[01:32] hi [09:33] michote: you can remove your attachments from the submissions wiki [09:34] for icons which have been replaced [09:34] macvr: ok [09:34] oops! s/replaced/uploaded [09:40] macvr: I deleted all my xdg submissions and smiley left in the attachments, thx for removing thme from the wikipage [09:42] michote: np... BTW do you know of any scripts which extract 128px *PNG* from the source svg? [09:44] macvr: no, but isn't it possible to change the Breathe-Python-skript to do this? [09:45] i'v been trying to , but didnt get it right :( [09:46] michote: are you doing any more smileys? [09:47] macvr: No, I didn't have much time last week ;) . Is there anything left to do? [09:48] there are 3 left [09:50] michote: worried , uncertain, laugh [09:51] macvr: laugh? what's the difference to smile/smile-big? [09:52] michote: check this > /usr/share/icons/gnome/scalable/emotes/face-laugh [09:53] michote: i guess mouth wider than surprise should do [09:56] macvr: for me It looks very similar to your smile-big, what about labeling this as laugh an creating something like the gnome-smile-big (similar to the devil-grin mouth)? [09:59] michote: actually i didnt like the gnome big smile , hence i did it this way, the laugh can be done similar to devil-grin [09:59] macvr: BTW do you know any workaroud get a svg displayed correctly in gnome? monkey, angel, sad, etc looks distorted in nautilus and eog [09:59] AFAIK there is no workaround, let me know if you find some way [10:00] michote: laugh, just with the eyes of devil-grin and same mouth should do it [10:01] macvr: same mouth as smile-big? [10:02] no... just the same as devil-grin, just change the color , remove the horns and straighten the teeth, you get laugh [10:03] i mean , no vampire teeth [10:04] macvr: ok [10:19] macvr: like this? http://files.getdropbox.com/u/1429945/laugh.png [10:21] michote: yeah thats it... just make sure the colors of the mouth match the rest of the smileys [10:24] macvr: I took the outline-color from wink which is darker then surprise, should I use a gradient inside the mouth like surprise? [10:27] michote: the outline from surprise would be better , be the thicker stroke too fro the 128px, just to minimize the pixelation , . but not sure about the gradient inside the mouth, you can just put up both the version with & without the gradient and we could choose [10:27] may be the thicker stroke too for the 128px [10:32] macvr: I'd prefer the gradient http://files.getdropbox.com/u/1429945/laugh2.png [10:33] michote: looks good, but reduce the opacity of the stroke [10:36] macvr: the outine of the mouth? [10:37] michote: yeah, reduce either the opacity or the size of the outline [10:40] macvr: than I'll use 1px stroke, because with less opacity the mouth would shine through for the half of the stroke :( [10:40] michote: 1px should do it i guess [10:41] macvr: http://files.getdropbox.com/u/1429945/laugh2.png [10:42] michote: looks good, :D the shadow inside the mouth on the teeth can be reduced [10:44] macvr: shadow from above or on the sides? [10:44] both [10:56] macvr: better? Its a gradient of 23 stops :P http://files.getdropbox.com/u/1429945/laugh.png [10:57] michote: yup.looks good. [10:57] its just ths shadow from devil , didnt suit this smiley ;p [10:57] the^ [10:59] macvr: yup, do you want me to do the other 2 smileys as well? [11:00] michote: i think it needs to be done sometime... so you can do it when you can [11:01] macvr: ok, I'll take a look this week [11:02] :) [11:04] macvr: hi :) [11:04] JonDoe297: where is jane? ;p [11:05] macvr: dunno :) [11:06] JonDoe297: well i guess , if you are a JonDoe yourself , it would be hard to find Jane ;p [15:26] kwwii: you might have to remind the flickr contributors about the resolution of their photos :) [15:26] lots of 800x600 / 1024x768 submissions [15:50] http://www.flickr.com/photos/28613801@N02/3716239785/in/pool-ubuntu-artwork [15:50] WOW [15:52] I wish it had larger resolution :) [15:52] im not sure but i think you can upload very high resolutions only if you have a pro account [15:52] cause some photos are labeled 1600x1050 and are at 1024x768 too [15:53] :( [16:19] SiDi_: ouch [16:19] thanks for the info [16:26] (what i said is a mere hypothesis though kwwii) [16:26] you may want to contact the photographs and ask them about the resolutions :P [16:26] im anyway astounded by the quality of some photos [16:26] well, the first pic is always the smallest version [16:27] so many do have larger sizes [16:27] but I will need to contact anyone with something less than 1600x1200 I guess [16:27] it seems that others have emailed for larger sizes and received them [16:30] do you know if there is a size restriction depending on the type of flickr accounts ? [16:31] Also some guy put the photos with a CC by sa NC license [16:35] yes, there is a file size limit per login with free accounts I think === SiDi_ is now known as SiDi [23:41] time for bed, night all [23:45] night kwwii