=== asac_ is now known as asac [04:27] yo [04:27] asac [04:27] fta [04:27] you there? [04:37] LLStarks: most probably sleeping [04:38] somthing I can help you with? [04:40] yeah [04:40] flash is wonky in 3.6 [04:40] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=503819 [04:40] I think they were working on that this morning [04:40] Mozilla bug 503819 in General "Flash websites like Youtube occasionally prevent clicking and typing in text boxes" [Normal,Unconfirmed] [04:41] LLStarks: which version of flash do you have installeD? [04:41] latest [04:42] from Ubuntu or Adobe? [04:42] ubuntu uses the adobe binaries [04:43] indeed [04:43] I just wanted to make sure you installed them through the installer from ubuntu though [04:43] yeah, i did [04:43] 3.5 and 3.0 are fine [04:43] 3.6 exhibits the behavior [04:44] are we thinking about the same bug? [04:44] * micahg isn't thinking about anything in particular [04:44] Here's today's log: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/07/12/%23ubuntu-mozillateam.txt [04:45] I know they mentioned flash, but I don't have time to read it [04:50] sorry, I'd help more, but I'm working right now, asac and co should be on in about 6-8 hours [04:59] can you confirm the bug? [05:04] I don't have that permission in bugzilla [05:04] and I don't have time right now === ripps_ is now known as ripps [10:43] asac, hello [10:43] asac, had a good weekend? [10:44] started good, ended bad with a hang-over and a light cold [10:44] aww : / [10:44] asac, did you have time to setup your debian system? [10:44] asac, the package is ready [10:45] asac, added a patch system instead of modifying stuff manually [10:45] thought you have more than one [10:45] can you send me the complete list of branches that are ready? [10:45] asac, yep [10:45] on pm? [10:45] no [10:45] mail [10:46] pm gets lost [10:47] asac, done [10:47] asac, next package I'll work on is cgmail [10:47] which is the third on my list [10:48] then I have the latest [10:48] is any of those packages NEW? [10:48] nope [10:48] good [10:49] bluekuja: you sent a mail with just one package [10:50] asac, yes, other one is already in [10:50] asac, and cgmail is not yet ready [10:50] asac, had to make a new patch system for ctorrent yesterday night so I didnt work on cgmail yet [10:52] bluekuja: so you found a sponsor for the other? [10:52] asac, yep [10:53] asac, but don't worry, you'll have to sponsor me some good stuff too [10:53] lol [11:01] hi [11:01] asac, http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=9643 :( [11:02] asac, i thought gnash was dead.. !? [11:03] heh [11:03] they were never dead [11:03] just not funded [11:03] but i think they raised some money [11:03] is that chrome bug because they wait for the new ia32libs? [11:03] did we ever manage to not break flash? [11:04] obviously, even with an update, the ime thing will not be solved [11:05] and no, still no idea why flash breaks [11:06] i will refresh the debs later today [11:08] asac, http://identi.ca/notice/6379257 [11:09] who will file the bugs upstream then ;)? [11:18] bug 398121 [11:18] Launchpad bug 398121 in firefox-3.5 "firefox-3.5-gnome-support failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/398121 [11:19] asac, let me know if everything went ok [11:24] asac, you can make it for this evening/night, right? [11:25] so I can move to another package [11:27] bluekuja: there is no hurry on this on my side [11:27] i have three uploads on my own list that needs to get done [11:28] i will do them in the same batch [11:28] no ETA [11:28] asac, problem is that some of my packages got an NMU [11:28] asac, so it would be nice to have everything fixed asp [11:28] * asap [11:30] yeah. but since you already did one upload you are not MIA anyymore [11:31] oh ok [11:35] bbl [12:09] asac: IIRC i have to work on sunbird's rules file for some reason whatever changes you made to it to better handle the nobinonly script it fails to produce a tarball using ./debian/rules. i thought i had carried over the changes when i looked at this a while ago but it looks like i didnt, not feeling really good today yet so maybe later this week. seamonkey is still ready and working good here. if all goes well i will have sunbir [12:09] damn thats long [12:10] gnomefreak: its ok. i am overloaded atm anyway ;) [12:10] gnomefreak: so rest and get better [12:14] asac: