[11:21] MacSlow: Heya, I think you're picking up plymouth? (not sure) there is this merge request to fix plymouth lp:~marceloshima/plymouth/ubuntu [11:41] MacSlow: hello, back from Gran Canaria ? [11:50] lool, I think we're not using plymouth [11:51] SiDi, yeah... and sorting out stuff [11:52] MacSlow: let me know when you have ~15/20 minutes for me please ;) i've got 2 bugs i wanna talk to you about [11:55] MacSlow: Are you still planning work on it though? [11:56] MacSlow: I think we decided it was not worth it in karmic === agateau_ is now known as agateau [13:26] SiDi, I see [13:26] SiDi, btw bug-numbers [13:26] ? [13:32] 382094 [13:32] and 335383 [13:32] or one of its duplicates, MacSlow [13:33] damn no ubottu [13:33] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/notify-osd/+bug/335383 https://bugs.launchpad.net/notify-osd/+bug/382094 [15:25] * SiDi is back === chrisccoulson is now known as chrisccoulson_ === chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson [15:45] SiDi, we'll probably have some gconf-keys for notify-osd for things like fg/text-color, bg-color and title/body text-size [15:46] MacSlow: ok, i'll see if i can write a little gui for it then, keep me in touch [15:46] SiDi, but atm I'm still busy with blur/surface-cache, text- and bubble-grow-animation [15:46] is it possible to add auto detection of the xfce font / dpi ? [15:46] i can give you the API to use if you want [15:47] SiDi, I don't know... I only know how this works under gnome [15:47] it's not hard to do :) its just that its called xfconf instead of gconf [15:49] MacSlow: want me to write pseudo code for it in the bug report ? [15:50] SiDi, with all the pending work I'd prefer a patch :) [15:50] MacSlow: i'll write a patch then XD [15:50] SiDi, best would be a compile-time option (defaulting to gnome/gconf like it is now) [15:50] but it will take a little more time [15:51] and if you pass e.g. --use-xconf switching to well the XFCE-variant [15:51] ok, then i suppose we would ship another notify-osd package with xfce settings ? [15:52] SiDi, that's the xfce-maintainers decision not mine :) [15:52] okey then, thanks [15:52] https://bugs.launchpad.net/notify-osd/+bug/382094 would you also accept a patch for the changes described here ? [15:54] SiDi, there you mainly request the "reformatting" of the output we provide in the ~/.cache/notify-osd.log right? [15:54] yes [15:55] and addition of priority (apparently trivial) and image when possible (requires more work) [15:55] its just much easier to parse that way and reduces the amount of particular cases / restrictions of content in title / body [15:55] priority ?= urgency-level I assume [15:55] yes [15:55] SiDi, "icon" is very hard [15:56] I'd just say it'll be filled with a filename if one is provided [15:56] when its given to you via the path, you directly get the pixbuf and dont store the path ? [15:56] i want the filename when it exists, otherwise gtk-missing-image is fair enough [15:56] if i notice people ask why i cant provide the image in the notification history i'll add a FAQ/Help entry in my app explaining it === rgreening_ is now known as rgreening