| Barhine | whoah | 00:24 |
|---|---|---|
| Barhine | this is a chennel | 00:24 |
| Barhine | so how far along is ubuntu on arm? | 00:24 |
| BitWraith | does anybody know where I can find a version of kexecboot that supports ext4? or am I going to have to install all over again because I used such a new filesystem? :-/ | 05:04 |
| dpb | That's the reason why people have usually made a separate /boot partitions with an older filesystem. | 05:55 |
| BitWraith | dpb, you ca't do that with kexecboot, it passes its own root= option to he kernel forcing it to use the same partition the kernel image was found on | 07:20 |
| BitWraith | supposedly they are fixing that in the latest version, but there aren't any ready-to-flash images of it yet, and I haven't figured out how t compile it myself yet | 07:22 |
| dpb | I see. | 07:24 |
| lool | ogra: Hmm we should be here | 11:19 |
| ogra | heh, yeah | 11:19 |
| ogra | hmm, identical version in debian | 11:21 |
| ogra | thats intresting | 11:21 |
| lool | ogra: What about the PR 10288 change? | 11:43 |
| lool | ogra: I couldn't fetch anything newer than 3rd of July as CVS seems down for m | 11:44 |
| lool | me | 11:44 |
| ogra | i'm just building with that one disabled :) | 11:44 |
| lool | Are you bisecting? | 11:44 |
| ogra | no, i just commented out http://paste.ubuntu.com/216821/ | 11:44 |
| ogra | s/commented out/reverted | 11:44 |
| ogra | its at the ld tests ... i'll know in 5 mins | 11:45 |
| lool | I doubt it's that change; I'd rather suspect the testsuite | 11:45 |
| ogra | not being brought up to date with the code you mean ? | 11:45 |
| ogra | well, ten it should still survive this test now | 11:46 |
| ogra | *then | 11:46 |
| lool | The testsuite was completely rewritten | 11:46 |
| ogra | between 20090704 and 20090622 ? | 11:47 |
| lool | Yes | 11:47 |
| ogra | i only see two changelog entries | 11:49 |
| ogra | +* binutils-all/objcopy.exp: Move XFAIL from objcopy_test to | 11:49 |
| ogra | +copy_executable. | 11:49 |
| ogra | and another unrealted one pointing to cygwin | 11:49 |
| lool | There are multiple ChangeLog file | 11:49 |
| lool | ogra: Did you file a bug already? | 11:50 |
| ogra | yeah, i just see that | 11:50 |
| ogra | nope | 11:50 |
| lool | ogra: You might want to start there | 11:50 |
| ogra | i was hoping to be able to attach some info | 11:50 |
| lool | Start by filing the bug, then collect more info? | 11:50 |
| ogra | well, the build is near the point of failure ... i'll file after it failed or passed that | 11:51 |
| ogra | ok, failed | 11:59 |
| * ogra files ... | 11:59 | |
| ogra | oh | 12:02 |
| * ogra looks at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-06/msg00289.html | 12:02 | |
| ogra | lool, bug 398732 | 12:10 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 398732 in binutils "binutils on armel fails to build due to regression test failure on 64 Bytes alignment test for gas/arm/arm.exp" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/398732 | 12:10 |
| ogra | feel free to mark it critical if you think its worth it | 12:11 |
| lool | Thanks | 12:12 |
| lool | ogra: I was thinking of filing it upstream though | 12:12 |
| ogra | i want to have it at dokos attention first, i'll file an upstream one as well | 12:13 |
| ogra | sigh, indeed upstream bugzilla needs a new account | 12:16 |
| * ogra hates that | 12:16 | |
| neure | hello | 12:40 |
| neure | anyone got kernel config for qemu? | 12:40 |
| ogra | the linux-image for versatile package contains the qemu config we use | 12:44 |
| ogra | lool, wow, upstream is quick :) already confirmed | 12:47 |
| lool | ogra: Where is that confirmed? | 12:48 |
| ogra | in the LP bugwatch | 12:48 |
| lool | That seems broken, I see no activity in the upstream bug | 12:50 |
| ogra | yeah, weird | 12:51 |
| ogra | lool, btw, are you using the packaged kernel in your cloud builder or a self rolled one (and did your chnages get included in our tree already) ? | 12:56 |
| lool | ogra: You mean the qemu kernel? | 12:57 |
| ogra | i'd like to switch rootstock to using the packaged version and new qemu | 12:57 |
| ogra | so i have a VM matching the HW we support | 12:57 |
| lool | I will probably use a custom kernel and qemu, but the Ubuntu ones are good enough for now | 12:57 |
| ogra | well, i dont want to have to change twice if we switch to v6 | 12:58 |
| lool | ogra: We don't have a versatile flavour in karmic anymore | 12:58 |
| ogra | ugh | 12:59 |
| ogra | ok | 12:59 |
| lool | The problem is that the upstream linux doesn't support arm > v5 versatile by default | 12:59 |
