[11:28] sadmac2: I was thinking "We do what we must because we can" :-) [11:29] mbiebl: yeah, the script was literally just a hack - if you've got a better version please do open an LP bug and I'll replace it [11:29] mbiebl: obviously the LP bug should be against the Ubuntu package ;) [11:30] keybuk: So...? :-) [11:30] sadmac2: I haven't received the state transfer patch from you, I don't think - let me check [11:30] ion: please do fix any errors you see in the manpages, or even rewrite bits if you like ;) I literally just wrote them all in a morning after getting carried away editing RH's events(5) page [11:31] ion: they're just wrapped in emacs at 80 columns I think - but obviously the wrapping goes awry when you edit the pages afterwards [11:31] Well, i’d use vim’s gq command to rewrap after any changes. [11:32] that gets manpages wrong though, right? [11:32] it tries to move the .B bits back onto the same line [11:32] some text, blah blah (cursor here) [11:33] more text, foobar [11:33] .B baz [11:34] 2gqgq rewraps the two lines, not touching the .B line. When there are so many lines it’s not easy to count them with a single skim, V switches to visual mode (”paint lines” mode), j extends the selected area downwards and gq finally rewraps it. [11:34] * Keybuk remembers why he uses emacs ;) [11:34] 2gqq even [11:35] Emacs has built-in functionality to rewrap man pages properly? [11:35] C-A-\ [11:35] Neat [11:35] well, rewrap anything really [11:35] I'd still rather use anjuta though [11:35] But it didn’t seem to wrap the Upstart manpages consistently. [11:37] that's because I didn't use it :) [11:37] I just typed stuff [11:38] it wrapped as I went [11:38] then I went back and editing things I typed [11:38] but I didn't rewrap after [11:38] I probably sometimes pressed enter manually to wrap too ;) [11:42] vim seems to support letting an external program or a vimscript function handle gq for certain filetypes. I wonder if one of the text formatters available from apt support manpages? [11:42] no idea [11:48] sadmac2: ah, I do - you added an "also affects 0.3" which sent it to the other mailbox [11:48] * Keybuk fixes his mailer confi [11:55] Ha! One can tell par 'P=.' and it “protects” lines starting with a dot. I’ll see if par handles manpages nicely otherwise. [12:07] ion: the trick though is keeping them formatted ;) [12:54] mbiebl: I fixed the test_control failure ;) [12:54] it was a brain failure [14:41] now I have a strange test case failure [14:41] that only seems to affect my laptop [14:41] * Keybuk wonders whether Upstart's test suite has uncovered a bug in the new fanotify() kernel stuff [16:51] well, the kernel update solves the other inotify bug I'd noticed [16:51] but not this one [23:00] ok iz confirmed [23:00] the test_conf failure is a kernel bug ;) [23:23] Does 0.6 already use the magic to follow forks? [23:31] no, it just uses ptrace [23:31] Ok [23:33] though since I binned the session leader crap, that actually appears to work [23:34] well [23:34] kinda [23:36] Have you already started working on the mount daemon? I wonder if i’d manage to contribute anything some day... An often-updated repository with a TODO list would be nice. :-) [23:36] no, not yet [23:36] I'll try and do that ;) [23:38] hmm, processes get kinda stuck in ptrace