doesnt say its GPL12:54
asacjust (c) ...12:54
gnomefreaki still have to get around to looking more into the firegpg clean bug and need to fix typo too but i will do that later once install is done and works12:54
asacwhich usually means its non-free12:55
gnomefreakah ok12:55
gnomefreakgood point12:55
* gnomefreak not likeing ubuntuone anymore12:58
gnomefreak:)12:58
* gnomefreak feels stupid as shit now. i was doing things the hard way today13:06
* gnomefreak going to be getting hate mail, glad i will be installing again and not cheaking email13:54
LantiziaHey, how come 3.5 still doesn't get it's real logo?13:59
asac!ff3513:59
ubottuFirefox 3.5 Final is available for Jaunty by installing the package firefox-3.5 | FF3.5 is referred to as Shiretoko on your UI, see http://is.gd/1reB3 for an explanation | Hardy & Intrepid: http://is.gd/1jkNY13:59
asac!ff35 | Lantizia14:00
ubottuLantizia: Firefox 3.5 Final is available for Jaunty by installing the package firefox-3.5 | FF3.5 is referred to as Shiretoko on your UI, see http://is.gd/1reB3 for an explanation | Hardy & Intrepid: http://is.gd/1jkNY14:00
Lantiziayeah that's a really lame reason14:01
LantiziaI'll adapt the firefox-3.0-branding package to work for 3.514:01
gnomefreakLantizia: since we already have a firefox branding firefox-3.5 official branding will just confuse users. well hell its doing that now14:03
Lantiziayou already have package firefox-3.5-branding14:03
Lantiziabut it does very little14:03
gnomefreakLantizia: its not the official branding14:03
Lantiziai realise14:03
gnomefreakok its that time again. Ill be back in a few hours i hope14:04
ftad'oh! "Estimated repository size: 45.4 GiB (100.00%) of 39.6 GiB"14:29
bluekujaasac, how can I create a bzr bd config file?15:09
asacbluekuja: .bzr-builddeb/defaulf.conf15:10
bluekujaso I create the hidden file .bzr-builddeb15:10
bluekuja* hidden folder15:10
bluekujado you have an example of the default.conf?15:10
asachidden folder15:11
asaca bunch of firefox-extension branches have that15:11
asacdebian/patches/re-libtoolize-karmic.dpatch15:11
asachttp://code.launchpad.net/firefox-extensions15:11
asaccheck out a fewq15:11
bluekujak, ty15:11
bluekujaasac, I need bzr bd -S to work15:14
bluekujain the default.conf file15:14
bluekujashould I just add a rule saying merge = true15:15
bluekujafor it?15:15
bluekujaso that with using bzr bd -S will invoke merge as well15:15
asacbluekuja: merge = true + export-upstream-revision + export-upstream15:17
asacmakes most sense15:17
bluekujaok15:17
asacbluekuja: for upstrem-revision use the long revision you see in bzr log --show-ids15:18
asacthats a worldwide unique revision15:18
asace.g. even works after merging etc. while revision numbers wouldnt15:18
bluekujaok15:18
bluekujalet me see15:18
asacso look at upstream branch like bzr log -l1 --show-ids15:18
asacthen you pick the long id and use revid:xxxxxxxxx15:18
asacin the export-upstream-revision field15:19
asacusually you bump that revision field either when merging in new upstream branch or when bumpng upstream versio nin changelog (in case its a debian only tree)15:19
asacfor full source trees export-upstream = .15:19
asacworks15:19
asacyou wont need to maintaina .upstream branch then15:19
asacbecause you can always extract the upstream branch from the uubuntu/debian one15:19
bluekujaso with new upstream releases15:20
bluekujaI bumb it15:20
asacright. i would do a bzr merge ...15:22
asacthen change the revision id15:22
asacand then commit it as "merged new upstream15:22
asac- adjust .bzr-builddeb/default.conf accordingly"15:22
asacor something15:22
bluekujawhy merging?15:22
asac(and you would add new changelog entry too15:22