| ogra | i thought that was carried over | 12:59 |
| lool | It was dropped along the "drop all the v5 stuff" commit | 12:59 |
| ogra | hrm | 12:59 |
| ogra | we could really have kept that | 12:59 |
| lool | I don't have time to fix the kernel build to allow both v5 and v6/v7; if you'd like to chase it, I think it's a good idea | 13:00 |
| ogra | given that we need it back anyway | 13:00 |
| ogra | lets see ... if we really skip A3 i migh have time for it | 13:00 |
| lool | ../../ld/ldlang.c:1399: error: no previous prototype for ‘next_matching_output_section_statement’ | 13:01 |
| ogra | for now there are still binutils, banshee, tomboy and a bunch of specs i have to attack :) | 13:01 |
| ogra | not to forget the ftbfs list :) | 13:01 |
| neure | ogra, where is that image? | 13:02 |
| ogra | in the archive | 13:02 |
| ogra | ports.ubuntu.com | 13:02 |
| neure | sorry looks like i dont know how to use that | 13:04 |
| ogra | http://ports.ubuntu.com/pool/main/l/linux/linux-image-2.6.28-14-versatile_2.6.28-14.46_armel.deb | 13:06 |
| neure | erm | 13:10 |
| neure | package architecture (armel) does not match system (i386) | 13:10 |
| neure | i wonder how can i get that open just to the the config file?) | 13:11 |
| ogra | open it with file roller :) | 13:11 |
| neure | ah | 13:13 |
| neure | got config-2.6.28-14-versatile | 13:13 |
| neure | is that the one you use with qemu? | 13:13 |
| neure | can i simply use it with 2.6.30 as well? | 13:13 |
| ogra | you probably need to make changes | 13:13 |
| ogra | but its a good base | 13:13 |
| neure | im having trouble getting anything into the qemu console on boot | 13:15 |
| neure | well | 13:27 |
| neure | i managed to build the kernel | 13:27 |
| neure | and i get to login | 13:27 |
| neure | but my question is: why i dont see kernel boot messages? | 13:28 |
| ogra | you likely dont use the right console= bootoption | 13:28 |
| neure | well | 13:29 |
| neure | i've tried many | 13:29 |
| ogra | console=ttyAMA0,115200n8 should be the right one looking at http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ogra/project-rootstock/trunk/annotate/head%3A/rootstock | 13:30 |
| neure | ive tried console=ttyAMA0 | 13:31 |
| neure | i wonder if ,115200n8 is important, but I can try | 13:31 |
| neure | first im enabling preempting in the kernel.. | 13:31 |
| ogra | yes, it is | 13:32 |
| neure | nope, that didnt help | 13:32 |
| === cbrake_away is now known as cbrake | ||
| neure | oh wait | 13:49 |
| neure | now i do gte the boot messages if i switch to ctrl-alt-3 | 13:49 |
| neure | i wonder - can I get that to the default, ctrl alt 1 console? | 13:49 |
| lool | Rebuilding latest binutils under jaunty gives a passing testsuite, so it builds with gcc 4.3 | 13:52 |
| ogra | lool, well, given it finishes fine in debian i wouldnt have doubted that | 13:53 |
| ogra | fsvo fine :) there are tons of error messages from gcc in their log | 13:55 |
| lool | ogra: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-07/msg00038.html | 14:42 |
| lool | (thanks to doko) | 14:42 |
| ogra | yeah | 14:42 |
| ogra | i dont see the patch anywhere though | 14:44 |
| ogra | ah | 14:45 |
| ogra | found it | 14:45 |
| ogra | http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-06/msg00289.html | 14:46 |
| lool | That's the one you mentionned earlier | 14:46 |
| lool | Just Matthias reported the issue already | 14:46 |
| ogra | yep | 14:46 |
| ogra | ok, but didnt open any bugs | 14:46 |
| lool | For some reason I can't build that very well from tip | 15:08 |
| lool | Hey doko | 15:17 |
| lool | I reproduce the failure after adding the patch | 15:19 |
| lool | doko: So you spotted the right patch, thanks1 | 15:19 |
| lool | ! | 15:19 |
| doko | lool: yes, but Daniel Gutson wasn't able to reproduce it | 15:24 |
| ogra | doko, do you think its not gcc version related at all ? i dont see him building with 4.4 | 15:38 |
| * ogra had the impression its the combo of patch and gcc version | 15:38 | |
| lool | doko: Could you bounce me his message so that I can reply to it not breaking the thread? | 15:38 |
| lool | doko: I'm sub-ing to the list | 15:38 |
| doko | lool: how do you bounce from thunderbird? | 15:39 |
| * ogra thinks TB needs a special plugin | 15:40 | |
| ogra | mail redirect plugin it seems | 15:41 |
| lool | doko: I don't know :) | 15:45 |
| lool | doko: forward as an attach? | 15:45 |
| lool | doko: So shall we just push a binutils without that patch? | 15:54 |