thanks i will [12:15] !sound [12:15] If you're having problems with sound, first ensure ALSA is selected, by double clicking on the volume control, then File -> Change Device (ALSA Mixer). If that fails, see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Sound - https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SoundTroubleshooting - http://alsa.opensrc.org/DmixPlugin - For playing audio files, see !Players and !MP3 [12:15] * asac has sound [12:16] i havent and i think since it iwll be a short day i will atleast see what i can get done [12:24] there that was easy [12:25] wrong sound card was being used [12:27] how goes it guys [12:27] eagles0513875: other than tired and running a small fever im ok [12:27] sry to hear bro get well soon [12:28] refresh button doesnt work in chrome O_O [12:28] humm [12:29] chrome? [12:29] you mnean chormuim browser? [12:30] chromuim even [12:30] chromium :) [12:30] that too :) [12:31] ya [12:31] anyone else trying it the nightly stuff out for it [12:33] eagles0513875: i have it i just havent played with it in a while ive been trying to get system to a good state so i can make another backup [12:33] gotcha [12:33] back to firefox for the time being will try again with it tomorrow [12:33] eagles0513875: giveme a few and i will finish this gwibber thing and test refresh [12:33] thanks gnomefreak if you havent updated it might need an update to it cuz i installed the build form im guessing last night [12:34] i ran updates about 30 minuts ag and it wasnt needed so i should be on latest [12:35] eagles0513875: check with fta ... bugabundo also runs the nightlies afaik [12:35] will do asac [12:40] gnomefreak: ping [12:40] someone highlight me please i need to know if system beep is now working [12:41] gnomefreak: ping [12:41] * asac lunch [12:41] gnomefreak: ping whats up [12:41] gnomefreak: like this? [12:41] ok thats just not what i wanted to hear :( the system beep doesnt work but speakers are bumping me [12:43] eagles0513875: this version of c-b 3.0.194.0~svn20090712r20470-0ubuntu1~ucd1? [12:43] ? of chromium-browser [12:43] let me check [12:43] ya thats it [12:46] ok what heappens when you click reload/refresh? [12:46] does the icon in top left spin? do you get progress bar at the bottom the the browser? [12:46] this build seems to work fine for me in LP [12:46] notyhing [12:46] strange you on 32 bit or 64bhit [12:46] bit [12:46] 32 [12:47] be back in a few [12:48] ok then this is most likely a bug in the ia32libs [12:51] asac, thanks a lot m8 [12:51] asac, you're the best [12:51] asac, fixing what you told me on the mail [12:52] asac, ah damn versioning [12:52] asac, just seen mail [12:52] asac, how can I fix that then? [13:05] * gnomefreak will look at it tomorrow most likely [13:13] bluekuja: you dpkg --compare-versions to verify that your new version is higher than the last one [13:13] asac, this way [13:13] dpkg --compare-versions ctorrent_1.3.4+dnh3.3.2-1 lt-nl ctorrent_1.3.4-dnh3.2-1.1 [13:14] bluekuja: man dpkg [13:15] dpkg --compare-versions 1 lt 2 && echo yes [13:15] dpkg --compare-versions 2 lt 1 && echo yes [13:15] asac, says yes to me [13:16] asac, dpkg --compare-versions ctorrent_1.3.4+dnh3.3.2-1 lt ctorrent_1.3.4-dnh3.2-1.1 && echo yes [13:16] bluekuja: VERSION [13:16] it probably works that way too [13:17] but ctorrent is definitly not part of the version ;) [13:17] asac, true, but it won't change the final result [13:17] ;) [13:17] 14:14 < asac> dpkg --compare-versions 1 lt 2 && echo yes [13:17] 14:15 < asac> dpkg --compare-versions 2 lt 1 && echo yes [13:17] compare what happens for those [13:17] look in manpage what lt [13:17] means [13:17] its smaller [13:17] 1 < 2 -> yes [13:17] 2 < 1 -> nothing [13:18] 1.3.4+dnh3.3.2-1 < 1.3.4-dnh3.2-1.1 -> yes -> thats wrong [13:18] e.g. we need something greater than 1.3.4-dnh3.2-1.1 [13:18] use the . [13:18] asac, exactly [13:18] lets move the rest to -motu please ;) [13:29] fta2: * Fixes ugly CPU spikes caused by broken expiring mechanism [13:29] in liferea [13:29] was that an ubuntu change? [13:29] no [13:30] ok ;) [13:30] in next merge it was kept in "remaining ubuntu changes" section [14:04] asac, it worked out? [14:05] no time yet [14:05] please send a mail and i will do wheni get to it [14:06] asac, mail with branches url? [14:08] asac, sent [14:09] asac, how can I uncommit stuff I already