bluekujaI have two different branches15:22
asacbluekuja: if you have a full source branch you need to merge new upstream15:22
bluekujafor debian and upstream15:22
asacif you have a debian only branch15:23
asacthen you dont need to merge15:23
bluekujayes15:23
bluekujaI have debian only15:23
bluekujaplus upstream only15:23
asacyeah then thats option too i mentioned above15:23
asacso in your cse i would do dch -vNEW-UPSTREAM-1 -DUNRELEASED15:23
asacand change revision15:23
asacid15:23
asacand commit15:23
asac"new upstream"15:23
asac- adjust .bzr-builddeb/default.conf accordingly15:23
asacor something like that15:23
bluekujawith the new revid15:24
bluekujaok15:24
asacyeah15:24
asacbluekuja: you can test whether it works by just running bzr bd15:24
bluekujayep15:24
asacif done properly it should automatically export orig.tar.gz from upstream branch etc.15:24
asacyeah15:24
asacgood15:24
bluekujaasac, with dch -vNEW-UPSTREAM-1 -DUNRELEASED15:26
bluekujaI'll get a new revision with distro name set as unreleased15:26
bluekujait that really needed?15:26
bluekujaor I can just get the rev id of the last revision15:26
asacbluekuja: yes. you first say "new upstream release" and leave it at UNRELEASED15:28
asacthen when you have everythingy you want to change15:28
asacyou do a single commit with just dch -r -Dkarmic/unstable or wahtehver15:28
bluekujaI've already did that15:28
bluekujaI mean15:28
asacsaying "RELEASE NEW-UPSTREAM-1 to debian/unstable"15:28
bluekujathe changelog is ready for the upload15:28
bluekujawith all stuff in it15:28
asacthats usually wrong because you want to do stuff one by one15:28
bluekujayes15:29
asacwhatver its your branch only thing that is important is that you can identify exactly which revision was uploaded15:29
asacby just looking at changelog15:29
bluekujaok15:29
bluekujain the default.cong15:29
bluekujathe rev id15:29
bluekujashould be taken from the upstream branch rght?15:29
asacformat is revid:REVISION-ID-FROM-BZR-LOG-SHOW_IDS15:29
asacbluekuja: yes.15:29
bluekujaok15:29
asacyou need to commit it to make it work with bzr bd15:30
bluekujayep15:31
bluekujaI get the last commit15:31
bluekujato the upstream.source branch15:32
bluekujawhich the mail of the guy who did it15:32
bluekujalooks ok15:32
bluekujaasac, one thing15:34
bluekujaasac, all my debian dir files are on top level15:34
bluekujabut when I run bzr bd i get an error15:34
bluekujacoz he tries to find debian/changelog15:35
bluekujawhich doesnt exist (everything on top level)15:35
bluekujado you know what can i do?15:35
asacthat works for me15:36
asacmost likely your merge = True has wrong syntax15:36
bluekujamerge = True15:37
bluekujaexport-upstream = .15:37
asacbluekuja: export-upstream = . is wrong15:37
asacthat would be true if the debian branch has full upstream source merged15:38
asacyou need to point to the upstream branch there15:38
bluekujaso it will be15:38
bluekuja../15:38
bluekujaright?15:38
asacbluekuja: .. is wrong15:38
asacyour upstream branch is a branch location15:38
asacthat must always be true15:38
asacregardless where i check it out15:38
asacso its the remote location most likely15:39
bluekujalike http://bzr.something15:39
bluekujaand so on?15:39
asacright15:39
bluekujaok15:39
asacyour other  branch i looked at had full upstream sources merged15:39
asacare you sure you have a debian only branch now?15:39
asac(/me thinkgs so)15:39
bluekujano15:40
bluekujaI still have two branches15:40
bluekujaone with debian dir only15:40
asacyeah then its like i said15:40
bluekujayep15:40
asacyour default.conf is wrong15:40
asac[BUILDDEB] needs to be on top15:40
bluekujatrue15:41
bluekujadamn me15:41
bluekujaasac, [BUILDDEB]15:41
bluekujamerge = True15:41