| lool | doko: I confirmed that this single patch is causing the regression by building tip + that patch | 15:54 |
| doko | lool: which regression exactly do you mean? | 15:54 |
| lool | doko: The one from the testsuite | 15:55 |
| doko | the newly added test? | 15:55 |
| lool | Yes | 15:55 |
| lool | Or do you think we should fix the test ourselves? | 15:55 |
| ogra | would be good to have a working ld :) | 15:55 |
| ogra | one way or the other | 15:55 |
| doko | well, that patch is a patch for as, so why is ld broken? | 15:55 |
| lool | doko: I'm just fixing the binutils build so that we have latest binutils | 15:56 |
| ogra | probably the ld issue i see in the upstart build is just a fallout | 15:56 |
| doko | lool: please let my build finish | 15:56 |
| lool | doko: Sure, so you're building a binutils without that patch? | 15:57 |
| doko | I'm currently checking current trunk with this patch, and trying to find out why it's not seen by Daniel. plus building on Debian as well | 15:59 |
| doko | and we did turn on ssp recently on arm as well ... | 16:00 |
| doko | lool, ogra: please could you check if you see the ld failure with the 20090620 binutils? This one doesn't fail the test | 16:20 |
| doko | now building the debian binutils with the align patch on unstable. it's a slow machine ... | 16:22 |
| ogra | will doo, but it will take a while, SD filesystem on my build machine here | 16:22 |
| === bjf_afk is now known as bjf | ||
| lool | doko: Isn't that the one we have now? we have 20090622 | 16:30 |
| ogra | doko, 20090620 ? 20090622 doesnt fail it either i think | 16:30 |
| ogra | heh, snap | 16:30 |
| lool | doko: I see you did upload a 20090620; I guess I could try that | 16:31 |
| ogra | though 22 did build fine ... | 16:31 |
| ogra | (but breaks in ld for the upstart build) | 16:31 |
| ogra | so 22 either didnt have the test or passed it | 16:32 |
| doko | lool: got it, changed objdump output, which breaks the comparision with the expected output | 16:42 |
| lool | doko: aha | 16:47 |
| lool | doko: But I only see it with the patch | 16:48 |
| doko | lool: the testcase is added with the patch | 16:54 |
| lool | doko: So I guess we should close the upstream bug and send an updated patch to Daniel Gutson? | 17:01 |
| lool | doko: I need to reboot my B2; the upstart build hung it; I guess OOM | 17:02 |
| doko | ouch, ok, not sure if I had something building on it | 17:04 |
| ogra | lool, your B2 ? | 17:05 |
| ogra | where did you get a B2 from ? | 17:05 |
| * ogra thought we only had one left | 17:05 | |
| lool | ogra: Just like you did?! | 17:05 |
| ogra | oh, you didnt send yours to the kernel team | 17:05 |
| * ogra forgot | 17:05 | |
| lool | 3954 lool 20 0 135m 126m 6216 R 92.9 26.8 0:38.71 cc1 | 17:06 |
| ogra | you were hiding for so long on that spanish island that i actually forgot about yours :) | 17:06 |
| ogra | it hangs in cc ? not in ld ? | 17:06 |
| ogra | wow, thats weird | 17:06 |
| lool | 16750 nih-dbus-tool/tests/test_node.c | 17:09 |
| lool | It's just a stupidly large file | 17:10 |
| ogra | it builds in less than 5min on x86 | 17:10 |
| ogra | the whole of upstart | 17:10 |
| lool | But it might be using a huge amount of memory | 17:10 |
| ogra | hmm, i didnt check that | 17:11 |
| ogra | i think Keybuk said something about 16000 LOC | 17:11 |
| NCommander | o___________O; | 17:18 |
| lool | ogra: Did you sub ubuntu-armel on that upstart bug? | 17:34 |
| * ogra thought he did | 17:34 | |
| ogra | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.4/+bug/398403 | 17:34 |
| ogra | yep | 17:34 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 398403 in gcc-4.4 "gcc-4.4 fails to build upstart 0.6 on armel due to an internal compiler error" [High,New] | 17:34 |
| lool | Oh good thqnks | 17:35 |
| ogra | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.4/+bug/398403/comments/1 is on a lange btw and errors out at the same point the buildd does ... | 17:36 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 398403 in gcc-4.4 "gcc-4.4 fails to build upstart 0.6 on armel due to an internal compiler error" [High,New] | 17:36 |
| ogra | the confusing part was the testbuild on the other board | 17:36 |
| ogra | which failed at totally random places | 17:36 |
| lool | doko: Is there a bug requesting the merge of the patch which broke our binutils bug? | 17:52 |
| doko | lool: no, binutils doesn't use issues for bug tracking. lets wait for Daniel's reply now | 17:54 |
| === j_ack_ is now known as j_ack | ||
| === cbrake is now known as cbrake_away | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!