[11:21] <lool> MacSlow: Heya, I think you're picking up plymouth?  (not sure)  there is this merge request to fix plymouth lp:~marceloshima/plymouth/ubuntu
[11:41] <SiDi> MacSlow: hello, back from Gran Canaria ?
[11:50] <MacSlow> lool, I think we're not using plymouth
[11:51] <MacSlow> SiDi, yeah... and sorting out stuff
[11:52] <SiDi> MacSlow: let me know when you have ~15/20 minutes for me please ;) i've got 2 bugs i wanna talk to you about
[11:55] <lool> MacSlow: Are you still planning work on it though?
[11:56] <lool> MacSlow: I think we decided it was not worth it in karmic
[13:26] <MacSlow> SiDi, I see
[13:26] <MacSlow> SiDi, btw bug-numbers
[13:26] <MacSlow> ?
[13:32] <SiDi> 382094
[13:32] <SiDi> and 335383
[13:32] <SiDi> or one of its duplicates, MacSlow 
[13:33] <SiDi> damn no ubottu
[13:33] <SiDi> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/notify-osd/+bug/335383 https://bugs.launchpad.net/notify-osd/+bug/382094
[15:25]  * SiDi is back
[15:45] <MacSlow> SiDi, we'll probably have some gconf-keys for notify-osd for things like fg/text-color, bg-color and title/body text-size
[15:46] <SiDi> MacSlow: ok, i'll see if i can write a little gui for it then, keep me in touch
[15:46] <MacSlow> SiDi, but atm I'm still busy with blur/surface-cache, text- and bubble-grow-animation
[15:46] <SiDi> is it possible to add auto detection of the xfce font / dpi ?
[15:46] <SiDi> i can give you the API to use if you want
[15:47] <MacSlow> SiDi, I don't know... I only know how this works under gnome
[15:47] <SiDi> it's not hard to do :) its just that its called xfconf instead of gconf
[15:49] <SiDi> MacSlow: want me to write pseudo code for it in the bug report ?
[15:50] <MacSlow> SiDi, with all the pending work I'd prefer a patch :)
[15:50] <SiDi> MacSlow: i'll write a patch then XD
[15:50] <MacSlow> SiDi, best would be a compile-time option (defaulting to gnome/gconf like it is now)
[15:50] <SiDi> but it will take a little more time
[15:51] <MacSlow> and if you pass e.g. --use-xconf switching to well the XFCE-variant
[15:51] <SiDi> ok, then i suppose we would ship another notify-osd package with xfce settings ?
[15:52] <MacSlow> SiDi, that's the xfce-maintainers decision not mine :)
[15:52] <SiDi> okey then, thanks
[15:52] <SiDi> https://bugs.launchpad.net/notify-osd/+bug/382094 would you also accept a patch for the changes described here ?
[15:54] <MacSlow> SiDi, there you mainly request the "reformatting" of the output we provide in the ~/.cache/notify-osd.log right?
[15:54] <SiDi> yes
[15:55] <SiDi> and addition of priority (apparently trivial) and image when possible (requires more work)
[15:55] <SiDi> its just much easier to parse that way and reduces the amount of particular cases / restrictions of content in title / body
[15:55] <MacSlow> priority ?= urgency-level I assume
[15:55] <SiDi> yes
[15:55] <MacSlow> SiDi, "icon" is very hard
[15:56] <MacSlow> I'd just say it'll be filled with a filename if one is provided
[15:56] <SiDi> when its given to you via the path, you directly get the pixbuf and dont store the path ?
[15:56] <SiDi> i want the filename when it exists, otherwise gtk-missing-image is fair enough
[15:56] <SiDi> if i notice people ask why i cant provide the image in the notification history i'll add a FAQ/Help entry in my app explaining it