bluekujaexport-upstream = http://bzr.debian.org/gnome-btdownload/debian.source15:41
bluekujais what I have now15:41
bluekuja* upstream.source15:41
asacthe revision is missing15:41
bluekujayes, it's there15:42
asacthat will always pull the latest top15:42
bluekujadidnt paste it15:42
asacbluekuja: why would debian.source be upstream?15:42
asacthats wrong15:42
bluekujanono15:42
bluekujaI mean it's export-upstream = http://bzr.debian.org/gnome-btdownload/upstream.source15:42
bluekujabut still bzr bd fails for the changelog problem15:42
asacah15:42
asacdidnt get that *15:42
asacbluekuja: why is the branch so huge?15:43
asacdid you remove everything at some point=15:43
bluekujayes15:43
bluekujaasac, bzr bd still don't works15:44
bluekujafor the debian/changelog stuff15:44
bluekuja{'_preformatted_string': None, 'location': '"debian/changelog"'}15:44
asacbluekuja: you need to commit stuff first15:45
asacat least the .bzr-builddeb/ directory needs to be properly committed afaik15:45
asacbzr bd --merge --export-upstream=http://bzr.debian.org/gnome-btdownload/upstream.source15:45
asacworks for me15:45
asacso either your .bzr-builddeb/default.conf is still wrong or you didnt commit or your bzr-buildded is broken15:46
bluekuja--merge works15:47
bluekujabut bzr bd -S15:47
bluekujanot15:47
bluekujaI wanted to have it working15:47
bluekujaI created the default.conf to prevent me from using bzr bd --merge15:48
bluekujabut only bzr bd -S only15:48
bluekujabut adding that config file the merge calling should work15:48
bluekujawithout specifying it15:49
bluekujaasac, try bzr bd -S15:49
bluekujaand see if it works for you15:49
bluekujaasac, seems like that merge = True don't do its work15:51
bluekujaasac, with bzr bd -S you get the changelog errr15:51
bluekujaasac, no idea?15:57
bluekujaasac, looking at HOWTOs, adding merge = true should do the work16:03
bluekujabut it doesnt for me16:03
bluekujaomg16:03
asacbluekuja: i think its a bug. use --merge for now and file a bug against bzr-builddeb maybe16:58
asacmaybe the bug happens because you moved debian/* to toplevel16:59
asacit doesnt happen for me for normal branches16:59
bluekujaasac, ok ty17:19
asacbluekuja: also i noticed that it downloads the upstream release automatically17:19
asacbluekuja: if you want to use bzr, remove the watch file i guess17:19
asacor you dont need the upstream branch at all i guess (unless you want to release snapshots)17:20
bluekujaasac, it's ok, wanted to get the tarball directly from upstream17:20
asacthen you dont need the upstream branch ;)17:20
bluekujaasac, yeah, that's a right point17:20
asacand also not the export-* options in default.conf17:20
asackeep merge17:20
asac=17:21
bluekujayep17:21
asacin case it works again at some point ;)17:21
bluekujaI have merge only now17:21
bluekujahoping it will work17:21
bluekujaon the futurr17:21
asacbluekuja: upgrade your branch please17:21
bluekujaI already did17:21
asacbluekuja: most likely just locally17:21
asacafter pushing, do a bzr bind http://...remotelocation17:21
asacthen run bzr upgrade17:22
bluekujaok17:22
asacthat will take some time i guess17:22
asacbluekuja: you can also run bzr bind ssh...17:22
asacdirectly17:22
asacwill run a bit though17:22
asacbut its worth it17:22
bluekujadone17:22
bluekujalet's see17:22
asacbluekuja: still not upgraded17:23
asactry to run upgrade REMOTEURL17:23
bluekujabzr: ERROR: Upgrade URL cannot work with readonly URLs.17:24
bluekujaneed ssh17:24
bluekujaasac, it's upgrading17:27
bluekujabrb17:27
bluekujacheck it in 5 mins17:27
bluekujait should be ok17:27
bluekujaasac, check now17:49
bluekujashould be ok17:50
=== dpm_ is now known as dpm
gnomefreakok who broke tbird3?18:11
