[04:10] <unknown_vv> ao
[04:24] <mr_spot_> hey, is there anybody about who can review pulseaudio-mixer-applet? http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/pulseaudio-mixer-applet
[11:42] <therm> Hi @all
[11:42] <therm> have a problem with debian watch file
[11:43] <therm> is it able to recognize the version of a file in the middle of the url?
[11:44] <therm> it is about: http://willuhn.de/products/jameica/releases/1.6/datasource/de_willuhn_ds.src.zip
[11:44] <therm> so the version of the code is 1.6 but the file has no version
[11:45] <therm> now uscan tells me http://pastebin.com/d10c0521
[11:46] <therm> has anyone an idea?
[11:56] <DktrKranz> therm, I don't think it's possible
[11:57] <goshawk> therm: i had a similar issue
[11:58] <goshawk> therm: wait
[11:58] <DktrKranz> therm, you can workaround it in a different way, by parsing http://willuhn.de/products/jameica/download.php for instance
[12:02] <goshawk> therm: http://pastebin.ca/1492570
[12:04] <therm> ok thank you I will try
[12:12] <therm> DktrKranz: Could you descripe it more detailed for me, what you mean by it?
[12:14] <DktrKranz> therm, is link to de_willuhn_ds.src.zip archive referenced in a webpage?
[12:15] <therm> goshawk: in your case the file did also have a version, mine has not. Or did I made a mistake: http://pastebin.com/m5781c43b
[12:16] <therm> DktrKranz, the website you download it is: http://willuhn.de/products/jameica/download_ext.php but the real location is http://willuhn.de/products/jameica/releases/1.6/datasource/de_willuhn_ds.src.zip or what did you mean?
[12:18] <DktrKranz> therm, thanks. I should be able to provide a working watch, now. I'll do some tests ;)
[12:21] <therm> DktrKranz, no thanks to you ;-)
[12:21] <DktrKranz> therm, http://pastebin.com/d6943d176
[12:25] <therm> hey wonderful it works, big thanks to you!
[12:30] <DktrKranz> therm, http://pastebin.com/d2a29d48f  improved version, so you  can fetch upstream archive too
[12:33] <therm> DktrKranz, thanks it is uploading now
[12:35] <therm> so is there maybe someone who wants to take a look after: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/willuhndatasource ?
[12:36] <fabrice_sp> Hi. Any MOTU willing to have a look at Bug #337337 ? It's a candidate for an SRU. Thnaks!
[12:39] <DktrKranz> fabrice_sp, you chould use (LP: #xxxxxx, #yyyyyy, #zzzzzz) format instead
[12:42] <fabrice_sp> DktrKranz, I have to say I didn't know it was possible :-)
[12:43] <DktrKranz> fabrice_sp, just test. Run debuild -S -uc -us and check *_source.changes. If Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed line is populated by all of them, you did it right ;)
[12:43] <fabrice_sp> great: I'll test right now :-)
[12:43] <DktrKranz> also, mind uploading debdiff for jaunty too, so devfil can process it?
[12:44] <fabrice_sp> DktrKranz, this is where I'm always lost: for a SRU, it should be fixed first in dev version. It could be at the same time?
[12:44] <devfil> fabrice_sp, same time
[12:44] <fabrice_sp> I'll post also a debdiff for jaunty-proposed
[12:44] <fabrice_sp> ok
[12:45] <DktrKranz> fabrice_sp, I fixed a rm -fr / command at the same time, I was in a little hurry that time ;)
[12:45] <DktrKranz> (rm -fr / with root privs, of course)
[12:46] <fabrice_sp> DktrKranz, it's understandable! :-)
[12:47] <DktrKranz> package in question was slack, wasn't that funny? :)
[12:47] <fabrice_sp> lol
[12:53] <leifdk1978> hep
[12:53] <quentusrex> Anyone awake?
[12:54] <quentusrex> Anyone familiar with x509 certs?
[12:54] <leifdk1978> sorry is new me self
[12:55] <mzz> (hoping I'm only slightly in the wrong place...) where do bugs in ubuntu-dev-tools (mk-sbuild-lv) go?
[12:55] <leifdk1978> just wondering if some on is the leader of the grafik programs
[12:56] <mzz> (specifically it bails when it can't modprobe dm_snapshot, which is built in now apparently)
[12:56] <ScottK> mzz: I think https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-dev-tools/+filebug will work.