pushed? [14:09] asac, is there a new command or I use overwrite? [14:13] over [14:17] asac, can't update ia32libs, https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libselinux/2.0.82-1ubuntu1 failed [14:18] jdstrand: do you feel responsible for libselinux? do you know bhavi? [14:19] that's a loaded question if I ever heard one [14:19] sorry if that stabbed in a wound ;) [14:19] let's say "marginally and no" [14:19] ie, we want it to work, but we don't actively work on it [14:19] lets see if he fixes the build failures then [14:20] fta2: cant you pick the previous version? [14:21] tbh, I very much want it to work, but we (ie the security team) don't have the resources to maintain two MAC systems at the same time [14:21] we'll fix stuff as we can, and help the community as needed [14:23] jdstrand: yeah. just wanted to know if you wanted to fix the build failure; guess not then. thx [14:23] asac: is there a bug on it? [14:23] (or if those uploads are coordinated) [14:23] asac, i can, but it means hacking the fetch-and-build heavily, or doing it manually, with a change to miss some deps [14:24] jdstrand: no. it failed only today: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libselinux/2.0.82-1ubuntu1 [14:24] jdstrand: if you didnt know about the upload, lets just wait. i guess he will work on it [14:24] fta2: ok. lets wait if he fixes it today then [14:24] fta2: but i386 build [14:25] isnt that what we need? [14:25] oh it failed too [14:25] nevermind then [14:25] asac: I'll mention it in the security team meeting today [14:25] asac: thanks for pointing it out [14:25] jdstrand: hey, no need to escalate. i was just wondering if those packages are something that is usually coordinated with the security team [14:25] jdstrand: the package awas uploaded 4 hours ago ;) [14:26] asac, lol, I overwritten debian.source with using upstream.source revisions [14:26] asac, now it's ok again [14:26] asac: sometimes they are, sometimes not [14:26] asac: we only get involved when we are asked to be [14:26] jdstrand: ok. thanks [14:27] I'll still mention it-- there might be something obvious to the others on the team [14:27] jdstrand: yeah. personally i would think that you as the security team should encourage folks that work on security packages to coordinate with you ;) [14:28] like i prefer if folks doing mozilla related stuff come to our channel and talk to us ;) [14:28] heh, or at the very least, in #ubuntu-security [14:28] jdstrand: thats what i mean [14:28] we have the Tresys folks in there [14:28] * jdstrand nods [14:34] asac, as regarding LP [14:34] is this right [14:34] export-upstream = lp:~bluekuja/ctorrent-enhanced/debian.source [14:34] asac, is that the right path for LP? [14:35] dude, please think ;) ... why would a debian only branch be upstream? [14:36] asac, yeah, sorry, I did a copy of the wrong branch [14:36] question was if that url works [14:38] you will figure ;) [14:38] its just a matter of trying, isnt it? [14:38] yep [14:38] gonna use the export-upstream thing [14:38] on bzr bd [14:40] asac, seems to work [14:40] ^^ [14:41] asac, export-upstream thing is really nice to use [14:42] yep [14:42] it gets the branch and makes the tarball for you [14:42] asac, seems selinux is the only missing bit [14:43] asac, anyway all ready, mail sent to you with changes I made and branches url [14:44] brb [14:46] k [14:47] fta2: ok. i think we should give him 12 hours time ;) [14:47] i guess you and I dont have time to fix that anyway ;) [14:47] (the experience for that package most likely) [14:48] cc -Wall -g -O2 -I../include -I/usr/include -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -s -s -shared -o libselinux.so.1 avc.lo avc_internal.lo avc_sidtab.lo booleans.lo callbacks.lo canonicalize_context.lo checkAccess.lo check_context.lo compute_av.lo compute_create.lo compute_member.lo compute_relabel.lo compute_user.lo context.lo deny_unknown.lo disable.lo enabled.lo fgetfilecon.lo freecon.lo freeconary.lo fsetfilecon.lo [14:48] ../src/libselinux.so: file not recognized: File truncated [14:48] collect2: ld returned 1 exit status [14:49] cryptic [14:50] i need to restart my desktop, it's all rotten. [14:50] brb (hopefully) [14:50] fta2: still unhappy with gwibber ;)? [14:51] it's not started here :P [14:51] http://identi.ca/notice/6397564 [14:51] it died so often that now, i don't miss it when