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg
gnomefreakasac: losing the sender field in tbird3 (on the list of emails) is gone is that our build or is it upstreams?18:54
gnomefreakasac: before i forget maybe we should have a kde build of ubufox19:00
gnomefreakmy day is just about over i hope19:32
gnomefreakanyone know if libgdl-1-0 was replaced with something or even just dropped?19:43
gnomefreakit has no rdepends so im not real sure why it is wanting to be removed19:44
* gnomefreak smokes than email than gone19:52
=== dpm__ is now known as dpm
=== BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo
BUGabundolets try this again:22:49
BUGabundoola ppl22:49
ftabonsoir23:15
BUGabundogun tag23:15
ftaBUGabundo, is there another gtk2/gnome client for identi.ca? one that crashes less than gwibber?23:15
BUGabundohahaahah23:16
BUGabundoI use XMPP!23:16
BUGabundothere qock or something23:16
BUGabundobut that's kde I think23:16
ftaq* sounds kde23:16
ftayep, don't want that23:17
BUGabundoXMPP  then!23:19
BUGabundoor do one NEW23:19
ftahttp://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=gwibber23:19
ftalol23:19
ftaBUGabundo, if i had more time, i'd probably do a fta-os :P23:20
ftaor a million-year of life time23:21
BUGabundoahahaah23:21
ftaasac, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Chromium/Packaging23:22
asacfta: good ;)23:25
BUGabundofta: how about an wiki.ubuntu.com/Google/OS/packaging ?23:25
ftaBUGabundo, how about wiki.ubuntu.com/Google/OS/waiting_for_the_code?23:26
BUGabundoeheheheheh23:26
ftaBUGabundo, did you try chromium since yesterday?23:41
BUGabundono23:41
BUGabundotrying now23:41
micahgBUGabundo: have you tried pidgin?23:42
BUGabundousing it now23:42
BUGabundofta: Chromium Dev Build23:42
micahgah, you were looking for another xmpp client?23:50
BUGabundome??23:50
BUGabundonow23:50
BUGabundofta was23:50
BUGabundoor another identica client23:50
micahgasac: the user agent guy mostaly has trouble with microsoft sites and facebook23:51
asac__jamesh: i uploaded couchdb_0.9.0-2ubuntu3.ffox35.1 (xulrunner 1.9.1 port) to https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ffox35 ... which hopefully will build well.23:51
BUGabundomicahg: is crap anyway23:51
micahgBUGabundo: what is?23:51
asac__jamesh: would be cool if you could verify it tomorrow or when you have time23:51
BUGabundomicahg: msft23:52
micahgBUGabundo: indeed23:52
asac__micahg: hotmail?23:52
asac__afaik hotmail doesnt even work with the right user agent23:52
micahgasac__: calendar.live.com and bing23:52
asac__they refuse to accept firefox + Linux23:52
asac__but not firefox + windows23:52
asac__(maybe its fixed now, but it was a big thing)23:52
asac__at lesat the start page of calendar.live.com doesnt complain23:53
asac__no access of course ;)23:53
BUGabundofta: but why did you ask about chromium?23:53
asac__bing works23:53
asac__not sure what wouldnt work23:53
* BUGabundo has never even seem bing page23:53
micahgasac__23:54
micahghttp://www.bing.com/maps/help/en-us/browsernotsupported.htm?http%3a%2f%2fwww.bing.com%3a80%2fmaps%2f23:54
asac__well23:54
asac__i expect that to happen if i go to a "browser not supported" webpage, right?23:55
ftaBUGabundo, to make sure my new sandbox doesn't prevent you to start the browser, as it did for someone23:55
micahghttp://www.bing.com/maps/23:55
micahgasac__: it doesn't work with FF3.5 User agent either23:56
ftahttp://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1636323:56
micahgasac__: I think we should ignore it...part of a browser being open source is that people can name it whatever they want...i.e. the asac browser :)23:57
BUGabundofta: daily 64bits WFM23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!