[12:57] <mzz> ScottK: tried that already: "Ubuntu Developer Tools does not use Launchpad as its bug tracker. "
[12:57] <ScottK> Odd, since there are bugs there.
[12:57] <ScottK> Then just file it against the Ubuntu package.
[12:57] <mzz> ScottK: (and "Launchpad doesn't know what bug tracker Ubuntu Developer Tools uses")
[12:58] <ScottK> mzz: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+filebug
[12:58] <mzz> ok, I'll just do that then. Thanks!
[12:58] <ScottK> quentusrex: Just ask your question.  Someone might answer.
[12:59] <quentusrex> ScottK it's the same question as earlier... I have a problem with openldap and my x509 certificates.
[12:59] <ScottK> OK.
[13:00] <ScottK> Well I know a fair amount about X.509 for mail related applications but nothing about LDAP.
[13:00] <leifdk1978> any one in charge of blender
[13:01] <Laney> nobody and everybody
[13:02] <fabrice_sp> I love that answer :-D
[13:02] <ScottK> It is both the curse and beauty of team maintenance.
[13:03] <quentusrex> I've filed a bug about it: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/398366
[13:03] <quentusrex> ScottK I'm familiar with x509s as well, but I can't figure out why openldap can't handle my certs.
[13:03] <quentusrex> when openvpn and everything can handle them.
[13:05] <leifdk1978> ok if there is a mentor avalible i would love to help on media/grafik program package en merge
[13:06] <ScottK> leifdk1978: Just ask your question and there's a reasonable chance someone will answer.
[13:07] <leifdk1978> is there mentoring avalible for learning to pack and merge packages
[13:07] <jpds> Yes.
[13:07] <leifdk1978> ok nice
[13:07] <Laney> merging blender with Debian's version is a nice task to undertake
[13:08] <ScottK> especially since Laney is volunteering to help.
[13:09] <leifdk1978> yeah and found other programs that need a minor update to
[13:09] <Laney> I'll answer questions in channel, but of course
[13:10] <leifdk1978> ok i just fiend the motu page and start reading those
[13:14] <leifdk1978> hmmmm
[13:16] <leifdk1978> Laney: is pbbuilder a good start
[13:16] <Laney> yes you want to get pbuilder set up
[13:16] <leifdk1978> ok
[13:17] <Laney> I recommend you use pbuilder-dist from ubuntu-dev-tools
[13:17] <leifdk1978> from apt
[13:17] <Laney> sure
[13:18] <leifdk1978> ok thanx
[13:22] <quentusrex> scottK: know any way to find out why gnutls/openldap don't like my certs?
[13:33] <leifdk1978> hmmmm is it 9,04 or jaunty
[13:34] <fabrice_sp> devfil, DktrKranz I've updated the bug #337337 with both debdiff (for Karmic and Jaunty), and just subscribed motu-sru
[13:35] <mr_spot_> can i get someone to review my new package, pulseaudio-mixer-applet? http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/pulseaudio-mixer-applet
[13:37] <leifdk1978> hmmm
[13:40] <fabrice_sp> mr_spot_, I have to go now, but I'll have a look after
[13:40] <mr_spot_> fabrice_sp: thanks :)
[13:41] <leifdk1978> :)
[13:43] <leifdk1978> hmmmm now i  am looking on debain files to merge on ubuntu the blender files
[13:48] <leifdk1978> Laney: is it the dcs file i need to merge debian to ubuntu
[14:57] <rrittenhouse> Anybody know whats up with the ubuntu planet?
[14:57] <rrittenhouse> No posts since the 9th :D
[14:59] <Laney> are bash conditionals right associative?
[14:59] <Laney> ie how is x && y || z parsed?
[15:05] <therm> I would be glad if someone could revu my packages: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/swtcalendar (advocated 1x), http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/willuhndatasource , http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/h2database
[15:06] <pochu> Laney:
[15:06] <pochu> emilio@saturno:~$ true && true || false; echo $?
[15:06] <pochu> 0
[15:06] <pochu> emilio@saturno:~$ true && false || false; echo $?
[15:06] <pochu> 1
[15:06] <pochu> so that would be: (x && y) || z
[15:07] <pochu> because of this:
[15:07] <pochu> emilio@saturno:~$ false && true || false; echo $?