it's gone [14:51] fta2: yeah. but it really doesnt die anymore ;) [14:51] i'm not crazy like bugabundo [14:52] i had the same problem. now that i fixed the crashes i use it again [14:52] before it was always gone when i looked ;) [14:52] ok [14:58] join #launchpad [14:58] oops [15:31] asac, evolution crashes & freezes too, wanna fix it? ;) [15:33] death to evolution ;) [15:33] jk [15:33] fta2: started today? [15:34] difficult to say, 2 crashes & 1 freeze today [15:34] it usually crashes once or twice a week [15:36] fta2: why not run it through gdb see if u get any info and a back trace on them [15:36] i did, i filed several bugs already, went nowhere [15:37] such as, there's nothing ubuntu can do, go upstream, and upstream seems to ignore all bugs [15:41] asac, bbl [15:46] fta2: debian/tmp/usr/lib/firefox-*/extensions/\{972ce4c6-7e08-4474-a285-3208198ce6fd\} usr/lib/xulrunner-addons/extensions [15:47] why do we install that to xulrunner? [15:47] hmm guess its the dom inspector [15:48] i think it's the default theme [15:55] oh yeah. thats a pity [15:55] i guess upstream should split that up somewhat [15:55] is xulrunner broken without that? [15:55] let me check what they ship in upstream xul binary [16:04] it should be in ff for sure, not sure if it breaks xul though [16:20] Hi, #mozillateam, I'm trying to find an xpi of lightning compatible with the nightly builds on the ppa [16:21] I've tried http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/ but can't find one that works with the amd64 build [16:25] seangarner: yeah. someone needs to work on that [16:25] i am not sure if gnomefreak fixed that yet, but i would think no [16:25] checkout his latest lighthing-sunbird branches [16:25] if there are no hints that he fixed tbird 3, come back;) [16:25] thanks asac, I'll take a look [16:40] Nope, they are all for tb2 builds === seangarner is now known as seangarner_afk [17:31] seangarner_afk: so next thing would be to find out what needs to be done to build it against tbird 3 ... e.g. where is the code for that hosted at all? === dpm is now known as dpm-afk [18:11] bug 363798 [18:11] Launchpad bug 363798 in ubufox "ubufox can't install adobe flash plugin on 64-bit jaunty live-cd" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/363798 [18:13] bug 347972 [18:13] Launchpad bug 347972 in ubufox "Does not work with Shiretoko Web Browser (Firefox 3.5)" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/347972 [18:21] asac, http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28975448/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-lpia.xulrunner-1.9.1_1.9.1.1~hg20090713r26052%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [18:22] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28975795/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-lpia.thunderbird-3.0_3.0~b3~hg20090712r3056%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [18:22] fta: is that a recent commit? [18:22] daily [18:22] todaystarted? [18:22] yes [18:23] yesterday was all green [18:23] is gtk changed [18:23] probably got more picky recently [18:23] yes, new gtk today [18:23] fta: which version do we ship now? .4? [18:24] .3 or .4? [18:24] Installed: 2.17.3-0ubuntu1 [18:24] Candidate: 2.17.4-0ubuntu1 [18:25] so .4 broke it [18:42] fta: ok seb is on it [19:00] read that, cool [19:06] it also breaks songbird [19:09] asac: bad instructions on the answer tracker blew up someone [19:09] s sources file === micahg1 is now known as micahg [19:09] I made a note in the answer that was the culprit to look at the help.ubuntu page that we helped with and converted the bug to a Q [19:13] asac, strangely enough, xul 1.9.2 is fine [19:13] micahg: huh? [19:13] fta: yeah. its kind of depreacted to include the gtk headers directly [19:13] fta: for gtk 3 they will forbid this [19:14] but this was accidentially landed [19:14] and is already backed out upstream [19:14] i guess that trunk already only includes gtk/gtk.h [19:16] asac: bug 398662 [19:16] Launchpad bug 398662 in ubuntu "I can't get download manager to work, error message???" