[00:25] <jonnor> on upstreaming bugreports. How _exactly_ do I link to the upstream bugreport?
[00:25] <jonnor> just add a comment with the direct link
[00:25] <jonnor> or is there some magic thing I should use?
[00:25] <bdmurray> also affects project / distribution
[00:26] <bdmurray> depending on which it is
[00:26] <bdmurray> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Watches
[00:26] <jonnor> freedesktop.org xf86-input-aiptek
[00:26] <bdmurray> project then
[00:27] <jonnor> ah, that was the page I was looking for. Thanks!
[00:28] <bdmurray> no problem, thanks for helping out!
[01:40]  * BUGabundo $ date; $ echo bedtime; $ aptitude why bed; $ echo guud pillow :p
[02:14] <micahg> ping bdmurray
[03:55] <BT-tux> Hi all
[05:29] <bdmurray> micahg: pong
[05:35] <micahg> hi
[05:35] <micahg> I was wondering if you came up with any solutions for our problem
[05:43] <bdmurray> not yet
[05:44] <micahg> ok
[05:44] <micahg> anything I can help with?
[05:48] <bdmurray> Thanks for asking I'll let you know.
[05:48] <micahg> ok
[05:48] <micahg> do you want me to keep poking, is this enough?
[05:53] <bdmurray> yes, poking is a big help! ;-)
[05:53] <micahg> ok, will do :)
[05:53] <micahg> my workaround is to wait until the attachment is gone before making public
[05:55] <micahg> bdmurray: do you know how to get the bot to give me a bug link without displaying it in the channel?
[05:55] <micahg> I tried msging the bit
[05:55] <micahg> bot
[05:58] <bdmurray> don't recall why do you need it?
[05:58] <micahg> I guess I don't
[05:59] <micahg> it's easy enough
[05:59] <micahg> to just use another bug and replace the number
[06:01] <bdmurray> there is also this firefox-launchpad-plugin which is nice
[06:01] <micahg> :)
[06:01] <micahg> ah
[06:01] <micahg> bug lookup is a search engine
[06:01] <bdmurray> yep
[06:01] <micahg> I installed it but never really used it :)
[06:01] <micahg> But I am using the gm scripts ext heavily now
[06:02] <micahg> I'm trying to clean up firefox-3.5 so it doesn't get like firefox-3.0
[06:03] <bdmurray> awesome!
[06:04] <micahg> we'll see how successful I am once ff3.5 becomes default in karmic :)
[06:42] <dholbach> good morning
[11:40] <nanomad> Who can have a look at bug #21367? That bug can be fixed (again!) in 0-seconds (there is a patch ready)
[11:40] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 21367 in linux "Wifi-enabled led is not lit on ipw2200 cards" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/21367
[11:57] <KrisCarr> Hi, im new to the bugscene + thought id say howdy :)
[17:29] <kklimonda> hey, anyone from bug control could set a importance of bug 394080 to medium?
[17:29] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 394080 in transmission "Night of the Living Dead (removed and deleted torrents keep coming back) ;)" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/394080
[17:33] <bdmurray> done
[17:33] <kklimonda> thanks
[17:34] <micahg> kklimonda: is the new version in a proposed repo?
[17:35] <kklimonda> micahg: 1.73 isn't yet released - the "Fix commited" is a really workaround imo to somehow keep track of bugs fixed upstream.
[17:36] <micahg> kklimonda: there's a query for fixed upstream
[17:36] <micahg> per bdmurray's revised status page, it would seem it should remain triaged until uploaded to karmic
[17:36] <micahg> bdmurray: ^^
[17:37] <kklimonda> micahg: can I query for "fix released" upstream and !"fixed released && !fix commited" ubuntu?
[17:37] <micahg> I think so
[17:37] <kklimonda> that was going to be my question for application but if we are already talking about it..
[17:37] <micahg> Under advanced, there is a checkbox for resolved upstream
[17:38] <kklimonda> micahg: unfortunately those that are "Won't Fix" upstream also hits this query.. :/
[17:39] <micahg> well
[17:39] <kklimonda> hmm, it looks kinda like a bug itself..
[17:39] <micahg> once you query, you can address those first or later
[17:39] <kklimonda> because upstream ticket is "Invalid/Unknown" so it isn't really "fixed"..
[17:39] <micahg> no, that's a resolved status
[17:39] <kklimonda> ach, I see
[17:40] <micahg> the idea is, that if it's resolved upstream, then we need to address it
[17:40] <micahg> either by releasing a version
[17:40] <micahg> or marking won't fix  or invalid
[17:41] <kklimonda> there is a wishlist that upstream developer refused to fix because it's an ubuntu/notify-osd issue
[17:41] <kklimonda> so we would have to prepare a patch ourselves..
[17:41] <micahg> right
[17:42] <micahg> so someone can take that if they want to work on it (i.e. In Progress state)
[17:43] <micahg> or if the bug is elsewhere, move the bug to the appropriate package
[17:57] <plars> bug #396762 - an recommendations for additional information to include, or how to better determine if this is a bug in python, or python-ldtp, or ldtp?
[17:57] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 396762 in ldtp "'import ldtp' freezes interpreter" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/396762
[17:57] <plars> I suspect this is going to impact a lot of people interested in testing, since LDTP just flat won't work under karmic
[18:21] <bdmurray> plars: using ipython I got some more information
[18:22] <plars> bdmurray: really? They behaved identically for me under ipython
[18:22] <plars> s/they/it
[18:22] <bdmurray> plars: it might have been since I was in a chroot and DISPLAY was not set then
[18:53] <hggdh> kklimonda, ping
[18:54] <kklimonda> pong
[18:56] <hggdh> kklimonda, you forgot to state what would be the importance fo the 5 bugs on you application :-)
[18:57] <hggdh> kklimonda, can you please forward it to the ML? I would really be happy to give you a +1
[18:57] <kklimonda> hggdh: All bugs I've selected has Importance set already (most of them by you ;) )
[18:58] <kklimonda> hggdh: forward what? /me is kinda lost when it comes to MLs :)
[18:59] <hggdh> kklimonda, even if they were set by me, a part of the application is you stating *why* you thought it was the correct one
[19:00] <kklimonda> ach, *why*.. damn, Sure - I'll forward it right away.
[19:00] <hggdh> and ML is MailingList -- in this case, ubuntu-bug-control@lists.launchpad.net
[19:01] <hggdh> :-) Sorry...
[21:20] <dcraven> There is a script for determining the version of a package in Debian repos. Is that correct?
[21:23] <Pici> dcraven: rmadison
[21:25] <dcraven> Pici: that's it. Thank you very much.
[21:25] <Pici> dcraven: its in the devscripts package
[21:26] <dcraven> Pici: Thanks. I have it, I just couldn't remember the name :/
[21:30] <bdmurray> speaking of rmadison I'm getting a database error using it for debian
[21:31] <dcraven> bdmurray: I was just going to mention that too.
[21:32] <micahg> It's a debian issue
[21:32] <micahg> I tried it on a debian etch system
[21:33] <bdmurray> okay, thanks
[22:26] <BUGabundo> ogasawara: ping I subbmited the new logs ! needed to install grub2 for it to see -31.2 LOL
[22:26] <BUGabundo> still a very hot CPU