[15:07] <pochu> 1
[15:07] <Laney> thanks
[15:07] <pochu> err
[15:08] <pochu> Laney: actually it's: x && (y || z)
[15:08] <pochu> emilio@saturno:~$ true && true || false; echo $?
[15:08] <pochu> 0
[15:08] <pochu> bah, I can't think
[15:09] <Laney> I just put the parens in explicitly :(
[15:09] <Laney> now all I need is apt-get source=$upstream_version --tar-only to work
[15:22] <coolbhavi> hello is the maintainer for universe now Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com>/
[15:39] <geser> yes
[15:42] <hyperair> geser: seriously?
[15:43] <geser> hyperair: see https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2009-May/028213.html
[15:46] <coolbhavi> thanks geser
[15:50] <hyperair> geser: seriously?,up
[16:09] <geser> hyperair: the new update-maintainer script from u-d-t in karmic already implements it
[16:15] <hyperair> geser: i see. i never knew it even existed =p
[17:03] <coolbhavi> strange problem http://pastebin.com/m23761330 but look at this: http://pastebin.com/m46a52f41
[17:03] <coolbhavi> it happens to me with some packages when  I download them off LP
[17:29] <geser> coolbhavi: dscverify doesn't use your keyring by default (look inside the script to see how it calls gpg). Add DSCVERIFY_KEYRINGS="~/.gnupg/pubring.gpg" to your .devscripts
[17:30] <geser> you can use dscverify on the .dsc file to check if it worked
[17:31] <coolbhavi> okay geser thanks again
[17:31] <fabrice_sp> coolbhavi, according to launchpad, version 0.4.4-0ubuntu1 has been signed by Thomas Jaeger
[17:32] <fabrice_sp> this would explain why you don't have the right key
[17:33] <coolbhavi> fabrice_sp, the package was uploaded and signed by nhandler while uploading
[17:33] <fabrice_sp> oh, ok
[17:35] <geser> fabrice_sp: changed-by is Thomas but signed-by is nathan (sponsored upload) [https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/karmic-changes/2009-May/001342.html]
[17:36] <fabrice_sp> thanks for the explanation, geser
[18:31] <hyperair> do ubuntu buildds have internet connections?
[18:32] <Laney> no
[18:32] <hyperair> hmmmm
[18:32] <hyperair> that means packaging microemu is going to be hell.
[18:32] <hyperair> it uses maven2 for building, and it appears that maven2 likes to download things
[18:40] <[Ramy]> can you point any python specific packaging tutorial ?
[18:45] <pochu> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Python
[18:45]  * hyperair grumbles about maven2 
[18:57] <[Ramy]> pochu, I have only .gz file format for the source code
[18:58] <pochu> [Ramy]: .gz or .tar.gz ?
[18:59] <[Ramy]> pochu, .gz and I have .bz2 but not .tar.gz or .tar.bz2
[19:01] <pochu> [Ramy]: you can repack then
[19:07] <AnAnt> Hello
[19:08] <AnAnt> I got a question, why is Ubuntu's bzr-fastimport different (and even out-dated) from Ubuntu's bzr-fastimport ? Although the maintainer in both distro's is the same person ?
[19:09] <pochu> did you mean Debian instead of Ubuntu somewhere?
[19:09] <AnAnt> yup
[19:09] <AnAnt> silly me !
[19:10] <AnAnt> why is Ubuntu's bzr-fastimport different (and even out-dated) from Debian's bzr-fastimport ? Although the maintainer in both distro's is the same person ?
[19:10]  * LarstiQ wagers a guess but first checks the packages
[19:11] <Laney> AnAnt: why don't you ask the maintainer?
[19:11] <pochu> who's the maintainer?
[19:11] <pochu> they are not in sync
[19:11] <AnAnt> jelmer
[19:11] <AnAnt> he's on IRC now, but not responding
[19:11] <LarstiQ> AnAnt: because jelmer is not an Ubuntu maintainer
[19:12] <AnAnt> LarstiQ: are you refering to the fact that there is no maintainer person in Ubuntu ?
[19:12] <pochu> I guess the package would need a sync
[19:12] <AnAnt> LarstiQ: if you look at Ubuntu's bzr-fastimport changelog, you'll find that jelmer is the one who packaged it for Ubuntu (using an @ubuntu.com) address
[19:13] <Laney> It could probably be synced, but I'd check to confirm.