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/398662 [19:17] yeah ok [19:17] good [19:19] asac, I got a couple questions about libmozjs and xulrunner-dev. Is there any reason why libmozjs.so.0d isn't symlinked to libmozjs.so? [19:19] Maybe I misunderstand what that library is. [19:21] leifkindal: that library is dead [19:21] remove libmozjs* [19:21] those are going to die [19:22] and are only there for legacy support [19:22] xulrunner ships libmozjs.so ... but only in the pkglibdir === leifkindal is now known as rleeds [19:22] we have to do some evangelization upstream to get it properly as a syslib [19:22] rleeds: what do you need it for? [19:22] (and why do you change your nick completely ;)) [19:23] asac, this is my normal nick...I had some booting/reconnecting and the other was my backup. [19:23] I'm trying to compile mongodb [19:23] hah ... https://twitter.com/asacasa/statuses/2618058910 [19:24] hmm. why didnt gwibber retweakt to identi.ca as well? [19:24] rleeds: yes. dont install libmozjs* stuff for sure [19:24] most likely you need to fix the build system to make it work with xulrunner-dev [19:24] asac, is it a problem that xulrunner and libxul0d are depending on it? [19:24] but first try. maybe upstream was smart enough [19:24] or are those obsolete too? [19:24] rleeds: no. thats all the rotten old 1.8 xulrunner cruft [19:25] asac, thought so [19:25] its best to remove everything forever ,) [19:25] bug 352968 [19:25] Launchpad bug 352968 in pcmanx-gtk2 "remove xulrunner 1.8 and all left over rdepend binaries from karmic archive." [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/352968 [19:27] asac, what would be the standard way for a build to discover the location of the xulrunner-dev packages? [19:28] to make upstream compile without modification [19:28] rleeds: 1st) mozjs isnt really ment to be used by anyone ;) ... thats why its in pkglibdir [19:28] (sorry if this is answered somewhere...) [19:28] lol [19:28] 2nd) now lets be pragmatic [19:28] pkg-config mozilla-js gives you the right linker and include flags [19:29] but for runtime you also need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH like: [19:29] export /usr/lib/xulrunner-`xulrunner --gre-version`/ [19:29] which is to be determined at runtime [19:29] alternatively you could use the xpcom standalone glue to get the GRE path [19:30] but that would require using a glue for js (like google gadgets are doing it) [19:30] asac, Any reason why xulrunner-1.9-dev doesn't satisfy xulrunner-dev? [19:30] why should it? [19:30] xulrunner-dev is the meta package that is supposed to pull in whatever -dev is the current default [19:31] so I guess my question is why isn't 1.9.1 the default. But I'll trust that whoever is making that choice knows what they're talking about. So forget that question. [19:31] rleeds: 1.9.1 will be the default soon in karmic [19:32] if you want to try you can upgrade to the PPA [19:32] asac, good enough for me. [19:32] https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ffox35 [19:32] thats where we prepare the transition [19:32] thanks [19:32] and xulrunner-dev is 1.9.1 there [19:46] bom fim de tarde :) [19:46] asac: when will a new NM be out? [19:46] with the merge of both trunks? [19:47] the merge of both trunks? [19:47] BUGabundo: ? [19:47] i cannot parse that ;) [19:48] what we had on .7.1 and .8 [19:48] I miss the signal strenth [19:48] ah you say the 0.7.1 feature of showing signal strength? [19:48] this one still has the antena and doesn't allow me to connect without a session [19:48] asac: yes [19:48] BUGabundo: so on 0.7.1 you had signal strength? [19:48] i really thought that signal strength was on trunk already [19:49] one I hope doesn't get ported is the one of terminating 3G with the wireless toogle [19:49] only the technology thing (e.g. edge, umts, H, etc.) is missing [19:49] asac: on 0.8 I still have the atena [19:49] heh [19:49] *antenna [19:49] BUGabundo: yeah. but didn the signal strength actually change for you or was always full? [19:49] Installed: 0.8~a~git.20090702t164632.9c8e600-0ubuntu1~nmt1 [19:50] it used to change a bit [19:50] not at first but then (after some updates) started to work [19:50] ok so you definitly saw changes; that means that the signal strength patch isnt in trunk applet yet. yes. [19:50] hmm [19:50] i mean, some modems dont support signal strenght [19:50] you had huawei? [19:50] with option driver? [19:52] asac: how can I check? [19:52] option1 [19:52] BUGabundo: better check this: if you run modemmanager --debug on the console, do you regularly get g_debug ("Signal quality: %d", quality); [19:52] e.g. such output [19:52] ? [19:52]