[19:14] <coolbhavi> AnAnt, yes but generally packages in ubuntu are maintained by a team
[19:15] <coolbhavi> AnAnt, like MOTU/development team for universe/multiverse and core-dev team for main/restricted packages
[19:15] <AnAnt> coolbhavi: yup I understand that
[19:18] <AnAnt> ok, I think it does need to be sync'ed
[19:18] <LarstiQ> AnAnt: yeah
[19:22] <AnAnt> did someone ask for a sync request or shall I do so ?
[19:23] <[Ramy]> pochu, there is no INSTALL file in my source, and it is not clear to me how did you figure out that terminator is using distutils ?
[19:23] <pochu> [Ramy]: if it has a setup.py file, it uses distutils
[19:24] <[Ramy]> pochu, it has setup.py :)
[19:27] <[Ramy]> pochu,  should I use bsd instead of mit in the dh_make tool ?
[19:27] <pochu> [Ramy]: use whatever upstream license is
[19:29] <[Ramy]> pochu, dh_make give me this message "Copyright type "mit" is not gpl, lgpl, artistic or bsd"
[19:30] <pochu> then use something else (or nothing) and later update debian/copyright
[19:33] <AnAnt> ok, I submitted a sync-request for bzr-fastimport
[19:36] <Laney> did you test it?
[19:43] <AnAnt> Laney: you mean bzr-fastimport ?
[19:43] <AnAnt> or were you talking to someone else /
[19:43] <AnAnt> ?
[19:44] <AnAnt> LP 398507
[19:44] <Laney> yes!
[19:44] <AnAnt> Laney: yes, I tested it here
[19:44] <AnAnt> Laney: actually I used git-bzr to test it
[19:44] <AnAnt> that's my only use for bzr-fastimport
[19:45] <Laney> ok
[19:47] <[Ramy]> pochu, is grep -B 3 -A 3 import * in the source code directory ?
[19:48] <pochu> [Ramy]: yeah
[19:48] <pochu> that is so that you can see whether an import is optional or not...
[19:48] <pochu> e.g. you would catch
[19:48] <pochu> try:
[19:48] <pochu>     import foo
[19:48] <pochu> except:
[19:48] <pochu>    pass # it's optional
[19:50] <[Ramy]> pochu, what I can see that there are imports for setuptools, glob,os,platform,re,sys
[19:51] <pochu> glob, os, re, sys are all core modules
[19:51] <pochu> setuptools isn't
[19:51] <pochu> (I think)
[19:51] <pochu> core modules are shipped with Python, so you don't need additional dependencies
[19:51] <[Ramy]> pochu, yeah, setuptools is in python-setuptools
[19:56] <pochu> [Ramy]: so if it's required, you will need it in Depends
[19:56] <pochu> [Ramy]: unless it's required only for the build (e.g. it's imported in setup.py), in which case you need it in Build-Depends
[19:56] <pochu> [Ramy]: in the case that you have e.g.:
[19:56] <pochu> try:
[19:57] <pochu>     import foo
[19:57] <pochu> except:
[19:57] <pochu>    import bar
[19:57] <pochu> you could have a Depends: python-foo | python-bar
[19:57] <pochu> btw there's #debian-python on OFTC, good channel for python packaging questions :)
[20:13]  * hyperair grumbles about his isp being stupid about alioth connections again
[20:13] <[Ramy]> pochu, what is OFTC ?
[20:13] <[Ramy]> pochu, is this output ok ? http://paste.ubuntu.com/216389/
[20:13] <hyperair> irc.oftc.net.
[20:14] <hyperair> it's an irc server
[20:19] <pochu> [Ramy]: you need to install the build dependencies
[20:21] <[Ramy]> pochu, in XS-Python-Version is there a keyword names 'all' ?
[20:22] <pochu> you should put >= $minimun_version
[20:23] <pochu> iirc
[20:27] <[Ramy]> pochu, it works :-D
[20:35] <pochu> [Ramy]: cool :)
[20:47] <[Ramy]> pochu, I am trying now to upload the package to launchpad. Where can I find sources.changes package ?
[20:48] <nhandler> [Ramy]: You get that from building the source package: debuild -S
[20:52] <[Ramy]> nhandler, I imported my gpg key to launchpad but I still get this error http://paste.ubuntu.com/216405/
[20:53] <hyperair> [Ramy]: run debsign with debsign -k <key id>
[20:53] <nhandler> Or just pass the -k option to debuild
[20:53] <hyperair> oh yeah debuild
[20:53] <nhandler> [Ramy]: It also looks like your .orig.tar.gz is missing
[20:53] <hyperair> or add an identity to your GPG key that matches "Ramy Eid <rmyeid@gmail.com>" exactly.
[20:54] <hyperair> the version number looks like a git commit hash O_O
[20:54] <[Ramy]> hyperair, it is
[20:55] <hyperair> [Ramy]: you should prepend some stuff to it.
[20:55] <hyperair> [Ramy]: e.g. git<date>.r1.<hash>
[20:56] <hyperair> this is to make sure that when you upload a newer version, it will definitely be a bigger version
[20:57] <[Ramy]> hyperair, I just want to make it working the first time so I can improve it later. now, I am confused in the packaging folder I have many new folders and I am not sure what to do
[20:57] <hyperair> [Ramy]: many new folders?
[20:58] <hyperair> could you name them?
[20:58] <hyperair> the only new folder you should be having is debian/
[20:59] <[Ramy]> hyperair, http://paste.ubuntu.com/216413/
[21:00] <hyperair> [Ramy]: basically debian/ is your packaging folder, and the rest is upstream
[21:01] <hyperair> [Ramy]: also your orig.tar.gz is named wrongly. it should be bpython_<hash>.orig.tar.gz
[21:01] <hyperair> note the underscore as opposed to the dash
[21:02] <[Ramy]> hyperair, I get this error http://paste.ubuntu.com/216418/
[21:04] <hyperair> [Ramy]: it's not signed.
[21:04] <hyperair> [Ramy]: you need to run debsign on the .changes file
[21:04] <hyperair> debsign -k <gpg key id> bpython_<version>_source.changes
[21:04] <hyperair> or when you run debuild, run it with -k <gpg key id>
[21:07] <[Ramy]> hyperair, http://paste.ubuntu.com/216423/
[21:07] <hyperair> well that's what it says
[21:07] <hyperair> you don't have a secret key for that key id =\
[21:07] <hyperair> which means you didn't generate the key properly
[21:07] <hyperair> or something of that sort
[21:11] <[Ramy]> hyperair,  how can I fix that ?
[21:12] <hyperair> [Ramy]: generate another key, use it?
[21:12] <Zhenech> hyperair, just a short note, didnt have time for geany stuff yet, but I think next week I should find some gap for you :)
[21:13] <hyperair> Zhenech: sure. you received my email about geany-plugins-0.17?
[21:13] <Zhenech> yupp
[21:13] <hyperair> okay =)
[21:13]  * hyperair never knew that Zhenech was Evgeni until a whois lookup a few seconds ago
[21:14] <Zhenech> :)
[21:14] <hyperair> :)
[21:14]  * Zhenech does not say much in here
[21:15] <hyperair> 18 lines since the beginning of my irssi log
[21:16] <Zhenech> guess that counts as not many :)
[21:16] <hyperair> ...aha! you're the guy in #debian-xfce! the one i was talking to about xfce4-notify
[21:16] <hyperair> i knew i saw your nick somewhere
[21:16] <Zhenech> *shrug* maybe :)
[21:17] <hyperair> my logs say so =O
[21:17] <hyperair> it was the tiem when banshee was spitting flames with xfce's notification daemon
[21:17] <Zhenech> the crash in that one funky c# media player, rigt?
[21:17] <hyperair> yep
[21:17] <Zhenech> aye, I remember
[21:17] <hyperair> haha
[21:22] <[Ramy]> hyperair, I made new gpg key and i get the same error !
[21:26] <hyperair> [Ramy]: could you paste the output of this command: gpg --list-secret-keys
[21:28] <[Ramy]> hyperair, http://paste.ubuntu.com/216429/
[21:32] <hyperair> [Ramy]: debsign -k D92F7084
[21:33] <hyperair> oh wait you tried that already
[21:33] <hyperair> huh how strange.
[21:33] <hyperair> [Ramy]: what does it say when you try running the command gpg --clearsign?
[21:36] <[Ramy]> hyperair, http://paste.ubuntu.com/216434/
[21:37] <[Ramy]> hyperair, i entered the passphrase and nothing after that it is hanging
[21:38] <hyperair> hmm
[21:38] <hyperair> hmmmmm
[21:38] <hyperair> well of course it is hanging
[21:38] <hyperair> it's waiting for your input =p
[21:38] <hyperair> type something in
[21:38] <hyperair> then type ^D
[21:38] <hyperair> ^D = Ctrl+D
[21:38] <hyperair> well anyway
[21:38] <hyperair> did you try -kA0E46752
[21:39] <hyperair> with debsign i mean
[21:40] <[Ramy]> hyperair, yeah, I tried that
[21:40] <hyperair> and it didn't work eiter hu -=
[21:40] <hyperair> how strange
[21:47] <[Ramy]> hyperair, pochu thanks very much  for the support, I will try later to sign the package even it is never worked :(
[21:47] <hyperair> =\
[23:37] <RoAkSoAx> who's an expert in python packaging?
[23:37] <ScottK> POX
[23:38] <RoAkSoAx> thanks ScottK
[23:38] <RoAkSoAx> POX, ping
[23:38] <POX> RoAkSoAx: You sent me a contentless ping.  This is a contentless pong.  Please provide a bit of information about what you want and I will respond when I am around.
[23:39] <ashbringer> Can anyone clarify the "Modify pool structure to include more packages" section of the InstallCD Customization guide (here: <https://help.ubuntu.com/community/InstallCDCustomization#Modify%20pool%20structure%20to%20include%20more%20packages>)? Specifically, do following the relevant instructions get the packages selected automatically? I'm sort of new to this, and unsure if I'm asking {the right questions,in the right place}, so any help is apprecia
[23:41] <RoAkSoAx> ScottK, you also do python packaging right??
[23:41] <ScottK> Yes
[23:41]  * Nafallo is tempted to !ask ;-)
[23:42] <RoAkSoAx> Ok here is the thing: I've merged python-pcapy: Bug #398012
[23:42] <RoAkSoAx> However it is failing to build: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28940415/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-amd64.pcapy_0.10.6-1ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[23:43] <RoAkSoAx> the only change in Ubuntu was the addition of export DH_PYCENTRAL=nomove in debian/rules. In Jaunty, it installed the module in python2.6/dist-packages... however, in Karmic is not doing so, and it's trying to install it on python2.6/site-packages and that's why it seems to be FTBFS
[23:44] <RoAkSoAx> (I also have to say that when I builded in in my pbuilder and PPA the package builded)
[23:44] <RoAkSoAx> now, by removing export DH_PYCENTRAL=nomove from debian/rules, it will actually install the module in python2.6/dist-packages
[23:45] <RoAkSoAx> so, I was wondering, why is this different? (And I think this means that I'll have to summit the patch to fix this)
[23:45] <RoAkSoAx> s/summit/submit
[23:46] <ScottK> RoAkSoAx: Does it use CDBS?
[23:46] <RoAkSoAx> ScottK, yes it does.
[23:48] <ScottK> RoAkSoAx: We now have a patch it CDBS that magically adds layout-style=deb for all Python packages.  This is great for some packages that didn't work before.  For some that had already made changes for the dist-packages stuff the result is less fortunate.
[23:48] <ScottK> Debian CDBS does not have this change.
[23:48] <ScottK> I suspect this is why you are seeing the different resuilt.
[23:50] <RoAkSoAx> ScottK, right. Well I've tested it removing export DH_PYCENTRAL=nomove and I have obtained what I believe is the expected result: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/216500/
[23:52] <RoAkSoAx> ScottK, so, should I just go ahead and submit the patch removing 'export DH_PYCENTRAL=nomove' from debian/rules?
[23:52] <ScottK> RoAkSoAx: Sounds reasonable to me.
[23:54] <RoAkSoAx> ScottK, Ok then. however, the difference between the Jaunty package and the Karmic package if I do remove the variable would be that it will leave 'pcapy-0.10.6.egg-info' in '/usr/share/pyshared/' instead of putting it in python2.6/dist-packages and python2.5/site-packages
[23:55] <ScottK> I think pyshared is the right place for that, but I don't promis that's correct.
[23:59] <RoAkSoAx> ScottK, Ok cool. I do think is the right place for it also, since both files contain the same info and besides, Debian package has that file in pyshared too. Thanks a lot for your help :)
[23:59] <ScottK> RoAkSoAx: No problem.